Alessia Bari

Secondary malignancies after treatment for indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a 16-year follow-up study

There is relatively little information on secondary cancers after non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. This long-term follow-up study determines the incidence rate and identifies subgroups of non-Hodgkins lymphoma patients with increased incidences of secondary malignancy. Background Relatively little information is available on the incidence of secondary cancer in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The aim of this long-term follow-up study was to determine the incidence, the time free of second tumors, and risk factors for developing secondary cancer in a homogeneous group of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Design and Methods We evaluated a total of 563 patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma enrolled in Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi trials from 1988 to 2003. Results After a median follow-up of 62 months, 39 patients (6.9%) developed secondary cancer: 12 myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia, and 27 solid tumors. The overall standardized incidence ratio of secondary malignancy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was higher than the risk of malignancy in the general population. The standardized incidence ratio was elevated in male patients and in patients under 65 years old at first treatment. Overall, the cumulative incidence of secondary cancer at 12 years was 10.5%, after correction in a competing-risk model. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that older age at the time of diagnosis, male sex, and fludarabine-containing therapy had significant negative impacts on the time free of second tumors. Conclusions We have identified subgroups of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients with increased standardized incidence ratios of secondary malignancy and variables that have a negative impact on the time free of second tumors. This information could help physicians to select the most appropriate treatments. Finally, taking into account the possible occurrence of secondary neoplasia, long-term monitoring must be considered.

Prognostic models for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a never-ending story

BACKGROUND Improved treatment have modified survival outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and altered the importance of previously recognized prognostic markers. DESIGN AND METHODS To evaluate International Prognostic Index (IPI) score before and after rituximab introduction and to validate the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)/revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) model, we carried out a retrospective analysis on a total of 831 patients with DLBCL. RESULTS Our results show that IPI lost its discriminating power with the introduction of rituximab. The analysis of our second set allowed us to validate the ALC/R-IPI model. The R-IPI and ALC/R-IPI could still be used for designing clinical trials, but both have difficulty recognizing a high percentage of poor prognosis patients, though it remains an important goal of a good prognostic model considering the modest impact of salvage treatments on survival. CONCLUSIONS A new model on the basis of significant variables in the rituximab era and built on a large database of patients treated with rituximab is urgently needed. As prognostic models are changing with the efficacy and mechanisms of action of treatment utilized, looking for a new prognostic score is a never-ending story in which researchers are trying to hit a continuously moving target.

Introduction of Rituximab in Front-Line and Salvage Therapies Has Improved Outcome of Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma Patients

It is unclear whether new treatment modalities have improved the survival of follicular lymphoma patients. Some data show that there has been no improvement in survival in the last 3 decades of the 20th century, whereas the results of recent retrospective studies suggest that evolving therapy has improved the outcome for follicular lymphoma patients.

Survival of multiple myeloma patients in the era of novel therapies confirms the improvement in patients younger than 75 years: a population-based analysis.

Novel treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have shown promising results in clinical trials, but the advantage in unselected patients is still unclear. In order to evaluate whether novel therapies impact survival of MM patients, we performed a population‐based analysis on data collected by the Modena Cancer Registry from 1989 to 2009. The analysis evaluated 1206 newly diagnosed MM patients collected in the years 1988–96 (conventional therapy), 1997–05 (high dose melphalan and autologous transplant), and 2006–09 (novel agents era). Both relative survival (RS) and overall survival (OS) improved over the years, but not equally in the three groups. For patients aged <65 years, RS improved in 1997–05 and 2006–09 compared with previous years and a trend to improvement was observed from 1997–05 to 2006–09. For patients aged 65–74 years, RS improved significantly in 2006–09 compared with 1988–96 and 1997–05. No amelioration was observed for patients 75+ years old. OS confirmed RS. In conclusion, the survival of MM patients aged <65 and, in particular, 65–74 years, has improved over time, especially after 2006. This observation provides circumstantial evidence that novel therapies might impact patient survival. Despite the limits of this study, these data refer to an unselected population, giving a picture of every day clinical practice.

Monocyte count at diagnosis is a prognostic parameter in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from a large multicenter study involving 1191 patients in the pre- and post-rituximab era

In this study we assessed the prognostic significance of absolute monocyte count and selected the best cut-off value at diagnosis in a large cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Data were retrieved for therapy-naïve patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma followed in Israel and Italy during 1993–2010. A final cohort of 1017 patients was analyzed with a median follow up of 48 months and a 5-year overall survival rate of 68%. The best absolute monocyte count cut-off level was 630/mm3 and the 5-year overall survival for patients with counts below this cut-off was 71%, whereas it was 59% for those with a count >630 mm3 (P=0.0002). Of the 1017 patients, 521 (51%) were treated with chemo-immunotherapy, and in this cohort, using multivariate analysis, elevated monocyte count retained a negative prognostic value even when adjusted for International Prognostic Index (HR1.54, P=0.009). This large study shows that a simple parameter such as absolute monocyte count (>630/mm3) can easily be used routinely in the evaluation of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to identify high-risk patients with a worse survival in the rituximab era.

Radiation therapy improves treatment outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The effects of radiotherapy (RT) after chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain unclear; several trials have yielded conflicting results. This study examined the effect of RT after cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone + rituximab (R-CHOP) treatment on event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival. Data from 216 patients with DLBCL who were enrolled in two clinical trials at Italian Lymphoma Study Group sites and were subjected to six R-CHOP cycles and involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) were retrospectively analyzed. IFRT treatment yielded significant EFS benefit, with a 66% reduction in the risk of death and/or disease progression. Cox analysis, when adjusted for age, gender, stage, performance status (PS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and disease bulk, confirmed the significant EFS benefit of IFRT. The role of RT in DLBCL in the rituximab era is unclear. Future studies must take into account new radiation techniques and the response to chemotherapy based on functional imaging. Prospective randomized trials incorporating response-adapted therapy and modern radiation techniques are needed.

