Allison J. Lockard
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Allison J. Lockard.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2013
Christine H. Lindquist; Kelle Barrick; Christopher P. Krebs; Carmen M. Crosby; Allison J. Lockard; Kathy Sanders-Phillips
To examine the context of sexual assault and postassault actions and consequences among women attending historically Black colleges or universities (HBCUs), web-based surveys were administered in November 2008 to 3,951 undergraduate women attending four HBCUs. Data on the context in which assaults occurred were generated for women who had been sexually assaulted since entering college (n = 358). Multivariate models were run on the full sample to examine the association between sexual assault and symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Results indicated that most survivors were assaulted by assailants well known to them and when the survivor and perpetrator were drinking alcohol. Very few survivors disclosed their experiences to formal sources of support. Survivors had significantly more symptoms of depression and were more likely to screen positive for PTSD than nonvictims. Further research on disclosure and its moderating role on the mental health consequences of sexual assault is needed.
Psychological Services | 2017
Andrés E. Pérez-Rojas; Allison J. Lockard; Theodore T. Bartholomew; Rebecca A. Janis; Dever M. Carney; Henry Xiao; Soo Jeong Youn; Brett E. Scofield; Benjamin D. Locke; Louis G. Castonguay; Jeffrey A. Hayes
Despite growing evidence that a greater number of students are seeking counseling in college and university counseling centers throughout the United States, there is a dearth of empirical information about (a) the presenting concerns for which students seek treatment and (b) how these concerns differ according to client demographic factors. The purpose of this descriptive and exploratory study was to explore how counseling center clinicians categorize client presenting concerns, and how these concerns vary according to client demographics. Given the importance of client suicide within the field of college counseling, the frequency of suicidality as an identified presenting concern was also explored. A sample of 1,308 clinicians from 84 counseling centers rated the presenting concerns of 53,194 clients using the Clinician Index of Client Concerns (CLICC) after an initial consultation. Results of descriptive and nonparametric analyses indicated that the most prevalent concerns were anxiety, depression, stress, family, and academic performance, and that clients who belong to different demographic groups frequently present to counseling with broadly similar types of concerns. Furthermore, suicidality represented an area of concern for 8.4% of all clients, and it ranked 20 of 44 as a clinician-rated concern. Comparable rates emerged across the range of client demographic groups examined, although rates were notably higher for a handful of groups. The findings offer one of the largest and most generalizable descriptions of why college students seek counseling services, as determined by clinicians’ evaluations of presenting concerns. Implications for research and clinical applications of the findings are discussed.
Counselling Psychology Quarterly | 2016
Jeffrey A. Hayes; Allison J. Lockard; Rebecca A. Janis; Benjamin D. Locke
Interest has been growing in the mental health benefits of self-compassion. Whereas, most research on this topic has been conducted with the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), a briefer 12-item version of the instrument, the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF), also exists. The SCS-SF has demonstrated good validity and reliability in non-clinical samples, but it has not been used often in research with psychotherapy clients. This study was designed to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the SCS-SF in a clinical population. Data for this study were collected from 1609 college students receiving services at 10 campus counseling centers. The previously proposed factor structure of the SCS-SF was not supported. Instead, analyses revealed two factors, Self Care and Self Disparagement. Evidence for the construct validity of these factors was found via expected relationships with indices of depression, anxiety, social anxiety, hostility, academic distress, eating concerns, family distress, maladaptive perfectionism, suicidality, self-injurious behavior, and social support. SCS-SF scores were unrelated to various measures of substance use. Implications for clinical work and future research are discussed.
