Alessandro Cappelli

Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous

Purpose: To evaluate (1) whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed in octogenarians increases the procedure-related risk and (2) the incidence of complex anatomy of the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels in patients >80 years old, which can increase the technical difficulty of CAS. Methods: Between December 2000 and September 2005, 1053 patients (903 men; mean age 72±2.2 years, range 46–90) underwent 1222 CAS procedures in 2 centers for de novo (n=1192) and restenotic (n=30) lesions (139 staged bilateral procedures). Indications for treatment were the presence of a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70% (n=798, 65.3%) or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80%. The patients were separated into 2 age categories: under 80 (n=1078 procedures, 88.2%) and 80 or older (n=144 procedures, 11.8%) for this analysis. Data analysis included death and stroke rate at discharge and at 30 days. Anatomical characteristics evaluated were aortic arch elongation, arch and supra-aortic vessel calcification and tortuosity, anatomical tortuosity of the lesion, and carotid plaque composition. Results: Three lesions in octogenarians could not be treated because of failure to access the vessel in 1 case and extremely tortuous arteries in 2. The overall death and stroke rate at 30 days was 2.12% in the older group (2 fatal strokes, 1 minor stroke) and 1.11% in the younger group (3 deaths, 3 major strokes, 6 minor strokes); the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.40). Significantly higher frequencies of tortuosity and calcification of the arch and supra-aortic vessels and of type III aortic arch were observed in the older group (p<0.001). Conclusion: In our experience, CAS has proven to be safe and effective in elderly patients. Different age-related anatomical features can represent an adjunctive technical challenge, but these difficulties can be successfully managed without increased perioperative risk if CAS is performed in high-volume centers by highly skilled operators.

Determinants of In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Angioplasty: A Case-Control Study

PURPOSE To report a retrospective study that sought to identify clinical factors contributing to the development of in-stent restenosis in the carotid arteries, to profile the patients at greatest risk, and to review the treatment modalities evolved from our experience. METHODS Between December 2000 and April 2003, 195 carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS) procedures (12 bilateral) were performed in 183 patients (131 men; median age 65.9 years, interquartile range 55.2-72.7). Stenting for de novo stenoses was performed in 119 (61%) carotid arteries; 76 (39%) vessels were treated for postsurgical restenosis. Nearly two thirds of the patients (117, 64%) were symptomatic. Patients were evaluated at 3 and 6 months and at 6-month intervals thereafter with duplex ultrasonography. Angiography was used to confirm any recurrent lesion detected on the ultrasound scan. RESULTS Overall perioperative neurological complications included 4 (2.2%) minor strokes, 1 (0.5%) intracranial hemorrhage, and 1 (0.5%) major stroke; both patients with major neurological complications died at 5 and 12 days, respectively, after the procedure. During the 12.5-month follow-up (range 0-27.2), 3 non-procedure-related late deaths and another 9 (4.9%) neurological events occurred (2 strokes and 7 transient ischemic attacks). In-stent restenosis after CAS was present in 10 (5.2%) of 193 carotid arteries (9/181 patients) in follow-up; all but 1 artery had been treated for postsurgical restenosis. All lesions were treated secondarily with endovascular procedures. Statistical analysis demonstrated that postsurgical restenosis was the only predictive factor for the development of in-stent restenosis (OR 15.5, 95% CI 2.05 to 125.6, p=0.001) in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS The present study, far from being exhaustive on the subject, indicates that patients who develop restenosis after carotid endarterectomy are also prone to develop restenosis after CAS; moreover, although strongly recommended for postsurgical restenosis, CAS carries a greater risk of in-stent restenosis in this subgroup, thus reducing the benefits of this procedure.

Optical Coherence Tomography after Carotid Stenting: Rate of Stent Malapposition, Plaque Prolapse and Fibrous Cap Rupture According to Stent Design

