Alessio Albanese

A Scan of Chromosome 10 Identifies a Novel Locus Showing Strong Association with Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease

Strong evidence of linkage to late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD) has been observed on chromosome 10, which implicates a wide region and at least one disease-susceptibility locus. Although significant associations with several biological candidate genes on chromosome 10 have been reported, these findings have not been consistently replicated, and they remain controversial. We performed a chromosome 10–specific association study with 1,412 gene-based single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to identify susceptibility genes for developing LOAD. The scan included SNPs in 677 of 1,270 known or predicted genes; each gene contained one or more markers, about half (48%) of which represented putative functional mutations. In general, the initial testing was performed in a white case-control sample from the St. Louis area, with 419 LOAD cases and 377 age-matched controls. Markers that showed significant association in the exploratory analysis were followed up in several other white case-control sample sets to confirm the initial association. Of the 1,397 markers tested in the exploratory sample, 69 reached significance (P

Recurrent Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Infection Caused by Small-Colony Variants of Staphylococcus aureus

Phenotypic variants of Staphylococcus aureus may be misidentified by routine microbiological methods, and they may also respond poorly to antibacterial treatment. Using molecular methods, we identified small-colony variants of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (which were misidentified by 3 widely used automated identification systems as methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci) as the cause of recurrent ventriculoperitoneal shunt-related meningitis.

Single-Arm Phase II Study of Conformal Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide plus Fractionated Stereotactic Conformal Boost in High-Grade Gliomas

Purpose:To assess survival, local control and toxicity using fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (FSCRT) boost and temozolomide in high-grade gliomas (HGGs).Patients and Methods:Patients affected by HGG, with a CTV1(clinical target volume, representing tumor bed ± residual tumor + a margin of 5 mm) ≤ 8 cm were enrolled into this phase II study. Radiotherapy (RT, total dose 6,940 cGy) was administered using a combination of two different techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT, to achieve a dose of 5,040 or 5,940 cGy) and FSCRT boost (19 or 10 Gy) tailored by CTV1diameter (≤ 6 cm and > 6 cm, respectively). Temozolomide (75 mg/m2) was administered during the first 2 or 4 weeks of RT. After the end of RT, temozolomide (150–200 mg/m2) was administered for at least six cycles. The sample size of 41 patients was assessed by the single proportion–powered analysis.Results:41 patients (36 with glioblastoma multiforme [GBM] and five with anaplastic astrocytoma [AA]) were enrolled; RTOG neurological toxicities G1–2 and G3 were 12% and 3%, respectively. Two cases of radionecrosis were observed. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 6–56 months), global and GBM median overall survival (OS) were 30 and 28 months. The 2-year survival rate was significantly better compared to the standard treatment (63% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.00001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, in GBM patients 10 months.Conclusion:FSCRT boost plus temozolomide is well tolerated and seems to increase survival compared to the standard treatment in patients with HGG.ZusammenfassungZiel:Untersuchung von Uberleben, lokaler Tumorkontrolle und Toxizitat einer fraktionierten stereotaktischen konformalen Strahlentherapie (FSCRT) mit Boostbestrahlung in Kombination mit Temozolomid bei hochmalignen Gliomen (HMG).Patienten und Methodik:Patienten mit HMG und einem CTV1(klinisches Zielvolumen, d. h. Tumorbett ± Resttumor + einem Sicherheitsabstand von 5 mm) ≤ 8 cm wurden in diese Phase-II-Studie eingeschlossen. Die Strahlentherapie (Gesamtdosis 6 940 cGy) wurde als Kombination aus zwei unterschiedlichen Techniken appliziert: dreidimensionale konformale Strahlentherapie (3D-CRT, um eine Strahlendosis von 5 040 oder 5 940 cGy zu erreichen) und lokale Dosisaufsattigung mit FSCRT-Boost (19 oder 10 Gy), die auf den CTV1-Durchmesser (≤ 6 cm bzw. > 6 cm) zugeschnitten war. Temozolomid (75 mg/m2) wurde wahrend der ersten 2 oder 4 Wochen der Strahlentherapie verabreicht. Nach dem Ende der Strahlentherapie erhielten die Patienten Temozolomid (150–200 mg/m2) fur wenigstens sechs Zyklen. Die Fallzahl wurde mit Hilfe eines einfach-proportionalen Testverfahrens („single proportion-powered analysis“) bei 41 Patienten bestimmt.Ergebnisse:41 Patienten (36 mit Glioblastoma multiforme [GBM] und funf mit anaplastischem Astrozytom [AA]) wurden behandelt; Neurotoxizitat gemas RTOG-Skala G1–2 bzw. G3 wurde in 12% bzw. 3% der Patienten beobachtet. Zwei Falle von Radionekrose traten auf. Bei einer mittleren Beobachtungszeit von 44 Monaten (Range 6–56 Monate) lagen die mittlere Gesamt- und die GBM-spezifische Uberlebenszeit (OS) bei 30 und 28 Monaten. Die 2-Jahres-Uberlebensrate war signifikant besser im Vergleich zur Standardbehandlung (63% vs. 26,5%; p < 0.00001). Die mittlere progressionsfreie Uberlebenszeit (PFS) betrug 11 Monate, bei GBM-Patienten 10 Monate.Schlussfolgerung:FSCRT-Boostbestrahlung plus Temozolomid wird gut toleriert und scheint im Vergleich zur Standardbehandlung die Uberlebenszeit von Patienten mit HMG zu verbessern.

Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme with poor prognosis: a feasibility study

We explored the feasibility of concurrent palliative chemotherapy and low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LD-FRT) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients with recurrent/progressive GBM at least 3 months after the end of primary radiotherapy received 0.3 Gy twice daily with cisplatin and fotemustine if progressing on temozolomide, or 0.4 Gy twice daily with temozolomide if recurrent 4-6 months later (retreatment group). Newly diagnosed GBM with gross residual mass received 30 Gy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide and 0.4 Gy twice daily from the second adjuvant cycle (naive group) for 2-4 cycles. Twenty-six patients were enrolled. In the retreatment group (n = 17; median LD-FRT total dose 7.2 Gy [range 2.4-11.6]), grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was observed in 5.9% of patients. Median follow-up time was 20 months (range 4-35). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of recurrence or progression were 4 and 8 months, respectively (OS at 6 months, 69%; at 12 months, 16.7%). In the naive group (n = 9; median LD-FRT total dose 8 Gy [range 3.2-16]), grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was observed in 11.1% of patients. Median follow-up time was 17 months (range 8-20)-median PFS was 9 months, with PFS at 6 months and at 1 year of 66.7% and 26.7%, respectively; and median OS was 12 months, with OS at 6 months and at 1 year of 77.8% and 34.6%, respectively. LD-FRT with concurrent chemotherapy was well tolerated.

Whole-brain radiotherapy combined with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain oligometastases: Long-term analysis

Objective:To verify whether the treatment of brain oligometastases with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or surgical resection results in different outcomes.Methods:Files of patients affected by brain metastases submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A) or WBRT + SRT (group B) were retrospectively selected for this study. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA). The outcomes of patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of toxicity, local control, and overall survival.Results:Total of 97 patients were selected (56 male; 42 female) who were respectively submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A, n = 50 patients) or WBRT + SRT (Group B, n = 47 patients). Median follow-up was 95 months (range, 8–171 months). The 1-year local control rates were 46.0% and 69.0% respectively. No significant difference in local tumor control was observed between group A and B (p = 0.10). Median overall survival was 15 and 19 months in group A and B, respectively. One-year survival was 56.0% and 62%, respectively. No difference was observed in the two groups (p = 0.40).Conclusion:Surgery remains the main therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients; nevertheless, our data support the use of WBRT plus SRT in one or two brain metastases smaller than 3 cm.Zielsetzung:Zu untersuchen, ob die Behandlung von Oligohirnmetastasen mit Ganzhirnbestrahlung (whole-brain radiotherapy, WBRT) plus stereotaktischer Radiotherapie (SRT) oder chirurgischer Resektion unterschiedliche Ergebnisse bringt.Methoden:Krankenakten von Patienten mit operativ entfernten Hirnmetastasen und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A) oder WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B) wurden retrospektiv für diese Studie ausgewählt. Die zwei Beghandlungsarme wurden für folgende prognostische Parameter gematcht: WBRT-Schema. Alter, Geschlecht, Allgemeinzustand, Art des Primärtumors, Anzahl der Hirnmetastasen, extrazerebrale Metastasen, Recursive-Partioning-Analysis-(RPA-)Klasse. Das Behandlungsergebnis für beide Patientengruppen wurde im Hinblick auf Toxizität, lokale Tumorkontrolle und Gesamtüberleben bewertet.Ergebnisse:Insgesamt wurden 97 Patienten ausgewählt (56 m; 42 w), die entweder mit operativer Entfernung und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A, n = 50 Pat.) oder mit WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B, n = 47 Pat.) behandelt wurden. Die mediane Beobachtungszeit betrug 95 Monate (Spanne 8–171). Die lokale Tumorkontrolle nach 1 Jahr betrug 46,0% (Gruppe A) und 69,0% (Gruppe B), ohne dass dieser Unterschied statistisch signifikant wäre (p = 0,10). Das mediane Gesamtüberleben betrug jeweils 15 und 19 Monate in Gruppe A and B. Die 1-Jahres-Überlebensrate betrug jeweils 56,0% and 62%. Es wurde kein Unterschied zwischen den beiden Gruppen gefunden (p = 0,40).Schlussfolgerung:Die chirurgische Entfernung bleibt die Behandlungsoption bei symptomatischen Patienten. Unsere Daten sprechen für eine Behandlung mit WBRT plus SRT bei Vorliegen von ein oder zwei Hirnmetastasen, die kleiner als 3 cm sind.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Surgery or Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Oligometastases

