Alexi A. Wright
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alexi A. Wright.
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2009
Alexi A. Wright; Haiden A. Huskamp; Matthew Nilsson; Matthew L. Maciejewski; Craig C. Earle; Susan D. Block; Paul K. Maciejewski; G Holly Prigerson.
BACKGROUND Life-sustaining medical care of patients with advanced cancer at the end of life (EOL) is costly. Patient-physician discussions about EOL wishes are associated with lower rates of intensive interventions. METHODS Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Cancer Institute, Coping With Cancer is a longitudinal multi-institutional study of 627 patients with advanced cancer. Patients were interviewed at baseline and were followed up through death. Costs for intensive care unit and hospital stays, hospice care, and life-sustaining procedures (eg, mechanical ventilator use and resuscitation) received in the last week of life were aggregated. Generalized linear models were applied to test for cost differences in EOL care. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection biases. RESULTS Of 603 participants, 188 (31.2%) reported EOL discussions at baseline. After propensity score matching, the remaining 415 patients did not differ in sociodemographic characteristics, recruitment sites, illness acknowledgment, or treatment preferences. Further analyses, adjusted by quintiles of propensity scores and significant confounders, revealed that the mean (SE) aggregate costs of care (in 2008 US dollars) were
Nature | 2014
Akinyemi I. Ojesina; Lee Lichtenstein; Samuel S. Freeman; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Ivan Imaz-Rosshandler; Trevor J. Pugh; Andrew D. Cherniack; Lauren Ambrogio; Kristian Cibulskis; Bjørn Enge Bertelsen; Sandra Romero-Cordoba; Victor Trevino; Karla Vazquez-Santillan; Alberto Salido Guadarrama; Alexi A. Wright; Mara Rosenberg; Fujiko Duke; Bethany Kaplan; Rui Wang; Elizabeth Nickerson; Heather M. Walline; Michael S. Lawrence; Chip Stewart; Scott L. Carter; Aaron McKenna; Iram P. Rodriguez-Sanchez; Magali Espinosa-Castilla; Kathrine Woie; Line Bjørge; Elisabeth Wik
1876 (
JAMA | 2009
Andrea C. Phelps; Paul K. Maciejewski; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy A. Balboni; Alexi A. Wright; M. Elizabeth Paulk; E. D. Trice; Deborah Schrag; John R. Peteet; Susan D. Block; Holly G. Prigerson
177) for patients who reported EOL discussions compared with
Cancer | 2011
Tracy A. Balboni; Michael J. Balboni; M. Elizabeth Paulk; Andrea Phelps; Alexi A. Wright; John R. Peteet; Susan D. Block; Christopher S. Lathan; Tyler J. VanderWeele; Holly G. Prigerson
2917 (
BMJ | 2014
Alexi A. Wright; Nancy L. Keating; Jane C. Weeks; Holly G. Prigerson
285) for patients who did not, a cost difference of
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009
Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Paul K. Maciejewski; Elizabeth Paulk; Susan DeSanto-Madeya; Matthew Nilsson; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Alexi A. Wright; Tracy A. Balboni; Jennifer S. Temel; Heather Stieglitz; Susan D. Block; Holly G. Prigerson
1041 (35.7% lower among patients who reported EOL discussions) (P =.002). Patients with higher costs had worse quality of death in their final week (Pearson production moment correlation partial r = -0.17, P =.006). CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced cancer who reported having EOL conversations with physicians had significantly lower health care costs in their final week of life. Higher costs were associated with worse quality of death.
Cancer | 2013
Alexi A. Wright; Brooke E. Howitt; Andrea P. Myers; Suzanne E. Dahlberg; Emanuele Palescandolo; Paul Van Hummelen; Laura E. MacConaill; Melina Shoni; Nikhil Wagle; Robert T. Jones; Charles M. Quick; Anna Laury; Ingrid T. Katz; William C. Hahn; Ursula A. Matulonis; Michelle S. Hirsch
Cervical cancer is responsible for 10–15% of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. The aetiological role of infection with high-risk human papilloma viruses (HPVs) in cervical carcinomas is well established. Previous studies have also implicated somatic mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53, STK11 and KRAS as well as several copy-number alterations in the pathogenesis of cervical carcinomas. Here we report whole-exome sequencing analysis of 115 cervical carcinoma–normal paired samples, transcriptome sequencing of 79 cases and whole-genome sequencing of 14 tumour–normal pairs. Previously unknown somatic mutations in 79 primary squamous cell carcinomas include recurrent E322K substitutions in the MAPK1 gene (8%), inactivating mutations in the HLA-B gene (9%), and mutations in EP300 (16%), FBXW7 (15%), NFE2L2 (4%), TP53 (5%) and ERBB2 (6%). We also observe somatic ELF3 (13%) and CBFB (8%) mutations in 24 adenocarcinomas. Squamous cell carcinomas have higher frequencies of somatic nucleotide substitutions occurring at cytosines preceded by thymines (Tp*C sites) than adenocarcinomas. Gene expression levels at HPV integration sites were statistically significantly higher in tumours with HPV integration compared with expression of the same genes in tumours without viral integration at the same site. These data demonstrate several recurrent genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas that suggest new strategies to combat this disease.
