Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alison J. King is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alison J. King.


Marine and Freshwater Research | 2012

Short-term effects of a prolonged blackwater event on aquatic fauna in the Murray River, Australia: considerations for future events

Alison J. King; Zeb Tonkin; J Lieshcke

Blackwater contains high levels of dissolved organic carbon that can be rapidly consumed by microbes, sometimes leading to extremely low levels of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) and drastic consequences for aquatic life, including fish kills. Drought-breaking rains in late 2010 inundated large areas of the Barmah–Millewa Forest, southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia, and resulted in a prolonged hypoxic blackwater event within the forest and the Murray River downstream. This study investigated the short-term effects of the blackwater event on fish and crayfish. Compared with non-affected sites, blackwater affected sites had: significantly higher abundances of emerged Murray crayfish (Euastacus armatus) that were vulnerable to desiccation, predation and exploitation; large numbers of dead or dying shrimp and yabbies; significantly reduced abundances of native fish; but contained similar abundances of alien fish species (particularly common carp, Cyprinus carpio). The nature of the mechanisms that caused these changes and the longer term significance of the event on the river system remains an important area for future research. We also propose a range of management considerations for reducing the blackwater impacts, such as the timing of environmental water delivery after prolonged drought and the importance of maintaining river–floodplain connectivity during flood periods.


Environmental Management | 2015

Improving ecological response monitoring of environmental flows.

Alison J. King; Ben Gawne; Leah Beesley; John D. Koehn; Daryl L. Nielsen; Amina Price

AbstractEnvironmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2014

Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives

Nick R. Bond; Justin F. Costelloe; Alison J. King; Danielle M. Warfe; Paul Reich; Stephen Richard Balcombe

Restoration of floodplain ecosystems through the reinstatement of floods is often hampered by insufficient water as a result of competing human demands. An emerging alternative approach relies on floodplain infrastructure – such as levees, weirs, regulators, and pumps – to control water levels within floodplains without requiring landscape-scale overbank floods. This technique, albeit water efficient and capable of achieving some ecological targets, does not mimic the hydraulics, hydrodynamics, and lateral connectivity of natural floods. Engineering approaches like this may risk detrimental ecological outcomes, including reductions in biotic connectivity, river–floodplain productivity, and water quality, and thus may fail to support the range of ecological processes required to sustain healthy river–floodplain systems. Here, we review the potential benefits, risks, and mitigation options associated with engineered artificial flooding. Given the growing challenge of equitable water allocation, further research on and monitoring of engineered floods as a tool to sustain floodplain ecosystems are urgently required.


Wetlands | 2012

A Bayesian Belief Network Decision Support Tool for Watering Wetlands to Maximise Native Fish Outcomes.

Ben Gawne; Amina Price; John D. Koehn; Alison J. King; Daryl L. Nielsen; Shaun Meredith; Leah Beesley; Lorenzo Vilizzi

Wetlands are productive and diverse habitats for native fish but can be highly degraded, particularly in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB), south-eastern Australia. Wetland management requires tools and processes that facilitate the synthesis and application of knowledge for decisions concerning the allocation of environmental water to wetlands to improve environmental outcomes. This paper describes the development of a Decision Support Tool (DST), based on a Bayesian Network designed to provide the best available science and support adaptive management of environmental flows into wetlands. The DST predicts the probability of improvements in fish population health as defined by abundance, population structure and fish condition for introduced common carp and three native species of fish: carp gudgeon, Australian smelt, and golden perch. Model sensitivity and validation showed that fish response varied depending on model inputs, but that responses from the DST were an accurate reflection of fish responses in wetlands based on field data. Ultimately, the success of this DST is dependent on its adoption by wetland managers. Throughout the entire development process, adoption of the DST has been promoted through engagement with managers and subsequently, through initiatives to integrate it into current management initiatives.


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2016

Using abiotic drivers of fish spawning to inform environmental flow management

Alison J. King; Daniel C. Gwinn; Zeb Tonkin; John Mahoney; Scott Raymond; Leah Beesley

Summary 1. Environmental flows are a key restoration technique for conserving ecological function in flow-degraded rivers. Species-specific, flow–biota relationships are increasingly being used to determine environmental flow needs and manage their use; however, many of these relationships are poorly described. 2. We evaluate relationships between environmental variables and spawning intensity for a fish assemblage from the Murray River, Australia, over a ten-year period. We developed a hierarchical multispecies model that accounted for incomplete detection to compare spawning outcomes of native and non-native species using realistic, alternative, water management scenarios. 3. Temperature was an important predictor of spawning intensity for all seven species studied, while both concurrent and antecedent flow conditions were important for many species. Our water management scenario testing accounted for these relationships and indicated that increasing the magnitude of smaller floods following lower antecedent flow conditions, at water temperatures of 18–20C, achieves the greatest spawning outcome for native fish. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results indicate that principally temperature, and flow as a secondary variable, influence the timing and strength of fish spawning. The synthesis of these spawning relationships predicts that managers will achieve the greatest spawning return per unit of environmental water when flows are applied on top of an existing flow pulse. This study highlights the importance of considering a range of abiotic factors and the use of modelling scenarios to improve environmental flow outcomes.