Rehabilitation Psychology | 2018
Allison R. Fleming; Mary Edwin; Jeffrey A. Hayes; Benjamin D. Locke; Allison J. Lockard
Students with disabilities are a growing population on college campuses and have unique challenges that put them at risk for early departure, creating complexity in efforts to address their personal and academic needs. Purpose: The purpose was to explore academic and other sources of distress among college students with disabilities to identify possible areas where enhanced supports might benefit this population. Research Method and Design: Researchers analyzed cross-sectional data from the Center for Collegiate Mental Health to compare subsamples of students with (n = 1,774) and without disabilities (n = 1,774) on presenting concerns, and to determine significant predictors of academic distress among students with disabilities. Results: Results indicated that students with disabilities have many similar treatment concerns with their peers, but showed greater concerns in depression and self-harm; academic performance; anxiety and obsessions/compulsions; and fewer concerns in relationship problems. Significant predictors of academic distress for students with disabilities included attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression and self-harm, trauma or victimization, stress and academic performance, and social support from family and peers. Conclusions/Implications: These results suggest the importance of several factors in understanding the presenting concerns of treatment-seeking students with disabilities and mitigating academic distress for this population. Additional areas for research are presented.
Counselling Psychology Quarterly | 2017
Theodore T. Bartholomew; Andrés E. Pérez-Rojas; Allison J. Lockard; Benjamin D. Locke
Psychotherapy science and the practice of psychotherapy do not always co-exist. Rather, tension has developed overtime between researchers and practitioners. This tension, however, has not eroded all links between science and practice. In fact, many therapists pursue careers in which they can engage in psychotherapy research. This phenomenological study was undertaken to understand the meaning therapists ascribe to being a part of psychotherapy research while being full-time clinicians. To accomplish this task, we interviewed ten therapists who work in a college counseling center where the intersection of research and practice is evident. Using a semi-structured protocol, each participant was individually interviewed about their experiences of engaging in research while being a practitioner. Analyses of interviews led to the identification and interpretation of 450 statements that were grouped into six themes: (a) Making Research Feasible; (b) Ubiquitous Nature of Research in the Center; (c) Benefits of Doing Research; (d) Impediments to Psychotherapy Science; (e) Psychotherapy Science Beyond Data Collection; and (f) Scientist-Practitioner Values and Identity. Results highlight the value of embedding research in clinical settings; however, the impediments to engaging in research while providing therapy were clear. Results are discussed in the context of practice-oriented research and integrating science and practice.
Counselling Psychology Quarterly | 2017
Theodore T. Bartholomew; Allison J. Lockard; Susan F. Folger; Blakely E. Low; Andrea D. Poet; Brett E. Scofield; Benjamin D. Locke
Abstract Empirical efforts have focused on predicting whether or not clients prematurely terminate therapy, with nonattendance of last session equated to premature termination. However, this fails to explore the relationship between clients’ distress reduction and reasons for termination. With this study, we aimed to understand how clients’ distress change relates to premature termination and examine clients’ distress change in conjunction with therapists’ perceptions of termination reasons. We collected data from 797 clients who prematurely terminated or attended termination but completed therapy a minimum of three individual sessions provided by 38 therapists. Clients completed an assessment of psychological symptoms before each session. At the end of treatment, therapists identified the reasons they believed termination occurred for all clients in the sample. Results demonstrate that total sessions attended and missed predict premature termination, whereas distress change does not. Additionally, clients who were believed to accomplish goals do show greater change. However, therapists’ indicated that over half of clients did not reach goals at termination and they did not perceive nonattendance at last session to equate to drop out in all cases. Implications are discussed with respect to understanding why clients’ terminate, therapeutic goal conceptualization, and review of goals during termination in time-limited psychotherapy.
Journal of Counseling Psychology | 2012
Andrew A. McAleavey; Samuel S. Nordberg; Jeffrey A. Hayes; Louis G. Castonguay; Benjamin D. Locke; Allison J. Lockard
Journal of college counseling | 2014
Allison J. Lockard; Jeffrey A. Hayes; Kristin D. Neff; Benjamin D. Locke
Psychotherapy Research | 2015
Andrew A. McAleavey; Allison J. Lockard; Louis G. Castonguay; Jeffrey A. Hayes; Benjamin D. Locke
Psychotherapy | 2015
Soo Jeong Youn; Louis G. Castonguay; Henry Xiao; Rebecca A. Janis; Andrew A. McAleavey; Allison J. Lockard; Benjamin D. Locke; Jeffrey A. Hayes