Alison M. Crowe
East Sussex County Council
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alison M. Crowe.
The Lancet | 1999
Harold Ellis; Brendan Moran; Jeremy N. Thompson; Michael C. Parker; Malcolm S Wilson; D. Menzies; Alistair McGuire; A.M. Lower; Robert J. S. Hawthorn; Fiona O'Brien; Scot Buchan; Alison M. Crowe
BACKGROUND Adhesions after abdominal and pelvic surgery are important complications, although their basic epidemiology is unclear. We investigated the frequency of such complications in the general population to provide a basis for the targeting and assessment of new adhesion-prevention measures. METHODS We used validated data from the Scottish National Health Service medical record linkage database to identify patients undergoing open abdominal or pelvic surgery in 1986, who had no record of such surgery in the preceding 5 years. Patients were followed up for 10 years and subsequent readmissions were reviewed and outcomes classified by the degree of adhesion. We also assessed the rate of adhesion-related admissions in 1994 for the population of 5 million people. FINDINGS 1209 (5.7%) of all readmissions (21,347) were classified as being directly related to adhesions, with 1169 (3.8%) managed operatively. Overall, 34.6% of the 29,790 patients who underwent open abdominal or pelvic surgery in 1986 were readmitted a mean of 2.1 times over 10 years for a disorder directly or possibly related to adhesions, or for abdominal or pelvic surgery that could be potentially complicated by adhesions. 22.1% of all outcome readmissions occurred in the first year after initial surgery, but readmissions continued steadily throughout the 10-year period. In 1994, 4199 admissions were directly related to adhesions. INTERPRETATION Postoperative adhesions have important consequences to patients, surgeons, and the health system. Surgical procedures with a high risk of adhesion-related complications need to be identified and adhesion prevention carefully assessed.
Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2001
M. C. Parker; Harold Ellis; Brendan Moran; Jeremy N. Thompson; Malcolm S Wilson; D. Menzies; Alistair McGuire; A.M. Lower; Robert J. S. Hawthorn; Fiona O'Brien; Scot Buchan; Alison M. Crowe
PURPOSE: Postoperative adhesions are a significant problem after colorectal surgery. However, the basic epidemiology and clinical burden are unknown. The Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study has investigated the scale of the problem in a population of 5 million. METHODS: Validated data from the Scottish National Health Service Medical Record Linkage Database were used to define a cohort of 12,584 patients undergoing open lower abdominal surgery in 1986. Readmissions for potential adhesion-related disease in the subsequent ten years were analyzed. The methodology was conservative in interpreting adhesion-related disease. RESULTS: In the study cohort 32.6 percent of patients were readmitted a mean of 2.2 times in the subsequent ten years for a potential adhesion-related problem. Although 25.4 percent of readmissions were in the first postoperative year, they continued steadily throughout the study period. After open lower abdominal surgery 7.3 percent (643) of readmissions (8,861) were directly related to adhesions. This varied according to operation site: colon (7.1 percent), rectum (8.8 percent), and small intestine (7.6 percent). The readmission rate was assessed to provide an indicator of relative risk of adhesion-related problems after initial surgery. The overall average rate of readmissions was 70.4 per 100 initial operations, with 5.1 directly related to adhesions. This rose to 116.4 and 116.5, respectively, after colonic or rectal surgery—with 8.2 and 10.3 directly related to adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high relative risk of adhesion-related problems after open lower abdominal surgery and a correspondingly high workload associated with these readmissions. This is influenced by the initial site of surgery, colon and rectum having both the greatest impact on workload and highest relative risk of directly adhesion-related problems. The study provides sound justification for improved adhesion prevention strategies.
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 2000
A.M. Lower; Robert J. S. Hawthorn; Harold Ellis Emeritus; Fiona O'Brien; Scot Buchan; Alison M. Crowe
Objective To investigate the epidemiology of, and the clinical burden related to, adhesions following gynaecological surgery.
