Alessandro Marco Minisini

What is the effect of systemic anticancer treatment on cognitive function

Treatment regimens for solid tumours have been extensively investigated for their physical toxic effects, but far less is known about the potential impairment of cognitive function by anticancer treatment regimens. Here, we review published studies that examined cognitive function in adult patients receiving systemic therapy for solid tumours. Our review suggests that patients can experience cognitive changes related to their treatment. However, several studies had methodological limitations, such as use of a limited sample size, lack of baseline assessment, and lack of control for potential confounding factors. Better designed clinical trials are required so that the difficulties patients face in terms of reduced cognitive function as a result of anticancer treatment can be fully elucidated. These trials should have sufficient statistical power and, importantly, should also be prospective.

Role of Mammography, Ultrasound and Large Core Biopsy in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Papillary Breast Lesions

Background: It is well recognized that distinguishing benign from malignant papillary lesions of the breast may pose challenging diagnostic problems. To prospectively evaluate the potential role of mammography, ultrasound and image-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast. Methods: 1,442 women consecutively underwent 14-gauge core biopsy and in 51 cases (3.5%) a diagnosis of papillary lesion was formulated. Both radiologists and pathologists independently expressed their degree of suspicion of malignancy (not suspicious, low, moderate, high) on the basis of radiological and core biopsy findings, respectively. Surgical excision of the lesion was used as gold standard and diagnostic agreement was assessed by the kappa statistic. Results: At surgery, 19 of the 49 (38.7%) resected cases had a diagnosis of malignancy. A poor agreement was found between mammography and core biopsy results in the categorization of suspicion of malignancy (k = 0.03). Similar data were obtained between ultrasound and core biopsy (k = 0.07). A poor agreement was also observed between radiological and surgical results (k < 0.20). In contrast, a good agreement was found between core biopsy and surgical samples (k > 0.70). However, 5 (26%) out of the 19 malignant cases at surgery were judged as benign or probably benign on core biopsy. Depending on how the categories of suspicion on core biopsy were set up, the range of sensitivity was 74–89%, whereas specificity ranged from 91 to 97%. Conclusions: Image-guided large core biopsy allows for a correct diagnosis in the majority of papillary lesions. However, its sensitivity is not good enough for surgical excision to be avoided.

Measures of Outcome in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Insights From a Real-World Scenario

No gold standard treatment exists for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Clinical decision making is based on knowledge of prognostic and predictive factors that are extrapolated from clinical trials and, sometimes, are not reliably transferable to a real-world scenario. Moreover, misalignment between endpoints used in drug development and measures of outcome in clinical practice has been noted. The roles of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoints in the context of clinical trials are the subjects of lively debate. Information about these parameters in routine clinical practice is potentially useful to design new studies and/or to interpret the results of clinical research. This study analyzed the impact of patient and tumor characteristics on the major measures of outcome across different lines of treatment in a cohort of 472 patients treated for MBC. OS, PFS, and postprogression survival (PPS) were analyzed. The study showed how biological and clinical characteristics may have different prognostic value across different lines of therapy for MBC. After first-line treatment, the median PPS of luminal A, luminal B, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive groups was longer than 12 months. The choice of OS as a primary endpoint for clinical trials could not be appropriate with these subtypes. In contrast, OS could be an appropriate endpoint when PPS is expected to be low (e.g., triple-negative subtype after the first line; other subtypes after the third line). The potential implications of these findings are clinical and methodological.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM Capecitabine is an orally bioavailable prodrug that is converted to 5-fluorouracil through several enzymatic steps, the last of which is mediated by thymidine phosphorylase (TP). TP has been reported to be expressed at higher levels in cancer tissue compared with normal counterpart. The present study aimed at evaluating the potential relationship between TP expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). METHODS Immunohistochemistry for TP and other biological markers was carried out on paraffin-embedded cancer tissues of 61 patients with BC treated with at least three cycles of capecitabine as single agent for metastatic disease. All patients had received capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. days 1-14 every 21 days. The following variables were analyzed as potential determinants of benefit from capecitabine: TP expression, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, MIB-1 expression, performance status at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, stage at diagnosis, grade, presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, and previous chemotherapy. RESULTS Overall, median time to progression (TTP) was 6.5 months (range 1.4-33). On multivariate analysis, ER status [hazard ratio (HR) for progression = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.15-0.64; P = 0.002], presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment (HR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.21-4.39; P = 0.01), and capecitabine as first- or second-line treatment (HR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.21-4.32; P = 0.01) independently predicted TTP. TP was highly expressed in 34 of 61 cases (55.7%). In the subgroup of patients with TP-expressing tumor, TTP was significantly longer in patients who received anthracyclines and taxanes before capecitabine (median TTP 7.5 versus 3.3 months, P = 0.01, log-rank test). Similarly, patients with a TP-positive tumor showed a longer TTP if they received taxanes before capecitabine than patients with TP-positive tumor who did not receive this treatment (7.3 versus 3.4 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS These data provide further evidence that TP expression in BC could represent a biomarker of sensitivity to capecitabine treatment. Prospective studies with translational approach are desirable to confirm the predictive and prognostic role of TP.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression is associated with time to progression in patients receiving low-dose, docetaxel-modulated capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND Preclinical data have indicated a synergistic interaction between docetaxel and capecitabine by means of taxane-induced up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). On the basis of such premises, we conducted a phase II trial to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Furthermore, we explored the relationship between TP tumor expression and benefit from this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine orally 625 mg/m(2) b.i.d. from days 8 to 21. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. In the correlative study, we evaluated the TP expression by immunohistochemistry and the TP messenger RNA expression by real-time RT-PCR in the primary tumor. RESULTS Forty-seven women were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, objective responses were achieved in 24 patients (51%). Fourteen additional patients (30%) had stable disease. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6 months (range 1-44 months). Median survival was 17 months (range 1-48 months). Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The most common clinical adverse events (all grades) were alopecia (55%), nail changes (53%), fatigue/asthenia (51%), nausea/vomiting (51%), neutropenia (49%), and neuropathy (49%). A significantly higher TTP was observed in patients with TP-positive tumors (log-rank test, P = 0.009). Interestingly, a subgroup analysis confirmed this TTP benefit in patients with TP-positive tumors obtaining a tumor response (log-rank test, P = 0.03), whereas the statistical significance was lost in nonresponders (log-rank test, P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that a regimen with low doses of capecitabine plus weekly docetaxel is active against MBC. The correlative analysis provides preliminary evidence that TP expression may be a predictive marker for therapeutic benefit.

Cognitive functions and elderly cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment : A prospective study

It has been reported that anticancer treatment may cause cognitive impairment. Elderly patients in particular could be at increased risk for treatment-related cognitive deterioration. A consecutive series of cancer out-patients >or=65 years old were prospectively assessed by means of a neuropsychological test Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) test at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months from study entry. Patients were categorized in three groups (group 1, no anticancer treatment; group 2, receiving chemotherapy; group 3, receiving endocrine therapy). Comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed at the three time points evaluation. Sixty-one patients were enrolled (32, 16 and 13, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). At baseline, cognitive function was directly correlated to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scores and was associated with higher educational level and absence of depression. Overall, cognitive function did not worsen across time in each group. However, more patients in the CT group showed worsening in memory skills, and more patients in the ET and CT group experienced reduction in the attention score.

Overcoming Treatment Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 overexpression or amplification occurs in about 20% of all breast cancers and results in a worse prognosis. Nevertheless, anti-HER2 treatments have recently been developed, resulting in dramatic improvements in the clinical outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab has shown efficacy in early and advanced breast cancer treatment and lapatinib is currently approved for the treatment of advanced disease. Other anti-HER2 agents are being investigated. Mechanisms of resistance to trastuzumab treatment include crosstalk with heterologous receptors and amplification of HER2 signalling; amplification of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway; alteration in binding of trastuzumab to HER2; and loss of HER2 expression. Proposed mechanisms of resistance to lapatinib involve derepression and/or activation of compensatory survival pathways through increased PI3K/AKT or estrogen receptor (ER) signalling. Several strategies to overcome resistance to anti-HER2 treatment are in different phases of development and include treatment with pertuzumab, T-DM1 and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors.

Increased blood volume and CD34+CD38- progenitor cell recovery using a novel umbilical cord blood collection system

A major problem with the use of umbilical cord/placental blood (UCB) is the limited blood volume that can be collected from a single donor. In this study, we evaluated a novel system for the collection of UCB and analyzed the kinetics of output of hematopoietic stem cells in the collected blood.

First-line chemotherapy with or without biologic agents for metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality representing the first tumor in the female sex in terms of incidence and the third in terms of mortality in the western world. An increased survival is evident in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as a result of the introduction of novel therapeutic agents. Oncologists have several options available (chemotherapy, hormone-therapy and biologic agents such as anti-angiogenic and anti-HER2 drugs) and the challenge nowadays is the individualization of the therapy (tailored approach). Despite better diagnostic tools and new therapeutic agents, at the present the main treatment goal in MBC is still palliation. Into the attempt to better tailor treatments, the search for predictive factors deserves a huge effort. This review faces the different approaches in terms of first-line chemotherapy for MBC together with the biological therapies recently approved for the treatment of this tumor.

Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Real-World Scenario: Is Progression-Free Survival With First Line Predictive of Benefit From Second and Later Lines?

INTRODUCTION Despite the availability of several therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), no robust predictive factors are available to help clinical decision making. Nevertheless, a decreasing benefit from first line to subsequent lines of treatment is commonly observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of benefit from first-line therapy on outcome with subsequent lines. METHODS We analyzed a consecutive series of 472 MBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2004 and 2012. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) at first (PFS1), second, third, and fourth therapeutic lines, according to treatment (ET and/or CT) and tumor subtypes. RESULTS In the whole cohort, median overall survival was 34 months, and median PFS1 was 9 months. A 6-month benefit was shown by 289 patients (63.5%) at first line, 128 (40.5%) at second line, 76 (33.8%) at third line, and 34 (23.3%) at fourth line. Not having a 6-month benefit at PFS1 was associated with less chance of benefit at second line (odds ratio [OR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.77, p = .0026) and at any line beyond first (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.62, p < .0001). In the total series, after stratification for tumor subtypes, a strong predictive effect was observed among HER2-positive tumors (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p = .0152). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the absence of at least a 6-month benefit in terms of PFS with first-line therapy predicts a reduced probability of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines, especially in HER2-positive disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study supports evidence showing that the absence of a 6-month benefit in terms of progression-free survival with first-line therapy predicts a lack of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines in metastatic breast cancer. The random distribution of benefit experienced by a subset of the cohort further spurs an interest in identifying predictive factors capable of identifying the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.