Alison Oliveto

Cue-induced brain activity changes and relapse in cocaine-dependent patients

This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the association between brain activation during exposure to cocaine-related cues and relapse to drug use in cocaine-dependent (CD) patients. We imaged 17 CD subjects during a 2-week in-patient stay. The subjects then entered a 10-week outpatient placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial where urine toxicologies were assessed three times weekly to calculate the treatment effectiveness score (TES). Worse TES correlated with BOLD activation in the left precentral, superior temporal, and posterior cingulate cortices (PCC), and right middle temporal and lingual cortices (R>0.65; P<0.005). The left PCC activation also distinguished eight nonrelapsers (TES above mean and completed treatment) from nine relapsers. Cocaine-free urines were significantly greater in the nonrelapsers (92%) than in the relapsers (66%), who also remained in treatment for an average of only 3.2 weeks. Self-reports of craving during fMRI did not differ between nonrelapsers and relapsers and did not correlate with TES. Relapse to cocaine abuse was associated with increased activation in the sensory association cortex, the motor cortex, and PCC while viewing images of cocaine-related cues. These results suggest that relapse to cocaine abuse is associated with increased brain activation to cocaine cues in sensory, motor, and cognitive-emotional processing areas. This physiological activation was a better predictor of relapse than subjective reports of craving, and may be a useful target for treatment development.

Desipramine and contingency management for cocaine and opiate dependence in buprenorphine maintained patients

Co-dependence on opiates and cocaine occurs in about 60% of patients entering methadone treatment and has a poor prognosis. However, we recently found that desipramine (DMI) could be combined with buprenorphine to significantly reduce combined opiate and cocaine use among these dually dependent patients. Furthermore, contingency management (CM) has been quite potent in reducing cocaine abuse during methadone maintenance. To test the efficacy of combining CM with these medications we designed a 12-week, randomized, double blind, four cell trial evaluating DMI (150 mg/day) or placebo plus CM or a non-contingent voucher control in 160 cocaine abusers maintained on buprenorphine (median 16 mg daily). Cocaine-free and combined opiate and cocaine-free urines increased more rapidly over time in those treated with either DMI or CM, and those receiving both interventions had more drug-free urines (50%) than the other three treatment groups (25-29%). Self reported opiate and cocaine use and depressive and opioid withdrawal symptoms showed no differences among the groups and symptom levels did not correlate with urine toxicology results. Lower DMI plasma levels (average 125 ng/ml) were associated with greater cocaine-free urines. DMI and CM had independent and additive effects in facilitating cocaine-free urines in buprenorphine maintained patients. The antidepressant appeared to enhance responsiveness to CM reinforcement.

Endorsement of DSM-IV dependence criteria among caffeine users

The purpose of this article is to determine whether some caffeine users endorse clinical indicators of dependence and abuse. We asked 162 randomly-selected caffeine users generic DSM-IV criteria for dependence, abuse, intoxication and withdrawal pertaining to their caffeine use in the last year via a structured telephone interview. The prevalence of endorsement of dependence items was 56% for strong desire or unsuccessful attempt to stop use, 50% for spending a great deal of time with the drug, 28% for using more than intended, 18% for withdrawal, 14% for using despite knowledge of harm, 8% for tolerance and 1% for foregoing activities to use. Seven percent of users met DSM-IV criteria for caffeine intoxication and, among those who had tried to stop caffeine permanently, 24% met DSM-IV research criteria for caffeine withdrawal. Test-retest interviews for dependency agreed in 29/30 cases (97%). Eight expert substance abuse clinicians agreed with self-endorsed caffeine dependence 91% of the time. Our results replicate earlier work and suggest that a substantial proportion of caffeine users exhibit dependence-like behaviors. Further studies are needed to determine whether such users exhibit a clinically significant syndrome of drug dependence.

