Alexei A. Grom

Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most severe subtype of JIA; treatment options are limited. Interleukin-6 plays a pathogenic role in systemic JIA. METHODS We randomly assigned 112 children, 2 to 17 years of age, with active systemic JIA (duration of ≥6 months and inadequate responses to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids) to the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab (at a dose of 8 mg per kilogram of body weight if the weight was ≥30 kg or 12 mg per kilogram if the weight was <30 kg) or placebo given intravenously every 2 weeks during the 12-week, double-blind phase. Patients meeting the predefined criteria for nonresponse were offered open-label tocilizumab. All patients could enter an open-label extension. RESULTS At week 12, the primary end point (an absence of fever and an improvement of 30% or more on at least three of the six variables in the American College of Rheumatology [ACR] core set for JIA, with no more than one variable worsening by more than 30%) was met in significantly more patients in the tocilizumab group than in the placebo group (64 of 75 [85%] vs. 9 of 37 [24%], P<0.001). At week 52, 80% of the patients who received tocilizumab had at least 70% improvement with no fever, including 59% who had 90% improvement; in addition, 48% of the patients had no joints with active arthritis, and 52% had discontinued oral glucocorticoids. In the double-blind phase, 159 adverse events, including 60 infections (2 serious), occurred in the tocilizumab group, as compared with 38, including 15 infections, in the placebo group. In the double-blind and extension periods combined, 39 serious adverse events (0.25 per patient-year), including 18 serious infections (0.11 per patient-year), occurred in patients who received tocilizumab. Neutropenia developed in 19 patients (17 patients with grade 3 and 2 patients with grade 4), and 21 had aminotransferase levels that were more than 2.5 times the upper limit of the normal range. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab was efficacious in severe, persistent systemic JIA. Adverse events were common and included infection, neutropenia, and increased aminotransferase levels. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00642460.).

Two Randomized Trials of Canakinumab in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND Interleukin-1 is pivotal in the pathogenesis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We assessed the efficacy and safety of canakinumab, a selective, fully human, anti-interleukin-1β monoclonal antibody, in two trials. METHODS In trial 1, we randomly assigned patients, 2 to 19 years of age, with systemic JIA and active systemic features (fever; ≥2 active joints; C-reactive protein, >30 mg per liter; and glucocorticoid dose, ≤1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight per day), in a double-blind fashion, to a single subcutaneous dose of canakinumab (4 mg per kilogram) or placebo. The primary outcome, termed adapted JIA ACR 30 response, was defined as improvement of 30% or more in at least three of the six core criteria for JIA, worsening of more than 30% in no more than one of the criteria, and resolution of fever. In trial 2, after 32 weeks of open-label treatment with canakinumab, patients who had a response and underwent glucocorticoid tapering were randomly assigned to continued treatment with canakinumab or to placebo. The primary outcome was time to flare of systemic JIA. RESULTS At day 15 in trial 1, more patients in the canakinumab group had an adapted JIA ACR 30 response (36 of 43 [84%], vs. 4 of 41 [10%] in the placebo group; P<0.001). In trial 2, among the 100 patients (of 177 in the open-label phase) who underwent randomization in the withdrawal phase, the risk of flare was lower among patients who continued to receive canakinumab than among those who were switched to placebo (74% of patients in the canakinumab group had no flare, vs. 25% in the placebo group, according to Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio, 0.36; P=0.003). The average glucocorticoid dose was reduced from 0.34 to 0.05 mg per kilogram per day, and glucocorticoids were discontinued in 42 of 128 patients (33%). The macrophage activation syndrome occurred in 7 patients; infections were more frequent with canakinumab than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS These two phase 3 studies show the efficacy of canakinumab in systemic JIA with active systemic features. (Funded by Novartis Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00889863 and NCT00886769.).

Natural killer cell dysfunction is a distinguishing feature of systemic onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and macrophage activation syndrome

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) has been reported in association with many rheumatic diseases, most commonly in systemic juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (sJRA). Clinically, MAS is similar to hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a genetic disorder with absent or depressed natural killer (NK) function. We have previously reported that, as in HLH, patients with MAS have profoundly decreased NK activity, suggesting that this abnormality might be relevant to the pathogenesis of the syndrome. Here we examined the extent of NK dysfunction across the spectrum of diseases that comprise juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected from patients with pauciarticular (n = 4), polyarticular (n = 16), and systemic (n = 20) forms of JRA. NK cytolytic activity was measured after co-incubation of PBMC with the NK-sensitive K562 cell line. NK cells (CD56+/T cell receptor [TCR]-αβ-), NK T cells (CD56+/TCR-αβ+), and CD8+ T cells were also assessed for perforin and granzyme B expression by flow cytometry. Overall, NK cytolytic activity was significantly lower in patients with sJRA than in other JRA patients and controls. In a subgroup of patients with predominantly sJRA, NK cell activity was profoundly decreased: in 10 of 20 patients with sJRA and in only 1 of 20 patients with other JRA, levels of NK activity were below two standard deviations of pediatric controls (P = 0.002). Some decrease in perforin expression in NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes was seen in patients within each of the JRA groups with no statistically significant differences. There was a profound decrease in the proportion of circulating CD56bright NK cells in three sJRA patients, a pattern similar to that previously observed in MAS and HLH. In conclusion, a subgroup of patients with JRA who have not yet had an episode of MAS showed decreased NK function and an absence of circulating CD56bright population, similar to the abnormalities observed in patients with MAS and HLH. This phenomenon was particularly common in the systemic form of JRA, a clinical entity strongly associated with MAS.

Macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A multinational multicenter study of thirty‐eight patients

OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and laboratory features of macrophage activation syndrome as a complication of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS Cases of juvenile SLE-associated macrophage activation syndrome were provided by investigators belonging to 3 pediatric rheumatology networks or were found in the literature. Patients who had evidence of macrophage hemophagocytosis on bone marrow aspiration were considered to have definite macrophage activation syndrome, and those who did not have such evidence were considered to have probable macrophage activation syndrome. Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with macrophage activation syndrome were contrasted with those of 2 control groups composed of patients with active juvenile SLE without macrophage activation syndrome. The ability of each feature to discriminate macrophage activation syndrome from active disease was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS The study included 38 patients (20 with definite macrophage activation syndrome and 18 with probable macrophage activation syndrome). Patients with definite and probable macrophage activation syndrome were comparable with regard to all clinical and laboratory features of the syndrome, except for a greater frequency of lymphadenopathy, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in patients with definite macrophage activation syndrome. Overall, clinical features had better specificity than sensitivity, except for fever, which was highly sensitive but had low specificity. Among laboratory features, the best sensitivity and specificity was achieved using hyperferritinemia, followed by increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypofibrinogenemia. Based on the results of statistical analysis, preliminary diagnostic guidelines for macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile SLE were developed. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that the occurrence of unexplained fever and cytopenia, when associated with hyperferritinemia, in a patient with juvenile SLE should raise the suspicion of macrophage activation syndrome. We propose preliminary guidelines for this syndrome in juvenile SLE to facilitate timely diagnosis and correct classification of patients.

Subtype-specific peripheral blood gene expression profiles in recent onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE To identify differences in peripheral blood gene expression between patients with different subclasses of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and healthy controls in a multicenter study of patients with recent-onset JIA prior to treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologic agents. METHODS Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 59 healthy children and 136 patients with JIA (28 with enthesitis-related arthritis [ERA], 42 with persistent oligoarthritis, 45 with rheumatoid factor [RF]-negative polyarthritis, and 21 with systemic disease) were isolated from whole blood. Poly(A) RNA was labeled using a commercial RNA amplification and labeling system (NuGEN Ovation), and gene expression profiles were obtained using commercial expression microarrays (Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0). RESULTS A total of 9,501 differentially expressed probe sets were identified among the JIA subtypes and controls (by analysis of variance; false discovery rate 5%). Specifically, 193, 1,036, 873, and 7,595 probe sets were different in PBMCs from the controls compared with those from the ERA, persistent oligoarthritis, RF-negative polyarthritis, and systemic JIA patients, respectively. In patients with persistent oligoarthritis, RF-negative polyarthritis, and systemic JIA subtypes, up-regulation of genes associated with interleukin-10 (IL-10) signaling was prominent. A hemoglobin cluster was identified that was underexpressed in ERA patients but overexpressed in systemic JIA patients. The influence of JAK/STAT, ERK/MAPK, IL-2, and B cell receptor signaling pathways was evident in patients with persistent oligoarthritis. In systemic JIA, up-regulation of innate immune pathways, including IL-6, Toll-like receptor/IL-1 receptor, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling, were noted, along with down-regulation of gene networks related to natural killer cells and T cells. Complement and coagulation pathways were up-regulated in systemic JIA, with a subset of these genes being differentially expressed in other subtypes as well. CONCLUSION Expression analysis identified differentially expressed genes in PBMCs obtained early in the disease from patients with different subtypes of JIA and in healthy controls, providing evidence of immunobiologic differences between these forms of childhood arthritis.

Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is associated with MUNC13-4 polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVE Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is associated with macrophage activation syndrome. Macrophage activation syndrome bears a close resemblance to familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). The development of familial HLH has been recently associated with mutations in MUNC13-4. The purpose of this study was to assess for possible sequence alterations in MUNC13-4 in patients with systemic JIA/macrophage activation syndrome. METHODS The MUNC13-4 sequence was analyzed in 18 unrelated patients with systemic JIA/macrophage activation syndrome, using 32 primer pair sets designed to amplify the 32 exons and at least 100 basepairs of the adjacent intronic regions. DNA samples obtained from 73 unrelated patients with systemic JIA and no history of macrophage activation syndrome and 229 unrelated healthy individuals were used as controls. RESULTS The biallelic sequence variants in MUNC13-4 reported in familial HLH were present in 2 of the 18 patients with JIA/macrophage activation syndrome. Further analysis of the MUNC13-4 sequences revealed an identical combination of 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 9 of the remaining 16 patients with systemic JIA/macrophage activation syndrome (56%). Additional analysis suggested that these 12 SNPs (154[-19] g>a, 261[+26] c>g, 388[+81] g>a, 388[+122] c>t, 570[-60] t>g, 888 G>C, 1389[+36] g>a, 1992[+5] g>a, 2447[+144] c>t, 2599 A>G, 2830[+37] c>g, 3198 A>G) were inherited as an extended haplotype. In several patients, in addition to the described haplotype, there were other SNPs in the second allele of MUNC13-4. Moreover, 1 patient had a complex mutation with 2 changes, 2542 A>C and 2943 G>C, in a cis configuration. The haplotype was present in only 27 (12%) of 229 healthy control subjects (chi(2) = 23.5) and in 6 (8.2%) of 73 patients with systemic JIA and no history of macrophage activation syndrome. CONCLUSION The data suggest an association between MUNC13-4 polymorphisms and macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic JIA.

Macrophage activation syndrome and reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: the same entities?

Purpose of the reviewOne of the most perplexing features of systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is the association with macrophage activation syndrome, a life-threatening complication caused by excessive activation and proliferation of T cells and macrophages. The main purpose of the review is to summarize current understanding of the relation between macrophage activation syndrome and other clinically similar hemophagocytic disorders. Recent findingsClinically, macrophage activation syndrome has strong similarities with familial and virus-associated reactive hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The better understood familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a constellation of rare, autosomal recessive immune disorders. The most consistent immunologic abnormalities in patients with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis are decreased natural killer and cytotoxic cell functions. In approximately one third of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis patients, these immunologic abnormalities are secondary to mutations in the gene encoding perforin, a protein that mediates cytotoxic activity of natural killer and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Several recent studies have suggested that profoundly depressed natural killer cell activity and abnormal levels of perforin expression may be a feature of macrophage activation syndrome in systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis as well. Although it has been proposed that in both hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and macrophage activation syndrome, natural killer and cytotoxic cell dysfunction may lead to inadequate control of cellular immune responses, the exact nature of such dysregulation and the relation between macrophage activation syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis still remain to be determined.

Macrophage activation syndrome: advances towards understanding pathogenesis

Purpose of reviewMacrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric rheumatology, is most strongly associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA). There are no validated diagnostic criteria and early diagnosis is difficult. This review summarizes the progress in understanding of MAS pathophysiology that may help define specific diagnostic biomarkers. Recent findingsMAS is similar to the autosomal recessive disorders collectively known as familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHLH), all associated with various genetic defects affecting the cytolytic pathway. Cytolytic function is profoundly depressed in SJIA with MAS as well. This immunologic abnormality distinguishes SJIA from other rheumatic diseases and is caused by both genetic and acquired factors. Phenotypic characterization of hemophagocytic macrophages has been another focus of research. These macrophages express CD163, a scavenger receptor that binds hemoglobin–haptoglobin complexes, and initiate pathways important for adaptation to oxidative stress induced by free iron. Expansion of these macrophages is seen in more than 30% of SJIA patients perhaps representing early stages of MAS. Recent gene expression studies linked expansion of these macrophages to distinct signatures. SummaryRecent advances in understanding of pathophysiologic conditions that favor expansion of hemophagocytic macrophages provide a source of new MAS biomarkers with applicability to clinical practice.

Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcome of Macrophage Activation Syndrome Complicating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Multinational, Multicenter Study of 362 Patients

To describe the clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic features, current treatment, and outcome of patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Systemic JIA: New Developments in the Understanding of the Pathophysiology and Therapy

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, systemic inflammatory disease classified as a subtype of JIA. Besides arthritis, it is characterised by systemic features such as spiking fever, skin rash, hepatosplenomegaly or serositis. It is becoming clear now that abnormalities in the innate immunity (cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 and IL-18, and neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages rather than lymphocytes) play a major role in the pathogenesis of sJIA, distinguishing it from other JIA subtypes. Another distinctive feature of sJIA is its strong association with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Based on this, consensus is emerging that sJIA should be viewed as an autoinflammatory syndrome rather than a classic auto-immune disease. As a consequence of the progression in understanding the underlying mechanisms of sJIA, major changes in the management are evolving. So far, treatment has been based on glucocorticosteroids in combination with disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate. Recently, remarkable improvement has been observed with IL-1 and IL-6 targeted therapies. These therapies might also change the long-term outcome of this disease. However, controlled trials set up in international collaboration are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for all sJIA patients.