Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alison Rowsell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alison Rowsell.


Implementation Science | 2015

Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review

Ivaylo Vassilev; Alison Rowsell; Catherine Pope; Anne Kennedy; Alicia O’Cathain; Chris Salisbury; Anne Rogers

BackgroundThere is a substantial and continually growing literature on the effectiveness and implementation of discrete telehealth interventions for health condition management. However, it is difficult to predict which technologies are likely to work and be used in practice. In this context, identifying the core mechanisms associated with successful telehealth implementation is relevant to consolidating the likely elements for ensuring a priori optimal design and deployment of telehealth interventions for supporting patients with long-term conditions (LTCs).MethodsWe adopted a two-stage realist synthesis approach to identify the core mechanisms underpinning telehealth interventions. In the second stage of the review, we tested inductively and refined our understanding of the mechanisms. We reviewed qualitative papers focused on COPD, heart failure, diabetes, and behaviours and complications associated with these conditions. The review included 15 papers published 2009 to 2014.ResultsThree concepts were identified, which suggested how telehealth worked to engage and support health-related work. Whether or not and how a telehealth intervention enables or limits the possibility for relationships with professionals and/or peers. Telehealth has the potential to reshape and extend existing relationships, acting as a partial substitute for the role of health professionals. The second concept is fit: successful telehealth interventions are those that can be well integrated into everyday life and health care routines and the need to be easy to use, compatible with patients’ existing environment, skills, and capacity, and that do not significantly disrupt patients’ lives and routines. The third concept is visibility: visualisation of symptoms and feedback has the capacity to improve knowledge, motivation, and a sense of empowerment; engage network members; and reinforce positive behaviour change, prompts for action and surveillance.ConclusionsUpfront consideration should be given to the mechanisms that are most likely to ensure the successful development and implementation of telehealth interventions. These include considerations about whether and how the telehealth intervention enables or limits the possibility for relationships with professionals and peers, how it fits with existing environment and capacities to self-manage, and visibility-enabling-enhanced awareness to self and others.


BMJ Open | 2015

TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation

Chris Salisbury; Clare Thomas; Alicia O'Cathain; Anne Rogers; Catherine Pope; Lucy Yardley; Sandra Hollinghurst; Tom Fahey; Glyn Lewis; Shirley Large; Louisa Edwards; Alison Rowsell; Julia Segar; Simon Brownsell; Alan A Montgomery

Objective To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression. Design The model was based on several strands of evidence: a metareview and realist synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence on telehealth for chronic conditions; a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ experience of telehealth; a quantitative survey of patients’ interest in using telehealth; and review of existing models of chronic condition management and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Based on these evidence strands, a model was developed and then refined at a stakeholder workshop. Then a telehealth intervention (‘Healthlines’) was designed by incorporating strategies to address each of the model components. The model also provided a framework for evaluation of this intervention within parallel randomised controlled trials in the two exemplar conditions, and the accompanying process evaluations and economic evaluations. Setting Primary care. Results The TElehealth in CHronic Disease (TECH) model proposes that attention to four components will offer interventions the best chance of success: (1) engagement of patients and health professionals, (2) effective chronic disease management (including subcomponents of self-management, optimisation of treatment, care coordination), (3) partnership between providers and (4) patient, social and health system context. Key intended outcomes are improved health, access to care, patient experience and cost-effective care. Conclusions A conceptual model has been developed based on multiple sources of evidence which articulates how telehealth may best provide benefits for patients with chronic health conditions. It can be used to structure the design and evaluation of telehealth programmes which aim to be acceptable to patients and providers, and cost-effective.


Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2015

Views of People With High and Low Levels of Health Literacy About a Digital Intervention to Promote Physical Activity for Diabetes: A Qualitative Study in Five Countries

Alison Rowsell; Ingrid Muller; Elizabeth Murray; Paul Little; Christopher D. Byrne; Kristin Ganahl; Gabriele Müller; Sarah Gibney; Courtney R. Lyles; Antonia Lucas; Don Nutbeam; Lucy Yardley

Background Low health literacy is associated with poor health-related knowledge, illness self-management, health service use, health, and survival, and thus addressing issues related to low health literacy has been highlighted as a pressing international priority. Objective To explore views of a digital health promotion intervention designed to be accessible to people with lower levels of health literacy, in particular examining reactions to the interactive and audiovisual elements of the intervention. Methods Qualitative think-aloud interviews were carried out with 65 adults with type 2 diabetes in the UK, Ireland, USA, Germany, and Austria, with purposive sampling to ensure representation of people with lower levels of health literacy. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. We then systematically compared views in subgroups based on country, health literacy level, age, gender, and time since diagnosis. Results Most participants from the chosen countries expressed positive views of most elements and features of the intervention. Some interactive and audiovisual elements required modification to increase their usability and perceived credibility and relevance. There were some differences in views based on age and gender, but very few differences relating to health literacy level or time since diagnosis. Conclusions In general, participants found the intervention content and format accessible, appropriate, engaging, and motivating. Digital interventions can and should be designed to be accessible and engaging for people with a wide range of health literacy levels.


BMJ Open | 2017

Has the NHS 111 urgent care telephone service been a success? Case study and secondary data analysis in England

Catherine Pope; Joanne Turnbull; Jeremy Jones; Jane Prichard; Alison Rowsell; Susan Halford

Objectives To explore the success of the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) 111 urgent care service and describe service activity in the period 2014–2016. Design Comparative mixed method case study of five NHS 111 service providers and analysis of national level routine data on activity and service use. Settings and data Our primary research involved five NHS 111 sites in England. We conducted 356 hours of non-participant observation in NHS 111 call centres and the urgent care centres and, linked to these observations, held 6 focus group interviews with 47 call advisors, clinical and managerial staff. This primary research is augmented by a secondary analysis of routine data about the 44 NHS 111 sites in England contained in the NHS 111 Minimum Data Set made available by NHS England. Results Opinions vary depending on the criteria used to judge the success of NHS 111. The service has been rolled out across 44 sites. The 111 phone number is operational and the service has replaced its predecessor NHS Direct. This new service has led to changes in who does the work of managing urgent care demand, achieving significant labour substitution. Judged against internal performance criteria, the service appears not to meet some targets such as call answering times, but it has seen a steady increase in use over time. Patients appear largely satisfied with NHS 111, but the view from some stakeholders is more mixed. The impact of NHS 111 on other health services is difficult to assess and cost-effectiveness has not been established. Conclusion The new urgent care service NHS 111 has been brought into use but its success against some key criteria has not been comprehensively proven.


Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2017

Effects on engagement and health literacy outcomes of web-based materials promoting physical activity in people with diabetes: An international randomized trial

Ingrid Muller; Alison Rowsell; Beth Stuart; Victoria Hayter; Paul Little; Kristin Ganahl; Gabriel Muller; Gerardine Doyle; Peter Wushou Chang; Courtney R. Lyles; Don Nutbeam; Lucy Yardley

Background Developing accessible Web-based materials to support diabetes self-management in people with lower levels of health literacy is a continuing challenge. Objective The objective of this international study was to develop a Web-based intervention promoting physical activity among people with type 2 diabetes to determine whether audiovisual presentation and interactivity (quizzes, planners, tailoring) could help to overcome the digital divide by making digital interventions accessible and effective for people with all levels of health literacy. This study also aimed to determine whether these materials can improve health literacy outcomes for people with lower levels of health literacy and also be effective for people with higher levels of health literacy. Methods To assess the impact of interactivity and audiovisual features on usage, engagement, and health literacy outcomes, we designed two versions of a Web-based intervention (one interactive and one plain-text version of the same content) to promote physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes. We randomly assigned participants from the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Ireland, and Taiwan to either an interactive or plain-text version of the intervention in English, German, or Mandarin. Intervention usage was objectively recorded by the intervention software. Self-report measures were taken at baseline and follow-up (immediately after participants viewed the intervention) and included measures of health literacy, engagement (website satisfaction and willingness to recommend the intervention to others), and health literacy outcomes (diabetes knowledge, enablement, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to undertake physical activity). Results In total, 1041 people took part in this study. Of the 1005 who completed health literacy information, 268 (26.67%) had intermediate or low levels of health literacy. The interactive intervention overall did not produce better outcomes than did the plain-text version. Participants in the plain-text intervention group looked at significantly more sections of the intervention (mean difference –0.47, 95% CI –0.64 to –0.30, P<.001), but this did not lead to better outcomes. Health literacy outcomes, including attitudes and intentions to engage in physical activity, significantly improved following the intervention for participants in both intervention groups. These improvements were similar across higher and lower health literacy levels and in all countries. Participants in the interactive intervention group had acquired more diabetes knowledge (mean difference 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.94, P<.001). Participants from both groups reported high levels of website satisfaction and would recommend the website to others. Conclusions Following established practice for simple, clear design and presentation and using a person-based approach to intervention development, with in-depth iterative feedback from users, may be more important than interactivity and audiovisual presentations when developing accessible digital health interventions to improve health literacy outcomes. ClinicalTrial International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 43587048; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN43587048. (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6nGhaP9bv)


