Alison Hall

Polyarticular sonographic assessment of gout: A hospital-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE To assess the sonographic frequency of synovial effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis, and double contour sign at joints commonly affected by gout and whether these features differ according to serum urate levels, disease duration, and use of urate-lowering therapy. METHODS Participants with gout were recruited from rheumatology clinics. A detailed clinical assessment was undertaken of gout history, co-morbidities, medication, alcohol consumption, height, weight, clinical synovitis, tophi, and serum urate. Sonographic examination of the metatarsophalangeal joints, ankles, knees, metacarpophalangeal joints, wrists and elbows for synovial effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis and double contour sign was undertaken. The mean number of joints affected were compared according to serum urate (<360 μmol/L versus ≥360 μmol/L), urate-lowering therapy (yes/no), and disease duration (≤5 years versus>5 years). RESULTS Forty patients participated in the study. Synovial effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis, and double contour sign were identified in 36 (90%), 38 (95%), 24 (62%) and 37 (93%) participants respectively. Synovial effusion was seen most frequently at the knee (right 70%, left 68%) followed by the first metatarsophalangeal (right 48%, left 40%) and lesser metatarsophalangeal joints (right 45%, left 35%). Synovial hypertrophy, synovitis, and double contour sign were seen most frequently at the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hypertrophy: right 65%, left 60%; synovitis: right 18%, left 18%; double contour: right 60%, left 68%). These findings did not differ according to serum urate, disease duration, or use of urate-lowering therapy. CONCLUSION Polyarticular sonography frequently identifies synovial effusion, synovial hypertrophy, synovitis and double contour sign in patients with gout, particularly at the metatarsophalangeal joints and knees.

Management of shoulder pain by UK general practitioners (GPs): a national survey

Objectives Studies in Canada, the USA and Australia suggested low confidence among general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing and managing shoulder pain, with frequent use of investigations. There are no comparable studies in the UK; our objective was to describe the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain by GPs in the UK. Methods A national survey of a random sample of 5000 UK GPs collected data on shoulder pain diagnosis and management using two clinical vignettes that described primary care presentations with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) and adhesive capsulitis (AdhC). Results Seven hundred and fourteen (14.7%) responses were received. 56% and 83% of GPs were confident in their diagnosis of RCT and AdhC, respectively, and a wide range of investigations and management options were reported. For the RCT presentation, plain radiographs of the shoulder were most common (60%), followed by blood tests (42%) and ultrasound scans (USS) (38%). 19% of those who recommended a radiograph and 76% of those who recommended a USS did so ‘to confirm the diagnosis’. For the AdhC presentation, the most common investigations were blood tests (60%), plain shoulder radiographs (58%) and USS (31%). More than two-thirds of those recommending a USS did so ‘to confirm the diagnosis’. The most commonly recommended treatment for both presentations was physiotherapy (RCT 77%, AdhC 71%) followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (RCT 58%, AdhC 74%). 17% opted to refer the RCT to secondary care (most often musculoskeletal interface service), compared with 31% for the AdhC. Conclusions This survey of GPs in the UK highlights reliance on radiographs and blood tests in the management of common shoulder pain presentations. GPs report referring more than 7 out of 10 patients with RCT and AdhC to physiotherapists. These findings need to be viewed in the context of low response to the survey and, therefore, potential non-response bias.

A training, assessment and feedback package for the trainee shoulder sonographer

Diagnostic ultrasound of the shoulder is recognised as being one of the most technically challenging aspects of musculoskeletal ultrasound to master. It has a steep learning curve and makes gaining competency a time-intensive training process for both the trainee and their trainer. This article describes a training, assessment and feedback package developed within the framework of a Consortium for the Accreditation of Sonographic Education approved post-graduate ultrasound course. The package comprises: (i) a shoulder diagnostic ultrasound scan protocol with definition of findings, differential diagnosis and pro forma for recording scan findings, (ii) an assessment form for performance of shoulder diagnostic ultrasound scans with assessment criteria and (iii) a combined performance assessment and scan findings form, for each tissue being imaged. The package has been developed using medical education principles and provides a mechanism for trainees to follow an internationally recognised protocol. Supplementary information includes the differential diagnostic process used by an expert practitioner, which can otherwise be difficult to elicit. The package supports the trainee with recording their findings quickly and consistently and helps the trainee and trainer to explicitly recognise the challenges of scanning different patients or pathologies. It provides a mechanism for trainers to quantify and trainees to evidence their emerging competency. The package detailed in this article is therefore proposed for use in shoulder ultrasound training and its principles could be adapted for other musculoskeletal regions or other ultrasound disciplines.

Coexistence of plantar calcaneal spurs and plantar fascial thickening in individuals with plantar heel pain

Objectives To examine associations between plantar calcaneal spurs, plantar fascia thickening and plantar heel pain (PHP), and to determine whether tenderness on palpation of the heel differentiates between these presentations. Methods Adults aged ⩾50 years registered with four general practices were mailed a Health Survey. Responders reporting foot pain within the last 12 months underwent a detailed clinical assessment. PHP in the past month was documented using a foot manikin. Plantar calcaneal spurs were identified from weight-bearing lateral radiographs and plantar fascia thickening (defined as >4 mm) from ultrasound. Tenderness on palpation of the plantar fascia insertion was documented. Associations between these factors and PHP were explored using generalized estimating equations. Results Clinical and radiographic data were available from 530 participants (296 women, mean [s.d.] age 64.9 [8.4] years), 117 (22.1%) of whom reported PHP. Plantar calcaneal spurs and plantar fascia thickening were identified in 281 (26.5%) and 501 (47.3%) feet, respectively, but frequently coexisted (n = 217, 20.4%). Isolated plantar calcaneal spurs were rare (n = 64, 6.0%). Participants with PHP were more likely to have a combination of these features compared with those without PHP (odds ratio 2.16, 95% CI 1.24, 3.77, P = 0.007). Tenderness on palpation of the heel was not associated with plantar calcaneal spurs or plantar fascia thickening, either in isolation or in combination, in those with PHP. Conclusion Plantar calcaneal spurs and plantar fascial thickening are associated with PHP, but frequently coexist. Tenderness on palpation of the heel does not appear to differentiate between clinical presentations of PHP.