Allison N. Martin
University of Virginia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Allison N. Martin.
Clinical Transplantation | 2016
Joshua S. Jolissaint; Linda Langman; Claire L. DeBolt; Jacob A. Tatum; Allison N. Martin; Andrew Y. Wang; Daniel S. Strand; Victor M. Zaydfudim; Reid B. Adams; Kenneth L. Brayman
The purpose of this study was to determine whether bacterial contamination of islets affects graft success after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT).
American Journal of Surgery | 2016
Allison N. Martin; Yinin Hu; Ivy A. Le; Kendall D. Brooks; Adela Mahmutovic; Joanna Choi; Helen Kim; Sara K. Rasmussen
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict medical student success in acquiring invasive procedural skills. We hypothesized that students with interest in surgery and with prior procedural experience would have higher rates of success. METHODS Preclinical students were enrolled in a simulation course comprised of suturing, intubation, and central venous catheterization. Students completed surveys to describe demographics, specialty interest area, prior experience, and confidence. Using linear regression, variables predictive of proficiency were identified. RESULTS Forty-five participants completed the course. Under univariate analysis, composite pretest score was inversely associated with confidence (P = .039). Under multivariable analysis, female gender was associated with higher pretest suturing score (P = .016). Male gender (P = .029) and high confidence (P = .021) were associated with greater improvement in suturing. CONCLUSIONS Among novices, higher confidence can predict lower baseline technical proficiency. Although females had higher pretest suturing scores, high confidence and male gender were associated with the greatest degree of improvement.
Surgery | 2018
Allison N. Martin; Jean Claude Byiringiro; Robin T. Petroze; Menelas Nkeshimana; Fidele Byiringiro; James Forrest Calland
Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus on trauma outcomes in low‐resource settings. This study sought to evaluate the impact of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus on mortality outcomes for Rwandan patients presenting after trauma. Methods: This retrospective review of the University of Rwanda trauma registry captured all adult trauma patients with known human immunodeficiency virus status presenting between March 2011 and July 2015. Confirmed human immunodeficiency virus‐positive cases were matched 1:2 with known human immunodeficiency virus‐negative controls using a modified Kampala Trauma Score, sex, and district of residence or primary hospital. All‐cause mortality was compared using multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 11,280 patients were recorded prospectively in the registry (169 human immunodeficiency virus positive; 334 human immunodeficiency virus negative matches). There was no difference in delay of hospital presentation or time until operation (P = .50 and P = .57, respectively). Less than 30% of all patients underwent operation during admission (n = 133), and the rate of operative intervention was independent of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus (P = .946). There was no association between development of any complication and human immunodeficiency virus status (P = .837). The overall mortality rate was 8.9% and 3.3% for human immunodeficiency virus‐positive and human immunodeficiency virus‐negative patients, respectively (P = .010). Human immunodeficiency virus positivity was associated with increased 30‐day mortality when controlling for potential confounders (P = .016; odds ratio 3.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.27–10.2, C statistic 0.88). Conclusion: Both human immunodeficiency virus and trauma pose substantial public health threats in sub‐Saharan Africa. Known human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity in Rwandan trauma patients is associated with early mortality. Further investigation regarding testing, treatment, and outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus‐positive trauma patients is warranted and provides an opportunity for leveraging human immunodeficiency virus global health efforts in trauma outcomes assessment.
American Journal of Surgery | 2018
Nathan R. Elwood; Allison N. Martin; Florence E. Turrentine; R. Scott Jones; Victor M. Zaydfudim
BACKGROUND This study aims to test associations between perioperative blood transfusion and postoperative morbidity and mortality after major abdominal operations. METHODS The 2014 ACS NSQIP dataset was queried for all patients who underwent one of the ten major abdominal operations. Separate multivariable regression models, were developed to evaluate the independent effects of perioperative blood transfusion on morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Of 48,854 patients in the study cohort, 4887 (10%) received a blood transfusion. Rates of transfusion ranged from 4% for laparoscopic gastrointestinal resection to 58% for open AAA. After adjusting for significant effects of NSQIP-estimated probabilities, transfusion was independently associated with morbidity and mortality after open AAA repair (OR = 1.99/14.4 respectively, p ≤ 0.010), esophagectomy (OR = 2.80/3.0, p < 0.001), pancreatectomy (OR = 1.88/3.01, p < 0.001), hepatectomy (OR = 2.82/5.78, p < 0.001), colectomy (OR = 2.15/3.17, p < 0.001), small bowel resection (OR = 2.81/3.83, p ≤ 0.004), and laparoscopic gastrointestinal operations (OR = 2.73/4.05, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative blood transfusion is independently associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after most major abdominal operations.
Gynecologic oncology reports | 2017
George Ruzigana; Lisa Bazzet-Matabele; Stephen Rulisa; Allison N. Martin; Rahel Ghebre
In limited resource settings such as Rwanda, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is the primary model for cervical cancer screening. The objective of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes for women presenting for cervical cancer screening. A prospective, observational study was conducted between September 2015 and February 2016 at Kigali University Teaching Hospital (CHUK). Women referred to the VIA clinic were enrolled and completed a semi-structured questionnaire. During the six-month study period, 150 women were enrolled and evaluated with VIA followed by colposcopy directed biopsy for VIA positive. The median age was 42 years (IQR 36–49). Only 20 (13.3%) asymptomatic women presented for screening exam, whereas 126 (84%) were symptomatic. Among symptomatic patients, more than one-third had never had a speculum exam prior to referral (n = 43). Twenty-two (14.7%) women were VIA positive, and 8 (5.3%) had lesions suspicious for cancer, while 120 (80%) were found to be VIA negative. Among women undergoing biopsy (n = 30), 11 were normal (36.7%), 5 cases showed CIN 1 (16.6%), 4 cases showed CIN 2 (13.3%), 2 cases showed CIN 3 (6.7%) and 8 were confirmed cervical cancers (26.7%). In Rwanda, VIA is the current method for cervical cancer screening. In this study, few asymptomatic patients presented for cervical cancer screening. Increasing knowledge about cervical cancer screening and expanding access are key elements to improving cervical cancer control in Rwanda.
Journal of Surgical Research | 2016
Allison N. Martin; Matthew J. Kerwin; Florence E. Turrentine; Todd W. Bauer; Reid B. Adams; George J. Stukenborg; Victor M. Zaydfudim
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2016
Allison N. Martin; Deepanjana Das; Florence E. Turrentine; Todd W. Bauer; Reid B. Adams; Victor M. Zaydfudim
American Journal of Surgery | 2017
Anna Fashandi; Allison N. Martin; Patty T. Wang; Traci L. Hedrick; Charles M. Friel; Philip W. Smith; R. Ann Hays; Peter T. Hallowell
Journal of Pediatric Urology | 2017
Jessica N. Jackson; Rebecca S. Zee; Allison N. Martin; Sean T. Corbett; C.D. Anthony Herndon
Surgery | 2016
Adriana G. Ramirez; Amber L. Shada; Allison N. Martin; Prashant Raghavan; Christopher R. Durst; Sugoto Mukherjee; John R. Gaughen; David Ornan; John B. Hanks; Philip W. Smith