Alfonso Varela Román

Why and when do patients with heart failure and normal left ventricular ejection fraction die? Analysis of >600 deaths in a community long-term study.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to examine the causes of the death of patients with heart failure (HF) and evaluate the differences in this respect between patients with and without depression of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHOD All patients hospitalized with HF between 1995 and 2002 in the cardiology service of a tertiary hospital were assessed. LVEF was evaluated by echocardiography during hospitalization and was considered normal when it was > or =50%. After a mean follow-up time of 3.7 +/- 2.8 years, 615 cases had terminated in death. RESULTS The most common cause was refractory HF, both in the whole group (39%) and in both the subgroups defined with respect to LVEF (normal and depressed). There was no statistically significant difference between the normal and depressed subgroups as regard the distribution of deaths, although the depressed group showed a somewhat greater incidence of sudden death (21% as against 16% in the normal group) and a somewhat smaller incidence of death due to refractory HF (37% as against 47%). However, in the depressed LVEF group, the cumulative risk of death due to acute myocardial infarction in the first 1.5 years first increased rapidly and then more slowly, whereas the reverse pattern was held in the normal left ventricular systolic function group, in which it was the cumulative risks of death from noncardiovascular or vascular noncardiac causes that initially increased more rapidly than later. CONCLUSIONS The spectrum of causes of death among patients with HF who have been hospitalized is independent of LVEF in the long term. In the short term, there are differences between patients with normal LVEF and depressed LVEF as regard the dynamics of the risks of death from acute myocardial infarction, noncardiac vascular causes, and noncardiovascular causes. These results may help orient the short-term and long-term management of HF, especially for patients with normal LVEF, for whom there is still no well-established consensus strategy.

Renal Failure Is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients and Is Associated With a Worse Cardiovascular Risk Profile

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Most clinical trials that demonstrated the negative impact of renal failure on survival in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) included a relatively small proportion of subjects with a high creatinine level and were performed in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function. Our aim was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of hospitalized CHF patients with depressed or preserved systolic function and different degrees of renal dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHOD The study included 552 consecutive CHF patients admitted to a hospital department of cardiology between 2000-2002. Renal function was determined from the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and patients were divided into three groups: GFR>60, GFR 30-60, and GFR<30 mL.min per 1.73 m2 (severe renal failure), containing 56.5%, 35.5%, and 8.0% of patients, respectively. RESULTS Patients with severe renal failure had the worst cardiovascular risk profile: older age, higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, anemia, inflammatory markers in plasma, and less prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Survival in this patient group was significantly poorer than in other groups (relative risk or RR=2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.4) in those with either depressed (RR=3.8; 95% CI, 1.4-10.6) or preserved (RR=2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9) systolic function, independent of other prognostic factors. The negative impact of severe renal failure on prognosis was reduced by ACE inhibitor use. CONCLUSIONS Renal failure is common and a strong predictor of mortality in hospitalized CHF patients with or without depressed systolic function. It is associated with a worse risk profile.

Mid-range Ejection Fraction Does Not Permit Risk Stratification Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines include a new patient category with mid-range (40%-49%) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF). HFmrEF patient characteristics and prognosis are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to analyze the HFmrEF category in a cohort of hospitalized heart failure patients (REDINSCOR II Registry). METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted with 1420 patients classified according to ejection fraction as follows: HFrEF, < 40%; HFmrEF, 40%-49%; and HFpEF, ≥ 50%. Baseline patient characteristics were examined, and outcome measures were mortality and readmission for heart failure at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to compare the HFmrEF group with the other ejection fraction groups. RESULTS Among the study participants, 583 (41%) had HFrEF, 227 (16%) HFmrEF, and 610 (43%) HFpEF. HFmrEF patients had a clinical profile similar to that of HFpEF patients in terms of age, blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation prevalence, but shared with HFrEF patients a higher proportion of male participants and ischemic etiology, and use of class I drugs targeting HFrEF. All other features were intermediate, and comorbidities were similar among the 3 groups. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cause of death, or heart failure readmission. The similar outcomes were confirmed in the propensity score matched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The HFmrEF patient group has characteristics between the HFrEF and HFpEF groups, with more similarities to the HFpEF group. No between-group differences were observed in total mortality, cause of death, or heart failure readmission.

Nutritional status is related to heart failure severity and hospital readmissions in acute heart failure

BACKGROUND Malnutrition is common in hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients and predicts adverse outcomes. The relationship between nutritional status and outcomes in HF has been partially studied. Our aim was to determine the relationship between the nutritional status and the long-term prognosis in patients hospitalized for acute HF. METHODS We analyzed 145 patients admitted consecutively to a cardiology department for acute HF. Nutritional status was measured with the CONUT method, a validated scale based on laboratory testing (albumin; cholesterol; lymphocytes) during hospitalization. Patients were classified as normal, mildly, moderately or severely malnourished, and followed in a HF clinic. RESULTS The mean aged of the population was 69.6years and 61% of patients were men, 54 had previous HF hospitalization (37%), 112 had hypertension (77%), 67 were diabetic (46%) and 135 had class III or IV NYHA (93%). Forty eight patients (33%) had normal nutritional status, 75 were mildly malnourished (52%), and 22 were moderately or severely malnourished (15%). Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or NYHA class among the three groups were not statistically different. ProBNP was directly correlated with the nutritional status. After a mean follow-up of 326days, 27 had a HF hospitalization (19%) and 61 (42,1%) had a hospitalization not related to HF. The analysis by Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test showed that these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Malnutrition is common in patients hospitalized for HF. It seems to be a mediator of disease progression and determines a poor prognosis especially in advanced stages.

Evolution of left ventricular hypertrophy and function during long-term treatment of systemic hypertension with enalapril.

Continued treatment of hypertensive patients with enalapril reduced left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy steadily over a period of 5 years (by which time gross structural parameters were normal) and produced no further reduction during the following 2 years. Temporary suspension of treatment after 5-year follow-up gave rise to an increase in blood pressure, and to deterioration of LV isovolumic relaxation time and deceleration of the ventricular filling E wave, both of which chiefly reflect the active relaxation of the ventricle.

Evolucion y repercusion cientifica de las becas de investigacion de la Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia y la Fundacion Espanola del Corazon (2000-2006)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The Sociedad Española de Cardiología (Spanish Society of Cardiology) every year awards grants to finance research in the field of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of these investments during the period 2000-2006 from the subsequently published articles in scientific journals. METHODS Using the identifying data of each project as search terms, all articles that resulted from these grants were located in the Spanish Índice Médico Español and Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud databases, and in Science Citation Index-Expanded and Scopus. Descriptive statistical analysis of these articles included type of grant, number and amount awarded per year, and the recipients sex and institutional affiliation. RESULTS The Sociedad Española de Cardiología awarded €3,270,877 to 207 recipients, an average annual total of €467,268. We identified 231 publications that resulted from 123 (59.42%) of these grants. The average number of articles per grant awarded was 1.12, and 1.9 when taking into account only the awards that led to publication. CONCLUSIONS During the period 2000 to 2006, the Sociedad Española de Cardiología/ Fundación Española del Corazón (Spanish Heart Foundation) provided about €500,000 per year to fund research grants, thereby contributing to the fight against cardiovascular diseases. Almost 60% of grants have led to publications, 73% of which were published in international journals, and 91.34% in national or international journals with an impact factor in the Journal Citation Reports.

Long-term improvement of QT dispersion is unaffected by short-term changes in blood pressure during treatment of systemic hypertension with enalapril.

Background: We report the reduction of QT and QTc dispersion in patients treated for 7 years with enalapril for systemic hypertension with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We assess the correlation between QT dispersion and LV mass during this period and at the end of an 8‐week period of suspension of enalapril treatment after 5 years.

Comments on the 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

In accordance with the policy on clinical practice guidelines established by the Executive Committee of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the current article discusses the most notable and novel aspects of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF). The aim of the guidelines is to update our knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of HF based on the best clinical evidence available.

Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: Clinical characteristics, determinants and prognosis. CARDIOCHUS-CHOP registry

BACKGROUND The magnitude and the prognostic impact of recovering left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and systolic dysfunction is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with HFrecEF in an HF population. METHODS 449 consecutive patients were selected with the diagnosis of HF and an evaluation of LVEF in the 6 months prior to selection who were referred to two HF units. Patients with systolic dysfunction were only considered if a second echocardiogram was performed during the follow-up. RESULTS At the time of diagnosis, 207 patients had LVEF > 40% (HFpEF) and 242 had LVEF ≤ 40% (HFrEF). After 1 year, the LVEF was re-evaluated in all 242 patients with a LVEF ≤ 40%: in 126 (52%), the second LVEF was > 40% (HFrecEF), and the remaining 116 (48%) had LVEF ≤ 40% (HFrEF). After 1800 ± 900 days of follow-up patients with recovered LVEF had a significantly lower mortality rate (HFpEF vs. HFrecEF: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.286, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.264-4.145, p = 0.019; HFrEF vs. HFrecEF: HR = 2.222, 95% CI 1.189-4.186, p < 0.001) and hospitalization rate (HFpEF vs. HFrecEF: HR = 1.411, 95% CI 1.046-1.903, p = 0.024; HFrEF vs. HFrecEF: HR = 1.388, 95% CI 1.002-1.924, p = 0.049). The following are predictors of LVEF recovery: younger age, lower functional class, treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers, absence of defibrillator use, and non-ischemic etiology. CONCLUSIONS Patients with HF and reduced LVEF who were re-evaluated after 1 year, had significant improvement in their LVEF and had a more favourable prognosis than HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.

Effects on Left Ventricular Mass and Function of Low Doses of Enalapril for Systemic Hypertension

After 7 years of treatment with 20 mg of enalapril twice daily, regression of the initial left ventricular hypertrophy in a group of 24 patients with essential arterial hypertension was achieved: gradual reduction in the dosage to 10 or 5 mg twice daily caused no worsening of either blood pressure or ventricular structure or function.