Cancer | 2009
Matthew Nilsson; Paul K. Maciejewski; Alexi A. Wright; E. D. Trice; Anna C. Muriel; Robert J. Friedlander; Karen Fasciano; Susan D. Block; Holly G. Prigerson
CONTEXT Patients frequently rely on religious faith to cope with cancer, but little is known about the associations between religious coping and the use of intensive life-prolonging care at the end of life. OBJECTIVE To determine the way religious coping relates to the use of intensive life-prolonging end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A US multisite, prospective, longitudinal cohort of 345 patients with advanced cancer, who were enrolled between January 1, 2003, and August 31, 2007. The Brief RCOPE assessed positive religious coping. Baseline interviews assessed psychosocial and religious/spiritual measures, advance care planning, and end-of-life treatment preferences. Patients were followed up until death, a median of 122 days after baseline assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intensive life-prolonging care, defined as receipt of mechanical ventilation or resuscitation in the last week of life. Analyses were adjusted for demographic factors significantly associated with positive religious coping and any end-of-life outcome at P < .05 (ie, age and race/ethnicity). The main outcome was further adjusted for potential psychosocial confounders (eg, other coping styles, terminal illness acknowledgment, spiritual support, preference for heroics, and advance care planning). RESULTS A high level of positive religious coping at baseline was significantly associated with receipt of mechanical ventilation compared with patients with a low level (11.3% vs 3.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.81 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-7.69]; P = .04) and intensive life-prolonging care during the last week of life (13.6% vs 4.2%; AOR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.14-7.35]; P = .03) after adjusting for age and race. In the model that further adjusted for other coping styles, terminal illness acknowledgment, support of spiritual needs, preference for heroics, and advance care planning (do-not-resuscitate order, living will, and health care proxy/durable power of attorney), positive religious coping remained a significant predictor of receiving intensive life-prolonging care near death (AOR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.07-7.89]; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Positive religious coping in patients with advanced cancer is associated with receipt of intensive life-prolonging medical care near death. Further research is needed to determine the mechanisms for this association.
Cancer | 2009
Jennifer W. Mack; Susan D. Block; Matthew Nilsson; Alexi A. Wright; E. D. Trice; Robert J. Friedlander; Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G. Prigerson
Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Alexi A. Wright; Kari Bohlke; Deborah K. Armstrong; Michael A. Bookman; William A. Cliby; Robert L. Coleman; Don S. Dizon; Joseph J. Kash; Larissa A. Meyer; Kathleen N. Moore; Alexander B. Olawaiye; Jessica Oldham; Ritu Salani; Dee Sparacio; William P. Tew; Ignace Vergote; Mitchell I. Edelson
Objectives To determine whether the receipt of chemotherapy among terminally ill cancer patients months before death was associated with patients’ subsequent intensive medical care and place of death. Design Secondary analysis of a prospective, multi-institution, longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer. Setting Eight outpatient oncology clinics in the United States. Participants 386 adult patients with metastatic cancers refractory to at least one chemotherapy regimen, whom physicians identified as terminally ill at study enrollment and who subsequently died. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes: intensive medical care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or both) in the last week of life and patients’ place of death (for example, intensive care unit). Secondary outcomes: survival, late hospice referrals (≤1 week before death), and dying in preferred place of death. Results 216 (56%) of 386 terminally ill cancer patients were receiving palliative chemotherapy at study enrollment, a median of 4.0 months before death. After propensity score weighted adjustment, use of chemotherapy at enrollment was associated with higher rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, or both in the last week of life (14% v 2%; adjusted risk difference 10.5%, 95% confidence interval 5.0% to 15.5%) and late hospice referrals (54% v 37%; 13.6%, 3.6% to 23.6%) but no difference in survival (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.38). Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy were more likely to die in an intensive care unit (11% v 2%; adjusted risk difference 6.1%, 1.1% to 11.1%) and less likely to die at home (47% v 66%; −10.8%, −1.0% to −20.6%), compared with those who were not. Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy were also less likely to die in their preferred place, compared with those who were not (65% v 80%; adjusted risk difference −9.4%, −0.8% to −18.1%). Conclusions The use of chemotherapy in terminally ill cancer patients in the last months of life was associated with an increased risk of undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation or both and of dying in an intensive care unit. Future research should determine the mechanisms by which palliative chemotherapy affects end of life outcomes and patients’ attainment of their goals.