Alice Barkan

Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in plants.

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins constitute one of the largest protein families in land plants, with more than 400 members in most species. Over the past decade, much has been learned about the molecular functions of these proteins, where they act in the cell, and what physiological roles they play during plant growth and development. A typical PPR protein is targeted to mitochondria or chloroplasts, binds one or several organellar transcripts, and influences their expression by altering RNA sequence, turnover, processing, or translation. Their combined action has profound effects on organelle biogenesis and function and, consequently, on photosynthesis, respiration, plant development, and environmental responses. Recent breakthroughs in understanding how PPR proteins recognize RNA sequences through modular base-specific contacts will help match proteins to potential binding sites and provide a pathway toward designing synthetic RNA-binding proteins aimed at desired targets.

Participation of nuclear genes in chloroplast gene expression.

The expression of the plastid genome is dependent on a large number of nucleus-encoded factors. Some of these factors have been identified through biochemical assays, and many others by genetic screens in Arabidopsis, Chlamydomonas and maize. Nucleus-encoded factors function in each step in plastid gene expression, including transcription, RNA editing, RNA splicing, RNA processing, RNA degradation, and translation. Many of the factors discovered via biochemical approaches play general roles as components of the basic gene expression machinery, whereas the majority of those identified by genetic approaches are specifically required for the expression of small subsets of chloroplast genes and are involved in post-transcriptional steps. Some of the nucleus-encoded factors may play regulatory roles and modulate chloroplast gene expression in response to developmental or environmental cues. They may also serve to couple chloroplast gene expression with the assembly of the protein products into the large complexes of the photosynthetic apparatus. The convergence of biochemical approaches with those of classical and reverse genetics, and the contributions from large scale genomic sequencing should result in rapid advances in our understanding of the regulatory interactions that govern plastid gene expression.

A combinatorial amino acid code for RNA recognition by pentatricopeptide repeat proteins.

The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) is a helical repeat motif found in an exceptionally large family of RNA–binding proteins that functions in mitochondrial and chloroplast gene expression. PPR proteins harbor between 2 and 30 repeats and typically bind single-stranded RNA in a sequence-specific fashion. However, the basis for sequence-specific RNA recognition by PPR tracts has been unknown. We used computational methods to infer a code for nucleotide recognition involving two amino acids in each repeat, and we validated this model by recoding a PPR protein to bind novel RNA sequences in vitro. Our results show that PPR tracts bind RNA via a modular recognition mechanism that differs from previously described RNA–protein recognition modes and that underpins a natural library of specific protein/RNA partners of unprecedented size and diversity. These findings provide a significant step toward the prediction of native binding sites of the enormous number of PPR proteins found in nature. Furthermore, the extraordinary evolutionary plasticity of the PPR family suggests that the PPR scaffold will be particularly amenable to redesign for new sequence specificities and functions.

RNA immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis show a chloroplast Pentatricopeptide repeat protein to be associated with the 5' region of mRNAs whose translation it activates.

Plant nuclear genomes encode hundreds of predicted organellar RNA binding proteins, few of which have been connected with their physiological RNA substrates and functions. In fact, among the largest family of putative RNA binding proteins in plants, the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) family, no physiologically relevant RNA ligands have been firmly established. We used the chloroplast-splicing factor CAF1 to demonstrate the fidelity of a microarray-based method for identifying RNAs associated with specific proteins in chloroplast extract. We then used the same method to identify RNAs associated with the maize (Zea mays) PPR protein CRP1. Two mRNAs whose translation is CRP1-dependent were strongly and specifically enriched in CRP1 coimmunoprecipitations. These interactions establish CRP1 as a translational regulator by showing that the translation defects in crp1 mutants are a direct consequence of the absence of CRP1. Additional experiments localized these interactions to the 5′ untranslated regions and suggested a possible CRP1 interaction motif. These results enhance understanding of the PPR protein family by showing that a PPR protein influences gene expression through association with specific mRNAs in vivo, suggesting an unusual mode of RNA binding for PPR proteins, and highlighting the possibility that translational regulation may be a particularly common function of PPR proteins. Analogous methods should have broad application for the study of native RNA–protein interactions in both mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Molecular cloning of the maize gene crp1 reveals similarity between regulators of mitochondrial and chloroplast gene expression

The maize nuclear gene crp1 is required for the translation of the chloroplast petA and petD mRNAs and for the processing of the petD mRNA from a polycistronic precursor. In order to understand the biochemical role of the crp1 gene product and the interconnections between chloroplast translation and RNA metabolism, the crp1 gene and cDNA were cloned. The predicted crp1 gene product (CRP1) is related to nuclear genes in fungi that play an analogous role in mitochondrial gene expression, suggesting an underlying mechanistic similarity. Analysis of double mutants that lack both chloroplast ribosomes and crp1 function indicated that CRP1 activates a site‐specific endoribonuclease independently of any role it plays in translation. Antibodies prepared to recombinant CRP1 were used to demonstrate that CRP1 is localized to the chloroplast stroma and that it is a component of a multisubunit complex. The CRP1 complex is not associated detectably with either chloroplast membranes or chloroplast ribosomes. Models for CRP1 function and its relationship to other activators of organellar translation are discussed.

Site-specific binding of a PPR protein defines and stabilizes 5′ and 3′ mRNA termini in chloroplasts

Chloroplast mRNA populations are characterized by overlapping transcripts derived by processing from polycistronic precursors. The mechanisms and functional significance of these processing events are poorly understood. We describe a pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein, PPR10, whose binding defines mRNA segments derived from two transcription units in maize chloroplasts. PPR10 interacts in vivo and in vitro with two intergenic RNA regions of similar sequence. The processed 5′ and 3′ RNA termini in these regions overlap by approximately 25 nucleotides. The PPR10‐binding sites map precisely to these overlapping sequences, and PPR10 is required specifically for the accumulation of RNAs with these termini. These findings show that PPR10 serves as a barrier to RNA decay from either the 5′ or 3′ direction and that a bound protein provides an alternative to an RNA hairpin as a barrier to 3′ exonucleases. The results imply that protein ‘caps’ at both 5′ and 3′ ends can define the termini of chloroplast mRNA segments. These results, together with recent insights into bacterial RNA decay, suggest a unifying model for the biogenesis of chloroplast transcript populations and for the determinants of chloroplast mRNA stability.

A Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Facilitates the trans-Splicing of the Maize Chloroplast rps12 Pre-mRNA

The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) is a degenerate 35–amino acid repeat motif that is widely distributed among eukaryotes. Genetic, biochemical, and bioinformatic data suggest that many PPR proteins influence specific posttranscriptional steps in mitochondrial or chloroplast gene expression and that they may typically bind RNA. However, biological functions have been determined for only a few PPR proteins, and with few exceptions, substrate RNAs are unknown. To gain insight into the functions and substrates of the PPR protein family, we characterized the maize (Zea mays) nuclear gene ppr4, which encodes a chloroplast-targeted protein harboring both a PPR tract and an RNA recognition motif. Microarray analysis of RNA that coimmunoprecipitates with PPR4 showed that PPR4 is associated in vivo with the first intron of the plastid rps12 pre-mRNA, a group II intron that is transcribed in segments and spliced in trans. ppr4 mutants were recovered through a reverse-genetic screen and shown to be defective for rps12 trans-splicing. The observations that PPR4 is associated in vivo with rps12-intron 1 and that it is also required for its splicing demonstrate that PPR4 is an rps12 trans-splicing factor. These findings add trans-splicing to the list of RNA-related functions associated with PPR proteins and suggest that plastid group II trans-splicing is performed by different machineries in vascular plants and algae.

Nuclear Mutants of Maize with Defects in Chloroplast Polysome Assembly Have Altered Chloroplast RNA Metabolism.

The molecular basis for the photosynthetic defect in four nuclear mutants of maize was investigated. Mutants hcf7, cps1-1, cps1-2, and cps2 contained reduced levels of many chloroplast-encoded proteins without corresponding deficiencies in chloroplast mRNAs. Many chloroplast mRNAs were associated with abnormally few ribosomes, indicating that the protein deficiencies were due to global defects in chloroplast translation. These mutants were used to study the effects of reduced ribosome association on the metabolism of chloroplast RNAs. The level of the rbcL mRNA was reduced fourfold in each mutant, but was unaltered in other nonphotosynthetic mutants with normal chloroplast translation. These results suggest that the rbcL mRNA is destabilized as a consequence of its decreased association with ribosomes. The fact that many other chloroplast mRNAs accumulated to normal levels demonstrated that a decreased association with ribosomes does not significantly alter their stabilities or processing. hcf7 seedlings had a gross defect in the processing of the 16S rRNA: the primary lesion in this mutant may be a defect in 16S rRNA processing itself.

Proteins encoded by a complex chloroplast transcription unit are each translated from both monocistronic and polycistronic mRNAs.

Chloroplast genes are typically organized into polycistronic transcription units that give rise to complex sets of overlapping RNAs through a series of processing steps. The functional significance of this complicated mode of expression is unknown. To determine whether processing of the primary transcript is required to create translatable mRNAs, the translational properties of the RNAs derived from the maize psbB gene cluster (containing the psbB, psbH, petB and petD genes) were examined. Almost all of the approximately 20 RNAs derived from this region co‐sediment with polysomes in sucrose gradients, suggesting that at least one coding region on most transcripts is translated. To determine which sequences are translated on each polycistronic RNA, antibodies to psbB, petB or petD proteins were used to immunoselect polysomes engaged in the synthesis of each protein. Northern and S1 nuclease analyses of the immunoselected RNAs revealed that (i) potential start codons within the petB and petD introns are not functional in translation; (ii) all transcripts containing spliced petB or petD sequences are translated to give these proteins, regardless of upstream or downstream sequences; (iii) psbB is translated from all transcripts encoding it. It is concluded that intercistronic processing is not required for translation of these RNAs, although certain processing steps may enhance translational efficiency.

Expression of Plastid Genes: Organelle-Specific Elaborations on a Prokaryotic Scaffold

Chloroplasts and their nonphotosynthetic relatives in the plastid organelle family evolved from a cyanobacterial endosymbiont (for review, see [Timmis et al., 2004][1]). The subsequent coevolution of the chloroplast and nuclear genomes produced an organelle that is eubacterial at its core but with