Alexander Felzenbaum
Weizmann Institute of Science
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alexander Felzenbaum.
Discrete Mathematics | 1993
Alexander Felzenbaum; Ron Holzman; Daniel J. Kleitman
Abstract We characterize the n -tuples (a 1 ,…,a n ) for which one can find a i lines in the i th direction in the n -cube, i =1,… n , so that all lines are disjoint.
Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society | 1986
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
We announce some new results about systems of residue sets. A residue set R C Z is an arithmetic progression R = {a,a±n,a± 2n,...}. The positive integer n is referred to as the modulus of R. Following Znam [21] we denote this set by a(n). We need several number-theoretic functions. p(ra)-the least prime divisor of a natural number ra, P(m)-the greatest prime divisor of ra, A(m)-the greatest divisor of m which is a power of a single prime: A(ra) = max{d G Z: d\m, d = p s , p prime}, /(ra) = Ylj=i s j(Pj ~ 1) + 1> where ra has the prime factorization ra = Si Si g(m) = rij-iU + X J) ~ Ei=i x 3 ~ !> where Z^k=o Pj Pj 2^k=o Pj and m has the above prime factorization, <p(ra)-Eulers totient function, [x]-the greatest integer in x.a t (nt)), t > 1, which partition Z. The multiplicity of a modulus n = rik is the number of sets in D with that modulus. The multiplicity of D is the maximum multiplicity of its moduli. THEOREM 1. The multiplicity of any modulus n = rik is at least (1) mi = min A (-, r). ni^n \{n,ni)J The multiplicity of D is at least (2) m 2-N + 1,
Combinatorica | 1986
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
A direct combinatorial proof is given to a generalization of the fact that the largest modulusN of a disjoint covering system appears at leastp times in the system, wherep is the smallest prime dividingN. The method is based on geometric properties of lattice parallelotopes.
Journal of Combinatorial Theory | 1986
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
Abstract We prove that for a disjoint covering system with rational moduli, the two largest numerators of the moduli are identical. Furthermore, if the two moduli corresponding to these two identical numerators are distinct, then actually the three largest numerators of the moduli are identical for a system with at least three moduli.
Discrete Applied Mathematics | 1990
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
Abstract We develop the lattice geometry which corresponds to irreducible disjoint covering systems of residue sets. For such systems Korec has established a stronger version of Mycielskis inequality, which gives a lower bound on the size of the system in terms of its moduli. We show how the lattice geometry can be used to interpret this and obtain a stronger result. Of particular interest here are the collapsible cell partitions, which are the geometric analogue of the natural disjoint covering systems introduced by Porubský.
Linear Algebra and its Applications | 1987
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum
Abstract We study the sign pattern relationship between a matrix and its inverse. To do so we examine the graph whose vertices are the sign pattern matrices, and whose edges connect those which are possible sign patterns of a matrix and its inverse. We have bounds for the degree, connectivity, radius, and diameter of this graph. In addition we have the complete description for the 3 × 3 case.
Discrete Mathematics | 1987
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
Abstract The purpose of this work is two-fold. First, to establish a connection between certain partitions of lattice point parallelotopes, and disjoint (or exact) covering systems of residue sets. The study of these partitions involves both geometry and combinatorics. Second, as particular consequences of this connection, Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 5.2 are obtained. Theorem 4.1 relates the multiplicity of a disjoint covering system to the prime factors of its moduli. This result can be interpreted either as a lower bound for the multiplicity, given the prime factors, or as an upper bound for the prime factors, given the multiplicity (cf. Burshtein [13]). In particular, it establishes Burshteins conjecture (in fact somewhat more) for general disjoint covering systems. Corollary 5.2 proves a Newman-Znam type lower bound [17, 19] for the multiplicity of maximal moduli in systems of residue sets whose covering functions are identically constant modulo γ, for some number γ. These systems are generalizations of disjoint covering systems, for which the covering function is identically one.
Fundamenta Mathematicae | 1987
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
Acta Arithmetica | 1988
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin | 1986
Marc A. Berger; Alexander Felzenbaum; Aviezri S. Fraenkel