Alice P. Chen

Phase I Study of Single-Agent AZD1775 (MK-1775), a Wee1 Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

PURPOSE Wee1 tyrosine kinase phosphorylates and inactivates cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) 1/2 in response to DNA damage. AZD1775 is a first-in-class inhibitor of Wee1 kinase with single-agent antitumor activity in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I study of single-agent AZD1775 in adult patients with refractory solid tumors to determine its maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and modulation of phosphorylated Tyr15-Cdk (pY15-Cdk) and phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) levels in paired tumor biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS AZD1775 was administered orally twice per day over 2.5 days per week for up to 2 weeks per 21-day cycle (3 + 3 design). At the MTD, paired tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and after the fifth dose to determine pY15-Cdk and γH2AX levels. Six patients with BRCA-mutant solid tumors were also enrolled at the MTD. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The MTD was established as 225 mg twice per day orally over 2.5 days per week for 2 weeks per 21-day cycle. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients carrying BRCA mutations: one with head and neck cancer and one with ovarian cancer. Common toxicities were myelosuppression and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicities were supraventricular tachyarrhythmia and myelosuppression. Accumulation of drug (t1/2 approximately 11 hours) was observed. Reduction in pY15-Cdk levels (two of five paired biopsies) and increases in γH2AX levels (three of five paired biopsies) were demonstrated. CONCLUSION This is the first report of AZD1775 single-agent activity in patients carrying BRCA mutations. Proof-of-mechanism was demonstrated by target modulation and DNA damage response in paired tumor biopsies.

Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

Dermatologic adverse events to cancer therapies have become more prevalent and may to lead to dose modifications or discontinuation of life-saving or prolonging treatments. This has resulted in a new collaboration between oncologists and dermatologists, which requires accurate cataloging and grading of side effects. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 is a descriptive terminology and grading system that can be used for uniform reporting of adverse events. A proper understanding of this standardized classification system is essential for dermatologists to properly communicate with all physicians caring for patients with cancer.

PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Ovarian and Breast Cancer

DNA damages result from errors in replication, production of reactive oxygen species, and exposure to ultraviolet rays and ionizing radiation. These lesions that result from these noxious events include point mutations, single strand breaks (SSBs), double strand breaks (DSBs), intrastrand and interstrand cross-links. Cells employ multiple types of DNA repair mechanisms: base excision repair (BER), nucleic acid excision repair (NER), homologous recombination(HR), single strand annealing (SSA), Mismatch Repair (MMR), and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) to repair these damages on a regular basis. As a result of DNA repair, injured cells can survive, which is optimal for normal cells, but exactly the opposite of the goal for tumor cells that undergo DNA damage in response to chemotherapy or radiation. In addition, errors can occur in the repair process especially with NHEJ that can lead to new abnormalities and dysfunction of the cells. Certain genetic disorders, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, as well as other genetic anomalies that prevent DNA repair are associated with increased risk of malignancies. [3] PARP is a family of proteins with enzymatic properties, scaffolding properties, and recruiting ability for other necessary DNA repair proteins. [4] PARP 1 and PARP 2 are the best known of these proteins and are critical for the function of BER. BER repairs single strand DNA breaks and inhibition of BER may ultimately lead to cell death. This makes PARP proteins ideal targets for anticancer therapy. PARP inhibitors interfere with BER and therefore DNA repair. By this route, PARP inhibitors can affect death of tumor cells. PARP inhibitors currently under clinical development are targeted to PARP 1 and PARP 2 proteins. They include Pfizer’s PF 01367338 (AG014699), AstraZeneca’s olaparib (AZD2281, KU-0059436), sanofi-aventis’ iniparib (BSI 201), Abbott Laboratories’ veliparib (ABT 888), Merck’s MK 4827, and Cephalon’s CEP 9722. Biomarin’s BMN673 (LT-673) and BiPar Science’s BSI 401 are in preclinical development.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of 9-aminocamptothecin given by 72-hour infusion in adult cancer patients.

PURPOSE To conduct a phase I and pharmacologic study of the new topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC was administered every 14 days to 48 solid-tumor patients at doses of 5 to 59 microg/m2/h without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 47 to 74 microg/m2/h with G-CSF. RESULTS Without G-CSF, two of eight patients who received 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their initial cycle, as did both patients who received 59 microg/m2/h (with a platelet count < 25,000/microL in one). With G-CSF, zero of seven patients treated with 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their first cycle, while dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in six of 14 patients (with platelet count < 25,000/microL in five) entered at 59 microg/m2/h. Among 39 patients entered at > or = 25 microg/m2/h 9-AC with or without G-CSF, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting of grade 2 severity ultimately occurred in 54%, 30%, and 38%, respectively, while grade 3 toxicities of each type occurred in 8% of patients. Steady-state 9-AC lactone concentration (Css) increased linearly from 0.89 to 10.6 nmol/L, and correlated strongly with leukopenia ( r = .85). CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC given by 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks is 35 microg/m2/h without G-CSF or 47 microg/m2/h with G-CSF support. Dose escalation in individual patients may be possible according to their tolerance.

Molecular Pathways: Targeting PARP in Cancer Treatment

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP) are a family of nuclear protein enzymes involved in the DNA damage response. The role of PARP-1 in base excisional repair has been extensively characterized. More recent in vitro studies additionally implicate a role for PARP-1 in facilitating homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining. The more faithful process of homologous recombination repair of double-stranded DNA breaks involves localization of BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 to sites of DNA damage, resection of the double-stranded break, and gap-filling DNA synthesis using the homologous sister chromatid as a template. Simultaneous dysfunction of both DNA repair pathways decreases the ability of cells to compensate, and forms the basis for the concept of synthetic lethality. Treatment strategies, thus far, have focused on two main principles: (i) exploitation of the concept of synthetic lethality in homologous recombination–deficient tumors, primarily in breast and ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation, and (ii) as radiosensitizers and chemosensitizers. BRCA deficiency accounts for only a fraction of dysfunction in homologous recombination repair. Epigenetic alterations of BRCA function and defects within the Fanconi anemia pathway also result in defective DNA repair. Rational therapeutic combinations exploiting alternate mechanisms of defective DNA repair, abrogation of cell-cycle checkpoints, and additional functions of PARP-1 present novel opportunities for further clinical development of PARP inhibitors. On the basis of the results of clinical studies of PARP inhibitors thus far, it is imperative that future development of PARP inhibitors take a more refined approach, identifying the unique subset of patients that would most benefit from these agents, determining the optimal time for use, and identifying the optimal combination partner in any particular setting. Clin Cancer Res; 19(5); 977–84. ©2012 AACR.

Randomized Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide and Veliparib in High-Grade Serous Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancers, or BRCA-Mutant Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: Veliparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrated clinical activity in combination with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with BRCA-mutant solid tumors in a phase I trial. To define the relative contribution of PARP inhibition to the observed clinical activity, we conducted a randomized phase II trial to determine the response rate of veliparib in combination with cyclophosphamide compared with cyclophosphamide alone in patients with pretreated BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer or in patients with pretreated primary peritoneal, fallopian tube, or high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC). Experimental Design: Adult patients were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide alone (50 mg orally once daily) or with veliparib (60 mg orally once daily) in 21-day cycles. Crossover to the combination was allowed at disease progression. Results: Seventy-five patients were enrolled and 72 were evaluable for response; 38 received cyclophosphamide alone and 37 the combination as their initial treatment regimen. Treatment was well tolerated. One complete response was observed in each arm, with three partial responses (PR) in the combination arm and six PRs in the cyclophosphamide alone arm. Genetic sequence and expression analyses were performed for 211 genes involved in DNA repair; none of the detected genetic alterations were significantly associated with treatment benefit. Conclusion: This is the first trial that evaluated single-agent, low-dose cyclophosphamide in HGSOC, peritoneal, fallopian tube, and BRCA-mutant ovarian cancers. It was well tolerated and clinical activity was observed; the addition of veliparib at 60 mg daily did not improve either the response rate or the median progression-free survival. Clin Cancer Res; 21(7); 1574–82. ©2015 AACR.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a 72-hour infusion of 9-aminocamptothecin in adult cancer patients

