Allison C. Koller

Incidence and outcomes of rearrest following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION Rearrest occurs when a patient experiences cardiac arrest after successful resuscitation. The incidence and outcomes of rearrest following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been estimated in limited local studies. We sought provide a large-scale estimate of rearrest incidence and its effect on survival. METHODS We obtained case data from emergency medical services-treated, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a multi-site clinical research network with clinical centers in 11 regions in the US and Canada. The cohort comprised all cases captured between 2006 and 2008 at 10 of 11 regions with prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. We used three methods to ascertain rearrest via direct signal analysis, indirect signal analysis, and emergency department arrival vital status. Rearrest incidence was estimated as the proportion of cases with return of spontaneous circulation that experience rearrest. Regional rearrest incidence estimates were compared with the χ(2)-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between rearrest and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS Out of 18,937 emergency medical services-assessed cases captured between 2006 and 2008, 11,456 (60.5%) cases were treated by emergency medical services and 4396 (38.4%) had prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. Of these, rearrest ascertainment data was available in 3253 cases, with 568 (17.5%) experiencing rearrest. Rearrest differed by region (10.2% to 21.2%, p < 0.001). Rearrest was inversely associated with survival (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.14-0.26). CONCLUSIONS Rearrest was found to occur frequently after resuscitation and was inversely related to survival.

Resuscitation characteristics and outcomes in suspected drug overdose-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION We sought to compare characteristics of emergency medical services-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests resulting from suspected drug overdose with non-overdose cases and test the relationship between suspected overdose and survival to hospital discharge. METHODS Data from emergency medical services-treated, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from 2006 to 2008 and late 2009 to 2011 were obtained from four EMS agencies in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania metropolitan area. Case definition for suspected drug overdose was naloxone administration, indication on the patient care report and/or indication by a review of hospital records. Resuscitation parameters included chest compression fraction, rate, and depth and the administration of resuscitation drugs. Demographic and outcome variables compared by suspected overdose status included age, sex, and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS From 2342 treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 180 were suspected overdose cases (7.7%) and were compared to 2162 non-overdose cases. Suspected overdose cases were significantly younger (45 vs. 65, p<0.001), less likely to be witnessed by a bystander (29% vs. 41%, p<0.005), and had a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge (19% vs. 12%, p=0.014) than non-overdoses. Suspected overdose cases had a higher overall chest compression fraction (0.69 vs. 0.67, p=0.018) and higher probability of adrenaline, sodium bicarbonate, and atropine administration (p<0.001). Suspected overdose status was predictive of survival to hospital discharge when controlling for other variables (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Patients with suspected overdose-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were younger, received different resuscitative care, and survived more often than non-overdose cases.

Tissue oximetry by near-infrared spectroscopy in a porcine model of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation

INTRODUCTION Monitoring during resuscitation remains relatively crude. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measures aggregate oxygen saturation in a volume of tissue. We assessed the utility of continuous StO2 measurement in a porcine model of cardiac arrest, and explored the effects of differential vasoconstriction on StO2. We hypothesized that (1) StO2 trends correspond with the onset of loss of pulses, resuscitation, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); (2) epinephrine has a dose-dependent effect on StO2. METHODS We anesthetized and instrumented 7 female swine, placing a NIRS probe on the left forelimb to recorded StO2. After 8 min of untreated VF and 2 min of CPR, we randomized animals to 0.015 mgkg(-1) (SDE) or 0.1mgkg(-1) (HDE) epinephrine. After 3 min of CPR, animals were defibrillated. Animals with ROSC were given SDE, then HDE for subsequent hemodynamic deteriorations. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and generalized linear model (alpha=0.05) to determine overall slope of pooled StO2 across animals for resuscitation segments. RESULTS Four animals received HDE and three SDE. All achieved ROSC. Significant coefficients (ΔStO2 min(-1)) were noted for resuscitation segments. StO2 decreased after loss of pulses (-29.1; 95%CI -33.4, -24.7; p<0.01) but plateaued during CPR (-0.2; 95%CI -1.2, 0.8; p=0.71). There was a graded decline in StO2 between SDE (-1.3; 95%CI -1.5, -1.2; p<0.01) and HDE (-3.1; 95%CI -5.8, -0.4; p=0.03). The slowest change occurred with ROSC (0.4; 95%CI 0.3, 0.5; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In a porcine model of OHCA, peripheral StO2 rapidly decreased after loss of pulses, but did not improve with CPR or epinephrine. It increased extremely slowly after ROSC.

The association between AHA CPR quality guideline compliance and clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND Measures of chest compression fraction (CCF), compression rate, compression depth and pre-shock pause have all been independently associated with improved outcomes from out-of-hospital (OHCA) cardiac arrest. However, it is unknown whether compliance with American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines incorporating all the aforementioned metrics, is associated with improved survival from OHCA. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database. As per the 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, guideline compliant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was defined as CCF >0.8, chest compression rate 100-120/minute, chest compression depth 50-60mm, and pre-shock pause <10s. Multivariable logistic regression models controlling for Utstein variables were used to assess the relationship between global guideline compliance and survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival with MRS ≤3. Due to potential confounding between CPR quality metrics and cases that achieved early ROSC, we performed an a priori subgroup analysis restricted to patients who obtained ROSC after ≥10min of EMS resuscitation. RESULTS After allowing for study exclusions, 19,568 defibrillator records were collected over a 4-year period ending in June 2015. For all reported models, the reference standard included all cases who did not meet all CPR quality benchmarks. For the primary model (CCF, rate, depth), there was no significant difference in survival for resuscitations that met all CPR quality benchmarks (guideline compliant) compared to the reference standard (OR 1.26; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.97). When the dataset was restricted to patients obtaining ROSC after ≥10min of EMS resuscitation (n=4,158), survival was significantly higher for those resuscitations that were guideline compliant (OR 2.17; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.27) compared to the reference standard. Similar findings were obtained for neurologically intact survival with MRS ≤3 (OR 3.03; 95% CI: 1.12, 8.20). CONCLUSIONS In this observational study, compliance with AHA guidelines for CPR quality was not associated with improved outcomes from OHCA. Conversely, when restricting the cohort to those with late ROSC, compliance with guidelines was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Strategies to improve overall guideline compliance may have a significant impact on outcomes from OHCA.

Regional incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with overdose.

BACKGROUND The frequency of lethal overdose due to prescription and non-prescription drugs is increasing in North America. The aim of this study was to estimate overall and regional variation in incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to overdose across North America. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using case data for the period 2006-2010 from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a clinical research network with 10 regional clinical centers in United States and Canada. Cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to drug overdose were identified through review of data derived from prehospital clinical records. We calculated incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to overdose per 100,000 person-years and proportion of the same among all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We analyzed the association between overdose cardiac arrest etiology and resuscitation outcomes. RESULTS Included were 56,272 cases, of which 1351 were due to overdose. Regional incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to overdose varied between 0.5 and 2.7 per 100,000 person years (p<0.001), and proportion of the same among all treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests ranged from 0.8% to 4.0%. Overdose cases were younger, less likely to be witnessed, and less likely to present with a shockable rhythm. Compared to non-overdose, overdose was directly associated with return of spontaneous circulation (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.35-1.78) and survival (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.72-2.65). CONCLUSIONS Overdose made up 2.4% of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, although incidence varied up to 5-fold across regions. Overdose cases were more likely to survive than non-overdose cases.

Inaccuracy of Patient Care Reports for Identification of Critical Resuscitation Events during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVE Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of mortality in the United States. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the patient care report (PCR) for detection of 2 clinically important events: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and rearrest (RA). METHODS We used defibrillator recordings and PCRs for Emergency Medical Services-treated OHCA collected by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortiums Pittsburgh site from 2006 to 2008 and 2011 to 2012. Defibrillator data included electrocardiogram rhythm tracing, chest compression measurement, and audio voice recording. Sensitivity analysis was performed by comparing the accuracy of the PCR to detect the presence and number of ROSC and RA events to integrated defibrillator data. RESULTS In the 158 OHCA cases, there were 163 ROSC events and 53 RA events. The sensitivity of PCRs to identify all ROSC events was 85% (confidence interval [CI], .795-.905); to identify primary ROSC events, it was 85% (CI, .793-.907); and to identify secondary ROSC events, it was 78% (CI, .565-.995). The sensitivity of PCRs to identify the presence of all RA events was .60 (CI, .469-.731); to identify primary RA events, it was 71% (CI, .578-.842); and to identify secondary RA events, it was 0. Of the 32 RA incidents captured by the PCR, only 15 (47%) correctly identified the correct lethal arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS We found that PCRs are not a reliable source of information for assessing the presence of ROSC and post-RA electrocardiogram rhythm. For quality control and research purposes, medical providers should consider augmenting data collection with continuous defibrillator recordings before making any conclusions about the occurrence of critical resuscitation events.

Physician and Nonphysician Health-care Provider Perspectives on Resuscitation of Suspected Drug-related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction. In the United States, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from drug overdose (OD-OHCA) caused over 38,000 deaths in 2010. A study in Pittsburgh found that OD-OHCA patients differed demographically and in the resuscitation treatments they received, despite identical AHA resuscitation guidelines. We hypothesized that health-care provider perceptions affect decision-making in the treatment of OD-OHCA versus non-OD OHCA. Methods. We conducted this survey at the National Association of EMS Physicians 2013 Scientific Assembly. Physicians and non-physician health-care providers were given one of two surveys containing 19 questions pertaining to the respondents’ affiliated EMS agencies, the estimated proportion of OD-OHCA as well as the drugs involved, and the respondents’ belief about the treatments for OD versus non-OD OHCA. Results. One hundred ninety-three respondents participated in this survey. Of the 193, 144 (75%) were physicians and 49 (25%) were nonphysicians. Seventy-nine percent of physicians identified current status as a medical director and 76% of nonphysicians identified as a paramedic. Participants estimated the average monthly proportion of all OHCA due to OD to be 9.4%. Participants ranked opioids, alcohol, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines as the most commonly utilized agents in OD-OHCA. The majority of physicians (42%) felt that the incidence of OD-OHCA was not changing while the majority of nonphysicians (53%) felt the incidence was increasing. Eighty-four percent of all respondents reported the use of naloxone during OD-OHCA resuscitation, while 13% reported administering naloxone during non-OD OHCA resuscitation. Eighty-nine percent of physicians and 67% of nonphysicians indicated that OD-OHCA patients had different demographics than non-OD OHCA, with primary reported differences being age, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status. Sixty-three percent of physicians and 71% of nonphysicians felt that OD-OHCA patients should be treated differently, with primary differences being the incorporation of etiology-specific treatments, performing different CPR with a focus on airway support, and transporting earlier. Conclusions. When surveyed, physicians and nonphysician providers report perceiving OD-OHCA treatment, outcomes, and patient demographics differently than non-OD OHCA and making different treatment decisions based on these perceptions. This may result in etiology-oriented resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting, despite the lack of OD-specific resuscitation guidelines.

Compression-to-ventilation ratio and incidence of rearrest—A secondary analysis of the ROC CCC trial☆

BACKGROUND Previous work has demonstrated that when out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), but subsequently have another cardiac arrest prior to hospital arrival (rearrest), the probability of survival to hospital discharge is significantly decreased. Additionally, few modifiable factors for rearrest are known. We sought to examine the association between rearrest and compression-to-ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to confirm the association between rearrest and outcomes. HYPOTHESIS Rearrest incidence would be similar between cases treated with 30:2 or continuous chest compression (CCC) CPR, but inversely related to survival and good neurological outcome. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a large randomized-controlled trial of CCC versus 30:2 CPR for the treatment of OHCA between 2011 and 2015 among 8 sites of the Resuscitation OUTCOMES: Consortium (ROC). Patients were randomized through an emergency medical services (EMS) agency-level cluster randomization design to receive either 30:2 or CCC CPR. Case data were derived from prehospital patient care reports, digital defibrillator files, and hospital records. The primary analysis was an as-treated comparison of the proportion of patients with a rearrest for patients who received 30:2 versus those who received CCC. In addition, we assessed the association between rearrest and both survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome (Modified Rankin Score≤3) in patients with and without ROSC upon ED arrival using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, initial rhythm and measures of CPR quality. RESULTS There were 14,109 analyzable cases that were determined to have definitively received either CCC or 30:2 CPR. Of these, 4713 had prehospital ROSC and 2040 (43.2%) had at least one rearrest. Incidence of rearrest was not significantly different between patients receiving CCC and 30:2 (44.1% vs 41.8%; adjusted OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.16). Rearrest was significantly associated with lower survival (23.3% vs 36.9%; adjusted OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.36-0.51) and worse neurological outcome (19.4% vs 30.2%; adjusted OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.38, 0.55). CONCLUSION Rearrest occurrence was not significantly different between patients receiving CCC and 30:2, and was inversely associated with survival to hospital discharge and MRS.

Perishock Pause Intervals and Rearrest after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND The loss of pulses after successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is known as rearrest (RA). The causes of RA are not well understood. OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between shock pause intervals and RA. METHODS Data from treated OHCA with ROSC and one or more defibrillation attempts were obtained from one site of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. All analyses were conducted internally. Data available for analysis included cases spanning 2006-2008 and 2010-2011. Defibrillator tracings were used to calculate both components of the perishock pause (PSP) interval: the pre- (preSP) and the postshock pauses (postSP). RA and no-RA shock pauses were compared and independent associations between shock pause intervals, patient characteristics, and RA were assessed with the appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS Analysis included 241 shocks from 101 cases. Forty-one cases (41%) had RA. RA vs. no-RA median (interquartile range) shock pauses in seconds were: preSP 13.5 (6.0-18.0) vs. 15.0 (10.9-21.5) (p = 0.121); postSP 6.0 (3.5-8.2) vs. 8.7 (4.5-13.9) (p = 0.053); and PSP 18.0 (12.3-24.0) vs. 24.0 (16.7-30.2) (p = 0.022). Considering all possible shock pause durations, shock pause lengths and various patient characteristics were not associated with RA. If 30 s or shorter, the preSP (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 955 confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.98) and postSP (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) were related to RA. CONCLUSION Shock pause length was inversely associated with RA when shock pause intervals were limited to 30 s or less. Shock pauses and RA were not associated when all durations of shock pauses were considered.

Effect of neuromonitor-guided titrated care on brain tissue hypoxia after opioid overdose cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION Brain tissue hypoxia may contribute to preventable secondary brain injury after cardiac arrest. We developed a porcine model of opioid overdose cardiac arrest and post-arrest care including invasive, multimodal neurological monitoring of regional brain physiology. We hypothesized brain tissue hypoxia is common with usual post-arrest care and can be prevented by modifying mean arterial pressure (MAP) and arterial oxygen concentration (PaO2). METHODS We induced opioid overdose and cardiac arrest in sixteen swine, attempted resuscitation after 9 min of apnea, and randomized resuscitated animals to three alternating 6-h blocks of standard or titrated care. We invasively monitored physiological parameters including brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2). During standard care blocks, we maintained MAP > 65 mmHg and oxygen saturation 94-98%. During titrated care, we targeted PbtO2 > 20 mmHg. RESULTS Overall, 10 animals (63%) achieved ROSC after a median of 12.4 min (range 10.8-21.5 min). PbtO2 was higher during titrated care than standard care blocks (unadjusted β = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.78, P < 0.001). In an adjusted model controlling for MAP, vasopressors, sedation, and block sequence, PbtO2 remained higher during titrated care (adjusted β = 0.75, 95%CI 0.43-1.06, P < 0.001). At three predetermined thresholds, brain tissue hypoxia was significantly less common during titrated care blocks (44 vs 2% of the block duration spent below 20 mmHg, P < 0.001; 21 vs 0% below 15 mmHg, P < 0.001; and, 7 vs 0% below 10 mmHg, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS In this model of opioid overdose cardiac arrest, brain tissue hypoxia is common and treatable. Further work will elucidate best strategies and impact of titrated care on functional outcomes.