Alexander B. Brady
Stony Brook University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alexander B. Brady.
ACS Nano | 2015
Lijun Wu; Feng Xu; Yimei Zhu; Alexander B. Brady; Jianping Huang; Jessica L. Durham; Eric Dooryhee; Amy C. Marschilok; Esther S. Takeuchi; Kenneth J. Takeuchi
Hollandites (OMS-2) are an intriguing class of sorbents, catalysts, and energy storage materials with a tunnel structure permitting one-dimensional insertion and deinsertion of ions and small molecules along the c direction. A 7-fold increase in delivered capacity for Li/AgxMn8O16 electrochemical cells (160 versus 23 mAh/g) observed upon a seemingly small change in silver content (x ∼1.1 (L-Ag-OMS-2) and 1.6 (H-Ag-OMS-2)) led us to characterize the structure and defects of the silver hollandite material. Herein, Ag hollandite nanorods are studied through the combined use of local (atomic imaging, electron diffraction, electron energy-loss spectroscopy) and bulk (synchrotron based X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis) techniques. Selected area diffraction and high resolution transmission electron microscopy show a structure consistent with that refined by XRD; however, the Ag occupancy varies significantly even within neighboring channels. Both local and bulk measurements indicate a greater quantity of oxygen vacancies in L-Ag-OMS-2, resulting in lower average Mn valence relative to H-Ag-OMS-2. Electron energy loss spectroscopy shows a lower Mn oxidation state on the surface relative to the interior of the nanorods, where the average Mn valence is approximately Mn(3.7+) for H-Ag-OMS-2 and Mn(3.5+) for L-Ag-OMS-2 nanorods, respectively. The higher delivered capacity of L-Ag-OMS-2 may be related to more oxygen vacancies compared to H-Ag-OMS-2. Thus, the oxygen vacancies and MnO6 octahedra distortion are assumed to open the MnO6 octahedra walls, facilitating Li diffusion in the ab plane. These results indicate crystallite size and surface defects are significant factors affecting battery performance.
Accounts of Chemical Research | 2018
Lisa M. Housel; Lei Wang; Alyson Abraham; Jianping Huang; Genesis D. Renderos; Calvin D. Quilty; Alexander B. Brady; Amy C. Marschilok; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi
Future advances in energy storage systems rely on identification of appropriate target materials and deliberate synthesis of the target materials with control of their physiochemical properties in order to disentangle the contributions of distinct properties to the functional electrochemistry. This goal demands systematic inquiry using model materials that provide the opportunity for significant synthetic versatility and control. Ideally, a material family that enables direct manipulation of characteristics including composition, defects, and crystallite size while remaining within the defined structural framework would be necessary. Accomplishing this through direct synthetic methods is desirable to minimize the complicating effects of secondary processing. The structural motif most frequently used for insertion type electrodes is based on layered type structures where ion diffusion in two dimensions can be envisioned. However, lattice expansion and contraction associated with the ion movement and electron transfer as a result of repeated charge and discharge cycling can result in structural degradation and amorphization with accompanying loss of capacity. In contrast, tunnel type structures embody a more rigid framework where the inherent structural design can accommodate the presence of cations and often multiple cations. Of specific interest are manganese oxides as they can exhibit a tunneled structure, termed α-MnO2, and are an important class of nanomaterial in the fields of catalysis, adsorption-separation, and ion-exchange. The α-MnO2 structure has one-dimensional 2 × 2 tunnels formed by corner and edge sharing manganese octahedral [MnO6] units and can be readily substituted in the central tunnel by a variety of cations of varying size. Importantly, α-MnO2 materials possess a rich chemistry with significant synthetic versatility allowing deliberate synthetic control of structure, composition, crystallite size, and defect content. This Account considers the investigation of α-MnO2 tunnel type structures and their electrochemistry. Examination of the reported findings on this material family demonstrates that multiple physiochemical properties influence the electrochemistry. The retention of the parent structure during charge and discharge cycling, the material composition including the identity and content of the central cation, the surface condition including oxygen vacancies, and crystallite size have all been demonstrated to impact electrochemical function. The selection of the α-MnO2 family of materials as a model system and the ability to control the variables associated with the structural family affirm that full investigation of the mechanisms related to active materials in an electrochemical system demands concerted efforts in synthetic material property control and multimodal characterization, combined with theory and modeling. This then enables more complete understanding of the factors that must be controlled to achieve consistent and desirable outcomes.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces | 2018
Paul F. Smith; Alexander B. Brady; Seung-Yong Lee; Andrea M. Bruck; Eric Dooryhee; Lijun Wu; Yimei Zhu; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi; Amy C. Marschilok
α-MnO2-structured materials are generally classified as semiconductors; thus, we present a strategy to increase electrochemical utilization through the design of a conductive material interface. Surface treatment of silver hollandite (AgxMn8O16) with Ag+ (Ag2O) provides significant benefits to the resultant electrochemistry, including a decreased charge-transfer resistance and a 2-fold increase in deliverable energy density at a high rate. The improved function of this designed interface relative to conventional electrode fabrication strategies is highlighted.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | 2015
Kevin C. Kirshenbaum; David C. Bock; Alexander B. Brady; Amy C. Marschilok; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi
Chemistry of Materials | 2017
Yiman Zhang; Christopher J. Pelliccione; Alexander B. Brady; Haoyue Guo; Paul F. Smith; Ping Liu; Amy C. Marschilok; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | 2016
Christina A. Cama; Christopher J. Pelliccione; Alexander B. Brady; Jing Li; Eric A. Stach; J.X. Wang; Jun Wang; Esther S. Takeuchi; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Amy C. Marschilok
Chemistry of Materials | 2017
Qing Zhang; Alexander B. Brady; Christopher J. Pelliccione; David C. Bock; Andrea M. Bruck; Jing Li; Varun Sarbada; R. Hull; Eric A. Stach; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi; Ping Liu; Amy C. Marschilok
Chemical Communications | 2017
Jiefu Yin; Alexander B. Brady; Esther S. Takeuchi; Amy C. Marschilok; Kenneth J. Takeuchi
Chemistry of Materials | 2016
Ruibo Zhang; Tesfaye A. Abtew; Nicholas F. Quackenbush; Linda Wangoh; Matthew M. Huie; Alexander B. Brady; David C. Bock; Harry Efstathiadis; M. Stanley Whittingham; Amy C. Marschilok; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Esther S. Takeuchi; Peihong Zhang; L. F. J. Piper
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | 2017
Jessica L. Durham; Alexander B. Brady; Christina A. Cama; David C. Bock; Christopher J. Pelliccione; Qing Zhang; Mingyuan Ge; Yue Ru Li; Yiman Zhang; Hanfei Yan; Xiaojing Huang; Yong S. Chu; Esther S. Takeuchi; Kenneth J. Takeuchi; Amy C. Marschilok