Colorectal Disease | 2005
M. C. Parker; Malcolm S Wilson; Donald Menzies; Graham Sunderland; D. Clark; A. D. Knight; Alison M. Crowe
Objective The Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) and SCAR‐2 studies demonstrated that the burden of adhesions following lower abdominal surgery is considerable and appears to remain unchanged despite advances in strategies to prevent adhesions. In this study, we assessed the adhesion‐related readmission risk directly associated with common lower abdominal surgical procedures, taking into account the effect of previous surgery, demography and concomitant disease.
Colorectal Disease | 2002
Malcolm S Wilson; D. Menzies; A. D. Knight; Alison M. Crowe
Objective To examine the feasibility of conducting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) in lower abdominal surgery to demonstrate a reduction in adhesion‐related admissions following use of an adhesion reduction product, and to model the cost effectiveness of such products.
Colorectal Disease | 2004
M. C. Parker; Malcolm S Wilson; D. Menzies; G. Sunderland; Jeremy N. Thompson; D. N. Clark; A. D. Knight; Alison M. Crowe
Objectives Adhesions are associated with serious medical complications. This study examines the real‐time burden of adhesion‐related readmissions following colorectal surgery and assesses the impact of previous surgery on adhesion‐related outcomes.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2008
Hugh W. Grant; Michael C. Parker; Malcolm S Wilson; Donald Menzies; Graham Sunderland; Jeremy N. Thompson; D. Clark; A. D. Knight; Alison M. Crowe; Harold Ellis
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to quantify the overall burden (operative and nonoperative) of small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions after laparotomy in children. METHODS Data from the Scottish National Health Service Medical Record Linkage database were used to assess risk of an adhesion-related readmission in the 5 years after open abdominal surgery in children and adolescents younger than 16 years from April 1996 to March 1997. RESULTS A total of 1581 children underwent abdominal surgery (ie, from duodenum downward). Patients undergoing surgery on the ileum had the highest risk of readmission because of adhesions in the subsequent 5 years after surgery (9.2%)--formation/closure of ileostomy had the greatest risk (25%); 6.5% of children were readmitted after general laparotomy, 4.7% after duodenal surgery, and 2.1% after colonic surgery. The incidence of readmissions was 0.3% after appendicectomy. The overall readmission rate was 5.3% (if appendicectomy was excluded) and 1.1% (if appendicectomy was included). CONCLUSION This population-based study has demonstrated that children have a high incidence of readmissions owing to adhesions after lower abdominal surgery. The risks are related to the site and the type of the original surgery. The risk of further readmissions was highest in the first year but continued with time. The data enable surgeons to target antiadhesion strategies at procedures that lead to a high risk of adhesions.
Colorectal Disease | 2015
Hugh Paterson; Ian D. Arnott; R. J. Nicholls; D. Clark; J. Bauer; P. C. Bridger; Alison M. Crowe; A. D. Knight; P. Hodgkins; Dory Solomon; Malcolm G. Dunlop
Symptomatic diverticular disease (DD) may be increasing in incidence in western society particularly in younger age groups. This study aimed to describe hospital admission rates and management for DD in Scotland between 2000 and 2010.
Gastroenterology | 2012
Hugh Paterson; Ian D. Arnott; Ralph J. Nicholls; Jacqui Bauer; David Clark; Alison M. Crowe; A. D. Knight; Anthea Springbett; Penelope Bridger; Linnette Yen; Paul Hodgkins; Dory Solomon; Kristine Paridaens; Malcolm G. Dunlop
location was classified as a lower GI bleed. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-9 code 578.1 (“blood in stool”) represents hematochezia in ~60% of cases and melena in ~30%. ICD-9 codes 578.1 and 578.9 represent an unknown location of GI bleeding in only about one-third of cases; the remainder are either upper or lower GI bleeding that has been misclassified. Detailed validation can help inform (or reassign) the use of these codes in electronic database studies. The limited specificity of such codes will persist in the ICD-10 era. Table 1. Bleeding Manifestation*
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England | 2006
D. Menzies; M Hidalgo Pascual; Mk Walz; Jj Duron; F Tonelli; Alison M. Crowe; A. D. Knight