Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aleksandar Sekulic is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aleksandar Sekulic.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib in Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma

Aleksandar Sekulic; Michael R. Migden; Anthony E. Oro; Luc Dirix; Karl D. Lewis; John D. Hainsworth; James A. Solomon; Simon Yoo; Sarah T. Arron; Philip Friedlander; Ellen S. Marmur; Charles M. Rudin; Anne Lynn S. Chang; Jennifer A. Low; Howard Mackey; Robert L. Yauch; Richard A. Graham; Josina C. Reddy; Axel Hauschild

BACKGROUND Alterations in hedgehog signaling are implicated in the pathogenesis of basal-cell carcinoma. Although most basal-cell carcinomas are treated surgically, no effective therapy exists for locally advanced or metastatic basal-cell carcinoma. A phase 1 study of vismodegib (GDC-0449), a first-in-class, small-molecule inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway, showed a 58% response rate among patients with advanced basal-cell carcinoma. METHODS In this multicenter, international, two-cohort, nonrandomized study, we enrolled patients with metastatic basal-cell carcinoma and those with locally advanced basal-cell carcinoma who had inoperable disease or for whom surgery was inappropriate (because of multiple recurrences and a low likelihood of surgical cure, or substantial anticipated disfigurement). All patients received 150 mg of oral vismodegib daily. The primary end point was the independently assessed objective response rate; the primary hypotheses were that the response rate would be greater than 20% for patients with locally advanced basal-cell carcinoma and greater than 10% for those with metastatic basal-cell carcinoma. RESULTS In 33 patients with metastatic basal-cell carcinoma, the independently assessed response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16 to 48; P=0.001). In 63 patients with locally advanced basal-cell carcinoma, the independently assessed response rate was 43% (95% CI, 31 to 56; P<0.001), with complete responses in 13 patients (21%). The median duration of response was 7.6 months in both cohorts. Adverse events occurring in more than 30% of patients were muscle spasms, alopecia, dysgeusia (taste disturbance), weight loss, and fatigue. Serious adverse events were reported in 25% of patients; seven deaths due to adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS Vismodegib is associated with tumor responses in patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Genentech; Erivance BCC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00833417.).


Nature Genetics | 2014

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type, displays frequent inactivating germline and somatic mutations in SMARCA4

Pilar Ramos; Anthony N. Karnezis; David Craig; Aleksandar Sekulic; Megan Russell; William Hendricks; Jason J. Corneveaux; Michael T. Barrett; Karey Shumansky; Yidong Yang; Sohrab P. Shah; Leah M Prentice; Marco A. Marra; Jeffrey Kiefer; Victoria Zismann; Bodour Salhia; Jaime Prat; Emanuela D'Angelo; Blaise Clarke; Joseph G. Pressey; John H Farley; Stephen P Anthony; Richard Roden; Heather E. Cunliffe; David Huntsman; Jeffrey M. Trent

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary of hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is an extremely rare, aggressive cancer affecting children and young women. We identified germline and somatic inactivating mutations in the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling gene SMARCA4 in 69% (9/13) of SCCOHT cases in addition to SMARCA4 protein loss in 82% (14/17) of SCCOHT tumors but in only 0.4% (2/485) of other primary ovarian tumors. These data implicate SMARCA4 in SCCOHT oncogenesis.


Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 2008

Malignant Melanoma in the 21st Century: The Emerging Molecular Landscape

Aleksandar Sekulic; Paul Haluska; Arlo J. Miller; Josep Genebriera De Lamo; Samuel Ejadi; Jose S. Pulido; Diva R. Salomao; Erik C. Thorland; Richard Vile; David L. Swanson; Barbara A. Pockaj; Susan D. Laman; Mark R. Pittelkow; Svetomir N. Markovic

Malignant melanoma presents a substantial clinical challenge. Current diagnostic methods are limited in their ability to diagnose early disease and accurately predict individual risk of disease progression and outcome. The lack of adequate approaches to properly define disease subgroups precludes rational treatment design and selection. Better tools are urgently needed to provide more accurate and personalized melanoma patient management. Recent progress in the understanding of the molecular aberrations that underlie melanoma oncogenesis will likely advance the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of melanoma. The emerging pattern of molecular complexity in melanoma tumors mirrors the clinical diversity of the disease and highlights the notion that melanoma, like other cancers, is not a single disease but a heterogeneous group of disorders that arise from complex molecular changes. Understanding of molecular aberrations involving important cellular processes, such as cellular signaling networks, cell cycle regulation, and cell death, will be essential for better diagnosis, accurate assessment of prognosis, and rational design of effective therapeutics. Defining an individual patients unique tumor characteristics may lead to personalized prediction of outcomes and selection of therapy. We review the emerging molecular landscape of melanoma and its implications for better management of patients with melanoma.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2015

Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study: 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC

Aleksandar Sekulic; Michael R. Migden; Karl D. Lewis; John D. Hainsworth; James A. Solomon; Simon Yoo; Sarah T. Arron; Philip Friedlander; Ellen S. Marmur; Charles M. Rudin; Anne Lynn S. Chang; Luc Dirix; Jeannie Hou; Huibin Yue; Axel Hauschild

BACKGROUND Primary analysis from the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study resulted in approval of vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor indicated for treatment of adults with metastatic or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that has recurred after surgery or for patients who are not candidates for surgery or radiation. OBJECTIVE An efficacy and safety analysis was conducted 12 months after primary analysis. METHODS This was a multinational, multicenter, nonrandomized, 2-cohort study in patients with measurable and histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic BCC taking oral vismodegib (150 mg/d). Primary outcome measure was objective response rate (complete and partial responses) assessed by independent review facility. RESULTS After 12 months of additional follow-up, median duration of exposure to vismodegib was 12.9 months. Objective response rate increased from 30.3% to 33.3% in patients with metastatic disease, and from 42.9% to 47.6% in patients with the locally advanced form. Median duration of response in patients with locally advanced BCC increased from 7.6 to 9.5 months. No new safety signals emerged with extended treatment duration. LIMITATIONS Limitations include low prevalence of advanced BCC and challenges of designing a study with heterogenous manifestations. CONCLUSION The 12-month update of the study confirms the efficacy and safety of vismodegib in management of advanced BCC.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2015

Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies: Part I: Inhibitors of the cellular membrane

James B. Macdonald; Brooke Macdonald; Loren E. Golitz; Patricia LoRusso; Aleksandar Sekulic

There has been a rapid emergence of numerous targeted agents in the oncology community in the last decade. This exciting paradigm shift in drug development lends promise for the future of individualized medicine. Given the pace of development and clinical deployment of targeted agents with novel mechanisms of action, dermatology providers may not be familiar with the full spectrum of associated skin-related toxicities. Cutaneous adverse effects are among the most frequently observed toxicities with many targeted agents, and their intensity can be dose-limiting or lead to therapy discontinuation. In light of the often life-saving nature of emerging oncotherapeutics, it is critical that dermatologists both understand the mechanisms and recognize clinical signs and symptoms of such toxicities in order to provide effective clinical management. Part I of this continuing medical education article will review in detail the potential skin-related adverse sequelae, the frequency of occurrence, and the implications associated with on- and off-target cutaneous toxicities of inhibitors acting at the cell membrane level, chiefly inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor, KIT, and BCR-ABL, angiogenesis, and multikinase inhibitors.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2015

Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies: Part II: Inhibitors of intracellular molecular signaling pathways.

James B. Macdonald; Brooke Macdonald; Loren E. Golitz; Patricia LoRusso; Aleksandar Sekulic

The last decade has spawned an exciting new era of oncotherapy in dermatology, including the development of targeted therapies for metastatic melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Along with skin cancer, deregulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR and RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK intracellular signaling pathways contributes to tumorigenesis of a multitude of other cancers, and inhibitors of these pathways are being actively studied. Similar to other classes of targeted therapies, cutaneous adverse effects are among the most frequent toxicities observed with mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibitors, PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors, hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitors, and immunotherapies. Given the rapid expansion of these families of targeted treatments, dermatologists will be essential in offering dermatologic supportive care measures to cancer patients being treated with these agents. Part II of this continuing medical education article reviews skin-related adverse sequelae, including the frequency of occurrence and the implications associated with on- and off-target cutaneous toxicities of inhibitors of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, hedgehog signaling pathway, and immunotherapies.


European Journal of Cancer | 2014

Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: Prognosis dependent on anatomic site and spread of disease

Margaret McCusker; Nicole Basset-Seguin; Reinhard Dummer; Karl D. Lewis; Dirk Schadendorf; Aleksandar Sekulic; Jeannie Hou; Lisa Wang; Huibin Yue; Axel Hauschild

PURPOSE This review provides a description of the epidemiology and survival outcomes for cases with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) based on published reports (1981-2011). METHODS A literature search (MEDLINE via PubMed) was conducted for mBCC case reports published in English: 1981-2011. There were 172 cases that met the following criteria: primary BCC located on skin, metastasis confirmed by pathology and metastasis not resulting from direct tumour spread. From these, 100 mBCC cases with explicit information on follow-up time were selected for analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Among 100 mBCC cases selected for analysis, including one case with Gorlin syndrome, 50% had regional metastases (RM) and 50% had distant metastases (DM). Cases with DM were younger at mBCC diagnosis (mean age, 58.0 versus 66.3 years for RM; P=0.0013). Among 93 (of 100) cases with treatment information for metastatic disease, more DM cases received chemotherapy (36.2% versus 6.5% for RM), but more RM cases underwent surgery (87.0% versus 40.4% for DM). Among all 100 cases, median survival after mBCC diagnosis was 54 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 24-72), with shorter survival in DM (24 months; 95% CI, 12-35) versus RM cases (87 months; 95% CI, 63-not evaluable). CONCLUSION Cases with RM and DM mBCC may have different clinical courses and outcomes. Based on published reports, DM cases were younger at mBCC diagnosis, with shorter median survival than RM cases. This study provides a historical context for emerging mBCC treatments.


Oncologist | 2010

Does Sunscreen Prevent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Inhibitor–Induced Rash? Results of a Placebo-Controlled Trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N05C4)

Aminah Jatoi; Abby Thrower; Jeff A. Sloan; Patrick J. Flynn; Nicole Lea Wentworth-Hartung; Shaker R. Dakhil; Bassam I. Mattar; Daniel A. Nikcevich; Paul J. Novotny; Aleksandar Sekulic; Charles L. Loprinzi

PURPOSE Rash occurs in >50% of patients prescribed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. This study was undertaken to determine whether sunscreen prevents or mitigates these rashes. METHODS This placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial enrolled rash-free patients starting an EGFR inhibitor. Patients were randomly assigned to sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 60 applied twice a day for 28 days versus placebo. They were then monitored for rash and quality of life (Skindex-16) during the 4-week intervention and for an additional 4 weeks. RESULTS Fifty-four patients received sunscreen, and 56 received placebo; the arms were balanced at baseline. During the 4-week intervention, physician-reported rash occurred in 38 (78%) and 39 (80%) sunscreen-treated and placebo-exposed patients, respectively (p = 1.00); no significant differences in rash rates emerged over the additional 4 weeks. There were no significant differences in rash severity, and patient-reported outcomes of rash yielded similar conclusions. Adjustment for sun intensity by geographical zone, season, and use of photosensitivity medications did not yield a significant difference in rash across study arms (p = .20). Quality of life scores declined but remained comparable between arms. CONCLUSIONS Sunscreen, as prescribed in this trial, did not prevent or attenuate EGFR inhibitor-induced rash.


Current Opinion in Oncology | 2013

Advanced basal cell carcinoma of the skin: Targeting the hedgehog pathway

Aleksandar Sekulic; Aaron R. Mangold; Donald W. Northfelt; Patricia LoRusso

Purpose of review This article provides an update on basal cell carcinoma (BCC), with a focus on the advanced BCC (aBCC), and the recent progress with targeted hedgehog signaling pathway inhibition for treatment of aBCC. Recent findings The hedgehog signaling pathway is aberrantly activated in most BCC tumors providing an attractive therapeutic target in this cancer. Recently developed targeted hedgehog pathway inhibitors have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of aBCC and the first oral hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib was granted the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Toxicities of the current hedgehog pathway inhibitors are mostly mild to moderate, but with prolonged treatment can pose a therapeutic challenge. Summary Hedgehog pathway inhibition is a novel and powerful approach for treatment of aBCC. Current research efforts aim to enhance the activity and minimize toxicity of this promising new therapy.


American Journal of Surgery | 2010

Risk factors associated with local and in-transit recurrence of cutaneous melanoma

Chee Chee H Stucky; Richard J. Gray; Amylou C. Dueck; Nabil Wasif; Susan D. Laman; Aleksandar Sekulic; Barbara A. Pockaj

BACKGROUND Understanding the risk factors for local and in-transit recurrences (LR/ITR) may help facilitate methods of prevention, early detection, and treatment. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed on patients diagnosed with single-lesion cutaneous melanoma. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of the tumors were evaluated. RESULTS Of 225 patients, 10% had LR/ITR. Patients with LR/ITR were older (P = .0002), had thicker tumors (P = .018), and positive angiolymphatic invasion more frequently (P < .0001). An increased tumor mitotic rate (TMR) was more common in LR/ITRs (P = .051). On univariate logistic regression, age, thickness, TMR of 11/mm(2) or greater, and angiolymphatic invasion were all significant risk factors for LR/ITR. Multivariate logistic regression showed age, thickness, and angiolymphatic invasion were the only significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Older patients with thicker tumors and angiolymphatic invasion appear to be at higher risk for LR/ITR. Such patients warrant consideration of preventative strategies and should receive close clinical follow-up evaluation for early recurrence.

Collaboration


Dive into the Aleksandar Sekulic's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey M. Trent

Translational Genomics Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William Hendricks

Translational Genomics Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey Kiefer

Translational Genomics Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karl D. Lewis

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael R. Migden

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victoria Zismann

Translational Genomics Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge