Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alex Haxeltine is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alex Haxeltine.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 1996

An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics

Jonathan A. Foley; I. Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Samuel Levis; David Pollard; Steven Sitch; Alex Haxeltine

Here we present a new terrestrial biosphere model (the Integrated Biosphere Simulator - IBIS) which demonstrates how land surface biophysics, terrestrial carbon fluxes, and global vegetation dynamics can be represented in a single, physically consistent modeling framework. In order to integrate a wide range of biophysical, physiological, and ecological processes, the model is designed around a hierarchical, modular structure and uses a common state description throughout. First, a coupled simulation of the surface water, energy, and carbon fluxes is performed on hourly timesteps and is integrated over the year to estimate the annual water and carbon balance. Next, the annual carbon balance is used to predict changes in the leaf area index and biomass for each of nine plant functional types, which compete for light and water using different ecological strategies. The resulting patterns of annual evapotranspiration, runoff, and net primary productivity are in good agreement with observations. In addition, the model simulates patterns of vegetation dynamics that qualitatively agree with features of the natural process of secondary succession. Comparison of the models inferred near-equilibrium vegetation categories with a potential natural vegetation map shows a fair degree of agreement. This integrated modeling framework provides a means of simulating both rapid biophysical processes and long-term ecosystem dynamics that can be directly incorporated within atmospheric models.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 1996

BIOME3 : An equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types

Alex Haxeltine; I. Colin Prentice

The equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model BIOME3 simulates vegetation distribution and biogeochemistry, and couples vegetation distribution directly to biogeochemistry. Model inputs consist of latitude, soil texture class, and monthly climate (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine) data on a 0.5 degrees grid. Ecophysiological constraints determine which plant functional types (PFTs) may potentially occur. A coupled carbon and water flux model is then used to calculate, for each PFT, the leaf area index (LAI) that maximizes net primary production (NPP), subject to the constraint that NPP must be sufficient to maintain this LAI. Competition between PFTs is simulated by using the optimal NPP of each PFT as an index of competitiveness, with additional rules to approximate the dynamic equilibrium between natural disturbance and succession driven by light competition. Model output consists of a quantitative vegetation state description in terms of the dominant PFT, secondary PFTs present, and the total LAI and NPP for the ecosystem. Canopy conductance is treated as a function of the calculated optimal photosynthetic rate and water stress. Regional evapotranspiration is calculated as a function of canopy conductance, equilibrium evapotranspiration rate, and soil moisture using a simple planetary boundary layer parameterization. This scheme results in a two-way coupling of the carbon and water fluxes through canopy conductance, allowing simulation of the response of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and leaf area to environmental factors including atmospheric CO2. Comparison with the mapped distribution of global vegetation shows that the model successfully reproduces the broad-scale patterns in potential natural vegetation distribution. Comparison with NPP measurements, and with an FPAR (fractional absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) climatology based on remotely sensed greenness measurements, provides further checks on the models internal logic. The model is envisaged as a tool for integrated analysis of the impacts of changes in climate and CO2 on ecosystem structure and function. (Less)


Geophysical Research Letters | 1996

Possible role of atmosphere‐biosphere interactions in triggering the Last Glaciation

Nathalie de Noblet; I. Colin Prentice; Sylvie Joussaume; Delphine Texier; Aurélie Botta; Alex Haxeltine

We coupled a global biome model iteratively with an atmospheric general circulation model to study the possible role of vegetation in the climate system, at the time of glacial inception 115,000 years ago. Orbital forcing alone was not sufficient to initiate glaciation when other components of the climate system were kept as present (atmospheric composition, oceans, biosphere and cryosphere). Summers were however cold enough to induce major vegetation shifts in high northern latitudes. Southward migration of the boreal forest/tundra limit helped to create favourable conditions for continental ice-sheet growth, with increasing snow depth and duration in Labrador, Arctic Canada and northern/western Fennoscandia. These results support a role for biogeophysical feedback in initiating glaciations.


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 1998

Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: First results of a model intercomparison study

Martin Heimann; Gerd Esser; Alex Haxeltine; J. Kaduk; David W. Kicklighter; Wolfgang Knorr; Gundolf H. Kohlmaier; A. D. McGuire; Jerry M. Melillo; Berrien Moore; R. D. Otto; I.C. Prentice; W. Sauf; Annette L. Schloss; Stephen Sitch; Uwe Wittenberg; Gudrun Würth

Results of an intercomparison among terrestrial biogeochemical models (TBMs) are reported, in which one diagnostic and five prognostic models have been run with the same long-term climate forcing. Monthly fields of net ecosystem production (NEP), which is the difference between net primary production (NPP) and heterotrophic respiration RH, at 0.5° resolution have been generated for the terrestrial biosphere. The monthly estimates of NEP in conjunction with seasonal CO2 flux fields generated by the seasonal Hamburg Model of the Oceanic Carbon Cycle (HAMOCC3) and fossil fuel source fields were subsequently coupled to the three-dimensional atmospheric tracer transport model TM2 forced by observed winds. The resulting simulated seasonal signal of the atmospheric CO2 concentration extracted at the grid cells corresponding to the locations of 27 background monitoring stations of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory network is compared with measurements from these sites. The Simple Diagnostic Biosphere Model (SDBM1), which is tuned to the atmospheric CO2 concentration at five monitoring stations in the northern hemisphere, successfully reproduced the seasonal signal of CO2 at the other monitoring stations. The SDBM1 simulations confirm that the north-south gradient in the amplitude of the atmospheric CO2 signal results from the greater northern hemisphere land area and the more pronounced seasonality of radiation and temperature in higher latitudes. In southern latitudes, ocean-atmosphere gas exchange plays an important role in determining the seasonal signal of CO2. Most of the five prognostic models (i.e., models driven by climatic inputs) included in the intercomparison predict in the northern hemisphere a reasonably accurate seasonal cycle in terms of amplitude and, to some extent, also with respect to phase. In the tropics, however, the prognostic models generally tend to overpredict the net seasonal exchanges and stronger seasonal cycles than indicated by the diagnostic model and by observations. The differences from the observed seasonal signal of CO2 may be caused by shortcomings in the phenology algorithms of the prognostic models or by not properly considering the effects of land use and vegetation fires on CO2 fluxes between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere.


Oecologia | 1998

Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: A comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)

Yude Pan; Jerry M. Melillo; A. D. McGuire; David W. Kicklighter; Louis F. Pitelka; K. Hibbard; L.L. Pierce; Steven W. Running; Dennis Ojima; William J. Parton; David S. Schimel; J. Borchers; Ronald P. Neilson; H.H. Fisher; Timothy G. F. Kittel; N.A. Rossenbloom; S. Fox; Alex Haxeltine; I.C. Prentice; Stephen Sitch; A. Janetos; R. McKeown; Ramakrisbna Nemani; T. Painter; Brian Rizzo; T. Smith; F.I. Woodward

Abstract Although there is a great deal of information concerning responses to increases in atmospheric CO2 at the tissue and plant levels, there are substantially fewer studies that have investigated ecosystem-level responses in the context of integrated carbon, water, and nutrient cycles. Because our understanding of ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 is incomplete, modeling is a tool that can be used to investigate the role of plant and soil interactions in the response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2. In this study, we analyze the responses of net primary production (NPP) to doubled CO2 from 355 to 710 ppmv among three biogeochemistry models in the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP): BIOME-BGC (BioGeochemical Cycles), Century, and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM). For the conterminous United States, doubled atmospheric CO2 causes NPP to increase by 5% in Century, 8% in TEM, and 11% in BIOME-BGC. Multiple regression analyses between the NPP response to doubled CO2 and the mean annual temperature and annual precipitation of biomes or grid cells indicate that there are negative relationships between precipitation and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for all three models. In contrast, there are different relationships between temperature and the response of NPP to doubled CO2 for the three models: there is a negative relationship in the responses of BIOME-BGC, no relationship in the responses of Century, and a positive relationship in the responses of TEM. In BIOME-BGC, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by the change in transpiration associated with reduced leaf conductance to water vapor. This change affects soil water, then leaf area development and, finally, NPP. In Century, the response of NPP to doubled CO2 is controlled by changes in decomposition rates associated with increased soil moisture that results from reduced evapotranspiration. This change affects nitrogen availability for plants, which influences NPP. In TEM, the NPP response to doubled CO2 is controlled by increased carboxylation which is modified by canopy conductance and the degree to which nitrogen constraints cause down-regulation of photosynthesis. The implementation of these different mechanisms has consequences for the spatial pattern of NPP responses, and represents, in part, conceptual uncertainty about controls over NPP responses. Progress in reducing these uncertainties requires research focused at the ecosystem level to understand how interactions between the carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles influence the response of NPP to elevated atmospheric CO2.


Journal of Vegetation Science | 1996

A coupled carbon and water flux model to predict vegetation structure

Alex Haxeltine; I. Colin Prentice; Ian David Creswell

A coupled carbon and water flux model (BIOME2) captures the broad-scale environmental controls on the natural distribution of vegetation structural and phenological types in Australia. Model input consists of latitude, soil type, and mean monthly climate (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours) data on a 1/10 degrees grid. Model output consists of foliage projective cover (FPC) for the quantitative combination of plant types that maximizes net primary production (NPP). The model realistically simulates changes in FPC along moisture gradients as a consequence of the trade-off between light capture and water stress. A two-layer soil hydrology model also allows simulation of the competitive balance between grass and woody vegetation including the strong effects of soil texture.


Climate Dynamics | 1997

Quantifying the role of biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks in climate change : coupled model simulations for 6000 years BP and comparison with palaeodata for northern Eurasia and northern Africa

Delphine Texier; N. de Noblet; Sandy P. Harrison; Alex Haxeltine; D. Jolly; Sylvie Joussaume; F. Laarif; I. C. Prentice; Pavel E. Tarasov


Science | 1997

Effect of Low Glacial Atmospheric CO2 on Tropical African Montane Vegetation

D. Jolly; Alex Haxeltine


Tellus B | 1996

Methane flux from northern wetlands and tundra

T. R. Christensen; I. C. Prentice; Jed O. Kaplan; Alex Haxeltine; Stephen Sitch


Archive | 1996

An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes

Jonathan A. Foley; I. Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Silvina Levis; David Pollard; Stephen Sitch; Alex Haxeltine

Collaboration


Dive into the Alex Haxeltine's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. D. McGuire

University of Alaska Fairbanks

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Pollard

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Kicklighter

Marine Biological Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jerry M. Melillo

Marine Biological Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan A. Foley

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Navin Ramankutty

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge