Alexander N. Shoushtari
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alexander N. Shoushtari.
Nature Medicine | 2017
Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R. Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M. Devlin; Matthew D. Hellmann; David Barron; Alison M. Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S. Ross; Jaclyn F. Hechtman; Deborah DeLair; Jinjuan Yao; Diana Mandelker; Donavan T. Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita Mohanty; Ryan Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa
Tumor molecular profiling is a fundamental component of precision oncology, enabling the identification of genomic alterations in genes and pathways that can be targeted therapeutically. The existence of recurrent targetable alterations across distinct histologically defined tumor types, coupled with an expanding portfolio of molecularly targeted therapies, demands flexible and comprehensive approaches to profile clinically relevant genes across the full spectrum of cancers. We established a large-scale, prospective clinical sequencing initiative using a comprehensive assay, MSK-IMPACT, through which we have compiled tumor and matched normal sequence data from a unique cohort of more than 10,000 patients with advanced cancer and available pathological and clinical annotations. Using these data, we identified clinically relevant somatic mutations, novel noncoding alterations, and mutational signatures that were shared by common and rare tumor types. Patients were enrolled on genomically matched clinical trials at a rate of 11%. To enable discovery of novel biomarkers and deeper investigation into rare alterations and tumor types, all results are publicly accessible.
Cancer Research | 2009
Amine Issa; Thomas X. Le; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Jacqueline D. Shields; Melody A. Swartz
Most carcinomas spread to distant sites through lymphatic vessels. Several preclinical and clinical studies have shown a positive correlation between the incidence of lymph node metastasis and secretion of the lymphatic growth factor vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) by tumor cells, suggesting tumor lymphangiogenesis as an escape mechanism. However, recent evidence has shown VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) expression on tumor cells and autocrine signaling, which increase metastatic potential. Furthermore, there is growing evidence implicating lymphatic-homing chemokine receptors, particularly C-C chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7), in lymph node metastasis. We report here that expressions of VEGF-C and CCR7 by tumor cells act synergistically to promote their invasion toward lymphatics. First, VEGF-C acts to increase lymphatic secretion of CCL21, which in turn drives CCR7-dependent tumor chemoinvasion toward lymphatics. Second, VEGF-C acts in an autocrine fashion to increase tumor invasiveness by increasing the proteolytic activity and motility of tumor cells in a three-dimensional matrix. Both of these effects are VEGFR-3 dependent and evident only in three-dimensional environments. We further verified that VEGF-C induces lymphatic CCL21 up-regulation in vivo by direct injection of VEGF-C protein intradermally in the mouse. Taken together, these results bridge the prometastatic functions of CCR7 and VEGF-C in tumors and show that, beyond lymphangiogenesis, VEGF-C promotes tumor invasion toward lymphatics by both autocrine and CCR7-dependent paracrine signaling mechanisms, which may be a significant cause of lymph node metastasis.
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Alexander M. Menzies; Douglas B. Johnson; Sangeetha Ramanujam; Victoria Atkinson; Annie Wong; John J. Park; Jennifer L. McQuade; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Katy K. Tsai; Zeynep Eroglu; Oliver Klein; Jessica C. Hassel; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Alexander Guminski; Ryan J. Sullivan; Antoni Ribas; Matteo S. Carlino; Michael A. Davies; Shahneen Sandhu
Background Anti-PD-1 antibodies (anti-PD-1) have clinical activity in a number of malignancies. All clinical trials have excluded patients with significant preexisting autoimmune disorders (ADs) and only one has included patients with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ipilimumab. We sought to explore the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 in such patients. Patients and methods Patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting ADs and/or major immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ipilimumab (requiring systemic immunosuppression) that were treated with anti-PD-1 between 1 July 2012 and 30 September 2015 were retrospectively identified. Results One hundred and nineteen patients from 13 academic tertiary referral centers were treated with anti-PD-1. In patients with preexisting AD (N = 52), the response rate was 33%. 20 (38%) patients had a flare of AD requiring immunosuppression, including 7/13 with rheumatoid arthritis, 3/3 with polymyalgia rheumatica, 2/2 with Sjogrens syndrome, 2/2 with immune thrombocytopaenic purpura and 3/8 with psoriasis. No patients with gastrointestinal (N = 6) or neurological disorders (N = 5) flared. Only 2 (4%) patients discontinued treatment due to flare, but 15 (29%) developed other irAEs and 4 (8%) discontinued treatment. In patients with prior ipilimumab irAEs requiring immunosuppression (N = 67) the response rate was 40%. Two (3%) patients had a recurrence of the same ipilimumab irAEs, but 23 (34%) developed new irAEs (14, 21% grade 3-4) and 8 (12%) discontinued treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions In melanoma patients with preexisting ADs or major irAEs with ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 induced relatively frequent immune toxicities, but these were often mild, easily managed and did not necessitate discontinuation of therapy, and a significant proportion of patients achieved clinical responses. The results support that anti-PD-1 can be administered safely and can achieve clinical benefit in patients with preexisting ADs or prior major irAEs with ipilimumab.
Human Pathology | 2015
Sandra P. D’Angelo; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Narasimhan P. Agaram; Deborah Kuk; Li-Xuan Qin; Richard D. Carvajal; Mark A. Dickson; Mrinal M. Gounder; Mary Louise Keohan; Gary K. Schwartz; William D. Tap
The prognostic and predictive implications of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is unknown in sarcoma. We sought to examine the immune milieu in sarcoma specimens. We evaluated PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry in sarcoma specimens and quantified tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). We correlated expression with clinical parameters and outcomes. Fifty sarcoma patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were selected. Using the DAKO PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay and archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens; PD-L1 expression was examined. Macrophage and lymphocyte PD-L1 status was determined qualitatively. TIL was quantified. Associations between PD-L1 expression in tumor, macrophages and lymphocytes, TIL and clinical-pathological characteristics were performed. The median age was 46 years (range, 22-76), and 66% of patients were men. Tumor, lymphocyte and macrophage PD-L1 expression was noted in 12%, 30% and 58%, respectively, with the highest prevalence in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (29%). Lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration was present in 98% and 90%, respectively. There was no association between clinical features, overall survival and PD-L1 expression in tumor or immune infiltrates. Lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration is common in sarcoma, but PD-L1 tumor expression is uncommon in sarcoma with the highest frequency observed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. There was no association between PD-L1 expression, TIL and clinicopathological features and overall survival; however, this is limited by the heterogenous patient sample and minimal death events in the studied cohort.
JCO Precision Oncology | 2017
Debyani Chakravarty; Jianjiong Gao; Sarah Phillips; Ritika Kundra; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Julia E. Rudolph; Rona Yaeger; Tara Soumerai; Moriah H. Nissan; Matthew T. Chang; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Tiffany A. Traina; Paul K. Paik; Alan L. Ho; Feras M. Hantash; Andrew Grupe; Shrujal S. Baxi; Margaret K. Callahan; Alexandra Snyder; Ping Chi; Daniel C. Danila; Mrinal M. Gounder; James J. Harding; Matthew D. Hellmann; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y. Janjigian; Thomas Kaley; Douglas A. Levine; Maeve Aine Lowery
PURPOSE With prospective clinical sequencing of tumors emerging as a mainstay in cancer care, there is an urgent need for a clinical support tool that distills the clinical implications associated with specific mutation events into a standardized and easily interpretable format. To this end, we developed OncoKB, an expert-guided precision oncology knowledge base. METHODS OncoKB annotates the biological and oncogenic effect and the prognostic and predictive significance of somatic molecular alterations. Potential treatment implications are stratified by the level of evidence that a specific molecular alteration is predictive of drug response based on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, disease-focused expert group recommendations and the scientific literature. RESULTS To date, over 3000 unique mutations, fusions, and copy number alterations in 418 cancer-associated genes have been annotated. To test the utility of OncoKB, we annotated all genomic events in 5983 primary tumor samples in 19 cancer types. Forty-one percent of samples harbored at least one potentially actionable alteration, of which 7.5% were predictive of clinical benefit from a standard treatment. OncoKB annotations are available through a public web resource (http://oncokb.org/) and are also incorporated into the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics to facilitate the interpretation of genomic alterations by physicians and researchers. CONCLUSION OncoKB, a comprehensive and curated precision oncology knowledge base, offers oncologists detailed, evidence-based information about individual somatic mutations and structural alterations present in patient tumors with the goal of supporting optimal treatment decisions.
Cancer | 2016
Alain Patrick Algazi; Katy K. Tsai; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz; Zeynep Eroglu; Josep M. Piulats; Patrick A. Ott; Douglas B. Johnson; Jimmy Hwang; Adil Daud; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Richard D. Carvajal; Bartosz Chmielowski; Michael A. Postow; Jeffrey S. Weber; Ryan J. Sullivan
Antibodies inhibiting the programmed death receptor 1 (PD‐1) have demonstrated significant activity in the treatment of advanced cutaneous melanoma. The efficacy and safety of PD‐1 blockade in patients with uveal melanoma has not been well characterized.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Sandra P. D'Angelo; James Larkin; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Celeste Lebbe; Benjamin Brady; Bart Neyns; Henrik Schmidt; Jessica C. Hassel; F.S. Hodi; Paul Lorigan; Kerry J. Savage; Wilson H. Miller; Peter Mohr; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Julie Charles; Martin Kaatz; Mario Sznol; Jeffrey S. Weber; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Mary Ruisi; Joel Jiang; Jedd D. Wolchok
Purpose Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab (a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor), alone or combined with ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 checkpoint inhibitor), have not been reported in this rare melanoma subtype. Patients and Methods Data were pooled from 889 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy in clinical studies, including phase III trials; 86 (10%) had mucosal melanoma and 665 (75%) had cutaneous melanoma. Data were also pooled for patients who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (n = 35, mucosal melanoma; n = 326, cutaneous melanoma). Results Among patients who received nivolumab monotherapy, median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 5.4 months) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 23.3% (95% CI, 14.8% to 33.6%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 37.1% to 44.7%), respectively. Median progression-free survival in patients treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 16.7 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 37.1% (95% CI, 21.5% to 55.1%) and 60.4% (95% CI, 54.9% to 65.8%), respectively. For mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, respectively, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 8.1% and 12.5% for nivolumab monotherapy and 40.0% and 54.9% for combination therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of data for anti-programmed death-1 therapy in mucosal melanoma to date. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab seemed to have greater efficacy than either agent alone, and although the activity was lower in mucosal melanoma, the safety profile was similar between subtypes.
Nature Genetics | 2016
Amanda R. Moore; Emilie Ceraudo; Jessica Sher; Youxin Guan; Alexander N. Shoushtari; Matthew T. Chang; Jenny Zhang; Edward Walczak; Manija A. Kazmi; Barry S. Taylor; Thomas Huber; Ping Chi; Thomas P. Sakmar; Yu Chen
Uveal melanomas are molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanomas and lack mutations in BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and NF1. Instead, they are characterized by activating mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, two highly homologous α subunits of Gαq/11 heterotrimeric G proteins, and in PLCB4 (phospholipase C β4), the downstream effector of Gαq signaling. We analyzed genomics data from 136 uveal melanoma samples and found a recurrent mutation in CYSLTR2 (cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2) encoding a p.Leu129Gln substitution in 4 of 9 samples that lacked mutations in GNAQ, GNA11, and PLCB4 but in 0 of 127 samples that harbored mutations in these genes. The Leu129Gln CysLT2R mutant protein constitutively activates endogenous Gαq and is unresponsive to stimulation by leukotriene. Expression of Leu129Gln CysLT2R in melanocytes enforces expression of a melanocyte-lineage signature, drives phorbol ester–independent growth in vitro, and promotes tumorigenesis in vivo. Our findings implicate CYSLTR2 as a uveal melanoma oncogene and highlight the critical role of Gαq signaling in uveal melanoma pathogenesis.
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | 2011
Alexander N. Shoushtari; Russell Z. Szmulewitz; Carrie W. Rinker-Schaeffer
Over the past 25 years, an expanding set of metastasis-suppressor genes (MSGs) has been identified that specifically regulate metastasis formation without affecting primary growth. MSGs are involved in diverse molecular processes in multiple tumor types. Given the wealth of metastasis biology that underlies their functions, treatment strategies based on MSGs have an unparalleled potential to improve patient care. Using NM23 as a prime example, we discuss how specific MSGs have been used as prognostic markers, tools for predicting response to treatment, and targets for the development of novel therapies. Barriers specific to the translation of MSG biology into clinical practice are reviewed and future research directions necessary for clinical advances are delineated. Although to date the impact of MSGs on patient care is limited, it is an expanding field with vast potential to help develop new treatments and identify patients who will most benefit from them.
Cancer | 2016
Alexander N. Shoushtari; Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz; Deborah Kuk; Patrick A. Ott; Douglas B. Johnson; Katy K. Tsai; Suthee Rapisuwon; Zeynep Eroglu; Ryan J. Sullivan; Jason J. Luke; Tara C. Gangadhar; April K. Salama; Varina Clark; Clare Burias; Igor Puzanov; Michael B. Atkins; Alain Patrick Algazi; Antoni Ribas; Jedd D. Wolchok; Michael A. Postow
Therapeutic antibodies against programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD‐1) are considered front‐line therapy in metastatic melanoma. The efficacy of PD‐1 blockade for patients with biologically distinct melanomas arising from acral and mucosal surfaces has not been well described.