Allison Winter
Cleveland Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Allison Winter.
Annals of Oncology | 2017
Anthony R. Mato; Brian T. Hill; Nicole Lamanna; Paul M. Barr; Chaitra Ujjani; Danielle M. Brander; Christina Howlett; Alan P Skarbnik; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Jeffrey J. Pu; Pavel Kiselev; K. Foon; J. Lenhart; S. Henick Bachow; Allison Winter; Allan-Louie Cruz; David F. Claxton; Andre Goy; Catherine Daniel; K. Isaac; Kaitlin Kennard; Colleen Timlin; Molly Fanning; Lisa M. Gashonia; Melissa Yacur; Jakub Svoboda; Stephen J. Schuster; Chadi Nabhan
Background Ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax are approved for treating CLL patients in the United States. However, there is no guidance as to their optimal sequence. Patients and methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of CLL patients treated with kinase inhibitors (KIs) or venetoclax. We examined demographics, discontinuation reasons, overall response rates (ORR), survival, and post-KI salvage strategies. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 683 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar in the ibrutinib and idelalisib groups. ORR to ibrutinib and idelalisib as first KI was 69% and 81%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-60), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached. Patients treated with ibrutinib (versus idelalisib) as first KI had a significantly better PFS in all settings; front-line [hazard ratios (HR) 2.8, CI 1.3-6.3, P = 0.01], relapsed-refractory (HR 2.8, CI 1.9-4.1, P < 0.001), del17p (HR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4, P = 0.008), and complex karyotype (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.2, P = 0.02). At the time of initial KI failure, use of an alternate KI or venetoclax had a superior PFS when compared with chemoimmunotherapy. Furthermore, patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to progression or toxicity had marginally improved outcomes if they received venetoclax (ORR 79%) versus idelalisib (ORR 46%) (PFS HR .6, CI.3-1.0, P = 0.06). Conclusions In the largest real-world experience of novel agents in CLL, ibrutinib appears superior to idelalisib as first KI. Furthermore, in the setting of KI failure, alternate KI or venetoclax therapy appear superior to chemoimmunotherapy combinations. The use of venetoclax upon ibrutinib failure might be superior to idelalisib. These data support the need for trials testing sequencing strategies to optimize treatment algorithms.BACKGROUND Ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax are approved for treating CLL patients in the US. However, there is no guidance as to their optimal sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of CLL patients treated with kinase inhibitors (KIs) or venetoclax. We examined demographics, discontinuation reasons, overall response rates (ORR), survival, and post-KI salvage strategies. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 683 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar in the ibrutinib and idelalisib groups. ORR to ibrutinib and idelalisib as first KI was 69% and 81% respectively. With a median follow up of 17 months (range 1-60), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached. Patients treated with ibrutinib (vs. idelalisib) as first KI had a significantly better PFS in all settings; front-line (HR 2.8, CI1.3-6.3 p=.01), relapsed-refractory (HR 2.8, CI 1.9-4.1 p<.001), del17p (HR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.4 p=.008), and complex karyotype (HR 2.5, CI 1.2-5.2 p=.02). At the time of initial KI failure, use of an alternate KI or venetoclax had a superior PFS as compared to chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). Furthermore, patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to progression or toxicity had marginally improved outcomes if they received venetoclax (ORR 79%) versus idelalisib (ORR 46%) (PFS HR .6, CI.3-1.0, p=.06). CONCLUSIONS In the largest real-world experience of novel agents in CLL, ibrutinib appears superior to idelalisib as first KI. Further, in the setting of KI failure, alternate KI or venetoclax therapy appear superior to CIT combinations. The use of venetoclax upon ibrutinib failure might be superior to idelalisib. These data support the need for trials testing sequencing strategies to optimize treatment algorithms.
