Allen H. Heller

Pharmacokinetic profiles of ciprofloxacin after single intravenous and oral doses.

Ciprofloxacin was administered to 12 healthy male volunteers at doses of 300 and 400 mg intravenously (i.v.) and 500 and 750 mg orally in a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, four-period crossover study. On each treatment day, each subject received both oral and i.v. formulations, one of which was a placebo. Blood and urine samples were obtained through 24 h postdose. By each dosing route, the pharmacokinetic profiles were dose proportional. The 400-mg i.v. dose was equivalent to the 500-mg oral dose with respect to the area under the concentration-time curve and was equivalent to the 750-mg oral dose with respect to the maximum concentration of ciprofloxacin in serum. The oral bioavailability was 78.0%. The steady-state volume of distribution averaged 178 liters, and the terminal half-life in serum after i.v. dosing was approximately 4.3 h. Renal clearance accounted for approximately 60% of total body clearance. No significant adverse events were associated with either route of administration.

Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of cerivastatin

Cerivastatin, a new, entirely synthetic, and enantiomerically pure 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, is pharmacologically potent and hepatically selective, with an uncomplicated pharmacokinetic profile. In vitro and acute in vivo studies in animals demonstrated that cerivastatin is markedly more pharmacologically potent than other statins. In rats and dogs, cerivastatin inhibited hepatic cholesterol synthesis at concentrations 100-150 times lower than lovastatin. Cerivastatins potent inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase (the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis) is confirmed by its cholesterol-lowering properties, combined with significant triglyceride-decreasing effects, and dose-dependent increases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor binding in the liver. The antiatherogenic effects of cerivastatin extend beyond serum lipid and lipoprotein reductions to potent inhibition of migration of smooth muscle cells in vitro and reductions in the accumulation of cholesterol ester in the arterial tissue of rabbits. The high pharmacologic potency of cerivastatin, coupled with high liver selectivity, enable cerivastatin to be administered at 1-5% of the dose of currently available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. At ultra-low doses in the range 0.01-0.8 mg/day, cerivastatin proved to be both safe and well tolerated when administered to healthy volunteers in a series of ascending single- and multiple-dose studies. Cerivastatin has an uncomplicated pharmacokinetic profile; it can be administered to both young and elderly patients, male and female, without the need for dosage adjustments. Because no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions occur with cerivastatin, it may be the preferred HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor for patients on multiple-drug therapy including warfarin and digoxin.

Pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the 0.8-mg dose of cerivastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

Cerivastatin is a third generation hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-Co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor proven to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 28% to 31% in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia when given at 0.3 mg/day. This study evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin 0.8 mg once daily for 4 weeks. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial conducted at 2 study centers, 41 patients (63% women) with primary hypercholesterolemia were placed on an American Heart Association Step 1 diet for 4 weeks. Single-blind placebo was administered for the final 2 weeks, before randomization. Patients received cerivastatin 0.8 mg (n = 28) or placebo (n = 13) once each evening for 28 days. Cerivastatin at 0.8 mg daily was well tolerated. No discontinuations occurred during the study. Adverse events were mild and transient. One cerivastatin-treated patient experienced asymptomatic creatinine kinase, 8x the upper limit of normal (ULN) elevation on the last day of the study, which resolved 6 days after the completion of the study. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg daily significantly reduced LDL cholesterol compared with placebo (-44.0 +/- 2.0% vs 2.2 +/- 2.8%, p <0.0001); total cholesterol (-30.8 +/- 1.4% vs 2.6 +/- 2.1%, p <0.0001), triglycerides (-11.2 +/- 5.9% vs 15.9 +/- 8.6%, p <0.02), but did not significantly alter high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (3.2 +/- 2.1% vs -1.2 +/- 3.1%, p = NS). The pharmacokinetics of the 0.8-mg dose revealed dose proportional elevations in the 24-hour area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration relative to 0.3- and 0.4-mg doses with no change in time to maximum concentration or the elimination half-life in plasma. The increased efficacy and lack of clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or adverse events demonstrates a need for a large long-term study to confirm the safety and efficacy of this dose of cerivastatin.

PhRMA Perspective on Population and Individual Bioequivalence

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a second‐draft guidance in August 1999 on the subject of in vivo bioequivalence, which is based on the concepts of individual and population bioequivalence (IBE and PBE, respectively). The intention of this guidance is to replace the 1992 guidance that requires that in vivo bioequivalence be demonstrated by average bioequivalence (ABE). Although the concepts of population and individual bioequivalence are intuitively reasonable, a detailed review of the literature has not uncovered clinical evidence to justify the additional burden to the innovator and generic companies as well as the consumer that the new guidelines would impose. The criteria for bioequivalence described in the draft guidance employ aggregate statistics that combine information about differences in bioavailability between formulation means and differences in bioavailability variation of formulations between and within subjects. The purely technical aspects of the statistical approach are reasonably sound. However, PhRMA believes that important operational issues remain that need to be resolved before any changes to current practice are implemented. PhRMA believes that the ideals of prescribability and switchability are intuitively reasonable, but it is uncertain of the extent to which the proposed guidance can achieve these goals. It is not clear whether the attainment of such goals is necessary in the evaluation of bioequivalence given the role this plays in drug development, and the lack of clinical evidence argues against a pressing need to change current practice. PhRMA is concerned that the trade‐off offered by the aggregate criteria may ultimately represent more harm than good to the public interest. PhRMA recommends more rigorous evaluation of methods based on two‐way crossover designs before moving to methods that require more complex designs. One such method is identified herein and contains procedures for estimating prescribability and switchability. The possibility of a phase‐in or trial period to collect replicate crossover data to further evaluate IBE and PBE and possibly allow market access based on these criteria as they are being evaluated has been proposed. PhRMA believes this is unprecedented and will offer little additional information beyond that which can be obtained by simulation or has already been collected by the FDA. Simulation studies have the advantage of allowing evaluation of the sensitivity of various procedures to represent the data patterns as created within the simulation. Operating characteristics by which proposed criteria can be adequately judged have not yet been defined. The limitations of ABE for highly variable drugs and narrow therapeutic drugs are well appreciated and may be addressed by means other than a wholesale change in the current criteria.

The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin.

ObjectiveMoxifloxacin is a new 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone with a broad antibacterial spectrum. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of age and gender on pharmacokinetics, surrogate pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a single dose of moxifloxacin.DesignThis was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group single dose trial in young and elderly healthy volunteers.Patients and participantsThe study included 36 volunteers in 3 age and gender groups: young males (mean age 32 years), elderly males (mean age 74 years), and elderly females (mean age 74 years).MethodsParticipants received either a single 200mg oral dose of moxifloxacin (8/group) or placebo (4/group). Blood samples for moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics were obtained before and up to 48 hours after administration. Urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetics, and volunteers were monitored for clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.ResultsMaximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were higher in elderly females than in elderly males; however, when normalised for bodyweight, these pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Moreover, the plasma pharmacokinetics in elderly males were not meaningfully different from those in young males. Elimination half-life averaged 12 to 13 hours for the 3 groups. Surrogate pharmacodynamic measures were derived using AUC/MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) and Cmax/MIC ratios. These assessments indicated that, given the linear pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin previously demonstrated, a dose of 400mg would produce mean Cmax/MIC values in the different subgroups ranging from 10.4 to 15.4 for an MIC of 0.25, and 20.8 to 30.8 for an MIC of 0.125. The corresponding ranges of projected AUC/MIC ratios would be 112 to 158 for an MIC of 0.25, and 224 to 314 for an MIC of 0.125. The accepted target values of AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC for quinolones are 125 and 10, respectively. There were no serious adverse events or differences in adverse event profiles between the groups.ConclusionsMoxifloxacin does not exhibit age- or gender-dependent pharmacokinetics. Oral doses of 200 to 400mg yield effective antibacterial concentrations on the first day of administration.

Influence of Age on the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Novel HMG‐CoA Reductase Inhibitor Cerivastatin in Healthy Male Volunteers

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin, a novel, synthetic, potent, and highly selective HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitor, were studied in 48 young and elderly male volunteers in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Eight men ranging from 18 to 38 years of age (young) and 15 men ranging from 65 to 78 years of age (elderly) received 0.1‐mg cerivastatin tablets daily for 7 days. The remaining subjects (8 young and 17 elderly) received matching placebo tablets. Cerivastatin was well tolerated in elderly and young subjects. Adverse events were mild and occurred less frequently in the participants receiving cerivastatin than in those receiving placebo. In those participants given cerivastatin, the incidence of adverse events was similar for both age groups (4 of 8 young subjects and 8 of 15 elderly subjects). Transient and mild elevations in creatine kinase and transaminase levels were evenly distributed across the cerivastatin and placebo groups. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the concentration curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and elimination half‐life (t1/2), were similar between the two age groups. The mean elimination t1/2 for both groups was approximately 4 hours. These results indicate that cerivastatin is well tolerated in elderly male volunteers at a dosage of 0.1 mg/day. Further, the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin are not altered as a consequence of age. Dose adjustment is therefore not required in elderly men.

Pharmacokinetics of Nisoldipine Coat--Core Formulation in Subjects with Liver Cirrhosis.

The pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release formulation (coat-core) of the calcium channel blocker nisoldipine was investigated in eight subjects with biopsy-proved liver cirrhosis and eight healthy subjects. In Stage I, subjects received a single 10-mg dose to determine if this dose would be safely tolerated in the subjects with cirrhosis. Because all subjects in both groups tolerated the dose without difficulty, all were continued to Stage II. In Stage II, subjects received a once-daily dose of 10-mg coat-core tablets for 7 days. Serial plasma samples were assayed for nisoldipine in both stages. The Cmax and AUC of nisoldipine were approximately fourfold to fivefold higher (p < 0.01) in subjects with cirrhosis as compared to healthy subjects; however, there was overlap in the range of pharmacokinetic parameters between the two groups. The accumulation factor following multiple dosing was similar in both groups. Results suggest that nisoldipine dose should be optimized by monitoring of a pharmacodynamic end point, such as effect on blood pressure. It is likely that dose requirements for patients with liver disease will be lower.

Safety and Tolerance of Intravenous Nimodipine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerance of intravenous nimodipine administered via a peripheral vein in healthy male volunteers. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo- and vehicle-controlled trial with three fixed-dose panels. SETTING: Inpatient infusion and observation periods. SUBJECTS: 61 healthy male volunteers, aged 18–40 years. METHODS: Subjects in panel 1 received nimodipine 0.4 mg/h, vehicle 2 mL/h, or placebo 2 mL/h; subjects in panel 2 received nimodipine 1 mg/h, vehicle 5 mL/h, or placebo 5 mL/h; subjects in panel 3 received nimodipine 2 mg/h, vehicle 10 mL/h, or placebo 10 mL/h. All infusions were administered intravenously for 48 hours and volunteers were observed for 48 hours after cessation of the infusion. In addition to standard safety assessments (physical examination, electrocardiogram, laboratory studies, and adverse event reporting), supine and standing blood pressures and pulse rates were measured frequently. Plasma samples were also analyzed for nimodipine and its two demethylated metabolites. RESULTS: Of 61 subjects, 55 completed the 48-hour infusion and 6 discontinued the study because of adverse events. Intravenous nimodipine was well tolerated at 0.4 and 1 mg/h. However, all six subjects who received nimodipine 2 mg/h experienced moderate-to-severe adverse events, and one subject was discontinued because of dizziness, diaphoresis, and postural hypotension. The matched vehicle (10 mL/h) also was not well tolerated, with three subjects who discontinued because of phlebitis. Two subjects who received placebo were also discontinued during the study. Small (2 mm Hg) decreases in mean supine diastolic blood pressure were observed in the 0.4- and 1-mg/h nimodipine groups, but the 2-mg/h group showed a slight (5 mm Hg) increase in blood pressure. These changes were not clinically significant. Clearance and half-life of nimodipine and its metabolites were similar at all three dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Using peripheral vein administration, nimodipine 2 mg/h and matched vehicle at 10 mL/h were not well tolerated in this healthy normal population. The maximum tolerated dose of nimodipine was found to be 1 mg/h.