Rituximab Maintenance Compared With Observation After Brief First-Line R-FND Chemoimmunotherapy With Rituximab Consolidation in Patients Age Older Than 60 Years With Advanced Follicular Lymphoma: A Phase III Randomized Study by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab maintenance in 60- to 75-year-old patients with advanced follicular lymphoma responding to brief first-line chemoimmunotherapy followed by rituximab consolidation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 234 treatment-naive 60- to 75-year-old patients began chemoimmunotherapy with four monthly courses of rituximab, fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone (R-FND) followed by four weekly cycles of rituximab consolidation. Of these, 210 patients completed the planned treatment, and 202 responders were randomly assigned to rituximab maintenance (arm A) for 8 months, once every 2 months for a total of four doses, or to observation (arm B). RESULTS Median ages in arms A and B were 66 and 65 years, respectively. After induction and consolidation therapy, the overall response rate was 86%, with 69% complete remissions (CR). After a 42-month median follow-up from diagnosis, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS; the primary end point) and overall survival (OS) were 66% (95% CI, 59% to 72%) and 89% (95% CI, 85% to 93%), respectively. After randomization, 2-year PFS was 81% for rituximab maintenance versus 69% for observation, with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.45 to 1.21; P = .226), although this was not statistically significant. No differences between the two arms were detected for OS. Overall, the regimen was well-tolerated. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicity was neutropenia (25% of treatment courses), with 13 infections. Two toxic deaths (0.8%) occurred during induction treatment. CONCLUSION A brief R-FND induction plus rituximab consolidation achieved excellent results with high CR and PFS rates, supporting the feasibility of this regimen in patients older than 60 years. A short rituximab maintenance did not achieve a statistically significant PFS improvement over observation.

Persistence of minimal residual disease in bone marrow predicts outcome in follicular lymphomas treated with a rituximab-intensive program

We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the ML17638 phase 3 trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, investigating the role of rituximab maintenance in elderly follicular lymphoma (FL) patients after a brief first-line chemoimmunotherapy. MRD for the bcl-2/IgH translocation was determined on bone marrow cells in a centralized laboratory belonging to the Euro-MRD consortium, using qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Of 234 enrolled patients, 227 (97%) were screened at diagnosis. A molecular marker (MM) was found in 51%. Patients with an MM were monitored at 8 subsequent times. Of the 675 expected follow-up samples, 83% were analyzed. Conversion to PCR negativity predicted better progression-free survival (PFS) at all post-treatment times (eg, end of therapy: 3-year PFS, 72% vs 39%; P < .007). MRD was predictive in both maintenance (83% vs 60%; P < .007) and observation (71% vs 50%; P < .001) groups. PCR positivity at the end of induction was an independent adverse predictor (hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-7.07). MRD is a powerful independent outcome predictor in FL patients who receive rituximab-intensive programs, suggesting a need to investigate its value for decision-making. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrial.gov as #NCT01144364.

Risk for second malignancies in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Late side-effects are becoming an important issue in non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) survivors. We intended to estimate pooled relative risk (RR) of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs), to evaluate site-associated RR and the impact of different treatments. DESIGN We carried out an electronic search of Medline and EMBASE seeking articles investigating the risk of SMNs and reporting RR measures. The studies were evaluated for heterogeneity before meta-analysis and for publication bias. Pooled RRs were estimated using fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled RRs of SMNs overall and for solid tumors were 1.88 and 1.32, respectively. We found an excess of risk for several specific cancer sites. Radiotherapy alone did not increase the risk for SMNs, while chemotherapy and combined treatments augmented the RR. Regression analyses revealed a positive significant association for all SMNs with total body irradiation, and for solid SMNs with younger age. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that NHL patients experience a higher risk for SMNs than the general population and that various treatments have different impact on RR. More information will be necessary to evaluate possible interactions with genetic susceptibility and environmental exposure.

Second malignancies after treatment of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a GISL cohort study

Improved treatment has increased the life expectancy of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but the risk of second cancer in patients treated for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is unclear. This Italian study shows that only young patients have an increased incidence ratio of second malignancies, while the incidence ratio in patients aged over 59 years matched that in the Italian general population. Background Improved treatment has increased the life expectancy of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but few studies have addressed the issue of second cancer in patients treated for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and time free of second cancers in this subset of patients. Design and Methods We evaluated a cohort of 1280 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were first treated between 1988 and 2003. We utilized the central database of the Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi, which includes data on demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, treatment and follow-up of all patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma enrolled in clinical trials. Results After a median follow-up of 51 months, 48 patients had developed a second cancer: 13 hematologic malignancies and 35 solid tumors. The overall standardized incidence ratio in our cohort (with a median age of 58 years) matched that of the general Italian population. The incidence ratio of second tumors was age related, and the age groups 20–39 and 40–59 years showed an increased risk. Overall, the cumulative incidence of second cancer was 8.2% at 15 years. A multivariate analysis showed that older age at the time of diagnosis of lymphoma had a negative influence on the time free of second tumors. Conclusions In our cohort, only young patients showed an increased incidence ratio of second malignancies, while the incidence ratio in patients aged over 59 years matched the incidence in the Italian general population. Demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters and treatment modalities did not have any significant impact on the incidence ratio of a second cancer.