Freshwater Science | 2015

Implications of water extraction on the low-flow hydrology and ecology of tropical savannah rivers: an appraisal for northern Australia

Alison J. King; Simon A. Townsend; Michael M. Douglas; Mark J. Kennard

Balancing the freshwater needs of humans and ecosystems is a fundamental challenge for the management of rivers worldwide. River regulation and water extraction can affect all components of the natural flow regime, yet few studies have investigated the effects on the low-flow end of the hydrograph. Low-flow periods are hydrologically distinctive and ecologically important, varying in nature among climatic zones. Tropical savannah rivers are characterized by highly seasonal and predictable flow regimes, but with high interannual variation in the magnitude, timing, and duration of low flows. Many tropical savannah rivers are relatively intact, especially in northern Australia, but many are now receiving increasing attention for water-resource development through surface- and groundwater extraction. We identified the hydroecological effects of water extraction on 3 phases of the seasonal flow regime: the wet–dry transition, dry season, and dry–wet season transition for perennial and intermittent rivers in tropical savannah climates. We propose a conceptual model and 7 predictions that describe the ecological implications of dry-season water extraction in tropical savannah river systems worldwide. The predictions address: 1) connectivity, 2) availability of in-stream habitat, 3) dry-season persistence of in-channel refugia, 4) water quality during dry–wet and wet–dry transition periods, 5) decoupling of wet- and dry-season flows, and the cumulative effects on 6) groundwater-dependent species and 7) whole-ecosystem shifts. We used northern Australia as a case study to review the current level of evidence in support of these predictions and their potential ecological consequences, and used this review to propose key priorities for future research that are globally applicable.


Environmental Modelling and Software | 2013

Model development of a Bayesian Belief Network for managing inundation events for wetland fish

Lorenzo Vilizzi; Amina Price; Leah Beesley; Ben Gawne; Alison J. King; John D. Koehn; Shaun Meredith; Daryl L. Nielsen

Wetlands are essential components of floodplain-river ecosystems that often suffer degradation due to river regulation. To this end, the application of environmental water is increasingly being seen as an important amelioration strategy. However, decisions regarding the delivery of water to maximise environmental benefits, including native fish population health, are complex and difficult. This paper describes the development of a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) model as part of a Decision Support Tool for assessing inundation strategies to benefit native wetland fish. Separate, albeit closely related, BBNs were developed for three native (golden perch Macquaria ambigua, carp gudgeon Hypseleotris spp., Australian smelt Retropinna semoni) and one alien fish species (common carp Cyprinus carpio carpio). The model structure was based on a conceptualisation of the relationships between wetland habitats, hydrology and fish responses, with emphasis on the types of inundation activities undertaken by managers. Conditional probability tables for fish responses were constructed from expert opinion and the model was validated against field data. The predictive ability and sensitivity of the model reflected the inherent high variability in relationships between wetland characteristics, hydrology and fish responses, but was nonetheless able to address satisfactorily such complexities within a holistic framework. As the model was designed in conjunction with managers and evaluated by them, its application will be enhanced by on-going engagement between managers and scientists.


Nature Ecology and Evolution | 2017

Confronting the risks of large-scale invasive species control

R. Keller Kopf; Dale G. Nimmo; Paul Humphries; Lee Baumgartner; Michael Bode; Nick R. Bond; Andrea E. Byrom; Julien Cucherousset; Reuben P. Keller; Alison J. King; Heather M. McGinness; Peter B. Moyle; Julian D. Olden

Large-scale invasive species control initiatives are motivated by laudable desires for native species recovery and economic benefits, but they are not without risk. Management interventions and policies should include evidence-based risk-benefit assessment and mitigation planning.


Marine and Freshwater Research | 2015

A commentary on 'Long-term ecological trends of flow-dependent ecosystems in a major regulated river basin', by Matthew J. Colloff, Peter Caley, Neil Saintilan, Carmel A. Pollino and Neville D. Crossman

Richard T. Kingsford; Ralph Mac Nally; Alison J. King; Keith F. Walker; Gilad Bino; Ross M. Thompson; Skye Wassens; Paul Humphries

Colloff et al. in Marine and Freshwater Research (http:dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF14067) examined time-series data for flow-dependent vegetation, invertebrates, fish, frogs, reptiles and waterbirds in the Murray–Darling Basin, 1905–2013. They concluded that temporal patterns fluctuated, declining during droughts and recovering after floods. They suggested that major changes in land use in the late 19th century permanently modified these freshwater ecosystems, irretrievably degrading them before major water diversions. Restoring water to the environment might then be interpreted as not addressing biotic declines. We argue that their conclusions are inadequately supported, although data quality remains patchy and they neglected the influence of hydrology and the timing and extent of water resource development. We are critical of the lack of adequate model specification and the omission of statistical power analyses. We show that declines of native flow-dependent flora and fauna have continued through the 20th and early 21st centuries, in response to multiple factors, including long-term changes in flow regimes. We argue that flow-regime changes have been critical, but not in isolation. So, returning water to the environment is a prerequisite for sustained recovery but governments need to improve monitoring and analyses to adequately determine effectiveness of management of the rivers and wetlands of the Murray–Darling Basin.


Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries | 2016

Towards deeper collaboration: stories of Indigenous interests, aspirations, partnerships and leadership in aquatic research and management

David A. Crook; Michael M. Douglas; Alison J. King; Stephan B Schnierer

We have been a part of the lands so long that we, through that nutrient cycle, our flesh is put into the ground and becomes part of the soil and nourishes the grass, the trees, the animals that we eat. We become part of them.We become related to them. When we use these things or eat these things in our ceremony we give thanks because it is our relations that are keeping us alive. – Mi’kmaq elder Kerry Prosper on the concept of ‘‘Netukulimk’’ (McMillan and Prosper 2016).

Collaboration


Dive into the Alison J. King's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zeb Tonkin

Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. Koehn

Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leah Beesley

Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Mahoney

Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David S. L. Ramsey

Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Humphries

Charles Sturt University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge