Alessandro Strebel

Green fluorescent protein as a novel tool to measure apoptosis and necrosis.

BACKGROUND Several apoptosis-detecting methods are currently available. Many of them are work intensive and require the additional use of antibodies, dyes, specific substrates, or enzymatic reactions. A simple, fast, and reliable method was developed to test for apoptosis or necrosis using mouse and human cell lines (e.g., Jurkat, A20.2J, and PB3c cells) stably transfected with a vector coding for green fluorescent protein (GFP) as indicator cells. METHODS Apoptosis in GFP-transfected cell lines was induced either by soluble Fas-Ligand (sFasL), recombinant human TRAIL (rhTRAIL), or interleukin-3 (IL-3) deprivation. Necrosis was induced by polyclonal anti-A20 and complement treatment of GFP-transfected A20. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for GFP fluorescence. Propidium iodide and Annexin V staining were used to confirm the results obtained with the GFP-method. RESULTS Live GFP-transfected cells show a strong fluorescence intensity, which is significantly diminished upon induction of apoptosis, whereas necrotic GFP-transfected cells almost completely lose their GFP-associated fluorescence. Apoptosis but not necrosis of GFP-transfected cells was blocked by the use of a caspase inhibitor. The results are highly comparable to conventional apoptosis-detecting methods. CONCLUSIONS The advantage of our GFP-based assay compared with other methods is the analysis of apoptosis or necrosis without the necessity for additional staining or washing steps, making it an ideal tool for screening apoptotic or necrotic stimuli.

Tumor necrosis factor-related, apoptosis-inducing ligand supports growth of mouse mastocytoma tumors by killing tumor-infiltrating macrophages.

TRAIL antisense transfected mastocytoma cells (R56VTas) injected into syngeneic DBA/2 mice demonstrate significantly delayed tumor growth compared to mock transfected cells (R56VTMo). TRAIL expression in R56VTas cells was successfully, albeit not completely, downregulated, as shown by Western blots, flow‐cytometric analysis and functionally by loss of cytolytic activity against TRAIL‐R‐bearing target cells. Immunohistochemic and immunoblotting analyses of ex vivo tumors confirmed the lower expression of TRAIL by the antisense transfection compared to the mock transfection. Investigating the mechanism of the delayed tumor growth, it was found that neither T nor NK cells but activated macrophages infiltrated the tumors. The number of infiltrating macrophages was significantly lower in the mock transfected compared to the TRAIL antisense transfected tumor sections, indicating that TRAIL‐expressing tumor cells may lyse macrophages. Indeed, activated macrophages proved to be sensitive to TRAIL‐mediated apoptosis. This indicates that, although macrophages can infiltrate the mastocytoma R56VT, they are in part eliminated by TRAIL‐expressing tumor cells, allowing the tumor to rapidly grow. Hence, downregulation of TRAIL allows more macrophages to survive and to better attack the tumor cells, slowing down tumor growth. In conclusion, TRAIL expressed on R56VT tumor cells can impair an important innate immune defense mechanism against tumors by eliminating effector macrophages.