Caffeine self-administration and withdrawal: incidence, individual differences and interrelationships

In four prior studies, caffeine (100 mg) self-administration was assessed by greater self-administration of caffeinated coffee than decaffeinated coffee and caffeine withdrawal was assessed by placebo substitution using six double-blind tests in each subject. This paper collates data across these studies to examine the incidence and predictors of the occurrence of caffeine self-administration and withdrawal. Caffeine self-administration occurred in 31% of subjects when a consistency criterion was used (n = 41) and 27% when a statistical criterion was used. Caffeine withdrawal occurred in 35% and 49% of subjects with each criteria (n = 37). Subjects who had withdrawal headaches and drowsiness were 2.3-2.6 times more likely to self-administer the caffeinated coffee. Several variables (e.g., average caffeine intake) did not predict caffeine self-administration or withdrawal.

Combating opiate dependence: a comparison among the available pharmacological options.

Pharmacotherapies for heroin addiction may target opiate withdrawal symptoms, facilitate initiation of abstinence and/or reduce relapse to heroin use either by maintenance on an agonist or antagonist agent. Available agents include opioid agonists, partial opioid agonists, opioid antagonists and α2-agonists for use during managed withdrawal and long-term maintenance. Experimental approaches combine α2-agonists with naltrexone to reduce the time of opiate withdrawal and to accelerate the transition to abstinence. Recently, buprenorphine has been introduced in the US for office-based maintenance, with the hope of replicating the success of this treatment in Europe and Australia. Naloxone has been added to buprenorphine in order to reduce its potential diversion to intravenous use, whilst facilitating the expansion of treatment. Although comprehensive substance abuse treatment is not limited to pharmacotherapy, this review will focus on the rationale, indications and limitations of the range of existing medications for detoxification and relapse prevention treatments. The two major goals of pharmacotherapy are to relieve the severity of opiate withdrawal symptoms during the managed withdrawal of the opioid and to prevent relapse to heroin use either after abstinence initiation or after being stabilised on a long-acting opiate agonist, such as methadone.

Thrice-weekly versus daily buprenorphine maintenance

BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is a promising alternative to methadone or levo-acetyl alpha methadol for opioid agonist maintenance treatment, and thrice-weekly dosing would facilitate its use for this purpose. METHODS After a 3-day induction, opioid-dependent patients (n = 92) were randomly assigned to daily clinic attendance and 12-weeks maintenance treatment with sublingual buprenorphine administered double blind either daily (n = 45; 16 mg/70 kg) or thrice weekly (n = 47; 34 mg/70 kg on Fridays and Sundays and 44 mg/70 kg on Tuesdays). Outcome measures include retention, results of 3x/week urine toxicology tests, and weekly self-reported illicit drug use. RESULTS There were no significant differences at baseline in important social, demographic, and drug-use features. Retention was 71% in the daily and 77% in the 3x/week conditions. The proportion of opioid-positive urine tests decreased significantly from baseline in both groups and averaged 57% (daily) and 58% in 3x/week. There were no significant differences between groups in self-reported number of bags of heroin used for any day of the week, including Thursdays (48-72 hours following the last buprenorphine dose for subjects in the 3x/week condition), or in medication compliance (92%, 91%) and counseling attendance (82%, 82%). CONCLUSIONS At an equivalent weekly dose of 112 mg/70 kg, thrice-weekly and daily sublingual buprenorphine appear comparable in efficacy with regard to retention and reductions in illicit opioid and other drug use. These findings support the potential for utilizing thrice-weekly buprenorphine dosing in novel settings.

A pilot study of primary-care-based buprenorphine maintenance for heroin dependence

The treatment of heroin dependence with opioid maintenance has traditionally employed methadone and more recently buprenorphine administered in traditional drug treatment settings. In this pilot study we evaluated buprenorphine maintenance for the treatment of heroin dependence in a program administered by primary-care providers in a primary-care setting. Seven patients were admitted to this nonblinded open-label pilot study and were offered 6 months of primary-care-based buprenorphine maintenance. Buprenorphine was administered in doses of 16 mg on Monday and Wednesday and 32 mg on Friday. Patients were seen weekly by primary-care providers and attended self-help meetings. Of the seven patients admitted to the study, five (71%) completed the 6-month pilot study and two (29%) were removed from the study. Urine toxicology data showed that the majority of urines tested were clear of opioids in four out of five patients who remained in treatment. These results suggest that primary-care-based opioid maintenance using buprenorphine shows promise as a new approach to the treatment of heroin dependence.

Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone-stabilized patients.

UNLABELLED This study examined the dose-related efficacy of disulfiram for treating cocaine dependence in methadone-stabilized cocaine dependent participants. DESIGN One hundred and sixty-one cocaine- and opioid-dependent volunteers were entered into a 14-week, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial at two sites. METHODS Participants were stabilized on methadone during weeks 1-2 and received disulfiram at 0, 62.5, 125 or 250 mg/day during weeks 3-14. All participants also received weekly cognitive behavioral therapy. Thrice-weekly urine samples and weekly self-reported drug use assessments were obtained. RESULTS Baseline subject characteristics, retention and drug use did not differ across groups. Outcome analyses were performed on those who participated beyond week 2. Opioid-positive urine samples and self-reported opioid use did not differ by treatment group. The prevalence of alcohol use was low prior to and during the trial and did not differ by treatment group. Cocaine-positive urines increased over time in the 62.5 and 125 mg disulfiram groups and decreased over time in the 250 mg disulfiram and placebo groups (p < 0.0001). Self-reported cocaine use increased in the 125 mg disulfiram group relative to the other three treatment groups (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Disulfiram may be contraindicated for cocaine dependence at doses <250 mg/day. Whether disulfiram at higher doses is efficacious in reducing cocaine use in dually cocaine and opioid dependent individuals needs to be determined.

Comorbid major depressive disorder as a prognostic factor in cocaine-abusing buprenorphine-maintained patients treated with desipramine and contingency management

Depression is common among patients who abuse both opiates and cocaine, and its treatment has had mixed success. This study compares buprenorphine‐maintained patients with lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD, N = 53) with those never depressed (ND, N = 96) on cocaine and opiate‐free urines during a 12‐week outpatient double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized clinical trial. The 149 subjects were assigned to four groups: 1) desipramine (DMI) + contingency management (CM); 2) DMI + noncontingency management (NCM); 3) placebo + CM; and 4) placebo + NCM. Depression assessments included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Inventory, and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV interview for diagnosis of lifetime MDD. Urine toxicologies were performed thrice weekly and the CES‐D was performed monthly. The MDD group had a larger proportion of females (45% vs 21%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to be married (13.2% vs 7.3%, P = 0.02) than the ND group. Treatment retention did not vary by depression status. Hierarchical Linear Modeling found that depressive symptoms decreased comparably across the four treatment groups. Although participation in CM improved drug‐free urines more for patients with MDD than for the ND group (Z = 2.44, P = 0.01), treatment with DMI was significantly more efficacious for the ND group than for the MDD group (Z = −2.89, P = 0.003). These results suggest that patients with MDD may respond better to behavioral treatments such as CM than to desipramine plus buprenorphine. The ND cocaine‐abusing, opiate‐dependent patients may be more responsive to the anticraving effects of DMI.

Treatment of heroin (diamorphine) addiction: current approaches and future prospects.

New pharmacological treatments for heroin (diamorphine) addiction include drugs that reduce opiate withdrawal symptoms and agents that are given during the maintenance phase of treatment. A variety of different types of pharmacological agents (opioid agonists, partial opioid agonists, opioid antagonists and α2-adrenoreceptor agonists) are reviewed and the evidence of their use during managed withdrawal and maintenance are presented.Experimental approaches attempting to reduce the time of opiate withdrawal and to accelerate the transition to abstinence are being developed. The combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone that is to be introduced for office-based maintenance is currently undergoing intense evaluation in the US. This new approach may facilitate the expansion of treatment while reducing the potential for medication diversion and intravenous use.