Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alfredo Zurlo.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2003
Fabio Efficace; Andrew Bottomley; David Osoba; Carolyn Gotay; Henning Flechtner; Sven D'haese; Alfredo Zurlo
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inclusion of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), as a part of the trial design in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) setting, has supported clinical decision making for the planning of future medical treatments in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A minimum standard checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials was devised to assess the quality of the HRQOL reporting and to classify the studies on the grounds of their robustness. It comprises 11 key HRQOL issues grouped into four broader sections: conceptual, measurement, methodology, and interpretation. Relevant studies were identified in a number of databases, including MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Both their HRQOL and traditional clinical reported outcomes were systematically analyzed to evaluate their consistency and their relevance for supporting clinical decision making. RESULTS Although 54% of the identified studies did not show any differences in traditional clinical end points between treatment arms and 17% showed a difference in overall survival, 74% of the studies showed some difference in terms of HRQOL outcomes. One third of the RCTs provided a comprehensive picture of the whole treatment including HRQOL outcomes to support their conclusions. CONCLUSION A minimum set of criteria for assessing the reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials is necessary to make informed decisions in clinical practice. Using a checklist developed for this study, it was found that HRQOL is a valuable source of information in RCTs of treatment in metastatic prostate cancer.
ESMO Open | 2018
Walter Fiedler; Sara Cresta; Henning Schulze-Bergkamen; Sara De Dosso; Jens Weidmann; Anna Tessari; Hans Baumeister; Antje Danielczyk; Bruno Dietrich; Steffen Goletz; Alfredo Zurlo; Marc Salzberg; Cristiana Sessa; Luca Gianni
Background Changes in glycosylation of the constant domain (Fc) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) enhance antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity independently of downstream effects following receptor blockade by the antibody, thus extending their indication. We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and antitumour activity of tomuzotuximab, an IgG1 glycoengineered mAb against the epidermal growth factor receptor with enhanced tumour cytotoxicity in a phase I dose-escalation study (NTC01222637). Patients and methods Forty-one patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapies received tomuzotuximab weekly (12–1370 mg) or two-weekly (990 mg) on a three-plus-three dose escalation design. Results A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 31 (76%) patients (grade 3, 12%), mainly confined to the first dose, and skin toxicities (grade 1 or 2) in 30 (73%) patients. Hypomagnesaemia was observed in 9 out of 23 evaluable patients (39%). Similar to cetuximab, tomuzotuximab concentrations increased proportionally to dose from doses≥480 mg with a median terminal half life (t½) of 82 hours, range 55–113 hours. Antitumour activity included one complete response ongoing since more than 4.5 years in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and one partial response lasting 353 days in a patient with colorectal cancer. Twelve patients achieved stable disease (median, 166 days, range, 71–414 days) and two patients had prolonged control (>1 year) of their non-measurable disease. Conclusion Tomuzotuximab was safe and showed promising antitumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced metastatic disease. A phase IIb trial of chemotherapy and weekly tomuzotuximab or cetuximab followed with maintenance therapy with the corresponding mAb in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is ongoing.
Annals of Oncology | 2014
Dirk Arnold; Alfredo Zurlo; Ramon Salazar; Michel Ducreux; Tom Samuel Waddell; Alexander Stein; Christophe Tournigand; Werner Scheithauer; Alberto Sobrero; E. Van Cutsem; David Cunningham
ABSTRACT Background: In the phase 2 IMPACT trial the potent TLR-9 agonist MGN1703, a synthetic DNA-based immunomodulator, was compared to placebo in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with disease control after standard induction chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab and showed a superior effect with a hazard ratio for the primary endpoint PFS on maintenance of 0.55 (p = 0.041) by local investigator assessment and 0.56 (p = 0.070) by independent radiological review. Three objective responses were observed in the MGN1703 arm, two of them appearing as late as 9 months after the start of treatment. At time of study closure 4 MGN1703 patients were still without progressive disease and continued treatment by self-administration in a compassionate use setting. Exploratory Cox regression and ROC analyses suggested a potential predictive role at baseline for normal CEA, objective response to prior chemotherapy and presence of activated NKT-cells. Trial design: A pivotal study has been designed to confirm these data and will enroll patients with smaller tumor burden after a good response to chemotherapy, as best candidates to receive a maintenance treatment with immunotherapy. IMPALA is a randomized, international, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial that will include 540 patients from 120 centers in Germany, Austria, Spain, Italy, France, UK, Belgium and Estonia and with the collaboration of the AIO, TTD, and GERCOR cooperative groups. In this study mCRC patients with an objective tumor response following any first line induction therapy will be randomized to MGN1703 monotherapy maintenance or local standard of care. At time of relapse, patients will reintroduce the induction treatment whenever feasible, with those in the experimental arm continuing to receive MGN1703 in the weeks without chemotherapy. Patients will also be stratified by CEA level and activated NKT at baseline. The primary endpoint of the study will be overall survival. Secondary endpoints include PFS, response rates, safety, and QoL in selected centers. All patients will be evaluated for cytokines and chemokines in serum and the activation status of various immune cell populations. Disclosure: A. Zurlo: A.Z. is CMO of Mologen AG. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Cancer immunology research | 2016
