Alex Azrilevich
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alex Azrilevich.
Lancet Oncology | 2017
Padmanee Sharma; M. Retz; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Ari David Baron; Andrea Necchi; Jens Bedke; Elizabeth R. Plimack; Daniel Vaena; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Sergio Bracarda; Jose Angel Arranz; Sumanta K. Pal; Chikara Ohyama; Abdel Saci; Xiaotao Qu; Alexandre Lambert; Suba Krishnan; Alex Azrilevich; Matthew D. Galsky
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have a dismal prognosis and few treatment options after first-line chemotherapy. Responses to second-line treatment are uncommon. We assessed nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, for safety and activity in patients with metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed or recurred despite previous treatment with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. METHODS In this multicentre, phase 2, single-arm study, patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic or surgically unresectable locally advanced urothelial carcinoma, measurable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses of 0 or 1, and available tumour samples for biomarker analysis received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression and clinical deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, or other protocol-defined reasons. The primary endpoint was overall objective response confirmed by blinded independent review committee in all treated patients and by tumour PD-L1 expression (≥5% and ≥1%). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02387996, and is completed. Follow-up is still ongoing. FINDINGS Between March 9, 2015, and Oct 16, 2015, 270 patients from 63 sites in 11 countries received nivolumab, and 265 were evaluated for activity. Median follow-up for overall survival was 7·00 months (IQR 2·96-8·77). Confirmed objective response was achieved in 52 (19·6%, 95% CI 15·0-24·9) of 265 patients. Confirmed objective response was achieved in 23 (28·4%, 95% CI 18·9-39·5) of the 81 patients with PD-L1 expression of 5% or greater, 29 (23·8%, 95% CI 16·5-32·3) of the 122 patients with PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, and 23 (16·1%, 95% CI 10·5-23·1) of the 143 patients with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 48 (18%) of 270 patients-most commonly grade 3 fatigue and diarrhoea, which each occurred in five patients. Three deaths were attributed to treatment (pneumonitis, acute respiratory failure, and cardiovascular failure). INTERPRETATION Nivolumab monotherapy provided meaningful clinical benefit, irrespective of PD-L1 expression, and was associated with an acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial carcinoma. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Lancet Oncology | 2016
Padmanee Sharma; Margaret K. Callahan; Petri Bono; Joseph Kim; Pavlina Spiliopoulou; Emiliano Calvo; Rathi N. Pillai; Patrick A. Ott; Filippo de Braud; Michael A. Morse; Dung T. Le; Dirk Jaeger; Emily Chan; Chris Harbison; Chen Sheng Lin; Marina Tschaika; Alex Azrilevich; Jonathan E. Rosenberg
Summary Background There are few effective treatments for advanced urothelial carcinoma after progression following platinum-based chemotherapy. We assessed the activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed after prior platinum-based therapy. Methods This phase 1/2 multicentre open-label study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis, ureter, bladder, or urethra unselected by programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Tumour PD-L1 membrane expression was assessed. Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression or study treatment discontinuation, whichever occurred later. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by investigator assessment. All patients who received at least one dose of any study medication were analysed. Here we report an interim analysis of this ongoing trial. CheckMate 032 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01928394. Findings Between June 2014 and April 2015, 86 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled and 78 were treated with nivolumab monotherapy. At data cutoff (March 24, 2016), minimum follow-up was 9 months. A confirmed investigator-assessed objective response was achieved in 19 (24·4%) of 78 patients (95% CI 15·3–35·4). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 (21·8%) of 78 patients, the most common being laboratory abnormalities: asymptomatic elevated lipase in four (5·1%) and asymptomatic elevated amylase three (3·8%) patients. Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (46·2%) of 78 patients. Two (2·6%) of 78 patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events (pneumonitis and thrombocytopenia) and subsequently died. Interpretation Nivolumab monotherapy was associated with significant and durable clinical responses and a manageable safety profile in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. These data indicate a favourable benefit:risk profile for nivolumab and support further investigation of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | 2015
Padmanee Sharma; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Matthew D. Galsky; Ari David Baron; Sergio Bracarda; Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke; Alexandre Lambert; Alex Azrilevich; M. Retz
Meeting abstracts Clinical trials in patients with advanced bladder cancer have reported response rates of up to approximately 30% and 60% with single-agent and multi-agent regimens, respectively, and minimal improvements in survival over best supportive care. Guidance on second-line treatment
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Padmanee Sharma; Petri Bono; Joseph Kim; Pavlina Spiliopoulou; Emiliano Calvo; Rathi N. Pillai; Patrick A. Ott; Filippo de Braud; Michael A. Morse; Dung T. Le; Dirk Jaeger; Emily Chan; Christopher T. Harbison; Chen-Sheng Lin; Marina Tschaika; Alex Azrilevich; Jonathan E. Rosenberg
Annals of Oncology | 2017
Matthew D. Galsky; Abdel Saci; Peter Szabo; Alex Azrilevich; Christine Horak; Alexandre Lambert; A. Siefker-Radtke; Andrea Necchi; Padmanee Sharma
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Gregory R. Pond; Guru Sonpavde; Matt D. Galsky; Padmanee Sharma; Jonathan E. Rosenberg; Toni K. Choueiri; Joaquim Bellmunt; Soon Il Lee; Alex Azrilevich; Shuo Yang; Kyna McCullough Gooden; Dean F. Bajorin
Nature Communications | 2018
Li Wang; Abdel Saci; Peter Szabo; Scott D. Chasalow; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Josep Domingo-Domenech; Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke; Padmanee Sharma; John P. Sfakianos; Yixuan Gong; Ana Dominguez-Andres; William Oh; David J. Mulholland; Alex Azrilevich; Liangyuan Hu; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Hélène Salmon; Nina Bhardwaj; Jun Zhu; Matthew D. Galsky
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Josep Tabernero; Jason J. Luke; Anthony M. Joshua; Andrea Varga; Victor Moreno; Jayesh Desai; Ben Markman; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Filippo de Braud; Sandip Pravin Patel; Matteo S. Carlino; Lillian L. Siu; Giuseppe Curigliano; Zhaohui Liu; Yuko Ishii; Penny Phillips; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Paul Basciano; Alex Azrilevich; Karen A. Gelmon
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Matt D. Galsky; Abdel Saci; Peter Szabo; Li Wang; Jun Zhu; Alex Azrilevich; Bruce S. Fischer; Andrea Necchi; Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke; Padmanee Sharma
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Jonathan E. Rosenberg; Petri Bono; Joseph Kim; Pavlina Spiliopoulou; Emiliano Calvo; Rathi N. Pillai; Patrick A. Ott; F. de Braud; Michael A. Morse; Dung T. Le; Dirk Jaeger; Emily Chan; Christopher T. Harbison; Chen Sheng Lin; Marina Tschaika; Alex Azrilevich; Padmanee Sharma
Collaboration
Dive into the Alex Azrilevich's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs