Alexandra H. Cunha

Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large-scale planting

In coastal and estuarine systems, foundation species like seagrasses, mangroves, saltmarshes or corals provide important ecosystem services. Seagrasses are globally declining and their reintroduction has been shown to restore ecosystem functions. However, seagrass restoration is often challenging, given the dynamic and stressful environment that seagrasses often grow in. From our world-wide meta-analysis of seagrass restoration trials (1786 trials), we describe general features and best practice for seagrass restoration. We confirm that removal of threats is important prior to replanting. Reduced water quality (mainly eutrophication), and construction activities led to poorer restoration success than, for instance, dredging, local direct impact and natural causes. Proximity to and recovery of donor beds were positively correlated with trial performance. Planting techniques can influence restoration success. The meta-analysis shows that both trial survival and seagrass population growth rate in trials that survived are positively affected by the number of plants or seeds initially transplanted. This relationship between restoration scale and restoration success was not related to trial characteristics of the initial restoration. The majority of the seagrass restoration trials have been very small, which may explain the low overall trial survival rate (i.e. estimated 37%). Successful regrowth of the foundation seagrass species appears to require crossing a minimum threshold of reintroduced individuals. Our study provides the first global field evidence for the requirement of a critical mass for recovery, which may also hold for other foundation species showing strong positive feedback to a dynamic environment.Synthesis and applications. For effective restoration of seagrass foundation species in its typically dynamic, stressful environment, introduction of large numbers is seen to be beneficial and probably serves two purposes. First, a large-scale planting increases trial survival - large numbers ensure the spread of risks, which is needed to overcome high natural variability. Secondly, a large-scale trial increases population growth rate by enhancing self-sustaining feedback, which is generally found in foundation species in stressful environments such as seagrass beds. Thus, by careful site selection and applying appropriate techniques, spreading of risks and enhancing self-sustaining feedback in concert increase success of seagrass restoration.

Biomass and leaf dynamics of Cymodocea nodosa in the Ria Formosa lagoon, South Portugal

Abstract We describe shoot density, aboveground and belowground biomass, form and leaf production per shoot over a one-year cycle for Cymodocea nodosa meadows in the Ria Formosa lagoon (South Portugal). Habitat conditions in Ria Formosa allow the development of lush meadows (up to 1752 shoots m-2), supporting high shoot biomass (up to 945 g DW m-2), high leaf productivity (up to 14 g DW m-2 d-1) and large shoots (up to 113 cm leaf length) despite being located at the northern limit of the distributional range in the Atlantic Ocean. Biomass in the meadows examined is higher than other Atlantic sites with C. nodosa, and comparable to the most productive seagrass meadows yet reported. Shoot morphometry and biomass distribution were variable within Ria Formosa, with the stands growing in muddy sediments having a lower ratio of belowground/aboveground biomass than those in sandy sites. C. nodosa had a clear unimodal growth cycle, reaching maximum leaf development in summer. Mean leaf length and number of leaves per shoot, the rate of appearance of new leaves and the rate of leaf fall, average leaf growth and leaf turnover rates (P/B) were minimal in February and March, and maximal in July and September. The high production of the meadows examined may be related to the high nutrient availability in Ria Formosa, evidenced by the high leaf nutrient content (3.4% of DW and 0.38% of DW for nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively).