Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alya Dabbagh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alya Dabbagh.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2015

Progress toward regional measles elimination - worldwide, 2000-2014.

Robert Perry; Jillian Murray; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Alya Dabbagh; Mick N. Mulders; Peter M. Strebel; Jean-Marie Okwo-Bele; Paul A. Rota; James L. Goodson

In 2000, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), with MDG4 being a two-thirds reduction in child mortality by 2015, and with measles vaccination coverage being one of the three indicators of progress toward this goal.* In 2010, the World Health Assembly established three milestones for measles control by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) for children aged 1 year to ≥90% nationally and ≥80% in every district; 2) reduce global annual measles incidence to fewer than five cases per million population; and 3) reduce global measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate (1).† In 2012, the World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan§ with the objective to eliminate measles in four World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2015. WHO member states in all six WHO regions have adopted measles elimination goals. This report updates the 2000–2013 report (2) and describes progress toward global control and regional measles elimination during 2000–2014. During this period, annual reported measles incidence declined 73% worldwide, from 146 to 40 cases per million population, and annual estimated measles deaths declined 79%, from 546,800 to 114,900. However, progress toward the 2015 milestones and elimination goals has slowed markedly since 2010. To resume progress toward milestones and goals for measles elimination, a review of current strategies and challenges to improving program performance is needed, and countries and their partners need to raise the visibility of measles elimination, address barriers to measles vaccination, and make substantial and sustained additional investments in strengthening health systems.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

Global Eradication of Measles: An Epidemiologic and Economic Evaluation

Ann Levin; Colleen Burgess; Louis P. Garrison; Chris T. Bauch; Joseph B. Babigumira; Emily Simons; Alya Dabbagh

BACKGROUND Measles remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children in developing countries. Due to the success of the measles mortality reduction and elimination efforts thus far, the WHO has raised the question of whether global eradication of measles is economically feasible. METHODS The cost-effectiveness of various measles mortality reduction and eradication scenarios was evaluated vis-à-vis the current mortality reduction goal in six countries and globally. Data collection on costs of measles vaccination were conducted in six countries in four regions: Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Ethiopia, Tajikistan, and Uganda. The number of measles cases and deaths were projected from 2010 to 2050 using a dynamic, age-structured compartmental model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were then calculated for each scenario vis a vis the baseline. RESULTS Measles eradication by 2020 was the found to be the most cost-effective scenario, both in the six countries and globally. Eradicating measles by 2020 is projected to cost an additional discounted


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

Progress Toward Control of Rubella and Prevention of Congenital Rubella Syndrome—Worldwide, 2009

Susan E. Reef; Peter M. Strebel; Alya Dabbagh; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Stephen L. Cochi

7.8 billion and avert a discounted 346 million DALYs between 2010 and 2050. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the study found that, compared to the baseline, reaching measles eradication by 2020 would be the most cost-effective measles mortality reduction scenario, both for the six countries and on a global basis.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2007

A new global framework for immunization monitoring and surveillance

Alya Dabbagh; R Eggers; Stephen L. Cochi; Dietz; Peter M. Strebel; Thomas Cherian

Rubella, usually a mild rash illness in children and adults, can cause serious consequences when a pregnant woman is infected, particularly in early pregnancy. These serious consequences include miscarriage, fetal death or an infant born with birth defects (i.e., congenital rubella syndrome (CRS)). The primary purpose for rubella vaccination is the prevention of congenital rubella infection including CRS. Since 1969, several rubella virus vaccines have been licensed for use; however, until the 1990s, use of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) was limited primarily to developed countries. In 1996, it was estimated that 110,000 infants with CRS were born annually in developing countries. In 2000, the first World Health Organization rubella vaccine position paper was published to guide introduction of RCV in national childhood immunization schedules. From 1996 to 2009, the number of countries that introduced RCV into their national routine childhood immunization programs increased by 57% from 83 countries in 1996 to 130 countries in 2009. In addition, three of the six WHO regions established rubella control and CRS prevention goals: Region of the Americas and Europe rubella elimination by 2010 and 2015, respectively, and Western Pacific Region-accelerated rubella control and CRS prevention by 2015. Also, during this time period, the number of rubella cases reported decreased from 670,894 in 2000 to 121,344 in 2009. Rubella control and prevention of CRS can be accelerated by integrating with current global measles mortality reduction and regional elimination activities.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Using Seroprevalence and Immunisation Coverage Data to Estimate the Global Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome, 1996-2010: A Systematic Review.

