Allyn McConkie-Rosell
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Allyn McConkie-Rosell.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1989
David W. Yandell; Tracey A. Campbell; Siri H. Dayton; Robert A. Petersen; David S. Walton; John B. Little; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Edward G. Buckley; Thaddeus P. Dryja
Mutations of the retinoblastoma gene, most of which cannot be detected by conventional Southern blotting, are known to cause both the nonhereditary and hereditary forms of retinoblastoma and have been implicated in the development of other cancers. Nonhereditary retinoblastoma is caused by a somatic mutation. Hereditary retinoblastoma is caused by a germ-cell mutation, most often a new one, and thus there is usually no family history of the disease. Unlike patients with the nonhereditary disease, those with the hereditary form are at risk for additional retinoblastomas, and their progeny are at risk for the tumors. We used a sensitive technique of primer-directed enzymatic amplification, followed by DNA sequence analysis, to identify mutations as small as a single nucleotide change in tumors from seven patients with simplex retinoblastoma (with no family history of the disease). In four patients the mutation involved only the tumor cells, and in three it involved normal somatic cells as well as tumor cells but was not found in either parent; thus, these mutations appeared to be new, germ-cell mutations. In addition, we found point mutations in cells from a bladder carcinoma, a small-cell carcinoma of the lung, and another retinoblastoma. We conclude that the technique that we have described can distinguish hereditary from nonhereditary retinoblastoma and that it is useful in risk estimation and genetic counseling.
Genetics in Medicine | 2014
Vandana Shashi; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Bruce Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Kasturi Vellore; Marie McDonald; Yong-hui Jiang; Pingxing Xie; Anna C. Need; David B. Goldstein
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of the traditional, comprehensive clinical evaluation and targeted genetic testing, within a general genetics clinic. These data are critically needed to develop clinically and economically grounded diagnostic algorithms that consider presenting phenotype, traditional genetics testing, and the emerging role of next-generation sequencing (whole-exome/genome sequencing).Methods:We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 500 unselected consecutive patients who received traditional genetic diagnostic evaluations at a tertiary medical center. We calculated the diagnosis rate, number of visits to diagnosis, genetic tests, and the cost of testing.Results:Thirty-nine patients were determined to not have a genetic disorder; 212 of the remaining 461 (46%) received a genetic diagnosis, and 72% of these were diagnosed on the first visit. The cost per subsequent successful genetic diagnosis was estimated at
Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2005
Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Brenda Finucane; Amy Cronister; Liane Abrams; Robin L. Bennett; Barbara Pettersen
25,000.Conclusion:Almost half of the patients were diagnosed using the traditional approach, most at the initial visit. For those remaining undiagnosed, next-generation sequencing may be clinically and economically beneficial. Estimating a 50% success rate for next-generation sequencing in undiagnosed genetic disorders, its application after the first clinical visit could result in a higher rate of genetic diagnosis at a considerable cost savings per successful diagnosis.Genet Med 16 2, 176–182.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1998
Maria Veiga-da-Cunha; Isabelle Gerin; Yuan-Tsong Chen; Thierry de Barsy; Pascale de Lonlay; Carlo Dionisi-Vici; Christiane Fenske; Philip Lee; J. V. Leonard; Irène Maire; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Susanne Schweitzer; Miikka Vikkula; Emile Van Schaftingen
These recommendations describe the minimum standard criteria for genetic counseling and testing of individuals and families with fragile X syndrome, as well as carriers and potential carriers of a fragile X mutation. The original guidelines (published in 2000) have been revised, replacing a stratified pre- and full mutation model of fragile X syndrome with one based on a continuum of gene effects across the full spectrum of FMR1 CGG trinucleotide repeat expansion. This document reviews the molecular genetics of fragile X syndrome, clinical phenotype (including the spectrum of premature ovarian failure and fragile X-associated tremor-ataxia syndrome), indications for genetic testing and interpretation of results, risks of transmission, family planning options, psychosocial issues, and references for professional and patient resources. These recommendations are the opinions of a multicenter working group of genetic counselors with expertise in fragile X syndrome genetic counseling, and they are based on clinical experience, review of pertinent English language articles, and reports of expert committees. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. The professional judgment of a health care provider, familiar with the facts and circumstances of a specific case, will always supersede these recommendations.
Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2007
Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Liane Abrams; Brenda Finucane; Amy Cronister; Louise W. Gane; Sarah M. Coffey; Stephanie L. Sherman; Lawrence M. Nelson; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Sufen Chiu; Natalie Street; Ajay Vatave; Randi J. Hagerman
Glycogen-storage diseases type I (GSD type I) are due to a deficiency in glucose-6-phosphatase, an enzymatic system present in the endoplasmic reticulum that plays a crucial role in blood glucose homeostasis. Unlike GSD type Ia, types Ib and Ic are not due to mutations in the phosphohydrolase gene and are clinically characterized by the presence of associated neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction. Biochemical evidence indicates the presence of a defect in glucose-6-phosphate (GSD type Ib) or inorganic phosphate (Pi) (GSD type Ic) transport in the microsomes. We have recently cloned a cDNA encoding a putative glucose-6-phosphate translocase. We have now localized the corresponding gene on chromosome 11q23, the region where GSD types Ib and Ic have been mapped. Using SSCP analysis and sequencing, we have screened this gene, for mutations in genomic DNA, from patients from 22 different families who have GSD types Ib and Ic. Of 20 mutations found, 11 result in truncated proteins that are probably nonfunctional. Most other mutations result in substitutions of conserved or semiconserved residues. The two most common mutations (Gly339Cys and 1211-1212 delCT) together constitute approximately 40% of the disease alleles. The fact that the same mutations are found in GSD types Ib and Ic could indicate either that Pi and glucose-6-phosphate are transported in microsomes by the same transporter or that the biochemical assays used to differentiate Pi and glucose-6-phosphate transport defects are not reliable.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1997
Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A. Spiridigliozzi; Timothy Iafolla; Jack Tarleton; Ave M. Lachiewicz
The purpose of this paper is to report the outcome of a collaborative project between the Fragile X Research and Treatment Center at the Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (M.I.N.D.) Institute at the University of California at Davis, the National Fragile X Foundation (NFXF), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The objective of this collaboration was to develop and disseminate protocols for genetic counseling and cascade testing for the multiple disorders associated with the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) mutation. Over the last several years, there has been increasing insight into the phenotypic range associated with both the premutation and the full mutation of the FMR1 gene. To help develop recommendations related to screening for fragile X-associated disorders, four, two day advisory focus group meetings were conducted, each with a different theme. The four themes were: (1) fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS); (2) premature ovarian failure (POF) and reproductive endocrinology; (3) psychiatric, behavioral and psychological issues; and (4) population screening and related ethical issues.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1999
Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A. Spiridigliozzi; Kathleen A. Rounds; Deborah V. Dawson; Jennifer A. Sullivan; Deby Burgess; Ave M. Lachiewicz
This study surveyed obligate carriers of the fragile X syndrome fra(X) to ascertain opinions and attitudes regarding carrier testing. Female carriers of fra(X) syndrome were recruited during their visits to the Fragile X Clinic at Duke University Medical Center. Twenty-eight obligate carriers completed a 48 question structured interview and a visual analog scale (VAS). Strong trends in the responses were identified. Fra(X) syndrome was viewed as a very serious problem and the risk to offspring high. Subjects reported that prior knowledge of carrier status would have changed their reproductive plans. All felt that relatives should be informed about the inheritance of fra(X) syndrome; the mean age given for preferred age to inform their children of the inheritance of fra(X) syndrome was 12 years, and mean age given for optimal timing of carrier testing was 10 years. The women interviewed indicated that growing up with knowledge of their carrier status would have been preferable to learning this information as adults and they endorsed an aggressive approach to informing and testing their children. Further investigation is warranted to determine the psychological consequences of carrier testing for fra(X) syndrome in order to develop appropriate guidelines for testing and informing individuals at risk for fra(X) syndrome.
Human Mutation | 2013
Partha Sen; Yaping Yang; Colby Navarro; Iris Silva; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Katarzyna E. Kolodziejska; Avinash V. Dharmadhikari; Hasnaa Mostafa; Harry P. Kozakewich; Debra L. Kearney; John Cahill; Merrissa Whitt; Masha Bilic; Linda R. Margraf; Adrian Charles; Jack Goldblatt; Kathleen Gibson; Patrick E. Lantz; A. Julian Garvin; John K. Petty; Zeina N. Kiblawi; Craig W. Zuppan; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Marie McDonald; Stacey L. Peterson-Carmichael; Jane T. Gaede; Binoy Shivanna; Deborah Schady; Philippe Friedlich; Stephen R. Hays
Sixty-five parents of individuals affected by fragile X syndrome who attended the National Fragile X Conference in Portland, Oregon (1996), were asked to complete a survey assessing parental level of concern about carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome. All subjects completed a 15-item paper and pencil Likert response scale measure that was developed specifically for this study. The items included parental rights and duties, psychological adjustment, adaptation, discrimination, harm, childbearing, and interpersonal relationships. The major concern of the parents was that their children have knowledge of their carrier status prior to becoming sexually active and that their children be able to marry informed of their genetic risk. Mothers were significantly more concerned than fathers about raising their children with the knowledge of their carrier status. A sense of parental right to make the decision regarding carrier testing for children was associated with concerns about (1) behavioral or educational problems, (2) knowledge of carrier status prior to sexual activity or marriage, and (3) adjustment of the children to knowledge of their carrier status. As the sample was drawn from a unique population of parents, the results of this survey should be interpreted with caution. The findings of this study suggest a model of parents providing anticipatory guidance for their children to help them adjust to carrier information and for their children to have this knowledge prior to the possibility of reproduction.
Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2012
Brenda Finucane; Liane Abrams; Amy Cronister; Alison D. Archibald; Robin L. Bennett; Allyn McConkie-Rosell
Alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACD/MPV) is a rare and lethal developmental disorder of the lung defined by a constellation of characteristic histopathological features. Nonpulmonary anomalies involving organs of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and genitourinary systems have been identified in approximately 80% of patients with ACD/MPV. We have collected DNA and pathological samples from more than 90 infants with ACD/MPV and their family members. Since the publication of our initial report of four point mutations and 10 deletions, we have identified an additional 38 novel nonsynonymous mutations of FOXF1 (nine nonsense, seven frameshift, one inframe deletion, 20 missense, and one no stop). This report represents an up to date list of all known FOXF1 mutations to the best of our knowledge. Majority of the cases are sporadic. We report four familial cases of which three show maternal inheritance, consistent with paternal imprinting of the gene. Twenty five mutations (60%) are located within the putative DNA‐binding domain, indicating its plausible role in FOXF1 function. Five mutations map to the second exon. We identified two additional genic and eight genomic deletions upstream to FOXF1. These results corroborate and extend our previous observations and further establish involvement of FOXF1 in ACD/MPV and lung organogenesis.
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease | 1996
Allyn McConkie-Rosell; C. Wilson; D. A. Piccoli; J. Boyle; T. DeClue; Priya S. Kishnani; Jianjun Shen; Anne Boney; B. I. Brown; Yuan-Tsong Chen
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is one of several clinical disorders associated with mutations in the X-linked Fragile X Mental Retardation-1 (FMR1) gene. With evolving knowledge about the phenotypic consequences of FMR1 transcription and translation, sharp clinical distinctions between pre- and full mutations have become more fluid. The complexity of the issues surrounding genetic testing and management of FMR1-associated disorders has increased; and several aspects of genetic counseling for FMR1 mutations remain challenging, including risk assessment for intermediate alleles and the widely variable clinical prognosis for females with full mutations. FMR1 mutation testing is increasingly being offered to women without known risk factors, and newborn screening for FXS is underway in research-based pilot studies. Each diagnosis of an FMR1 mutation has far-reaching clinical and reproductive implications for the extended family. The interest in large-scale population screening is likely to increase due to patient demand and awareness, and as targeted pharmaceutical treatments for FXS become available over the next decade. Given these developments and the likelihood of more widespread screening, genetic counselors across a variety of healthcare settings will increasingly be called upon to address complex diagnostic, psychosocial, and management issues related to FMR1 gene mutations. The following guidelines are intended to assist genetic counselors in providing accurate risk assessment and appropriate educational and supportive counseling for individuals with positive test results and families affected by FMR1-associated disorders.