OBJECTIVES This study aims to evaluate the rate of stent malapposition, plaque prolapse and fibrous cap rupture detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging according to carotid stent design. DESIGN It was a prospective single-centre study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty consecutive patients undergoing protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) and high-definition OCT image acquisition were enrolled in the study. OCT frames were analysed off-line, in a dedicated core laboratory by two independent physicians. Cross-sectional OCT images within the stented segment of the internal carotid artery were evaluated at 1-mm intervals for the presence of strut malapposition, plaque prolapse and fibrous cap rupture according to stent design. RESULTS Closed-cell design stents (CC) were used in 17 patients (42.5%), open-cell design stents (OC) in 13 (32.5%) and hybrid design stents (Hyb) in 10 (25%). No procedural or post-procedural neurological complications occurred (stroke/death 0% at 30 days). On OCT analysis the frequencies of malapposed struts were higher with CC compared to OC and Hyb (34.5% vs 15% and 16.3%, respectively; p < 0.01). Plaque prolapse was more frequent with OC vs CC (68.6% vs 23.3%; p < 0.01) and vs Hyb stents (30.8%; p < 0.01). Significant differences were also noted in the rates of fibrous cap rupture between CC and OC (24.2% vs 43.8%; p < 0.01), and between CC and Hyb (24.2% vs 39.6%; p < 0.01), but not between OC and Hyb stents (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION Intravascular OCT after CAS revealed that micro-defects after stent deployment are frequent and are related to the design of implanted stents. Stent malapposition is more frequent with CC stents, while plaque prolapse is more common with OC stents. It remains, however, unknown whether these figures now detected with OCT are of any clinical and prognostic significance.

AAA with a Challenging Neck: Early Outcomes Using the Endurant Stent-Graft System

OBJECTIVES The efficacy and safety of endovascular aneurysm repair is disputable in aneurysms with a short, angulated, wide, conical, or thrombus-lined neck making a reliable seal difficult to achieve. The influence of a challenging neck on early results using the Endurant stent-graft system in high risk patients was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study conducted on a prospectively compiled database of 72 elective patients with challenging neck treated with the Endurant system (Endurant Stent Graft, Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). These patients were compared to a control group (n = 65) without significant neck problems. Endpoints were early technical and clinical success, deployment accuracy and differences in operative details at one month follow-up. Data are reported as mean and standard deviation or as absolute frequency and percentage (%). Normality distribution and homogeneity of variances were tested by Shapiro-Wilks and Levene tests, respectively. Inter-group comparisons for each variable were made by t-test or χ2-test or Fisher exact test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Mean age was 76.12 years; 76.6% were males. Risk factors and pre-operative variables did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean neck length was 10.56 mm in patients with challenging anatomies and 22.85 mm in controls. Patients with a challenging neck differed significantly (p < 0.001) from controls in terms of mean infrarenal (37.67° vs. 20.12°) and suprarenal angle (19.63° vs. 15.57°); 82% of patients with a challenging neck were ASA III/IV (vs. 86%). Technical success was 100%, with four unplanned proximal extension in challenging group. No type I endoleaks or aneurysm-related deaths occurred in either group; major complications were 1.54% vs. 1.39% (p = 0.942). Operative details were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Treatment with the Endurant stent-graft is technically feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory results even in challenging anatomies. Medium- and long-term data are needed to verify durability, but early results are promising.

Safety and Feasibility of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Using a Nonocclusive Technique to Evaluate Carotid Plaques Before and After Stent Deployment

Purpose To evaluate the safety and feasibility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods In a prospective study, 25 consecutive patients (15 men; mean age 74±4 years) undergoing protected CAS were enrolled and underwent high-definition (homoaxial resolution 10 μm) OCT image acquisition before stent deployment, immediately after stent placement, and following postdilation of the stent (3 scans/patient). Pullbacks were started during a nonocclusive flush, mechanically injecting 24 mL of 50% diluted contrast at 6 mL/s to displace blood from the artery. Two independent physicians judged the quality of images on a predefined 1–10 scale. The proportions of specific agreement and kappa values (κ) were calculated. Results No procedural or in-hospital neurological complications occurred (any stroke/death 0%). The technical success of OCT pullbacks was 97.3% (73/75). The total amount of contrast was 86±18 mL/patient. No significant alteration in glomerular filtration rate or any other significant adverse event occurred. The images obtained were of high quality (mean value 8.1 out of 10), with good inter- and intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.81–0.87 and κ = 0.95, respectively). OCT images revealed innovative features such as rupture of the fibrous cap, plaque prolapse, and stent malapposition in a high percentage of the patients (range 24%–100%). Conclusion Intravascular OCT during a nonocclusive flush appears to be feasible and safe in carotid arteries. Since some original and unexpected information after CAS has been made available for the first time at such a high definition, future studies with OCT should focus on the interaction between carotid plaque and stent design, which might revolutionize our understanding of the mechanisms of carotid stenting, as well as influence our clinical policies.

