Alina A. Constantinescu

Minor elevations in troponin I are associated with mortality and adverse cardiac events in patients with atrial fibrillation

AIMSnIn patients with atrial fibrillation, minor troponin I elevation is regularly detected; however, the prognostic significance of this finding is unknown. We therefore sought to examine the prognostic value of elevated troponin I in patients with atrial fibrillation.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnA prospective study was conducted analysing all consecutive patients admitted with atrial fibrillation in a 2-year period. Patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. Minor troponin elevation was defined as a troponin I level between 0.15 and 0.65 ng/mL, which is still below the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit. A positive troponin I was defined as ≥ 0.65 ng/mL. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality (death), death and myocardial infarction (death/MI), or all major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, or revascularization). A total of 407 patients were eligible for inclusion. The median duration of follow-up was 688 days. A minor elevation occurred in 81 (20%) patients and 77 (19%) had a positive troponin I. In a multivariate model, minor troponin I elevation and a positive troponin I were independently associated with death [hazard ratio (HR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-4.73 for minor elevation and HR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.42-10.02 for positive troponin I]. Also, there was an independent correlation between the combined endpoints of death/MI and MACE and both a minor elevation and a positive troponin I.nnnCONCLUSIONnMinor elevations in troponin I on hospital admission are associated with mortality and cardiac events in patients with atrial fibrillation and might be useful for risk stratification.

Repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T or C-reactive protein do not predict future allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Background Studies on the prognostic value of serial biomarker assays for future occurrence of allograft rejection (AR) are scarce. We examined whether repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T (TropT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict AR. Methods From 2005 to 2010, 77 consecutive heart transplantation (HTx) recipients were included. The NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP were measured at 16 ± 4 (mean ± standard deviation) consecutive routine endomyocardial biopsy surveillance visits during the first year of follow-up. Allograft rejection was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 2R or higher at endomyocardial biopsy. Joint modeling was used to assess the association between repeated biomarker measurements and occurrence of future AR. Joint modeling accounts for dependence among repeated observations in individual patients. Results The mean age of the patients at HTx was 49 ± 9.2 years, and 68% were men. During the first year of follow-up, 1,136 biopsies and concurrent blood samples were obtained, and 56 patients (73%) experienced at least one episode of AR. All biomarkers were elevated directly after HTx and achieved steady-state after ∼12 weeks, both in patients with or without AR. No associations were present between the repeated measurements of NT-proBNP, TropT, or CRP and AR both early (weeks 0–12) and late (weeks 13–52) in the course after HTx (hazard ratios for weeks 13–52: 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.68), 0.67 (0.27–1.69), and 1.44 (0.90–2.30), respectively, per ln[unit]). Combining the three biomarkers in one model also rendered null results. Conclusion The temporal evolution of NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP before AR did not predict occurrence of acute AR both in the early and late course of the first year after HTx.

First-Line Support by Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Non-Ischaemic Cardiogenic Shock in the Era of Modern Ventricular Assist Devices

Objectives: Little is known about circulatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) from other causes than the acute coronary syndrome or after cardiotomy. We evaluated the effects of first-line intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support in this subpopulation of CS patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 27 patients with CS from end-stage cardiomyopathy supported firstly by IABP in the years 2011-2016. Results: At 24 h, lactate decreased from 3.2 (2.1-6.8) to 1.8 (1.2-2.2) mmol/L (p < 0.001). Eighteen patients (67%) defined as IABP responders were successfully bridged to either recovery (n = 7), left ventricular assist device (n = 5), or heart transplantation (n = 6). IABP failed in 9 patients (non-responders, 33%) who either died (n = 7) or needed support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 2). At 24 h of IABP support, urinary output was higher (2,660 [1,835-4,440] vs. 1,200 [649-2,385] mL; p = 0.02) and fluid balance more negative (-1,564 [-2,673 to -1,086] vs. -500 [-930 to +240] mL; p < 0.001) in responders than non-responders. Overall survival at 1 year was 63%. Conclusion: In most patients, first-line support by IABP in end-stage cardiomyopathy is associated with improvement in organ perfusion and clinical stabilisation for at least 24 h allowing time for decision making on next therapies.

Intrapatient Variability in Tacrolimus Exposure Does Not Predict The Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplant

OBJECTIVEnA high intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure is associated with poor long-term outcomes after kidney transplant. We hypothesized that a high intrapatient variability of tacrolimus exposure after heart transplant may be associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy as a determinant of long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnEighty-six heart transplant recipients were included. Patients underwent coronary angiography at years 1 and 4 after transplant and were divided according to low and high intrapatient variability of tacrolimus exposure, with the median variability as cut-off. The primary outcome was the association between tacrolimus intrapatient variability and the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy score between years 1 and 4. Secondary outcome was this association with acute cellular rejection.nnnRESULTSnThere was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with high tacrolimus intrapatient variability in the group that progressed to higher grades of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 15) versus the group without progression (n = 71) at 4-year follow-up (60.0% vs 47.9%; P = .57). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with high tacrolimus intrapatient variability between the 58 patients with 1 or more acute cellular rejection episodes and the 28 patients without rejection (51.7% vs 46.4%; P = .82).nnnCONCLUSIONSnA high intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure does not appear to influence heart transplant outcomes, unlike its influence on kidney transplant function. A higher immunosuppression exposure after heart transplant, including the use of prednisone often in a combination of 3 immunosuppressive drugs, may protect against the effects of high intrapatient tacrolimus variability.

Long-Term Mechanical Durability of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Urgent Call for Periodic Assessment of Technical Integrity.

Long-term durability and incidence of potential mechanical device failure (MDF) are largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the incidence and potential predictors of MDF in continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients. We conducted a retrospective study of all CF-LVADs (type HeartMate II) implanted in our center. MDF was defined as a failure of driveline, inflow–outflow graft, electrical power, drive unit, or motor failure, excluding device failure because of a biologic complication (e.g., device thrombosis, hemolysis, or infections). A total of 69 CF-LVADs were implanted in 59 patients (median support time 344 days [interquartile range {IQR}, 149–712 days], mean age 50.1u2009±u200910.7 years, 75% male). MDF occurred in 9 (13%) CF-LVAD patients at a median follow-up time of 846 (IQR, 708–1337) days after implantation. Freedom of MDF through the first, second, and third year after LVAD implantation was 100%, 85%, and 64%, respectively. Patients who experienced MDF were significantly longer supported by their LVAD (median 846 [IQR, 708–1337] vs 268 [IQR, 103–481] days; p = 0.001) and were more frequently readmitted because of LVAD-related technical problems (p = 0.002), including a higher rate of LVAD controllers exchange (44% vs 12%, respectively; p = 0.03). The main reason for MDF was a damaged or fractured driveline (n=8, 89%). In 2 patients, sudden death was related to MDF. Patients needing extended CF-LVAD support are at increasing risk for MDF. Various technical problems precede the onset of MDF. Periodical extensive assessment of the technical integrity of the device is urgently needed during long-term LVAD support.