Objective:To verify whether the treatment of brain oligometastases with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or surgical resection results in different outcomes.Methods:Files of patients affected by brain metastases submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A) or WBRT + SRT (group B) were retrospectively selected for this study. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and recursive partitioning analysis class (RPA). The outcomes of patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of toxicity, local control, and overall survival.Results:Total of 97 patients were selected (56 male; 42 female) who were respectively submitted to surgical resection followed by WBRT (group A, n = 50 patients) or WBRT + SRT (Group B, n = 47 patients). Median follow-up was 95 months (range, 8–171 months). The 1-year local control rates were 46.0% and 69.0% respectively. No significant difference in local tumor control was observed between group A and B (p = 0.10). Median overall survival was 15 and 19 months in group A and B, respectively. One-year survival was 56.0% and 62%, respectively. No difference was observed in the two groups (p = 0.40).Conclusion:Surgery remains the main therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients; nevertheless, our data support the use of WBRT plus SRT in one or two brain metastases smaller than 3 cm.Zielsetzung:Zu untersuchen, ob die Behandlung von Oligohirnmetastasen mit Ganzhirnbestrahlung (whole-brain radiotherapy, WBRT) plus stereotaktischer Radiotherapie (SRT) oder chirurgischer Resektion unterschiedliche Ergebnisse bringt.Methoden:Krankenakten von Patienten mit operativ entfernten Hirnmetastasen und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A) oder WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B) wurden retrospektiv für diese Studie ausgewählt. Die zwei Beghandlungsarme wurden für folgende prognostische Parameter gematcht: WBRT-Schema. Alter, Geschlecht, Allgemeinzustand, Art des Primärtumors, Anzahl der Hirnmetastasen, extrazerebrale Metastasen, Recursive-Partioning-Analysis-(RPA-)Klasse. Das Behandlungsergebnis für beide Patientengruppen wurde im Hinblick auf Toxizität, lokale Tumorkontrolle und Gesamtüberleben bewertet.Ergebnisse:Insgesamt wurden 97 Patienten ausgewählt (56 m; 42 w), die entweder mit operativer Entfernung und anschließender WBRT (Gruppe A, n = 50 Pat.) oder mit WBRT + SRT (Gruppe B, n = 47 Pat.) behandelt wurden. Die mediane Beobachtungszeit betrug 95 Monate (Spanne 8–171). Die lokale Tumorkontrolle nach 1 Jahr betrug 46,0% (Gruppe A) und 69,0% (Gruppe B), ohne dass dieser Unterschied statistisch signifikant wäre (p = 0,10). Das mediane Gesamtüberleben betrug jeweils 15 und 19 Monate in Gruppe A and B. Die 1-Jahres-Überlebensrate betrug jeweils 56,0% and 62%. Es wurde kein Unterschied zwischen den beiden Gruppen gefunden (p = 0,40).Schlussfolgerung:Die chirurgische Entfernung bleibt die Behandlungsoption bei symptomatischen Patienten. Unsere Daten sprechen für eine Behandlung mit WBRT plus SRT bei Vorliegen von ein oder zwei Hirnmetastasen, die kleiner als 3 cm sind.

