Allan B. Levin

A multiinstitutional outcome and prognostic factor analysis of radiosurgery for resectable single brain metastasis

PURPOSE Recent randomized trials of selected patients with single brain metastasis comparing resection followed by whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to WBRT alone have shown a statistically significant survival advantage for surgery and WBRT. A multiinstitutional retrospective study was performed, which identified comparable patients who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (RS) and WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RS databases of four institutions were reviewed to identify patients who met the following criteria: single-brain metastasis; no prior cranial surgery or WBRT; age > 18 years; surgically resectable lesion; Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > or = 70 at time of RS; nonradiosensitive histology. One hundred twenty-two patients were identified who met these criteria. Patients were categorized by: (a) status of the primary, (b) status of non-CNS metastasis, (c) age, (d) baseline KPS (from 70-100), (e) histology, (f) time from diagnosis of primary to the detection of the brain metastasis, (g) gender, and (h) tumor volume. RS was performed with a linear accelerator based technique (peripheral dose range was 10-27 Gy, median was 17 Gy). WBRT was performed in all but five patients who refused WBRT (dose range was 25-40 Gy, median was 37.5 Gy). RESULTS The median follow-up for all patients was 123 weeks. The overall local control rate (defined as lack of progression in the RS volume) was 86%. Intracranial recurrence outside of the RS volume was seen in 27 patients (22%). The actuarial median survival from date of RS is 56 weeks, and the 1-year and 2-year actuarial survival rates are 53% and 30%. The median duration of functional independence (sustained KPS > or = 70) is 44 weeks. Nineteen of 77 deaths were attributed to CNS progression (25% of all deaths). Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors to be statistically significant predictors of survival: baseline KPS (p < .0001) and absence of other sites of metastasis (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION The RS in conjunction with WBRT for single brain metastasis can produce substantial functional survival, especially in patients with good performance status and without extracranial metastasis. These results are comparable to recent randomized trials of resection and WBRT. The advantages of RS over surgery in terms of cost, hospitalization, morbidity, and wider applicability strongly suggest that a randomized trial to compare RS with surgery is warranted.

Defining the role of radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of recurrent and newly diagnosed brain metastases was evaluated prospectively. From December 1988 to March 1991, 58 lesions in 40 patients were treated with accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months or to death. The primary purpose was to determine the impact of radiosurgery on local control and its subsequent effects on quality of life. An overall tumor control rate of 82% with a complete response rate of 43% were achieved. As anticipated, the response rate for smaller tumors was substantially better than that for larger tumors (78% for lesions < 2 cm3; 50% for lesions > or = 10 cm3). Although the overall in-field progression rate was 18.5%, only 1/23 (4%) complete responders subsequently recurred. The in-field failure rate is highly comparable with recently published surgical data. Progression outside the brain was noted in two-thirds of patients. One quarter of the deaths were neurologic. The median survival for this minimally selected patient population was 6.5 months. Stereotactic radiosurgery was also associated with improved quality of life as measured by Karnofsky score, neurologic function, and steroid dependence. Long-term steroid dependence was encountered in only four patients. We conclude that stereotactic radiosurgery can be used effectively in patients with brain metastases. In this series, a high tumor response rate was achieved which was associated with improved quality of life.

Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: Survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis

PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on the survival of patients treated with malignant gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 115 patients from three institutions (75 from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, 30 from the University of Wisconsin, and 10 from the University of Florida) were treated with a combination of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and linac-based radiosurgery as part of similar institutional protocols from March 1988 through July 1993. Patients were stratified into six prognostic classes (classes 1-6) based on the recursive partitioning analysis of multiple prognostic factors previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. RESULTS The actuarial 2-year and median survival for all patients analyzed was 45% and 96 weeks, respectively. In comparison to the results from a previously published analysis of 1578 patients entered on three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group external beam radiotherapy protocols from 1974 to 1989, those patients treated with radiosurgery had a significantly improved 2-year and median survival (p = 0.01) corresponding with a standardized mortality risk ratio of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.85]. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the worse prognostic classes (classes 3-6). The 2-year survival for the radiosurgical patients compared with the previously reported patients was 81% vs. 76% for classes 1/2, 75% vs. 35% for class 3, 34% vs. 15% for class 4, and 21% vs. 6% for classes 5/6, respectively. Although Karnofsky performance status and prognostic class were significant on univariate analysis, only the Karnofsky score was a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Median and 2-year survival for patients with a Karnofsky score > or = 70 was 106 weeks and 51%, respectively, as compared to 38 weeks and 0% for patients with a Karnofsky score < 70% (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The addition of radiosurgery to conventional treatment (surgery and external beam radiotherapy) of malignant gliomas appears to improve survival when compared to historical reports. These results should be interpreted with caution because the recursive partitioning model does not completely predict the prognosis of the patients treated in the present study. Although this study suggests that radiosurgery may prolong survival in patients with malignant gliomas, the role of radiosurgery in the management of these patients remains to be defined by a prospective randomized trial.

A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of radiosurgery vs. resection for single-brain metastases

PURPOSE The median survival of well-selected patients with single-brain metastases treated with whole-brain irradiation and resection or radiosurgery is comparable, although a randomized trial of these two modalities has not been performed. In this era of cost containment, it is imperative that health-care professionals make fiscally prudent decisions. The present environment necessitates a critical appraisal of apparently equi-efficacious therapeutic modalities, and it is within this context that we present a comparison of the actual costs of resection and radiosurgery for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS Survival and quality of life outcome data for radiation alone or with surgery were obtained from two randomized trials, and radiosurgical results were obtained from a multiinstitutional analysis that specifically evaluated patients meeting surgical criteria. Only linear accelerator radiosurgery data were considered. Cost analysis was performed from a societal view point, and the following parameters were evaluated: actual cost, cost ratios, cost effectiveness, incremental cost effectiveness, cost utility, incremental cost utility, and national cost burden. The computerized billing records for all patients undergoing resection or radiosurgery for single-brain metastases from January 1989 to July 1994 were reviewed. A total of 46 resections and 135 radiosurgery procedures were performed. During the same time period, 454 patients underwent whole-brain radiation alone. An analysis of the entire bill was performed for each procedure, and each itemized cost was assigned a proportionate figure. The relative cost ratios of resection and radiosurgery were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Cost effectiveness of each modality, defined as the cost per year of median survival, was evaluated. Incremental cost effectiveness, defined as the additional cost per year of incremental gain in median survival, compared to the next least expensive modality, was also determined. To calculate the societal or national impact of these practices, the proportion of patients potentially eligible for aggressive management was estimated and the financial impact was determined using various utilization ratios for radiosurgery and surgery. RESULTS Both resection and radiosurgery yielded superior survival and functional independence, compared to whole brain radiotherapy alone, with minor differences in outcome between the two modalities; resection resulted in a 1.8-fold increase in cost, compared to radiosurgery. The latter modality yielded superior cost outcomes on all measures, even when a sensitivity analysis of up to 50% was performed. A reversal estimate indicated that in order for surgery to yield equal cost effectiveness, its cost would have to decrease by 48% or median survival would have to improve by 108%. The average cost per week of survival was

Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma multiforme: Report of a prospective study evaluating prognostic factors and analyzing long-term survival advantage

310 for radiotherapy,

Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery employing both magnetic resonance angiography and standard angiography as a database

524 for resection plus radiation, and

Early changes in tumor metabolism after treatment : the effects of stereotactic radiotherapy

270 for radiosurgery plus radiation. CONCLUSIONS For selected patients, aggressive strategies such as resection or radiosurgery are warranted, as they result in improved median survival and functional independence. Radiosurgery appears to be the more cost-effective procedure.

Metrizamide--CSF contrast medium. Analysis of clinical application in 215 patients.

PURPOSE Prospective evaluation of the toxicity and efficacy of radiosurgery with external beam radiotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 5/89 to 12/92, 31 out of 51 patients with glioblastoma multiforme underwent radiosurgery, in addition to 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fraction following biopsy (n = 12) or resection (n = 19). Eligibility required supratentorial glioblastoma, tumor not > 4 cm in > 1 axis, age > 18 years, and location > 1 cm from optic chiasm. Patient characteristics were: age 20-78 years (median = 57); 22 male, 9 female; Karnofsky score 20-90 (m = 70), and volume of 2.3-59.7 c.c. (m = 17.4). Eighteen patients were treated with 1 collimator, 5 with 2, 7 with 3, and 1 with 4; peripheral isodoses were 40-90% (m = 72.5) and minimum and maximum tumor dose ranges were 10-20 (m = 12) and 15-35 Gy (m = 18.75). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically every 8-12 weeks to analyze survival, quality of life, and toxicity. RESULTS With a follow-up of 12-171 weeks, 8 out of 31 (26%) patients are alive. Median survival is 42 weeks. Twelve and 24-month actuarial survival are 38 and 28%. Comparison of the 2-year survival with previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group patients was carried out using a nonparametric recursive partitioning technique and the observed vs. expected values are 28 vs. 9.7% (p < 0.05). Extent of resection and performance status were associated with improved survival in a multivariate analysis. No significant acute toxicity was encountered. Four patients (13%) developed clinically significant necrosis verified by biopsy or positron emission tomography scan at 9-59 weeks after radiosurgery. CONCLUSION The improvement in median survival in broadly selected glioblastoma patients treated with radiosurgery is difficult to determine, but the 2-year survival may be superior. Future randomized trials of radiosurgery are recommended, and ad hoc use of this modality should be discouraged.

A model for the treatment of cancer pain

Twenty-one arteriovenous malformations were prospectively evaluated using magnetic resonance angiography and compared with stereotactic angiography. The goals were to establish the feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography, compare it to stereotactic angiography, employ magnetic resonance angiography in follow-up, and semiquantify flow. A correlative evaluation between flow and response to stereotactic radiosurgery was carried out. Phase contrast angiograms were obtained at flow velocities of 400, 200, 100, 60, and 20 cm/sec. The fractionated velocities provided images that selectively demonstrated the arterial and venous components of the arteriovenous malformations. Qualitative assessment of the velocity within the arteriovenous malformations and the presence of fistulae were also determined by multiple velocity images. In addition, 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms were obtained to define the exact size and shape of the nidus. This technique also permitted evaluation of the nidus and feeding arteries for the presence of low flow aneurysms. Correlation between the two imaging modalities was carried out by subjective and semiquantitative estimation of flow velocity and estimation of nidus size. The following velocity parameters were employed: fast, intermediate, slow, and none (arteriovenous malformation obliterated). In 19 of 21 (90.5%) arteriovenous malformations, magnetic resonance angiography was equal or superior to stereotactic angiography for flow quantification and visualization of the nidus. Only 2 of 21 arteriovenous malformations were better demonstrated by stereotactic angiography than by magnetic resonance angiography (failure rate of 9.5%). The nidus size in one case was clearly underestimated by stereotactic angiography and would have resulted in a geographic miss without magnetic resonance angiography. Seven post-radiosurgery arteriovenous malformations were evaluated for follow-up with both magnetic resonance angiography and stereotactic angiography. In 6 of 7 arteriovenous malformations, magnetic resonance angiography response matched stereotactic angiography response. Correlation of flow with outcome was carried out for 14 arteriovenous malformations using magnetic resonance angiography only. Interestingly, all nine arteriovenous malformations with intermediate or slow flow demonstrated partial or complete obliteration; whereas only 3 of 5 fast flow arteriovenous malformations achieved a response with a median follow-up of 10 months. This early analysis suggests that slower flowing arteriovenous malformations may obliterate faster after stereotactic radiosurgery and flow parameters could be employed to predict response. In conclusion, magnetic resonance angiography permits semiquantitative flow velocity assessment and may therefore be superior to stereotactic angiography. An additional advantage of magnetic resonance angiography is the generation of serial transverse images which can replace the conventional CT scan employed for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Treatment of increased intracranial pressure: a comparison of different hyperosmotic agents and the use of thiopental.

Four patients with intracranial neoplasms, two with malignant gliomas and two with brain metastases, were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Patients received between 15 and 27.5 Gray of photon irradiation to the central tumor target point; the 80% isodose line covered the periphery of the tumor as determined by contrast enhanced computed tomography. Patients underwent a sequence of three Positron Emission Tomographic scans using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET-FDG)--a baseline scan the day before treatment, and follow-up scans 1 and 7 days after treatment. Ratios between the maximal tumor regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (rCMRGlu) (T*) and the contralateral remote white matter rCMRGlu (RW), that is, the glucose uptake ratio (T*/RW), were calculated. The percent change in ratios relative to each patients baseline scan were calculated. Ratios increased 25% to 42% 1 day post-radiotherapy, then decreased to between 10% above and 12% below the baseline value 7 days post-radiotherapy. The T*/RW increased acutely after stereotactic radiotherapy in a fashion similar to that previously described following chemotherapy with a complex multi-drug regimen. A common metabolic pathway may underlie the increase in T*/RW after these different treatments.