Emilia Vynnycky; Elisabeth J. Adams; Felicity Cutts; Susan E. Reef; Ann Marie Navar; Emily Simons; Lay Myint Yoshida; David W. J. Brown; Charlotte Jackson; Peter M. Strebel; Alya Dabbagh

Each year despite the availability of low-cost interventions such as vaccines that could prevent millions of deaths nearly 11 million children worldwide die before the age of five. Failure to reach the Millennium Development Goal 4 (MDG 4) for child survival will result in an estimated 40 million childrens lives lost by 2015. As nearly a quarter of global under-five mortality is attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) vaccination can contribute significantly to attaining the MDG 4. An unprecedented array of life-saving vaccines is now available or in late stages of development. However the decision to invest in vaccine introduction must be evidence-based and requires reliable data. Vaccine-preventable disease surveillance and programme monitoring provide the scientific and factual database essential for informed decision-making and appropriate public health action. In 2005 WHO and UNICEF published the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006-2015 (GIVS) which defines the strategies and goals that will maximize the impact of immunization. One of the key components of achieving the GIVS goals is the need for strong systems for disease surveillance and programme monitoring. Recent developments such as the availability and accessibility of new vaccines for the worlds poorest countries the need to achieve and sustain the global polio eradication goal the new goal of reducing measles mortality by 90% by 2010 the new International Health Regulations and the threat of emerging or pandemic diseases make a renewed and more comprehensive approach to surveillance and programme monitoring a necessity. To address this need WHO together with its global immunization partners developed a Global Framework for Immunization Monitoring and Surveillance (GFIMS). (excerpt)


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

The Cost-Effectiveness of Supplementary Immunization Activities for Measles: A Stochastic Model for Uganda

David Bishai; Benjamin Johns; Divya Nair; Juliet Nabyonga-Orem; Braka Fiona-Makmot; Emily Simons; Alya Dabbagh

Background The burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) is typically underestimated in routine surveillance. Updated estimates are needed following the recent WHO position paper on rubella and recent GAVI initiatives, funding rubella vaccination in eligible countries. Previous estimates considered the year 1996 and only 78 (developing) countries. Methods We reviewed the literature to identify rubella seroprevalence studies conducted before countries introduced rubella-containing vaccination (RCV). These data and the estimated vaccination coverage in the routine schedule and mass campaigns were incorporated in mathematical models to estimate the CRS incidence in 1996 and 2000–2010 for each country, region and globally. Results The estimated CRS decreased in the three regions (Americas, Europe and Eastern Mediterranean) which had introduced widespread RCV by 2010, reaching <2 per 100,000 live births (the Americas and Europe) and 25 (95% CI 4–61) per 100,000 live births (the Eastern Mediterranean). The estimated incidence in 2010 ranged from 90 (95% CI: 46–195) in the Western Pacific, excluding China, to 116 (95% CI: 56–235) and 121 (95% CI: 31–238) per 100,000 live births in Africa and SE Asia respectively. Highest numbers of cases were predicted in Africa (39,000, 95% CI: 18,000–80,000) and SE Asia (49,000, 95% CI: 11,000–97,000). In 2010, 105,000 (95% CI: 54,000–158,000) CRS cases were estimated globally, compared to 119,000 (95% CI: 72,000–169,000) in 1996. Conclusions Whilst falling dramatically in the Americas, Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean after vaccination, the estimated CRS incidence remains high elsewhere. Well-conducted seroprevalence studies can help to improve the reliability of these estimates and monitor the impact of rubella vaccination.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2015

Global Progress Toward Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Control and Elimination - 2000-2014.

Gavin B. Grant; Susan E. Reef; Alya Dabbagh; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Peter M. Strebel

Supplemental Immunization Activities (SIAs) have become an important adjunct to measles control efforts in countries that endeavor to achieve higher levels of population immunity than can be achieved in a growing routine immunization system. Because SIAs are often supported with funds that have alternative uses, decision makers need to know how cost-effective they are compared with other options. This study integrated a dynamic stochastic model of measles transmission in Uganda (2010-2050) with a cost model to compare a strategy of maintaining Ugandas current (2008) levels of the first dose of routine measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) coverage at 68% with SIAs with a strategy using the same levels of MCV1 coverage without SIAs. The stochastic model was fitted with parameters drawn from district-level measles case reports from Uganda, and the cost model was fitted to administrative data from the Ugandan Expanded Program on Immunization and from the literature. A discount rate of 0.03, time horizon of 2010-2050, and a societal perspective on costs were assumed. Costs expressed in US dollars (2010) included vaccination costs, disease treatment costs including lost productivity of mothers, as well as costs of outbreaks and surveillance. The model estimated that adding on triennial SIAs that covered 95% of children aged 12-59 months to a system that achieved routine coverage rates of 68% would have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of


Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination | 2014

Measles Eradication versus Measles Control: An Economic Analysis

David Bishai; Benjamin Johns; Amnesty LeFevre; Divya Nair; Emily Simons; Alya Dabbagh

1.50 (


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

Strategic Planning for Measles Control: Using Data to Inform Optimal Vaccination Strategies

Emily Simons; Molly Mort; Alya Dabbagh; Peter M. Strebel; Lara Wolfson

US 2010) per disability-adjusted life year averted. The ICER was somewhat higher if the discount rate was set at either 0 or 0.06. The addition of SIAs was found to make outbreaks less frequent and lower in magnitude. The benefit was reduced if routine coverage rates were higher. This cost-effectiveness ratio compares favorably to that of other commonly accepted public health interventions in sub-Saharan Africa.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

Comparing measles with previous eradication programs: enabling and constraining factors.

Robert Keegan; Alya Dabbagh; Peter M. Strebel; Stephen L. Cochi

Rubella virus usually causes a mild fever and rash in children and adults. However, infection during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, stillbirth, or a constellation of congenital malformations known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated guidance on the preferred strategy for introduction of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into national routine immunization schedules, including an initial vaccination campaign usually targeting children aged 9 months-15 years . The Global Vaccine Action Plan endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 2012 and the Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan (2012-2020) published by Measles and Rubella Initiative partners in 2012 both include goals to eliminate rubella and CRS in at least two WHO regions by 2015, and at least five WHO regions by 2020 (2,3). This report updates a previous report and summarizes global progress toward rubella and CRS control and elimination during 2000-2014. As of December 2014, RCV had been introduced in 140 (72%) countries, an increase from 99 (51%) countries in 2000 (for this report, WHO member states are referred to as countries). Reported rubella cases declined 95%, from 670,894 cases in 102 countries in 2000 to 33,068 cases in 162 countries in 2014, although reporting is inconsistent. To achieve the 2020 Global Vaccine Action Plan rubella and CRS elimination goals, RCV introduction needs to continue as country criteria indicating readiness are met, and rubella and CRS surveillance need to be strengthened to ensure that progress toward elimination can be measured.

Collaboration


Dive into the Alya Dabbagh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter M. Strebel

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James L. Goodson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan E. Reef

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily Simons

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Perry

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen L. Cochi

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter M. Strebel

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arun Thapa

World Health Organization

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge