Alex Vilkin

Mutations in Both KRAS and BRAF May Contribute to the Methylator Phenotype in Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) often associate with epigenetic silencing of hMLH1 and an activating mutation in the BRAF gene. However, the current CIMP criteria are ambiguous and often result in an underestimation of CIMP frequencies in CRCs. Because BRAF and KRAS belong to same signaling pathway, we hypothesized that not only mutations in BRAF but mutant KRAS may also associate with CIMP in CRC. METHODS We determined the methylation status in a panel of 14 markers (7 canonical CIMP-related loci and 7 new loci), microsatellite instability status, and BRAF/KRAS mutations in a collection of 487 colorectal tissues that included both sporadic and Lynch syndrome patients. RESULTS Methylation analysis of 7 CIMP-related markers revealed that the mean number of methylated loci was highest in BRAF-mutated CRCs (3.6) vs KRAS-mutated (1.2, P < .0001) or BRAF/KRAS wild-type tumors (0.7, P < .0001). However, analyses with 7 additional markers showed that the mean number of methylated loci in BRAF mutant tumors (4.4) was the same as in KRAS mutant CRCs (4.3, P = .8610). Although sporadic microsatellite instability high tumors had the highest average number of methylated markers (8.4), surprisingly, Lynch syndrome CRCs also demonstrated frequent methylation (5.1). CONCLUSIONS CIMP in CRC may result from activating mutations in either BRAF or KRAS, and the inclusion of additional methylation markers that correlate with mutant KRAS may help clarify CIMP in future studies. Additionally, aberrant DNA methylation is a common event not only in sporadic CRC but also in Lynch syndrome CRCs.

Mucin function in inflammatory bowel disease: an update.

MUC2 is the primary component of the mucin barrier that separates the intestinal microbiota and the intestinal epithelium. This mucous barrier is affected by both luminal/microbial factors and host/immune factors, both of which have genetic and environmental determinants. The complex interactions between these players in health and disease states are not fully understood. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has both genetic and environmental etiologies that lead to the breakdown of the epithelial barrier. In this review, we explore the up-to-date evidence that implicates mucin in the pathogenesis of IBD. In IBD, quantitative changes in mucin secretion occur, as well as structural changes in mucin’s glycoprotein core and the sulfation and sialylation of mucin’s oligosaccharide residues. These changes are associated with a diminished functionality of the mucous barrier. We identify the various genetic mutations associated with these changes and outline the animal models that have enhanced the current understanding of the genetic basis for IBD. Further study is needed to better characterize the immune and genetic influences on mucin expression and secretion and role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and a defective unfolded protein response in mediating these changes.

Factors affecting compliance in faecal occult blood testing: a cluster randomized study of the faecal immunochemical test versus the guaiac faecal occult test

Objective To compare the uptake of faecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT) with guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) in a screening programme, with specific attention to the demographic and socioeconomic factors that might affect test uptake. Setting The Clalit Health Service screening programme, Israel. Methods Average-risk individuals aged 50–75 years were randomized into a FIT arm or gFOBT arm using a programme based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of their primary care clinics. G-FOBT was performed with Hemoccult SENSA™ (3 evacuations) and FIT with the OC- MICRO™ (3 evacuations, refrigerating mandated). The GLIMMIX model was used. Results There were 5,464 and 10,668 eligible participants in the FIT and gFOBT arms respectively. Compliance in taking the kits was better (but not statistically significantly better) with gFOBT (37.8% vs. 29.3%; odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [95% CI 0.73–2.80]; P = 0.227). Kit return was higher in the FIT arm (65.0% vs. 78.9%; OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.24–0.83], P = 0.021). Overall test uptake was affected by age, gender, being immigrant and SES (determined by whether or not the participant paid national insurance tax, and the SES of the primary care clinic). The overall uptake of gFOBT and FIT was comparable (OR 0.996 [95% CI 0.46–2.17], P = 0.99). Conclusions Overall compliance for test uptake was comparable between the two methods despite the more demanding procedure in the FIT arm. Sociodemographic parameters were the major determinants of compliance. An educational programme, with emphasis on the sociodemographic characteristics of the target population, should be instigated.

Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is not indicated in patients with positive immunochemical test and nonexplanatory colonoscopy.

Objectives Patients with positive fecal occult blood test and unrevealing colonoscopy are often advised to undergo esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) to exclude a bleeding source in the upper gastrointestinal tract. In this study, we evaluated EGD findings in patients with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test (I-FOBT) not explained by colonoscopy. Methods Out of 1221 consecutive patients having total colonoscopy after preparing I-FOBT (OC-MICRO, with threshold of 75 or 100 ngHb/ml), we included only patients without colorectal cancer or advanced adenomatous polyp on colonoscopy, who also underwent EGD within 4 months of the fecal blood testing. Findings on EGD were classified as those lesions which are likely or unlikely to bleed. Results EGD was performed in 160 patients after a negative colonoscopy. The procedure was performed 1.6±1.4 months after the I-FOBT. Lesion with a bleeding potential was found in 24 patients (15%). In three (12.5%) and two (8.3%) of these patients I-FOBT was positive at the 75 and 100 ngHb/ml threshold, respectively. In 136 patients EGD was normal, and I-FOBT was similarly positive in 16 (11.7%) and 13 patients (9.5%), respectively. The mean fecal hemoglobin was also similar between the groups. Conclusion Immunological FOBT positivity was not correlated with the finding of lesions, which are likely to bleed on EGD. Thus, EGD is probably not indicated in patients with positive I-FOBT and unrevealing colonoscopy.

Gastric mucin expression in Helicobacter pylori-related, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related and idiopathic ulcers

AIM To determine the pattern of secreted mucin expression in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-related, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related and idiopathic gastric ulcers. METHODS We randomly selected 92 patients with H. pylori-associated (n = 30), NSAID-associated (n = 18), combined H. pylori and NSAID-associated gastric ulcers (n = 24), and patients with idiopathic gastric ulcers (n = 20). Immunohistochemistry for T-cell CD4/CD8, and for mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) and mucin 6 (MUC6), was performed on sections of the mucosa from the ulcer margin. Inflammation score was assessed according to the Sydney system. RESULTS MUC5AC was expressed on the surface epithelium (98.9%) and neck glands (98.9%) with minimal expression in the deep glands (6.5%). MUC6 was strongly expressed in the deep glands (97.8%), variable in the neck glands (19.6%) and absent in the surface epithelium (0%). The pattern of mucin expression in idiopathic ulcer margins was not different from the expression in ulcers associated with H. pylori, NSAIDs, or combined H. pylori and NSAIDs. CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in H. pylori-positive patients (P = 0.009). Idiopathic ulcers are associated with hospitalized patients and have higher bleeding and mortality rates. CONCLUSION Idiopathic ulcers have a unique clinical profile. Gastric mucin expression in idiopathic gastric ulcers is unchanged compared with H. pylori and/or NSAID-associated ulcers.

Patients with sporadic colorectal cancer or advanced adenomatous polyp have elevated anti-JC virus antibody titer in comparison with healthy controls: a cross-sectional study.

Objective JC virus (JCV) is thought to infect approximately 80% of the human population. Antibodies against JCV can be found in the sera of many people with and without colorectal carcinoma (CRC). We hypothesized that JCV antibody titer will be higher in CRC patients than in healthy controls. Aim To evaluate this hypothesis in a cohort of patients undergoing colonoscopy. We compared JCV antibody titers in patients with simple adenoma, advanced adenomatous polyp (AAP), CRC, and healthy controls, and evaluated JCV DNA in the tissue. Methods Ninety-seven patients undergoing colonoscopy offered to participate in the study. Normal colonoscopy, simple adenoma, AAP, and CRC were found in 41, 19, 12, and 25 cases, respectively. A blood sample was taken for JCV DNA isolation and serology. In 18 patients with CRC or AAP tissue samples were taken for JCV DNA isolation and T-antigen (T-Ag) detection. Results A positive correlation was found between a JCV antibody titer and advanced colonic pathology. The average titer for normal controls, simple polyp, AAP, and CRC was 2.61±0.72, 2.95±0.77, 3.33±0.76, and 3.30±0.50 log, respectively (P<0.001). Viral DNA could not be shown in the serum. The presence of neoplastic tissue T-Ag (in 33.3% of the patients) was not associated with a difference in the log titer of serum antibody. Conclusions In this study we showed that patients with advanced neoplasia, compared with patients with normal colonoscopy, harbor a higher JCV antibody titer in the serum. If confirmed, our finding may serve as a marker for CRC or for an earlier stage of AAP.

Gastric mucin expression in first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients.

Objectives There are currently no accepted clinical guidelines for the surveillance of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of gastric cancer patients. The existence of intestinal metaplasia, as well as altered mucin expression, might be associated with an increased risk for gastric cancer. In the present study we aimed to investigate the mucin phenotype of individuals with a family history of gastric cancer. Methods We included FDRs of gastric cancer patients. Individuals with functional chest pain served as controls. Upper endoscopy including extensive biopsy according to the Olga protocol was performed. Immunohistochemical staining for MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 was performed. Sera were assayed for pepsinogen I and II. Helicobacter status was determined through Giemsa staining and serological tests. Results Forty FDRs and eight controls were included; the mean age was 46.7±12.0 years. In both the study group and the control group there were no gross endoscopic findings and no histological evidence of intestinal metaplasia. Superficial MUC1 expression was significantly increased in the study group (47.5 vs. 0%; P=0.01). There was no difference in the expression of deep MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, or MUC6 between the groups, nor was there a difference in pepsinogen I/II levels or Helicobacter pylori exposure (35.0 vs. 25.0%; P=0.46). Conclusion Despite normal appearing mucosa and the absence of intestinal metaplasia according to histological analysis, FDRs of gastric cancer patients show increased expression of MUC1, which may serve as a predictor of future intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and cancer. Further studies are needed to verify these findings and their implications.

Immunohistochemistry staining for mismatch repair proteins: the endoscopic biopsy material provides useful and coherent results☆☆☆

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for mismatch repair proteins (MMRP) in patients with colorectal cancer can be performed on endoscopic biopsy material or the surgical resection material. Data are continuing to accumulate regarding the deleterious effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on MMRP expression. However, despite continuing rise in the use of endoscopic biopsies for IHC, most pathology departments still use mainly the surgical materials for IHC testing. In this study we compared the quality of stains among 96 colon cancer subjects with paired endoscopic and surgical material available for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 stains (96 × 4, yielding 384 paired stains). Each slide received both a quantitative score (immunoreactivity [0-3] × percent positivity [0-4]) and a qualitative score (absent; weak and focal; strong). The quantitative scores of all MMRP were significantly higher among the endoscopic material (P<.001 for all). In 358 pairs (93.2%), both the endoscopic and operative material stained either strong (322, 83.9%) or absent (36, 9.4%). In 26 pairs (6.8%), the endoscopic material stained strong, whereas the operative material stained focal and weak. No endoscopic biopsy materials stained focal and weak. Our findings indicate that the biopsy material may provide more coherent results. Although these results may indicate that biopsy material provides coherent and useful results, it is yet to be determined if the demonstrated differences pose a real clinical problem in interpreting final results of IHC staining of such kind. Hence, we suggest that when available, the endoscopic material rather than the operative one should serve as the primary substrate for IHC staining.

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency and Lynch syndrome among consecutive Arab Bedouins with colorectal cancer in Israel

We assessed the molecular characteristics and the frequency of mutations in mismatch-repair genes among Bedouin patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Israel. Bedouin patients with a diagnosis of CRC at a major hospital in the southern part of Israel were deemed eligible for this study. The primary screening method was immunohistochemical staining for mismatch-repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). For subjects with abnormal immunohistochemical staining, we performed microsatellite instability (MSI) analyses, and for tumors with a loss of MLH1 expression we also performed BRAF testing. In MSI high cases we searched further for germline mutations. Of the 24 patients enrolled, four subjects (16.7%) had MSI high tumors: one subject was found to harbor a biallelic PMS2 mutation, one subject had Lynch syndrome (LS) with MSH6 mutation and two subjects had a loss of MLH1/PMS2 proteins/BRAFwild type/normal MLH1 sequence. Ten patients (41.7%) were younger than 50 at the time of diagnosis and none had first degree relatives with CRC. In conclusion, in this cohort of 24 consecutive Arab Bedouins with CRC, one patient was found to harbor a constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, one patient had LS with MSH6 mutation, and two patients had unresolved loss of MLH1/PMS2 proteins/BRAFwild type phenotype.

Sa1865 Colon Cancer Diagnosis by Multiple Biomarker Electrobiochemical Detection in Biopsy Slices

Back ground: Deep enteroscopy for the evaluation and treatment of small bowel pathology has undergone significant technology advancements over the last ten years. Studies directly comparing single (SBE) and double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) with spiral enteroscopy (SE) are few but suggest that the three techniques are comparable. Method: Retrospective review of Spirus® small bowel endoscopy cases over 12 months Results: A single experienced endoscopist completed all cases. The patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. Two patients had strictures (one was dilated) and one had multiple arteriovenous malformations (coagulated with Argon Plasma). Two patients experienced complications. Case 1: A 77 year old female with remote radiation treatment for endometrial carcinoma being evaluated for anemia had several slightly narrowed areas; all judged to be spacious enough to accommodate the overtube except one. The last area appeared tight and the overtube was unlocked as soon as it engaged the location and the scope alone was advanced further. Surprisingly the cecum was reached without difficulty. Upon endoscope withdrawal, bleeding was noted and a perforation was suspected. A tense abdomen was decompressed with a needle, rapidly stabilizing a low blood pressure. Perforation was identified and the segment with several strictures was resected. Case 2: A 44 year old female with cirrhosis secondary to primary sclerosing cholangitis status post hepaticojejunostomy had recurrent anastomotic strictures. On SE assisted ERCP, a perforation was suspected on radiography. ERCP was completed and exam was continued under water without gas insufflation. The perforation was found on the biliary limb and was not favorable for endoclip closure. The spilled intestinal contents were suctioned and pneumoperitoneum was decompressed allowing the patient to be comfortable and stable until laparotomy. A guidewire was placed endoscopically which allowed easy identification of the site during surgery (Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients with known or occult small bowel strictures and surgically altered anatomy with possible adhesional fixation may be at a higher risk of complications and we suggest caution with use of SE in these scenarios. When perforations occur, early recognition and immediate management are of benefit. Despite suffering complications, both patients benefited from their procedures. In case 1, the resection of the diseased intestine led to resolution of anemia. In Case 2, the bile duct stricture was successfully treated and she was bridged to transplant. Table 1: Patient characteristics