Allen D. Sawitzke

The effect of glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis: A report from the glucosamine/chondroitin arthritis intervention trial

OBJECTIVE Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee causes significant morbidity and current medical treatment is limited to symptom relief, while therapies able to slow structural damage remain elusive. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (CS), alone or in combination, as well as celecoxib and placebo on progressive loss of joint space width (JSW) in patients with knee OA. METHODS A 24-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted at 9 sites in the United States as part of the Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial (GAIT), enrolled 572 patients with knee OA who satisfied radiographic criteria (Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade 2 or grade 3 changes and JSW of at least 2 mm at baseline). Patients with primarily lateral compartment narrowing at any time point were excluded. Patients who had been randomized to 1 of the 5 groups in the GAIT continued to receive glucosamine 500 mg 3 times daily, CS 400 mg 3 times daily, the combination of glucosamine and CS, celecoxib 200 mg daily, or placebo over 24 months. The minimum medial tibiofemoral JSW was measured at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in JSW from baseline. RESULTS The mean JSW loss at 2 years in knees with OA in the placebo group, adjusted for design and clinical factors, was 0.166 mm. No statistically significant difference in mean JSW loss was observed in any treatment group compared with the placebo group. Treatment effects on K/L grade 2 knees, but not on K/L grade 3 knees, showed a trend toward improvement relative to the placebo group. The power of the study was diminished by the limited sample size, variance of JSW measurement, and a smaller than expected loss in JSW. CONCLUSION At 2 years, no treatment achieved a predefined threshold of clinically important difference in JSW loss as compared with placebo. However, knees with K/L grade 2 radiographic OA appeared to have the greatest potential for modification by these treatments.

Clinical efficacy and safety of glucosamine, chondroitin sulphate, their combination, celecoxib or placebo taken to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: 2-year results from GAIT

Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and functional limitation in older adults, yet longer-term studies of medical treatment of OA are limited. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate (CS), alone or in combination, as well as celecoxib and placebo on painful knee OA over 2 years. Methods A 24-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted at nine sites in the US ancillary to the Glucosamine/chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial, enrolled 662 patients with knee OA who satisfied radiographic criteria (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2 or 3 changes and baseline joint space width of at least 2 mm). This subset continued to receive their randomised treatment: glucosamine 500 mg three times daily, CS 400 mg three times daily, the combination of glucosamine and CS, celecoxib 200 mg daily, or placebo over 24 months. The primary outcome was a 20% reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain over 24 months. Secondary outcomes included an Outcome Measures in Rheumatology/Osteoarthritis Research Society International response and change from baseline in WOMAC pain and function. Results Compared with placebo, the odds of achieving a 20% reduction in WOMAC pain were celecoxib: 1.21, glucosamine: 1.16, combination glucosamine/CS: 0.83 and CS alone: 0.69, and were not statistically significant. Conclusions Over 2 years, no treatment achieved a clinically important difference in WOMAC pain or function as compared with placebo. However, glucosamine and celecoxib showed beneficial but not significant trends. Adverse reactions were similar among treatment groups and serious adverse events were rare for all treatments.

Predictors of pregnancy outcomes in patients with lupus: A cohort study

Background Since systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects women of reproductive age, pregnancy is a major concern.

Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib

Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine hydrochloride (CS+GH) versus celecoxib in patients with knee osteoarthritis and severe pain. Methods Double-blind Multicentre Osteoarthritis interVEntion trial with SYSADOA (MOVES) conducted in France, Germany, Poland and Spain evaluating treatment with CS+GH versus celecoxib in 606 patients with Kellgren and Lawrence grades 2–3 knee osteoarthritis and moderate-to-severe pain (Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score ≥301; 0–500 scale). Patients were randomised to receive 400 mg CS plus 500 mg GH three times a day or 200 mg celecoxib every day for 6 months. The primary outcome was the mean decrease in WOMAC pain from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC function and stiffness, visual analogue scale for pain, presence of joint swelling/effusion, rescue medication consumption, Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria and EuroQoL-5D. Results The adjusted mean change (95% CI) in WOMAC pain was −185.7 (−200.3 to −171.1) (50.1% decrease) with CS+GH and −186.8 (−201.7 to −171.9) (50.2% decrease) with celecoxib, meeting the non-inferiority margin of −40: −1.11 (−22.0 to 19.8; p=0.92). All sensitivity analyses were consistent with that result. At 6 months, 79.7% of patients in the combination group and 79.2% in the celecoxib group fulfilled OMERACT-OARSI criteria. Both groups elicited a reduction >50% in the presence of joint swelling; a similar reduction was seen for effusion. No differences were observed for the other secondary outcomes. Adverse events were low and similarly distributed between groups. Conclusions CS+GH has comparable efficacy to celecoxib in reducing pain, stiffness, functional limitation and joint swelling/effusion after 6 months in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis, with a good safety profile. Trial registration number: NCT01425853.

Nutraceuticals in the management of osteoarthritis : a critical review.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, highly prevalent and disabling disease that is expected to increase in prevalence secondary to longer life expectancy and a disproportionately aging population. Treatment of OA is only marginally effective and has been focused primarily on symptom control using weight loss, physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, intra-articular steroids or viscosupplementation, topical NSAIDs and analgesics, diacerein (an oral interleukin-1β inhibitor) and finally joint replacement surgery. The use of nutraceuticals in the treatment of OA is common, and scientific studies examining the effects of nutraceuticals on the pathogenesis and treatment of OA are increasing. This review examines the efficacy and safety of select nutraceuticals for the treatment of OA. The reviewed nutraceuticals include glucosamine, chondroitin, collagen hydrolysates (CHs) and avocado-soybean unsaponifiables (ASUs). There have been several clinical trials examining the efficacy of these products and the results demonstrate significant heterogeneity. Significant improvements in pain, function and structural outcomes have been shown for some of the treatment arms or subgroups of patients, but the effects are not consistent across the studies. Glucosamine, chondroitin and the two in combination have been the most extensively studied. Significant improvement in pain and functional indices and a decrease in the loss of joint space width were demonstrated in some but not all studies. CHs showed significant improvement in pain and functional indices for several subgroups of patients, but these findings were not pervasive amongst the treatment arms. ASU has demonstrated positive results with respect to decreased NSAID use in several studies and functional and pain end points in most of the reviewed studies; however, in the two studies examining structural end points, the results were mixed. The safety of these nutraceuticals has been demonstrated across all of the reviewed trials, and there were no significant issues with tolerance. Given the good safety profile of nutraceuticals, the marginal efficacy of conventional treatments, the high prevalence and rate of disability from OA and the possible benefit of nutraceuticals to patients with OA, use of nutraceuticals in select patients is appropriate. An overall recommendation to use nutraceuticals in the treatment of all patients with OA is not strongly supported by the available data. Future studies should focus on standardization of symptomatic and structural outcome measures, be of longer duration and pay careful attention to the content of the investigational product.

Heritability of vasculopathy, autoimmune disease, and fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the familiality of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in relation to Raynauds phenomenon (RP) (a marker of vasculopathy), other autoimmune inflammatory disease, and fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS A genealogic resource, the Utah Population Database (UPDB), was used to test heritability of RP, other autoimmune disease, and ILD. Diseases were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and identified from statewide discharge data, the University of Utah Health Science Center Enterprise Data Warehouse, and death certificates and were linked to the UPDB for analysis. Familial standardized incidence ratio (FSIR), relative risks (RRs) to first-, second-, third-, and fourth-degree relatives for SSc, RP, other autoimmune disease, and ILD (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]), and population attributable risk (PAR) were calculated. RESULTS A software kinship analysis tool was used to analyze 1,037 unique SSc patients. Fifty SSc families had significant FSIRs, ranging from 2.07 to 17.60. The adjusted PAR was approximately 8%. The RRs were significant for other autoimmune disease in the first-degree relatives (2.49 [95% CI 1.99-3.41], P = 2.42 x 10(-15)) and second-degree relatives (1.48 [95% CI 1.34-2.39], P = 0.002), for RP in first-degree relatives (6.38 [95% CI 3.44-11.83], P = 4.04 x 10(-9)) and second-degree relatives (2.39 [95% CI 1.21-4.74], P = 0.012), and for ILD in first-degree relatives (1.53 [95% CI 1.04-2.26], P = 0.03), third-degree relatives (1.47 [95% CI 1.18-1.82], P = 0.0004), and fourth-degree relatives (1.2 [95% CI 1.06-1.35], P = 0.004). CONCLUSION These data suggest that SSc pedigrees include more RP, autoimmune inflammatory disease, and ILD than would be expected by chance. In SSc pedigrees, genetic predisposition to vasculopathy is the most frequent risk among first-degree relatives.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Screening Then Indirect Immunofluorescence Confirmation of Antinuclear Antibodies

The purpose of this study was to analyze antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing to confirm and characterize the pattern and titer of the antibody. We evaluated 4 ANA ELISAs and 1 HEp-2 IFA substrate in 224 clinically defined serum samples consisting of 30 from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases, 94 from rheumatoid arthritis cases, and 100 from healthy donors plus 495 serum samples submitted for routine ANA testing and 12 reference serum samples distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. IFA tests were read independently by 2 certified medical technologists. ELISA sensitivities ranged from 90% to 97% compared with 80% by IFA in the SLE serum samples. The ELISAs had specificities of 36% to 94%, whereas the IFA had 99% specificity. Overall, ELISAs for ANA assays demonstrated better sensitivity and good specificity, suggesting ELISA is a more cost-effective alternative to IFA testing for initial ANA screening. Samples positive by ANA ELISA should be tested on HEp-2 to determine the titer and pattern.

Work Productivity Loss and Fatigue in Psoriatic Arthritis

Objective. To explore the relationship between fatigue and work productivity loss (WPL) in people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods. Data were collected from participants in the Utah Psoriasis Initiative Arthritis registry between January 2010 and May 2013. WPL was measured with the 8-item Work Limitations Questionnaire. Fatigue was assessed with question 1 from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI#1), “How would you describe the overall level of fatigue/tiredness you have experienced?” and with question 1 from the Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PsAQOL#1) “I feel tired whatever I do.” Psoriatic activity was evaluated with tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), dactylitis count, enthesitis count, inflammatory back pain (IBP), physician global assessment, body surface area, and psoriasis pain and itch. Results. Among 107 participants, work productivity was reduced by 6.7%, compared to benchmark employees without limitations. Fatigue was reported by 54 patients (50.5%) on PsAQOL#1, and 64 (60.0%) were classified as high fatigue by BASDAI#1. TJC, SJC, enthesitis count, IBP, and depressed mood were highest or most frequent in participants reporting fatigue. After adjustments for psoriatic activity and depressed mood, WPL was associated with fatigue, as measured by PsAQOL#1 (p = 0.01) and BASDAI#1 (p = 0.002). Conclusion. WPL was associated with fatigue, and the association was not entirely explained by the evaluated musculoskeletal, cutaneous, or psychiatric manifestations of PsA.

Modulation of cytokine profiles by the mycoplasma superantigen Mycoplasma arthritidis mitogen parallels susceptibility to arthritis induced by M. arthritidis

ABSTRACT Mycoplasma arthritidis mitogen (MAM) is a potent superantigen secreted by M. arthritidis, an agent of murine arthritis. Here we compare the abilities of MAM to induce a panel of cytokines in vitro and in vivo in BALB/c and C3H/HeJ mouse strains that differ in susceptibility to mycoplasmal arthritis. Splenocytes from both mouse strains produced high levels of all cytokines by 24 h following in vitro exposure to MAM. No differences in cytokine profiles were seen irrespective of the MAM dose. However, there were striking differences in cytokine profiles present in supernatants of splenocytes that had been collected from mice after intravenous (i.v.) injection of MAM and subsequently rechallenged with MAM in vitro. Splenocytes collected 24 and 72 h after i.v. injection of MAM and challenged in vitro with MAM showed the most marked divergence in the secreted cytokines. Type 1 cytokines were markedly elevated in C3H/HeJ cell supernatants, whereas they were depressed or remained low in BALB/c cell supernatants. In contrast, the levels of type 2 cytokines were all greatly increased in BALB/c cell cultures but were decreased or remained low in C3H/HeJ supernatants. Interleukin-12 mRNA and protein was also markedly elevated in C3H/HeJ mice, as were the levels of immunoglobulin G2a. The data indicate a major skewing in cytokine profiles to a type 1 inflammatory response in C3H/HeJ mice but to a protective type 2 response in BALB/c mice. These cytokine changes appear to be associated with the severe arthritis in C3H/HeJ mice following injection of M. arthritidis in comparison to the mild disease seen in injected BALB/c mice.

Presence of Lps d Mutation Influences Cytokine Regulation In Vivo by the Mycoplasma arthritidis Mitogen Superantigen and Lethal Toxicity in Mice Infected with M. arthritidis

ABSTRACT The Mycoplasma arthritidis mitogen (MAM) superantigen (SAg) is a potent activator of human and murine cells and is produced by an organism that is a cause of acute and chronic arthritis of rodents. It is phylogenetically unrelated to other bacterial SAgs and exhibits a number of unique features. We recently demonstrated that MAM differentially regulates the cytokine responses of different mouse strains following in vivo administration. Here we show that the presence in inbred C3H/HeJ mice of the mutantLpsd gene, which is associated with a defect in Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), influences MAM regulation of cytokine profiles in vivo. Whereas the levels of type 1 cytokines (interleukin-2 [IL-2], gamma interferon, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor alpha) were depressed in cells from MAM-injected wild-type C3H/HeSnJ mice, they were elevated in cells from C3H/HeJ mice. Furthermore, the levels of type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10) were elevated in Lpsn C3H/HeSnJ mice but depressed in Lpsd C3H/HeJ mice. The transcript for IL-12 p40 was highly expressed in C3H/HeJ but not C3H/HeSnJ mice. F1 mice exhibited the same cytokine profile as C3H/HeJ mice, indicating that the mutant gene exhibited dominant-negative inheritance. In addition, C3H/HeJ mice were highly susceptible to toxic death in comparison with C3H/HeSnJ mice after injection with live M. arthritidis organisms. Our results suggest that MAM interacts with the lipopolysaccharide signaling pathway, possibly involving TLR4 or a combinatorial Toll complex.