Alessandro Boccanelli

Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.

AIMS A large number of descriptive data on patients with acute myocardial infarction are based on clinical trials and registries on non consecutive patients: these data may give only a partial picture on treatment delay, patient characteristics, treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in the real world. METHODS AND RESULTS The BLITZ survey prospectively enrolled all of the patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted in 296 (87%) Italian Coronary Care Units from 15-29 October 2001. Data on treatment delay, therapeutic strategies, duration of hospitalization and 30-day outcome were collected. One thousand nine hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients (mean age 67+/-12 years, 70% males) were enrolled, 65% with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), 30% with no ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) and 5% with undetermined ECG. The median delay between symptom onset and hospital arrival was 2h and 9 min with 76% of patients hospitalized within the sixth hour (26% within the first hour, 48% within the second). The median delay from hospital arrival to reperfusion therapy in STEMI was 45 min (IQR 26-85) for thrombolysis (50% of the patients) and 85 min (IQR 60-135) for primary angioplasty (15% of the patients). Coronary angiography was performed during hospital stay in 46% of the patients (STEMI 48%, NSTEMI 43%, undetermined AMI 35%), coronary angioplasty in 25% (STEMI 26%, NSTEMI 15%, undetermined AMI 13%) and coronary bypass in 1.4% (1%, 2.2% and 1% respectively). Twenty-two percent of the patients admitted to hospitals without cath-lab were transferred to a tertiary care hospital for invasive procedures. The overall median hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 7-12, STEMI 10, NSTEMI 9, undetermined AMI 11) and was not significantly different between hospitals with or without cath-lab (respectively, 9 and 10 days, P=0.38). After discharge and up to 30 days, coronary angiography was performed in 11% (STEMI 11%, NSTEMI 11%, undetermined MI 9%), angioplasty in 10% (STEMI 10%, NSTEMI 11%, undetermined MI 7%), bypass surgery in 7% (STEMI 5%, NSTEMI 11%, undetermined AMI 7%). The in-hospital and 30-day case fatality rates were 7.4% and 9.4%, respectively (7.5% and 9.5% for STEMI, 5.2% and 7.1% for NSTEMI, 18.2% and 21.2% for undetermined MI). CONCLUSIONS Patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the Italian CCUs, are older than those represented in clinical trials. A high proportion of these cases has the chance to receive early reperfusion therapy. Short-term mortality is lower than expected for patients with STEMI, but higher than reported for NSTEMI.

Anti-remodelling effect of canrenone in patients with mild chronic heart failure (AREA IN-CHF study): final results.

To test whether canrenone, an aldosterone receptor antagonist, improves left ventricular (LV) remodelling in NYHA class II heart failure (HF). Aldosterone receptor antagonists improve outcome in severe HF, but no information is available in NYHA class II.

Awareness and perception of heart failure among European cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and primary care physicians

AIMS To assess awareness of heart failure (HF) management recommendations in Europe among cardiologists (C), internists and geriatricians (I/G), and primary care physicians (PCPs). METHODS AND RESULTS The Study group on HF Awareness and Perception in Europe (SHAPE) surveyed randomly selected C (2041), I/G (1881), and PCP (2965) in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Each physician completed a 32-item questionnaire about the diagnosis and treatment of HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%). This report provides an analysis of HF awareness among C, I/G, and PCP. Seventy-one per cent I/G and 92% C use echocardiography, and 43% I/G and 82% C use echo-Doppler as a routine diagnostic test (both P < 0.0001). In contrast, 75% PCP use signs and symptoms to diagnose HF. Fewer I/G would use an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor in >90% of their patients (64 vs. 82% C, P < 0.0001), whereas only 47% PCP would routinely prescribe an ACE-inhibitor. Worsening HF was considered a risk of ACE-inhibitor therapy by 35% PCP. I/G and PCP consistently do not prescribe target ACE-inhibitor doses (P < 0.0001 vs. C). Only 39% I/G would use a beta-blocker in >50% of their patients (vs. 73% C, P < 0.0001). Also, only 5% PCP would always, and 35% often, prescribe a beta-blocker and reach target doses in only 7-29%. Moreover, 34% PCP and 26% I/G vs. 11% C (P < 0.0001) do not start a beta-blocker in patients with mild HF, who are already on an ACE-inhibitor and are on diuretic. In mild, stable HF, 39% PCP and 18% I/G would only prescribe diuretics, vs. 7% C (P < 0.0001). In patients with worsening HF in sinus rhythm and on an optimal ACE-inhibitor, beta-blockade and diuretics, significantly more C would add spironolactone, but I/G would more often add digoxin. CONCLUSION Although each physician group lacks complete adherence to guideline-recommended management strategies, these are used significantly less well by I, G, and PCPs, indicating the need for education of these essential healthcare providers.

Prevalence of preclinical and clinical heart failure in the elderly. A population‐based study in Central Italy

We conducted a population‐based cross‐sectional study to assess the prevalence of both preclinical and clinical heart failure (HF) in the elderly.