Health Risk & Society | 2017

Risk work in NHS 111: the everyday work of managing risk in telephone assessment using a computer decision support system

Joanne Turnbull; Jane Prichard; Catherine Pope; Simon Brook; Alison Rowsell

The substitution of clinical with non-clinical staff to triage and manage calls in the NHS urgent care services is one of the number of measures designed to meet growing health services demand. The deployment of a Computer Decision Support System ‘NHS Pathways’ to support this work has created a new type of health worker and a new form of risk work. In this article, we examine how call handlers manage, experience and respond to risk in their everyday practice of telephone assessment. We draw on data from an ethnographic study of 5 NHS 111 sites involving 356 h of observation plus 6 focus groups with 47 health services staff in 2011–2012. We found that there was a ‘risk problem’ involving balancing the competing demands of assessing patients safely against rationing limited health resources. The new service used technology to support risk management but this technology also created risk work for call handlers, clinicians and patients. We found that call handlers engaged in risk work that involved interpretation, judgement and flexibility in using NHS Pathways. Call handlers also deferred some risk work to both clinicians and patients/callers. Risk work now involves ‘making the technology work’ and much of this work has been delegated to non-clinical call handlers. These new healthcare workers are interpreters of risk. Risk work creates a sense of responsibility (and sometimes anxiety) for these non-clinical call handlers.


Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities | 2013

The Psychological Impact of Abuse on Men and Women with Severe Intellectual Disabilities

Alison Rowsell; Isabel C. H. Clare; Glynis H. Murphy


Health Services and Delivery Research | 2014

The work, workforce, technology and organisational implications of the ‘111’ single point of access telephone number for urgent (non-emergency) care: a mixed-methods case study

Joanne Turnbull; Catherine Pope; Alison Rowsell; Jane Prichard; Susan Halford; Jeremy Jones; Carl May; Valerie Lattimer


Archive | 2010

A guide to VOICES-SC: a version of the VOICES questionnaire developed specifically for hospices and specialist palliative care services

Julia Addington-Hall; Alison Rowsell


Programme Grants for Applied Research | 2017

An evidence based approach to the use of telehealth in long-term health conditions: Development of an intervention and evaluation through pragmatic randomised controlled trials in patients with depression or raised cardiovascular risk

Chris Salisbury; Alicia O'Cathain; Clare Thomas; Louisa Edwards; Alan A Montgomery; Sandra Hollinghurst; Shirley Large; Jon Nicholl; Catherine Pope; Anne Rogers; Glyn Lewis; Tom Fahey; Lucy Yardley; Simon Brownsell; Padraig Dixon; Sarah Drabble; Lisa Esmonde; Alexis Foster; Katy Garner; Daisy Gaunt; Kim Horspool; Mei-See Man; Alison Rowsell; Julia Segar

Collaboration


Dive into the Alison Rowsell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catherine Pope

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucy Yardley

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Rogers

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julia Segar

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra Hollinghurst

National Institute for Health Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge