Alexander Kiani

Manipulating Immune Responses with Immunosuppressive Agents that Target NFAT

We thank Patrick Hogan, Jugnu Jain, and Cristina Lopez-Rodriguez for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (A. R.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (A. K.), and the Arthritis Foundation (J. A.). A. R. was a Stohlman Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America.

Treatment of refractory acute GVHD with third-party MSC expanded in platelet lysate-containing medium

Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to mediate immunomodulatory effects. They have been used in patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD (aGVHD), but their relevance as a therapeutic agent targeting aGVHD has still to be defined. In this case series, we report 13 patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD who received BM-derived MSC expanded in platelet lysate-containing medium from unrelated HLA disparate donors. MSC were characterized by their morphological, phenotypical and functional properties. All tested preparations suppressed the proliferation of in vitro activated CD4+ T cells. MSC were transfused at a median dosage of 0.9 × 106/kg (range 0.6–1.1). The median number of MSC applications was 2 (range 1–5). Only two patients (15%) responded and did not require any further escalation of immunosuppressive therapy. Eleven patients received additional salvage immunosuppressive therapy concomitant to further MSC transfusions, and after 28 days, five of them (45%) showed a response. Four patients (31%) are alive after a median follow-up of 257 days, including one patient who initially responded to MSC treatment. In our patient cohort, response to MSC transfusion was lower than in the series reported earlier. However, our experience supports the potential efficacy of MSC in the treatment of steroid-refractory aGVHD.

Azacitidine for treatment of imminent relapse in MDS or AML patients after allogeneic HSCT: results of the RELAZA trial

This study evaluated azacitidine as treatment of minimal residual disease (MRD) determined by a sensitive donor chimerism analysis of CD34+ blood cells to pre-empt relapse in patients with CD34+ myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). At a median of 169 days after HSCT, 20/59 prospectively screened patients experienced a decrease of CD34+ donor chimerism to <80% and received four azacitidine cycles (75u2009mg/m2/day for 7 days) while in complete hematologic remission. A total of 16 patients (80%) responded with either increasing CD34+ donor chimerism to ⩾80% (n=10; 50%) or stabilization (n=6; 30%) in the absence of relapse. Stabilized patients and those with a later drop of CD34+ donor chimerism to <80% after initial response were eligible for subsequent azacitidine cycles. A total of 11 patients (55%) received a median of 4 (range, 1–11) additional cycles. Eventually, hematologic relapse occurred in 13 patients (65%), but was delayed until a median of 231 days (range, 56–558) after initial decrease of CD34+ donor chimerism to <80%. In conclusion, pre-emptive azacitidine treatment has an acceptable safety profile and can substantially prevent or delay hematologic relapse in patients with MDS or AML and MRD after allogeneic HSCT.

Addition of sorafenib versus placebo to standard therapy in patients aged 60 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (SORAML): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUNDnPreclinical data and results from non-randomised trials suggest that the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib might be an effective drug for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib versus placebo in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia aged 60 years or younger.nnnMETHODSnThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was done at 25 sites in Germany. We enrolled patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia who had a WHO clinical performance score 0-2, adequate renal and liver function, no cardiac comorbidities, and no recent trauma or operation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive two cycles of induction therapy with daunorubicin (60 mg/m(2) on days 3-5) plus cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) on days 1-7), followed by three cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy (3 g/m(2) twice daily on days 1, 3, and 5) plus either sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo on days 10-19 of induction cycles 1 and 2, from day 8 of each consolidation, and as maintenance for 12 months. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation was scheduled for all intermediate-risk patients with a sibling donor and for all high-risk patients with a matched donor in first remission. Computer-generated randomisation was done in blocks. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, with an event defined as either primary treatment failure or relapse or death, assessed in all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. We report the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00893373, and the EU Clinical Trials Register (2008-004968-40).nnnFINDINGSnBetween March 27, 2009, and Nov 28, 2011, 276 patients were enrolled and randomised, of whom nine did not receive study medication. 267 patients were included in the primary analysis (placebo, n=133; sorafenib, n=134). With a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR 35·5-38·1), median event-free survival was 9 months (95% CI 4-15) in the placebo group versus 21 months (9-32) in the sorafenib group, corresponding to a 3-year event-free survival of 22% (95% CI 13-32) in the placebo group versus 40% (29-51) in the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 95% CI; 0·45-0·91; p=0·013). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in both groups were fever (71 [53%] in the placebo group vs 73 [54%] in the sorafenib group), infections (55 [41%] vs 46 [34%]), pneumonia (21 [16%] vs 20 [14%]), and pain (13 [10%] vs 15 [11%]). Grade 3 or worse adverse events that were significantly more common in the sorafenib group than the placebo group were fever (relative risk [RR] 1·54, 95% CI 1·04-2·28), diarrhoea (RR 7·89, 2·94-25·2), bleeding (RR 3·75, 1·5-10·0), cardiac events (RR 3·46, 1·15-11·8), hand-foot-skin reaction (only in sorafenib group), and rash (RR 4·06, 1·25-15·7).nnnINTERPRETATIONnIn patients with acute myeloid leukaemia aged 60 years or younger, the addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy has antileukaemic efficacy but also increased toxicity. Our findings suggest that kinase inhibitors could be a useful addition to curative treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia. Overall survival after long-term follow-up and strategies to reduce toxicity are needed to determine the future role of sorafenib in treatment of this disease.nnnFUNDINGnBayer HealthCare.

Minimal residual disease-directed preemptive treatment with azacitidine in patients with NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia and molecular relapse

Therapeutic options are often limited in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who relapse after intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); only a few will achieve long-lasting remissions with salvage chemotherapy or a 2nd HSCT. Furthermore, relapse

Prophylactic transfer of BCR-ABL–, PR1-, and WT1-reactive donor T cells after T cell–depleted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Donor lymphocyte infusions have been effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but their use is associated with the risk of graft-versus-host disease. We investigated the effects of prophylactic infusion of in vitro-generated donor T cells reactive against peptides derived from CML-associated antigens. Fourteen CML patients received conditioning therapy followed by CD34(+)-selected peripheral blood stem cells from matched siblings (n = 7) or unrelated (n = 7) donors. Donor-derived mature dendritic cells generated in vitro from CD14(+) monocytes were loaded with human leukocyte Ag-restricted peptides derived from PR1, WT1, and/or B-cell receptor-ABL and used to repetitively stimulate donor CD8(+) T cells in the presence of IL-2 and IL-7. Stimulated T cells were infused 28, 56, and 112 days after transplantation. Thirteen patients are alive and 7 remain in molecular remission (median follow-up, 45 months). Interestingly, all 4 patients receiving CD8(+) T cells displaying marked cytotoxic activity in vitro and detectable peptide-reactive CD8(+) T cells during follow-up have not experienced graft-versus-host disease or relapse. Our study reveals that prophylactic infusion of allogeneic CD8(+) T cells reactive against peptides derived from CML-associated antigens is a safe and promising therapeutic strategy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00460629.

Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in a patient with end-stage renal disease: effective clearance of its main metabolite by standard hemodialysis treatment

PurposeGemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a cytotoxic agent with a low toxicity profile and proven activity against a number of solid tumors. It is not known whether gemcitabine is safe to administer to patients with kidney failure, and if dose adjustment is necessary. We determined the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its noncytotoxic metabolite 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in a patient with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis therapy.Patient and methodsA 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer and end-stage renal disease received two cycles of gemcitabine at a standard dose of 1000xa0mg/m2 given as a 30-min infusion on daysxa01 and 10. A regular 3.5-h hemodialysis treatment was performed 24xa0h after each infusion. Plasma and dialysate concentrations of gemcitabine and dFdU were determined by HPLC. The tolerability of gemcitabine treatment was assessed by clinical and laboratory parameters.ResultsFor gemcitabine, the maximal plasma concentration, terminal half-life (t1/2) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were similar to those reported for patients with normal renal function. In contrast, end-stage renal disease resulted in a five- to tenfold prolongation of terminal half-life and a distinct increase in the AUC of plasma dFdU in this patient. Plasma dFdU was effectively eliminated by hemodialysis treatment. Both cycles of gemcitabine were tolerated well with no unexpected side effects observed.ConclusionsGemcitabine treatment in end-stage renal disease with intermittent standard hemodialysis treatment is safe and well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic data suggest that dose adjustment of gemcitabine should be avoided to ensure its full cytotoxic activity, and that hemodialysis treatment should be initiated 6–12xa0h after its administration to minimize the potential side effects of the metabolite dFdU.

Rapid reconstitution of dendritic cells after allogeneic transplantation of CD133+ selected hematopoietic stem cells

Rapid reconstitution of dendritic cells after allogeneic transplantation of CD133 + selected hematopoietic stem cells

Expression and regulation of NFAT (nuclear factors of activated T cells) in human CD34+ cells: down-regulation upon myeloid differentiation

The calcineurin‐dependent, cyclosporin A (CsA)‐sensitive transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) represents a group of proteins, which is well‐characterized as a central regulatory element of cytokine expression in activated T cells. In contrast, little is known about the expression or function of NFAT family members in myeloid cells; moreover, it is unclear whether they are expressed by hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Here, we show that NFATc2 (NFAT1) is expressed at high levels in CD34+ cells and megakaryocytes but not in cells committed to the neutrophilic, monocytic, or erythroid lineages. Cytokine‐induced in vitro differentiation of CD34+ cells into neutrophil granulocytes results in the rapid suppression of NFATc2 RNA and protein. NFATc2 dephosphorylation/rephosphorylation as well as nuclear/cytoplasmic translocation in CD34+ cells follow the same calcineurin‐dependent pattern as in T lymphocytes, suggesting that NFATc2 activation in these cells is equally sensitive to inhibition with CsA. Finally, in vitro proliferation, but not differentiation, of CD34+ cells cultured in the presence of fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3L), stem cell factor, granulocyte macrophage‐colony stimulating factor (GM‐CSF), interleukin‐3, and G‐CSF is profoundly inhibited by treatment with CsA in a dose‐dependent manner. These results suggest a novel and unexpected role for members of the NFAT transcription factor family in the hematopoietic system.

T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia reactions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation represents the only curative approach for many hematological malignancies. During the last years the impact of the conditioning regimen has been re-assessed. With the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning the paradigm has changed from cytoreduction executed by high-dose radio-chemotherapy to immunological surveillance of leukemia by donor cells. Distinct subsets of T cells and NK cells contribute to graft-versus-leukemia reactions. So far, cytotoxic T lymphocytes are the mainstay of allogeneic immunotherapy. Here, we summarise the current knowledge of T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia reactions and present results from pre-clinical and clinical studies of T cell-based adoptive immunotherapy. We address the issues of feasibility and specificity of adoptive immunotransfer from a clinical point of view and discuss the prerequisites for successful clinical applications. Finally, the prospects for immunological research that have evolved with the increasing use of reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation are highlighted.