Prognosis of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy after coronary revascularisation: relation to viability and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction

Background: In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) does not always improve after revascularisation. Whether this may affect prognosis is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the prognosis of viable patients with and without improvement of LVEF after coronary revascularisation. Methods: Before revascularisation, radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) and dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed to assess LVEF and myocardial viability, respectively. Nine to 12 months after revascularisation, LVEF improvement was assessed by RNV. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1, viable patients with LVEF improvement (n = 27); group 2, viable patients without LVEF improvement (n = 15), group 3, non-viable patients (n = 48). Cardiac events were evaluated during a 4-year follow-up. Results: After revascularisation, the mean (SD) LVEF improved from 32 (9)% to 42 (10)% in group 1, but did not change significantly in group 2 and in group 3, p<0.001 by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Heart failure symptoms improved in both groups 1 (mean (SD) NYHA class from 3.1 (0.9) to 1.7 (0.7)) and 2 (from 3.2 (0.7) to 1.7 (0.9)), but not in group 3 (from 2.8 (1.0) to 2.7 (0.5)), p<0.001 by ANOVA. During follow-up, the cardiac event rate was low (4%) in group 1, intermediate (21%) in group 2 and high (33%) in group 3 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The best prognosis after revascularisation may be expected in those viable patients whose LVEF improves. Conversely, viable patients without functional improvement have an intermediate prognosis.

Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction Results From the GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico)-Prevenzione Trial

Background— The relation between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease has been studied extensively, but results are still debated. In addition, little evidence is available on patients with established coronary heart disease. Methods and Results— Prospectively ascertained information among 11 231 Italian patients (9584 males and 1647 females) with recent (≤3 months) myocardial infarction enrolled in the GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico)-Prevenzione trial was used. Usual dietary habits were assessed at baseline and updated at 0.5 and 1.5 years. Coffee consumption was categorized as never/almost never, <2 cups per day, 2 to 4 cups per day, and >4 cups per day. Medication use and fasting glucose were assessed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 years. Risk was evaluated with Cox proportional hazards with time-varying covariates. The main outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke). A total of 1167 cardiovascular events occurred during 36 961 person-years of follow-up. After multivariable adjustment for potential confounders in the time-dependent analysis, the relative risk of cardiovascular events across categories of coffee consumption was 1.02 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.20) for <2 cups per day, 0.91 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.09) for 2 to 4 cups per day, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.20) for >4 cups per day compared with abstainers (P for trend=0.18). Ultimately, coffee consumption did not change the risk of coronary heart disease events, stroke, and sudden death. Conclusions— No association between moderate coffee intake and cardiovascular events was observed in post–myocardial infarction patients.

Temporal trends in the epidemiology, management, and outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes.

Despite advances in the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the leading cause of death in these patients. We describe the evolution of clinical characteristics, in‐hospital management, and outcome of patients with CS complicating ACS.

High pulse pressure and low mean arterial pressure : two predictors of death after a myocardial infarction

Objectives Although the negative prognostic implication of a clinical history of arterial hypertension in myocardial infarction (MI) survivors is well known, the predictive role of the blood pressure (BP) regimen after MI is not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of different BP indices in post-MI. Methods and results We evaluated the relationship between baseline systolic, diastolic, pulse and mean arterial pressure (MAP), measured by sphygmomanometry at discharge from hospital or within 3 months of an MI, and total and cardiovascular mortality in 11 116 patients enrolled in the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Over 3.5 years of follow-up, 999 patients died, 657 of them from cardiovascular causes. Low mean and high pulse pressure were significantly associated with total and cardiovascular mortality after controlling for potential confounders in the multivariate analysis. As compared with patients with less extreme BP values, patients with MAP of 80 mmHg or less (n = 1241; 11.2%) had a 48% higher risk of cardiovascular death [95% confidenceinterval (CI) 1.16–1.87; P = 0.001] and those with pulse pressure greater than 60 mmHg (n = 958; 8.6%) had a 35% higher risk (95% CI 1.09–1.69; P = 0.007); only four subjects (0.04%) had both a high pulse pressure and a low MAP (relative risk of cardiovascular death 3.48; 95% CI 0.48–25.88; P = 0.218). Conclusions Our results show for the first time an additional prognostic importance of two easily measurable components of BP, definitely high pulse pressure (> 60 mmHg) and low MAP (≤ 80 mmHg), in a large sample of non-selected patients surviving MI who entered a modern programme of cardiovascular prevention.

Programme to improve the use of beta‐blockers for heart failure in the elderly and in those with severe symptoms: Results of the BRING‐UP 2 Study

Beta‐blockers are underused in HF patients, thus strategies to implement their use are needed.

A decade of changes in clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction admitted in Italian cardiac care units.

Objective To describe the evolution of clinical characteristics, in-hospital management and early outcome of elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods We analysed data from five consecutive Italian nationwide registries, conducted between 2001 and 2010, including patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to cardiac care units (CCUs). Results Of 10 983 patients with NSTEMI enrolled in the 5 surveys, 4350 (39.6%) were ≥75 years old (mean age 81±5 years). Some clinical characteristics such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal dysfunction and previous percutaneous coronary intervention increased significantly, whereas a history of stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure decreased over time. An invasive approach increased from 26.6% in 2001 to 68.4% in 2010 (p<0.0001) and revascularisation rates increased from 9.9% to 51.7% (p<0.0001). Early use and prescription at discharge of β-blockers, statins and dual antiplatelet treatment increased significantly (p<0.0001). Thirty-day observed mortality decreased from 14.6% (95% CI 9.9 to 20.4) to 9.5% (95% CI 7.7 to 11.6). At the multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline characteristics, compared with 2001, the risk of death was significantly lower in all the other studies performed at different times with reductions in adjusted mortality between 66% and 45%. Conclusions Over the past decade, substantial changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients admitted with NSTEMI in Italian CCUs, with a greater use of revascularisation therapy and recommended medications. These variations have been associated with a reduction in 30-day adjusted mortality rate.