Autologous dural substitutes: A prospective study

OBJECTIVEnDuraplasty can be performed both by means of autologous tissues (such as galea-pericranium, temporal muscle, fascia lata) or by commercially available dural patches. Nowadays many neurosurgeons consider galea-pericranium duraplasty time-consuming, technically demanding or not adequate, thus dural surrogates are increasingly popular. In this prospective research we compared duraplasty using autologous galea-pericranium vs. dural patches in terms of postoperative long term results, ease/time required and costs.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnResearch has been designed as prospective cohort study, that included 185 patients undergoing supratentorial elective neurosurgery with galea-pericranium or non-autologous duraplasty (minimum follow-up 12 months). Variables taken into account were: wound infection, CSF fistula, subcutaneous CSF collection, bone flap osteitis, brain abscess, empyema and tardive wound dehiscence (particularly after postoperative radiotherapy). Time for galea-pericranium collection, size of galea-pericranium harvest and dural defects were recorded in each case. Costs for non-autologous duroplasty were calculated.nnnRESULTSnNo statistically significant differences were evident in long term postoperative results between the two groups. Mean time of galea-pericranium collection is less than 2min and enough galea-pericranium can be harvested in supratentorial approach to cover almost any dural defect. The only difference between the two groups is costs: an average of 268.7€/patient spent just for duraplasty. This figure is surely substantial if considered for the entire amount of surgeries performed in a department.nnnCONCLUSIONSnConsidering that in our study long term results are equivalent, that galea-pericranium duraplasty is feasible and rapid, our indications are in favor of saving a considerable amount of money since an ideal autologous dural substitute is available and free.

Angio-Architectural Features of High-Grade Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Correlation With Aggressive Clinical Presentation and Hemorrhagic Risk

BACKGROUNDnHigh-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) can present shunts with very different angio-architectural characteristics. Specific hemodynamic factors may affect clinical history and determine very different clinical courses.nnnOBJECTIVESnTo evaluate the relationship between some venous angio-architectural features in high-grade dAVFs and clinical presentation. Specific indicators of moderate or severe venous hypertension were analyzed, such as altered configurations of the dural sinuses (by a single or a dual thrombosis), or overload of cortical vessels (restrictions of outflow, pseudophlebitic cortical vessels, and venous aneurysms).nnnMETHODSnThe institutional series was retrospectively reviewed (49 cases), and the pattern of venous drainage was analyzed in relationship with clinical presentation (benign/aggressive/hemorrhage).nnnRESULTSnThirty-five of 49 cases displayed cortical reflux (high-grade dAVFs). This subgroup displayed a benign presentation in 31.42% of cases, an aggressive in 31.42%, and hemorrhage in 37.14%.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur data confirm that within high-grade dAVFs, 2 distinct subpopulations exist according to severity of clinical presentation. Some indicators we examined showed correlation with aggressive nonhemorrhagic manifestations (outflow restriction and pseudophlebitic cortical vessels), while other showed a correlation with hemorrhage (dual thrombosis and venous aneurysms). Current classifications appear insufficient to identify a wide range of conditions that ultimately determine the organization of the cortical venous drainage. Intermediate degrees of venous congestion correlate better with the clinical risk than the simple definition of cortical reflux. The angiographic aspects of venous drainage presented in this study may prove useful to assess dAVF hemodynamic characteristics and identify conditions at higher clinical risk.

Intraorbital and intracanalicular ophthalmic artery aneurysms. Literature review and report of a case

Abstract This paper reviews literature about intraorbital ophthalmic artery aneurysms discussing presentation, aetiology and treatment options. In addition we report on a case of intraorbital ophthalmic artery aneurysm with acute onset of headache, visual loss and right eye ophthalmoplegia.

Integration of Real-Time Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Surgical Treatment of Spinal Cord Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

BACKGROUNDnIn the surgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs), intraoperative definition of anatomic characteristics of the DAVF and identification of the fistulous point is mandatory to effectively exclude the DAVF.nnnCASE DESCRIPTIONnIntraoperative ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound integrated with color Doppler ultrasound was applied in the surgical setting for a cervical DAVF to identify the fistulous point and evaluate correct occlusion of the fistula.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIntegration of intraoperative ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a simple, cost-effective technique that provides an opportunity for real-time dynamic visualization of DAVF vascular patterns, identification of the fistulous point, and assessment of correct exclusion. Compared with other intraoperative tools, such as indocyanine green videoangiography, it allows the surgeon to visualize hidden anatomic and vascular structures, minimizing surgical manipulation and guiding the surgeon during resection.