Alexandra Thornadtsson

Extended nitric oxide analysis may improve personalized anti-inflammatory treatment in asthmatic children with intermediate FENO50

Exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO) is elevated in asthma, and a clinical practice guideline has been published with recommendations for anti-inflammatory treatment. It summarizes that a F(E)NO at an expiratory flow rate of 50 ml s(-1) (F(E)NO50) above 35 ppb in children indicates eosinophilic inflammation, and the most likely response is to use inhaled corticosteroids. Intermediate F(E)NO50 between 20-35 ppb should be interpreted cautiously. The aim of the study was to investigate this guideline in a small group of asthmatic children. Thirty-seven asthmatic children; 23 boys and 14 girls, visited the outpatient clinic, and provided exhaled breath samples for offline NO measurement. These samples were analysed with chemiluminescence techniques. Three flow rates, namely 16, 90 and 230 ml s(-1) were used for the extended NO analysis (Högman-Meriläinen algorithm, HMA) to estimate the alveolar concentration (C(A)NO), diffusion rate of the airway wall (D(aw)NO) and airway wall content (C(aw)NO). For accuracy of the HMA, the estimated value of F(E)NO at 50 ml s(-1) (F(E)NO50) was compared with measured F(E)NO50. In nine children the difference was more than 5 ppb and the data were therefore excluded. Five children with F(E)NO50 <20 ppb had no known allergy and their F(E)NO50 geometrical mean (25th; 75th percentile) was 11 (10;14) and CawNO was 32 (20;43) ppb. Ten children with F(E)NO50  >  35 ppb had an allergy and had F(E)NO50 of 56 (47;60) ppb and C(aw)NO of 140 (121;172) ppb. Thirteen children with allergies, with intermediate F(E)NO50, had F(E)NO50 of 27 (25;30) ppb with a wide range of C(aw)NO. In five of these children, values were comparable to healthy children, 44 (43;50) ppb while eight children had elevated C(aw)NO values of 108 (95;129) ppb. Our data indicate the clinical potential use of extended NO analysis to determine the personal target value of F(E)NO50 for monitoring the treatment outcome. Furthermore, for children with intermediate F(E)NO50 more than half of them could possibly benefit from an adjustment of inhaled corticosteroids if the C(aw)NO value was considered.

A practical approach to the theoretical models to calculate NO parameters of the respiratory system

Expired nitric oxide (NO) is used as a biomarker in different respiratory diseases. The recommended flow rate of 50 mL s⁻¹ (F(E)NO₀.₀₅) does not reveal from where in the lung NO production originated. Theoretical models of NO transfer from the respiratory system, linear or nonlinear approaches, have therefore been developed and applied. These models can estimate NO from distal lung (alveolar NO) and airways (bronchial flux). The aim of this study was to show the limitation in exhaled flow rate for the theoretical models of NO production in the respiratory system, linear and nonlinear models. Subjects (n = 32) exhaled at eight different flow rates between 10-350 mL s⁻¹ for the theoretical protocols. Additional subjects (n = 32) exhaled at tree flow rates (20, 100 and 350 mL s⁻¹) for the clinical protocol. When alveolar NO is calculated using high flow rates with the linear model, correction for axial back diffusion becomes negligible, -0.04 ppb and bronchial flux enhanced by 1.27. With Högman and Meriläinen algorithm (nonlinear model) the corrections factors can be understood to be embedded, and the flow rates to be used are ≤20, 100 and ≥350 mL s⁻¹. Applying these flow rates in a clinical setting any F(E)NO can be calculated necessitating fewer exhalations. Hence, measured F(E)NO₀.₀₅ 12.9 (7.2-18.7) ppb and calculated 12.9 (6.8-18.7) ppb. In conclusion, the only possibility to avoid inconsistencies between research groups is to use the measured NO values as such in modelling, and apply tight quality control to accuracies in both NO concentration and exhaled flow measurements.

Altered levels of exhaled nitric oxide in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by bone and joint destruction, but other organ systems can also be involved. Recent studies have suggested that the disease may start in the lungs. Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a marker of inflammation. The aims of the study were to compare the NO parameters between subjects with RA and healthy control subjects, and to examine whether the NO parameters correlated with lung function and disease activity in the subjects with RA. METHODS Subjects with RA (n = 35) were recruited during their regular outpatient visits to the rheumatology department. The nitric oxide (NO) parameters: alveolar NO concentration (CANO), airway compartment diffusing capacity of NO (DawNO), and tissue concentration of NO in the airway wall (CawNO), were algorithmically estimated. Healthy subjects (n = 35) matched by age, gender and height were used as controls. Data are given in median, (quartile 25, 75). Wilcoxon Matched Pairs test was used for group comparisons. Mann-Whitney U test was used to make comparisons between any two groups and for pairwise comparisons. Correlations were tested with Spearman rank order correlation. RESULTS CANO was significantly lower in the RA subjects compared with healthy subjects; 1.1 (0.5, 1.8) ppb versus 2.4 (2.0, 3.0) ppb, (p < 0.001). CawNO was significantly lower in the RA subjects with 51 (22, 87) ppb versus 120 (76, 162) ppb in the control group. DawNO was significantly higher at 25 (15, 36) mL/s in the RA group versus the control groups 7.7 (5.3, 10.7) mL/s. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences between subjects with RA and matched healthy control subjects regarding the exhaled NO parameters. It is unclear if this can be explained by the pathogenesis of RA, consequences of long-term disease, and/or due to drug treatment.

Increased levels of alveolar and airway exhaled nitric oxide in runners

Abstract Aim: The objective of this study was to apply extended NO analysis for measurements of NO dynamics in the lung, divided into alveolar and airway contribution, in amateur runners and marathoners. Methods: The athletes participated in either a marathon or a half marathon. The athletes self-reported their age, weight, height, training distance per week, competing distance, cardio-pulmonary health, atopic status, and use of tobacco. Measurements of exhaled NO (FENO) with estimation of alveolar NO (CANO) and airway flux (JawNO), ventilation, pulse oximetry, and peak flow were performed before, immediately after, and 1 hour after completing the race. Results: At baseline the alveolar NO was higher in amateur runners, 2.9 ± 1.1 ppb (p = 0.041), and marathoners, 3.6 ± 1.9 ppb (p = 0.002), than in control subjects, 1.4 ± 0.5 ppb. JawNO was higher in marathoners, 0.90 ± 0.02 nL s−1 (p = 0.044), compared with controls, 0.36 ± 0.02 nL s−1, whereas the increase in amateur runners, 0.56 ± 0.02 nL s−1, did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.165). Immediately after the race there was a decrease in FENO in both amateur runners and marathoners, whereas CANO and JawNO were decreased in marathoners only. Conclusion: Our results support the view that there is an adaptation of the lung to exercise. Thus strenuous exercise increased both airway and alveolar NO, and this might in turn facilitate oxygen uptake.

Effects of growth and aging on the reference values of pulmonary nitric oxide dynamics in healthy subjects

The lung just like all other organs is affected by age. The lung matures by the age of 20 and age-related changes start around middle age, at 40-50 years. Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been shown to be age, height and gender dependent. We hypothesize that the nitric oxide (NO) parameters alveolar NO (CANO), airway flux (JawNO), airway diffusing capacity (DawNO) and airway wall content (CawNO) will also demonstrate this dependence. Data from healthy subjects were gathered by the current authors from their earlier publications in which healthy individuals were included as control subjects. Healthy subjects (n = 433) ranged in age from 7 to 78 years. Age-stratified reference values of the NO parameters were significantly different. Gender differences were only observed in the 20-49 age group. The results from the multiple regression models in subjects older than 20 years revealed that age, height and gender interaction together explained 6% of variation in FENO at 50 ml s-1 (FENO50), 4% in JawNO, 16% in CawNO, 8% in DawNO and 12% in CANO. In conclusion, in this study we have generated reference values for NO parameters from an extended NO analysis of healthy subjects. This is important in order to be able to use these parameters in clinical practice.