Alessandra Banzato

Clinical course of high‐risk patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome

See also Galli M. The antiphospholipid triangle. This issue, pp 234–6.

Incidence of a first thromboembolic event in asymptomatic carriers of high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile: a multicenter prospective study

Persistent antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies are occasionally found in subjects without prior history of thromboembolic events (TEs), raising the dilemma of whether to initiate or not a primary thromboprophylaxis. A first TE is considered rare in aPL carriers, but previous studies did not consider the aPL profile nor was the test positivity confirmed in a reference laboratory. In this study, 104 subjects with high-risk aPL profile (positive lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-β(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies, triple positivity) confirmed in a reference laboratory, were followed up for a mean of 4.5 years. There were 25 first TEs (5.3% per year): the cumulative incidence after 10 years was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9%-54.3%). On multivariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio = 4.4; 95% CI, 1.5-13.1, P = .007) and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.5, P = .01) were independent predictors for TEs. Aspirin did not significantly affect the incidence of TE. In conclusion, the occurrence of a first TE in carriers of high-risk aPL profile is considerable; it is more frequent among male subjects and in the presence of additional risk factors for venous TE. These data can help in the decision to initiate primary thromboprophylaxis in these subjects.

Estimated Frequency of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients With Pregnancy Morbidity, Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Critical Review of the Literature

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) is an international research network devoted to conducting well‐designed clinical trials in persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)–positive patients. One of the first needs of APS ACTION was to know the true aPL frequency in patients with pregnancy morbidity (PM), stroke (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Reversal of excessive effect of regular anticoagulation: low oral dose of phytonadione (vitamin K1) compared with warfarin discontinuation.

To determine the best way to reverse the excessive effect of regular anticoagulation in patients with INR > 5 and no bleeding complications, 23 patients with INR > 5 were randomly subdivided into two groups: group A (n = 12) discontinued warfarin for one day and group B (n = 11) received 2 mg of vitamin K1 orally in addition to the usual warfarin dose. INR was determined after 24 h (day 1), after which both groups continued with their usual dose of warfarin. After 48 h (day 2), warfarin dosage was changed according to the INR value. On day 9, INR values were determined again. Five out of twelve patients in group A had INR values > 5 on day 1. One patient in group A had an INR value < 5 both on days 1 and 2. All eleven patients in group B had INR values < 5 on day 1, and all but one on day 2. On day 9, INR values were acceptable (INR 2.0-4.5) in ten group A patients and eight group B patients. These findings suggest that a low oral dose of vitamin K1 is a convenient treatment for excessive anticoagulation in patients with no bleeding complications.

A Paclitaxel-Hyaluronan Bioconjugate Targeting Ovarian Cancer Affords a Potent In vivo Therapeutic Activity

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacologic and biological properties of a paclitaxel-hyaluronan bioconjugate (ONCOFID-P) against IGROV-1 and OVCAR-3 human ovarian cancer xenografts following i.p. administration. Experimental Design:In vitro tumor sensitivity to ONCOFID-P was analyzed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, whereas bioconjugate interaction with cells was studied cytofluorimetrically and by confocal microscopy. In vivo toxicity was assessed by a single-dose maximum-tolerated dose, peripheral blood cell count determination and by histologic analysis. Biodistribution of the compound was evaluated with a small animal–dedicated scintigraphy gamma camera following injection of 99mTc-labeled ONCOFID-P. Pharmacokinetic analysis was also carried out. Female severe combined immunodeficiency mice implanted with ovarian cancer cells underwent treatment with ONCOFID-P or free paclitaxel starting from day 7 or 14 after tumor injection, and survivals were compared. Results: ONCOFID-P interacted with CD44, entered cells through a receptor-mediated mechanism, and exerted a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect against tumor cell growth. After i.p. administration, the bioconjugate distributed quite uniformly within the peritoneal cavity, was well-tolerated, and was not associated with local histologic toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that blood levels of bioconjugate-derived paclitaxel were much higher and persisted longer than those obtained with the unconjugated free drug. Intraperitoneal treatment of tumor-bearing mice with the bioconjugate revealed that ONCOFID-P exerted a relevant increase in therapeutic activity compared with free drug. Conclusions: ONCOFID-P significantly improved results obtained with conventional paclitaxel, in terms of in vivo tolerability and therapeutic efficacy; these data strongly support its development for locoregional treatment of ovarian cancer.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to Domain 1 of β2-glycoprotein 1 correctly classify patients at risk

Determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and β2‐Glycoprotein 1 (aβ2GP1) antibodies is mandatory to classify patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) into risk categories.

Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti β2-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of β2-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that aβ2GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Rationale and design of the Trial on Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS) trial:

Background New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy in conditions requiring anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been extensively studied and is now approved for the prevention and therapy of a number of thromboembolic conditions. Objective and methods This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, study that will evaluate if Rivaroxaban 20 mg od (or 15 mg od in patients with moderate renal insufficiency) is non-inferior to warfarin (INR target 2.5), for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death in high risk (triple positive) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Secondary endpoints will assess the incidence of any individual component of the composite end point. An external adjudication committee will evaluate all suspected outcome events. This will be a unique trial, as it will enrol the biggest homogenous cohort of high risk APS individuals. Conclusion The methods and the study design should be appropriate to achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Confirmation of initial antiphospholipid antibody positivity depends on the antiphospholipid antibody profile

The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I [aβ2GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months.

What have we learned about antiphospholipid syndrome from patients and antiphospholipid carrier cohorts

Venous or arterial thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In terms of accepted APS criteria, aPL are detected by one coagulation test (lupus anticoagulant; LAC) and two immunoassays (anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoptrotein I antibodies). In patients with APS, a single positive test carries a much lower risk of thrombosis recurrence or new pregnancy loss than does multiple (or triple) positivity. The same holds true for aPL carriers, namely subjects with laboratory tests but without clinical criteria for APS. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as in carriers of aPL. Triple positivity apparently identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (antidomain I-II of β2-glycoptrotein I); it is in this category of patients that trials on new therapeutic strategies should focus.