Haematologica | 2018
Anthony R. Mato; Chadi Nabhan; Meghan Thompson; Nicole Lamanna; Danielle M. Brander; Brian T. Hill; Christina Howlett; Alan P Skarbnik; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Jeffrey Pu; Pavel Kiselev; Andre Goy; David F. Claxton; Krista Isaack; Kaitlin Kennard; Colleen Timlin; Daniel J. Landsburg; Allison Winter; Sunita D. Nasta; Spencer Henick Bachow; Stephen J. Schuster; Colleen Dorsey; Jakub Svoboda; Paul M. Barr; Chaitra Ujjani
Clinical trials that led to ibrutinib’s approval for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia showed that its side effects differ from those of traditional chemotherapy. Reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice have not been adequately studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with ibrutinib either commercially or on clinical trials. We aimed to compare the type and frequency of toxicities reported in either setting, assess discontinuation rates, and evaluate outcomes. This multicenter, retrospective analysis included ibrutinib-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients at nine United States cancer centers or from the Connect® Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Registry. We examined demographics, dosing, discontinuation rates and reasons, toxicities, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Six hundred sixteen ibrutinib-treated patients were identified. A total of 546 (88%) patients were treated with the commercial drug. Clinical trial patients were younger (mean age 58 versus 61 years, P=0.01) and had a similar time from diagnosis to treatment with ibrutinib (mean 85 versus 87 months, P=0.8). With a median follow-up of 17 months, an estimated 41% of patients discontinued ibrutinib (median time to ibrutinib discontinuation was 7 months). Notably, ibrutinib toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuation in all settings. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached (median follow-up 17 months), respectively. In the largest reported series on ibrutinib- treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, we show that 41% of patients discontinued ibrutinib. Intolerance as opposed to chronic lymphocytic leukemia progression was the most common reason for discontinuation. Outcomes remain excellent and were not affected by line of therapy or whether patients were treated on clinical studies or commercially. These data strongly argue in favor of finding strategies to minimize ibrutinib intolerance so that efficacy can be further maximized. Future clinical trials should consider time-limited therapy approaches, particularly in patients achieving a complete response, in order to minimize ibrutinib exposure.
Clinical Pharmacokinectics | 2017
Madeline Waldron; Allison Winter; Brian T. Hill
Management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia has changed markedly over the last several years with the emergence of several novel oral agents targeting B-cell receptor and Bcl-2 signaling pathways. For patients requiring treatment, ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax offer unique clinical benefits with a different set of therapeutic considerations compared with traditional parenteral therapy. Despite the conveniences afforded by oral therapy, these agents also carry unique logistical obstacles. Drug interactions with agents that are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway are possible with all three agents. Unique treatment-related adverse events including bleeding and atrial fibrillation with ibrutinib, hepatotoxicity with idelalisib, and tumor lysis syndrome with venetoclax can be severe and dose limiting. Furthermore, dose adjustments for organ dysfunction may also be warranted. Here, we review the available literature on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these novel agents to guide the reader in the appropriate use of ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax.
Blood | 2017
Allison Winter; Daniel J. Landsburg; Anthony R. Mato; Krista Isaac; Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Nishitha Reddy; Stephen D. Smith; Mazyar Shadman; Mitchell R. Smith; Paolo F. Caimi; Deepa Jagadeesh; Brian T. Hill
To the editor: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with distinct immunophenotypes, genetic features, and clinical outcomes. Based on differential gene expression, termed cell of origin (COO), DLBCL can be subcategorized into germinal center B-cell-like (GCB), activated
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2018
Allison Winter; Lisa Rybicki; Shetal N. Shah; Deepa Jagadeesh; Aaron T. Gerds; Betty K. Hamilton; Hien Liu; Robert Dean; Ronald Sobecks; Brad Pohlman; Mitchell R. Smith; Matt Kalaycio; Brian J. Bolwell; Navneet S. Majhail; Brian T. Hill
Abstract Pre-transplant PET/CT may be prognostic in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We reviewed relapsed and pre-transplant PET/CT scans of 32 patients with DLBCL treated with ASCT to determine the Deauville score and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Patients with a Deauville score of 4 had a significantly inferior prognosis. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with Deauville 1–3 score was 64%, compared to 0% for Deauville 4, while the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 84% and 25%, respectively (p < .001, p = .002). The change in the SUVmax (>66 versus ≤66%) was not predictive of PFS or OS, but a high pre-transplant SUVmax (>6) demonstrated a trend towards an inferior PFS. Pre-transplant PET/CT is a tool for identifying DLBCL patients at high risk for treatment failure with ASCT and could be used to risk-stratify patients in prospective clinical trials of novel transplant strategies.
Haematologica | 2018
Anthony R. Mato; Meghan Thompson; John N. Allan; Danielle M. Brander; John M. Pagel; Chaitra Ujjani; Brian T. Hill; Nicole Lamanna; Frederick Lansigan; Ryan Jacobs; Mazyar Shadman; Alan P Skarbnik; Jeffrey J. Pu; Paul M. Barr; Alison Sehgal; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Hande H. Tuncer; Stephen J. Schuster; Peter V. Pickens; Nirav N. Shah; Andre Goy; Allison Winter; Christine Garcia; Kaitlin Kennard; Krista Isaac; Colleen Dorsey; Lisa M. Gashonia; Arun Singavi; Lindsey E. Roeker
Venetoclax is a BCL2 inhibitor approved for 17p-deleted relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with activity following kinase inhibitors. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with venetoclax to describe outcomes, toxicities, and treatment selection following venetoclax discontinuation. A total of 141 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients were included (98% relapsed/refractory). Median age at venetoclax initiation was 67 years (range 37-91), median prior therapies was 3 (0-11), 81% unmutated IGHV, 45% del(17p), and 26.8% complex karyotype (≥ 3 abnormalities). Prior to venetoclax initiation, 89% received a B-cell receptor antagonist. For tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis, 93% received allopurinol, 92% normal saline, and 45% rasburicase. Dose escalation to the maximum recommended dose of 400 mg daily was achieved in 85% of patients. Adverse events of interest included neutropenia in 47.4%, thrombocytopenia in 36%, tumor lysis syndrome in 13.4%, neutropenic fever in 11.6%, and diarrhea in 7.3%. The overall response rate to venetoclax was 72% (19.4% complete remission). With a median follow up of 7 months, median progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort have not been reached. To date, 41 venetoclax treated patients have discontinued therapy and 24 have received a subsequent therapy, most commonly ibrutinib. In the largest clinical experience of venetoclax-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, the majority successfully completed and maintained a maximum recommended dose. Response rates and duration of response appear comparable to clinical trial data. Venetoclax was active in patients with mutations known to confer ibrutinib resistance. Optimal sequencing of newer chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapies requires further study.
Blood | 2016
Anthony R. Mato; Nicole Lamanna; Chaitra Ujjani; Danielle M. Brander; Brian T. Hill; Christina Howlett; Alan P Skarbnik; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Jeffrey J. Pu; Pavel Kiselev; Spencer Henick Bachow; Allison Winter; Allan-Louie Cruz; David F. Claxton; Catherine Daniel; Krista Isaack; Kaitlin Kennard; Colleen Timlin; Melissa Yacur; Molly Fanning; Lauren E. Strelec; Daniel J. Landsburg; Sunita D. Nasta; Stephen J. Schuster; David L. Porter; Chadi Nabhan; Paul M. Barr
Blood | 2016
Anthony R. Mato; Brian T. Hill; Nicole Lamanna; Paul M. Barr; Chaitra Ujjani; Danielle M. Brander; Christina Howlett; Alan P Skarbnik; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Jeffrey J. Pu; Pavel Kiselev; Spencer Henick Bachow; Allison Winter; Allan-Louie Cruz; David F. Claxton; Catherine Daniel; Krista Isaack; Kaitlin Kennard; Colleen Timlin; Molly Fanning; Melissa Yacur; Jakub Svoboda; Stephen J. Schuster; Chadi Nabhan
Blood | 2016
Allison Winter; Daniel J. Landsburg; Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Nishitha Reddy; Stephen J. Smith; Mazyar Shadman; Paolo F. Caimi; Deepa Jagadeesh; Mitchell R. Smith; Brian T. Hill
Blood | 2017
Erin Bange; Chadi Nabhan; Danielle M. Brander; Nicole Lamanna; Chaitra Ujjani; Christina Howlett; Alan P Skarbnik; Brian T. Hill; Bruce D. Cheson; Clive S. Zent; Jeffrey J. Pu; Allison Winter; Krista Isaac; Kaitlin Kennard; Colleen Timlin; Colleen Dorsey; Sunita D. Nasta; Jakub Svoboda; Daniel J. Landsburg; Stephen J. Schuster; Paul M. Barr; Anthony R. Mato