Allan McKenzie

Positron Emission Tomography Is Superior to Computed Tomography Scanning for Response-Assessment After Radical Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE To prospectively study the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to determine response soon after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and, thereby, predict survival. PET is known to provide a more accurate estimate of true extent of disease than CT when used to stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-three patients with NSCLC underwent [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET and CT scans before and after radical radiotherapy (n = 10) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 63). Follow-up PET scans were performed at a median of 70 days after radiotherapy. The median PET-CT interval was 1 day. Each patient had determinations of response to therapy made with PET and CT, categorized as complete response, partial response, no response, progressive disease, or nonassessable. Responses were correlated with subsequent survival. RESULTS Median survival after follow-up PET was 24 months. There was poor agreement between PET and CT responses (weighted kappa = 0.35), which were identical in only 40% of patients. There were significantly more complete responders on PET (n = 34) than CT (n = 10), whereas fewer patients were judged to be nonresponders (12 patients on PET v 20 on CT) or nonassessable (zero patients on PET v six on CT) by PET. Both CT and PET responses were individually significantly associated with survival duration; but on multifactor analysis that included the known prognostic factors of CT response, performance status, weight loss, and stage, only PET response was significantly associated with survival duration (P <.0001). CONCLUSION In NSCLC, a single, early, posttreatment PET scan is a better predictor of survival than CT response, stage, or pretreatment performance status.

Clinical Impact of 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE To prospectively study the impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on clinical management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred five consecutive patients with NSCLC undergoing (18)F FDG PET were analyzed. Before PET, referring physicians recorded scan indication, conventional clinical stage, and proposed treatment plan. PET scan results were reported in conjunction with available clinical and imaging data, including results of computed tomography (CT). Subsequent management and appropriateness of PET-induced changes were assessed by follow-up for at least 6 months or until the patients death. RESULTS Indications for PET were primary staging (n = 59), restaging (n = 34), and suspected malignancy subsequently proven to be NSCLC (n = 12). In 27 (26%) of 105 of cases, PET results led to a change from curative to palliative therapy by upstaging disease extent. Validity of the PET result was established in all but one case. PET appropriately downstaged 10 of 16 patients initially planned for palliative therapy, allowing either potentially curative treatment (four patients) or no treatment (six patients). PET influenced the radiation delivery in 22 (65%) of 34 patients who subsequently received radical radiotherapy. Twelve patients considered probably inoperable on conventional imaging studies were downstaged by PET and underwent potentially curative surgery. PET missed only one primary tumor (5-mm scar carcinoma). CT and PET understaged three of 20 surgical patients (two with N1 lesions < 5 mm and one with unrecognized atrial involvement), and PET missed one small intrapulmonary metastasis apparent on CT. No pathological N2 disease was missed on PET. CONCLUSION FDG PET scanning changed or influenced management decisions in 70 patients (67%) with NSCLC. Patients were frequently spared unnecessary treatment, and management was more appropriately targeted.

Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software

PURPOSE To examine the interclinician variation in the definition of gross tumor volume (GTV) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), develop methods to minimize this variation, and test these methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS The radiotherapy planning computed tomography (CT) scans of 6 consecutive patients with NSCLC in which the radiologist was able to define and outline the GTV were used. Six oncologists independently contoured the tumors with the radiologists markings as a guide using a three-dimensional treatment planning system. Separate contours were prepared using only mediastinal window settings and using both mediastinal and lung window settings. The volumes were calculated using the planning system software (series 1). Factors that resulted in interclinician variation were determined, and, after a 3-year interval, 5 of the 6 clinicians redefined the GTVs using a revised protocol aimed at minimizing variation (series 2). RESULTS For series 1, the interclinician variation in the measurement of volumes ranged from 5%, in the most tightly measured tumor, to 42%, in the most variable, but was, on average, 20%. Statistically significant differences were noted among the clinicians (p = 0.002), that is, some clinicians tended to record relatively small and some relatively large volumes. The reasons for the variation among the oncologists included a tendency to include regions with a low probability of containing tumor, as if the oncologist were contouring a target volume; inclusion of adjacent atelectasis (ignoring the radiologists outline); and variable treatment of spicules. When the exercise was repeated using the revised protocol (series 2), the degree of interclinician variation was reduced, with a range of 7-22% (average 13%). In series 2, the differences among the clinicians were not statistically significant (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION Despite major radiologic input, significant variation occurred in the delineation of the three-dimensional GTVs of NSCLC among oncologists. Standardization of the approach with guidelines resulted in a reduction in this variation.

Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.

In 32 patients with stage 1 or 2 cervical cancer, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were compared with corresponding linear measurements made on fresh histopathology specimens. Their clinical tumor diameters recorded as a part of Federation of International Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) staging were also correlated with the MRI-derived tumor volumes. The locations of neoplastic lesions within the cervix and uterus were identified accurately by MRI as verified in subsequent histopathology examinations. The examination under anesthesia (EUA) diameter (tumor size) was not related to the MRI-derived tumor diameter. Pathologic tumor diameter correlated well with the corresponding diameter in T2-weighted MRI. Tumor volume as measured by MRI was an accurate representation of the local extent of the disease and can be used as an objective measure of cervical cancer at the primary site. Substituting MRI-derived volume in place of clinical tumor diameter in the FIGO staging system will help refine its prognostic significance in patients with both operable and nonoperable cervical cancer.

Imaging with F-18 FDG PET is superior to Tl-201 SPECT in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer for radical radiation therapy.

Thallium-201 (Tl-201) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is funded for evaluation of malignancy in Australia and may have utility for staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) if CT results are equivocal. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to CT for staging NSCLC but is more expensive and less widely available than Tl-201 SPECT. Therefore, these techniques were prospectively compared in 27 radical radiation therapy candidates. Patients were allocated a conventional, PET and Tl-201 stage. Tumour to background ratios (TBR) were recorded for the primary on both techniques. Metastatic disease was confirmed by surgical pathology, serial imaging or clinical follow up. Tumour to background ratios were consistently higher for FDG PET than Tl-201 SPECT (P < 0.0001). Positron emission tomography detected all known primary tumours but Tl-201 failed to image four primary tumours (15%). In 10 of 18 cases of discordance between PET and Tl-201 SPECT regarding stage, corroboration was available from pathology or disease progression. Positron emission tomography was shown to have a 100% positive predictive value, including all three patients with PET-detected distant metastases (P=0.002). Results indicate that PET is superior to Tl-201 SPECT scanning in the staging of NSCLC for radical radiation therapy, and that the low sensitivity for detection of local and metastatic disease is likely to limit the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of this technique despite its lower cost.

Pseudotumoral paraesophageal varices.

We report a case of paraesophageal varices presenting as a posterior mediastinal mass in a patient with long-standing portal hypertension. These collaterals were present, despite multiple previous sclerotherapies for submucosal esophageal varices and no endoscopic evidence of their recurrence.