PURPOSE To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) infused over 72 hours at doses of 5 to 74 micrograms/m2/h. PATIENTS AND METHODS 9-AC lactone and total (lactone plus carboxylate) plasma concentrations were measured in 44 patients with solid tumors using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Fifteen patients underwent extended pharmacokinetic sampling to determine the distribution and elimination kinetics of 9-AC. RESULTS At steady-state, 8.7% +/- 4.7% (mean +/- SD) of the total drug circulated in plasma as the active 9-AC lactone. Clearance of 9-AC lactone was uniform (24.5 +/- 7.3 L/h/m2) over the entire dose range examined; however, total 9-AC clearance was nonlinear and increased at higher dose levels. In 15 patients treated at dose levels > or = 47 micrograms/m2/h, the volume of distribution at steady-state for 9-AC lactone was 195 +/- 114 L/m2 and for total 9-AC it was 23.6 +/- 10.6 L/m2. The elimination half-life was 4.47 +/- 0.53 hours for 9-AC lactone and 8.38 +/- 2.10 hours for total 9-AC. In pharmacodynamic studies, dose-limiting neutropenia correlated with steady-state lactone concentrations (Css) R2 = .77) and drug dose (R2 = .71). CONCLUSION Plasma 9-AC concentrations rapidly declined to low levels following the end of a 72-hour infusion and the mean fraction of total 9-AC circulating in plasma as the active lactone was less than 10%. The pharmacokinetics of 9-AC may have a great impact on its clinical activity and should be considered in the design of future clinical trials of this topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Phase I clinical trial of continuous infusion cyclopentenyl cytosine.

Cyclopentenyl cytosine (CPE-C) is an investigational drug that is active against human solid tumor xenografts. The 5′-triphosphate of CPE-C inhibits CTP synthase, and depletes CTP and dCTP pools. We conducted a phase I clinical trial of CPE-C given as a 24-h continuous i. v. infusion every 3 weeks in 26 adults with solid tumors. The starting dose rate, 1 mg/m2 per h, was selected on the basis of both preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic data from two patients obtained after a test dose of 24 mg/m2 CPE-C as an i. v. bolus. Dose escalation was guided by clinical toxicity. A total of 87 cycles were given, and ten patients received four or more cycles. The mean CPE-C steady-state plasma levels (Cpss) increased linearly from 0.4 μM to 3.1 μM at dose levels ranging from 1 to 5.9 mg/m2 per h (actual body weight); the mean total body clearance was 146±38 ml/min per m2. CPE-C was eliminated by both renal excretion of intact drug and deamination to cyclopentenyl uracil in an apparent 2∶1 ratio. CTP synthase activity in intact bone marrow mononuclear cells was inhibited by 58% to 100% at 22 h compared to matched pretreatment samples at all CPE-C dose levels. When all data were combined, flux through CTP synthase was decreased by 89.6%±3.1% at 22h (mean ± SE,n=16), and remained inhibited by 67.6%±7.7% (n=10) for at least 24 h post-CPE-C infusion. Granulocyte and platelet toxicities were dose-dependent, and dose-limiting myelosuppression occurred during the initial cycle in two of three patients treated with 5.9 mg/m2 per h. Four of 11 patients (4 of 20 cycles) who received 4.7 mg/m2 per h CPE-C experienced hypotension 24–48 h after completion of the CPE-C infusion during their first (n=2), third (n=1) and sixth cycles (n=1), respectively. Two of these patients died with refractory hypotension despite aggressive hydration and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. One of 12 patients (28 total cycles) treated with 3.5 mg/m2 per h CPE-C experienced orthostatic hypotension during cycle 1, and this patient had a second episode of orthostatic hypotension at a lower dose (3.0 mg/m2per h). Hypotension was not seen in patients receiving ≤2.5 mg/m2 per h CPE-C. The occurrence of hypotension did not directly correlate with either CPE-C Cpss, CPE-U plasma levels, pretreatment cytidine plasma levels, baseline CTP synthase activity, or with the degree of enzyme inhibition during treatment. While the hypotension appeared to be dose-related, its unpredictable occurrence and the uncertainty concerning the mechanism preclude a recommendation of a tolerable dose for future studies.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given in combination with fluorouracil plus calcium leucovorin in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE To determine the toxicities and potential for dose escalation of intravenous (IV) bolus fluorouracil (5-FU) given with 500 mg/m2/d leucovorin (LCV) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-seven patients received escalating doses of 5-FU/LCV on days 1 to 5 with subcutaneous GM-CSF either 5 or 10 micrograms/kg/d starting on day 6 or 3 micrograms/kg/d starting on day 1. 5-FU was escalated from 370 mg/m2/d by 15% increments between patient cohorts and within patients according to tolerance. RESULTS With GM-CSF starting on day 6, dose-limiting toxicity occurred during cycle no. 1 in all three patients entered at 5-FU 490 mg/m2/d. However, individual patients tolerated 5-FU doses up to 644 mg/m2/d. When all cycles were analyzed, grade 3 to 4 mucositis and grade 4 granulocytopenia complicated < or = 15% and < or = 6% of cycles with 5-FU doses < or = 560 mg/m2/d (115 cycles). With GM-CSF starting on day 1, dose-limiting granulocytopenia occurred during cycle no. 1 in five of 10 patients entered at 5-FU 490 mg/m2/d. Although the granulocyte nadirs were significantly lower at each 5-FU dose level with the concurrent GM-CSF schedule (eg, 490 mg/m2/d: median, 879/microL v3,286/microL; two-tailed P [P2] < .001), dose-limiting granulocytopenia complicated < or = 16% of cycles with 5-FU < or = 560 mg/m2/d (99 cycles); > or = grade 3 mucositis occurred in < or = 20% of cycles. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was unusual with either GM-CSF schedule. Most patients treated with GM-CSF > or = 5 micrograms/kg/d required dose reductions for constitutional toxicity; 3.0 to 3.8 micrograms/kg/d was better tolerated. Venous thrombosis occurred in 17% of patients (concurrent v sequential GM-CSF, 29% v 5%; P2 = .08). The median delivered 5-FU dose-intensity for GM-CSF starting either on day 6 or on day 1 was 615 and 647 mg/m2/wk (P2 = .41), respectively. Pharmacologic exposure to 5-FU increased with higher doses of 5-FU, and concurrent GM-CSF administration did not affect 5-FU clearance. CONCLUSION A starting dose of 425 mg/m2/d of 5-FU with LCV on days 1 to 5 could be safely combined with GM-CSF starting either on day 1 or day 6, with further 5-FU dose escalation according to individual tolerance.

Application of Molecular Profiling in Clinical Trials for Advanced Metastatic Cancers

There is growing interest in the application of molecular profiling, including sequencing, genotyping, and/or mRNA expression profiling, to the analysis of patient tumors with the objective of applying these data to inform therapeutic choices for patients with advanced cancers. Multiple clinical trials that are attempting to validate this personalized or precision medicine approach are in various stages of development and execution. Although preliminary data from some of these efforts have fueled excitement about the value and utility of these studies, their execution has also provoked many questions about the best way to approach complicating factors such as tumor heterogeneity and the choice of which genetic mutations to target. This commentary highlights some of the challenges confronting the clinical application of molecular tumor profiling and the various trial designs being utilized to address these challenges. Randomized trials that rigorously test patient response to molecularly targeted agents assigned based on the presence of a defined set of mutations in putative cancer-driving pathways are required to address some of the current challenges and to identify patients likely to benefit from this approach.