The Wonders of a Newly Available Post-analysis CT Software in the Hands of Vascular Surgeons

INTRODUCTION Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has become a widespread and accepted practice in most Vascular Surgery centres. The optimal method to identify and characterise complications still awaits assessment. CASE REPORT An 83-year-old woman was admitted to our Institution for volumetric expansion of the aneurysm sac due to a suspected type II endoleak. Post-analysis, using OsiriX, revealed the presence of a hole at the distal portion of the main body in the docking zone near the flow divider. CONCLUSION OsiriX is an image processing software and an attractive alternative to dedicated workstations and allows rendering and analysis of numerous medical imaging modalities.

Carotid Restenosis After Endarterectomy and Stenting: A Critical Issue?

BACKGROUND Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is currently considered a valid alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. One of the most important issues for both of these techniques is carotid restenosis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of post-CEA and post-CAS restenosis in a large cohort of patients in a single high-volume center. METHODS Between December 2000 and December 2010, 2453 CEA and 2628 CAS procedures were performed in the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit at our institution. The mean age of patients was 73.8 years (range 55‒89 years), 78% of whom were men. Indications for carotid revascularization were: presence of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of >70%, or asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80%, especially in patients with vulnerable plaques. RESULTS Mild and long-term results after CEA and CAS were similar. The overall perioperative neurologic complication rate (minor and major stroke) was similar in the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up the restenosis rate after CEA was 1.58%. In-stent restenosis after CAS occurred in 1.67% of the procedures. All but 3 arteries had been treated for postsurgical restenosis. All lesions were approached secondarily with endovascular procedures. Statistical analysis demonstrated that post-CEA restenosis was the most important predictive factor for the development of in-stent restenosis after CAS. CONCLUSIONS This review of our 10-year experience confirms that patients who develop restenosis after CEA are also prone to developing in-stent restenosis after CAS.

Inguinal field block for femoral artery exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair.

Purpose To analyze the feasibility and outcomes of an inguinal field block (IFB) for femoral artery exposure in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods Between January 2004 and June 2012, 784 patients (597 men; mean age 76 years) underwent elective EVAR via surgical cutdown to the common femoral arteries. The data from these procedures were retrospectively analyzed to determine the technical feasibility of IFB, need for conversion to general anesthesia, mortality, and complication rate. Results IFB was successfully performed in 768 (97.9%) patients. Conversion from IFB to general anesthesia was necessary in 11 (1.4%) patients owing to patient discomfort (n=3, 0.4%), anxiety (n=5, 0.6%), and persistent patient movement (n=3, 0.4%). The remaining 5 (0.7%) patients underwent EVAR under general anesthesia because they refused IFB. Technical success of EVAR was 99.7%; the mean operation time was 84 minutes and the radiation time was 13 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 days; no patient required intensive care. At 6 months, there were no reports of local/systemic complications related to IFB, such as infection, seroma, hematoma, nerve injury, or allergic/toxic reactions. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that performing EVAR with femoral cutdown under IFB is a feasible, safe, and effective surgical and anesthetic combination, with very little need for conversion to general anesthesia.

Fistula first, graft on arterialized vein second:

Objectives Arterovenous grafts (AVGs) present a feasible solution for creating a vascular access in patients who are unsuitable for autogenous fistula (AVF). The aim of this study is to assess the prevention rate of vein stenosis, placing a graft on an arterialized vein (GAV) instead of an anastomized AVG in a native vein (GNV). Methods This was a cohort study conducted from January 2009 to November 2012. All consecutive patients who underwent AVG in our institution were included. All patients requiring a secondary intervention were also referred to our centre. Patients underwent ultrasound follow up at first and the every month. A Kaplan–Meier method was used; a Log-rank test was used to identify whether significant difference existed between GAV and GNV (p < 0.05). Results Forty-six grafts were placed. Twenty patients had arterialized receiving veins (group A), while 26 patients received an AVG immediately because they lacked autogenous veins suitable for fistula (group B).The average follow-up period was 16.1 months (range 0–41). The group A 41 months-patency rate was 84.3%, while group B was 43.7% (p = 0.06). Secondary patency was similar in the two groups. Conclusions Vein arterialization seems to prevent venous stenosis improving AVG-patency rate. More data are needed; however, the borderline p value encourages new studies.

Smoking Cessation and Clinical Outcomes in Young Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment for Critical Limb Ischemia

as initial indication for treatment who received BM stent were less likely to develop critical limb ischemia after stent occlusion (OR, 0.25; P 1⁄4 .016). Conclusions: Compared to BM stent use of CS in the treatment of advanced SFA and popliteal lesions is associated with higher primary patency rates. Patients are more likely to advance from claudication to critical limb ischemia after failure of a covered stent.