Manuel Schmidt; Kerstin Kapp; Detlef Oswald; Matthias Schroff; Burghardt Wittig; Alfredo Zurlo
Background: The synthetic DNA-based immunomodulator MGN1703 is a member of the new dSLIM® family of TLR-9 agonists, comprising covalently closed dumbbell-like DNA molecules which consist entirely of natural DNA with two single-stranded CG-containing loops separated by a double-stranded stem. MGN1703 exerts its function by activating the innate and both arms of the adaptive immune system. MGN1703 has already shown a good safety profile and benefit for patients compared to placebo in maintenance therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) after fist-line induction therapy in a phase 2 clinical trial (MGN1703-C02, IMPACT). Methods: Following preclinical studies in mice and monkeys, a human clinical program was performed, including a phase 1 trial (MGN1703-C01), on a variety of solid tumors, and the double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 IMPACT trial with mCRC patients. Additionally, a single dose crossover, placebo-controlled phase 1 cardiac safety trial, MGN1703-C04, was conducted to assess cardiac and general safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in healthy volunteers (HV). Fourteen HV were randomized and 13 subjects completed the study receiving a subcutaneous dose of 60 mg MGN1703 during one treatment period and a single dose of placebo during the other. Results: After single dose administration of MGN1703 standard PK parameters were determined in the MGN1703-C04 trial: mean Tmax (14h), AUC0-t (5000 ng•hr/mL) and shape of the curve of MGN1703 concentration in serum. These were similar to single dose data obtained from cancer patients, where a mean Tmax of 10h and a mean AUC0-t of 5340 ng•hr/mL have been observed. Notably, multiple doses resulted in similar levels in serum of cancer patients, without accumulation of MGN1703. PD was mainly evaluated by analyzing levels of the chemokine IP-10 in serum of the HV as an equivalent of innate immune activation. Elevated IP-10 levels in the serum of HV were shown peaking at 24-48 hours after dosing with MGN1703. This is clearly in line with expected time frame of immune activation subsequent to MGN1703 appearance in the serum of the HV. Timing and levels of IP-10 elevation are in keeping with data from the peripheral blood of cancer patients, where in addition to IP-10 also the subsequent activation of innate immune cells – especially the up-regulation of CD169 on monocytes – as a consequence of MGN1703 administration was observed. Conclusions: The data show obvious similarities between healthy volunteers and cancer patients with respect to PK and PD and also confirm the appearance of the appropriate immunomodulatory signature downstream of MGN1703 appearance. This supports the twice weekly application scheme of current immunotherapy studies with MGN1703, e.g. the ongoing phase 3 IMPALA trial in mCRC patients. Further data will allow for evaluation of a possible association with clinical parameters in cancer patients. Citation Format: Manuel Schmidt, Kerstin Kapp, Detlef Oswald, Matthias Schroff, Burghardt Wittig, Alfredo Zurlo. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the immunotherapeutic TLR-9 agonist MGN1703 – conclusions by comparison of data from clinical trials with healthy volunteers and cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR Inaugural International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; September 16-19, 2015; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A035.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
David Cunningham; Alfredo Zurlo; Ramon Salazar; Michel Ducreux; Tom Samuel Waddell; Alexander Stein; Christophe Tournigand; Werner Scheithauer; Alberto Sobrero; Eric Van Cutsem; Dirk Arnold
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Sebastian Ochsenreither; Ulrich Keilholz; Konrad Klinghammer; Christina Dicke; Maxim Kebenko; Elena Garralda; Josep Tabernero; Ignacio Matos; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi; Luca Gianni; Gianluca Del Conte; Beate Habel; Hans Baumeister; Riccardo Belli; Alfredo Zurlo; Walter Fiedler
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Ulrich Keilholz; Andrzej Kawecki; Andreas Dietz; Bogdan Zurawski; Michael Schenker; Bozena Kukielka-Budny; Philippe Schafhausen; Anca C. Mihailov; Sebastian Ochenduszko; Ilaria Imarisio; Simona Mihutiu; Cristina-Marinela Oprean; Gunnar Folprecht; Alina Turcu; Sylvie Rottey; Philippe Debourdeau; Javier Lavernia; Bruno Dietrich; Alfredo Zurlo; Jérôme Fayette
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Hans Baumeister; Alfredo Zurlo; Jérôme Fayette; Bruno Dietrich; Ulrich Keilholz
Annals of Oncology | 2018
Elena Garralda; M E Van Hoef; Sebastian Ochsenreither; Luca Gianni; Domenica Lorusso; Walter Fiedler; Ulrich Keilholz; Konrad Klinghammer; C Dicke; Maxim Kebenko; Ignacio Matos; Josep Tabernero; Francesco Raspagliesi; G Del Conte; B Habel; Hans Baumeister; Alfredo Zurlo
Archive | 2016
Matthias Schroff; Manuel Schmidt; Kerstin Kapp; Alfredo Zurlo; Søgaard Ole Schmeltz; Martin Tolstrup; Rasmus Offersen