Alyssa Morimoto

Safety and pharmacodynamics of rontalizumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase I, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies and inflammation in multiple organ systems. Elevation of messenger RNA levels of interferon (IFN)-regulated genes (IRGs) has been described in the peripheral blood of SLE patients and has been associated with disease activity. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rontalizumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IFNα, were assessed in a phase I dose-escalation study of single and repeat doses of rontalizumab in adults with mildly active SLE. The present report describes the safety results and the impact of rontalizumab on expression of IRGs, IFN-inducible proteins, and autoantibodies. METHODS Patients were enrolled into dose groups ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg, administered via intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous routes. Expression levels of 7 IRGs and IFN-inducible serum proteins were monitored as potential biomarkers for the PD activity of rontalizumab. RESULTS An acceptable safety profile was demonstrated for rontalizumab in patients with SLE. Prespecified criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were not met. The incidence of serious adverse events was comparable across cohorts. The PK properties were as expected for an IgG1 monoclonal antibody and were proportional to dose. Following administration of rontalizumab, a rapid decline in the expression of IRGs was observed in the 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg IV cohorts, and this effect could be sustained with repeat dosing. There was no apparent decline in the levels of IFN-inducible proteins or levels of anti-double-stranded DNA and anti-extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies following treatment with rontalizumab. CONCLUSION The preliminary safety, PK profile, and observed PD effects of rontalizumab support further evaluation of its safety and efficacy in SLE.

Association of Endogenous Anti–Interferon-α Autoantibodies With Decreased Interferon-Pathway and Disease Activity in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE Numerous observations implicate interferon-α (IFNα) in the pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the potential impact of endogenous anti-IFNα autoantibodies (AIAAs) on IFN-pathway and disease activity is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize IFN-pathway activity and the serologic and clinical profiles of AIAA-positive patients with SLE. METHODS Sera obtained from patients with SLE (n = 49), patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 25), and healthy control subjects (n = 25) were examined for the presence of AIAAs, using a biosensor immunoassay. Serum type I IFN bioactivity and the ability of AIAA-positive sera to neutralize IFNα activity were determined using U937 cells. Levels of IFN-regulated gene expression in peripheral blood were determined by microarray, and serum levels of BAFF, IFN-inducible chemokines, and other autoantibodies were measured using immunoassays. RESULTS AIAAs were detected in 27% of the serum samples from patients with SLE, using a biosensor immunoassay. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified 2 subgroups of patients, IFN(low) and IFN(high) , that differed in the levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity, IFN-regulated gene expression, BAFF, anti-ribosomal P, and anti-chromatin autoantibodies, and in AIAA status. The majority of AIAA-positive patients had significantly lower levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity, reduced downstream IFN-pathway activity, and lower disease activity compared with the IFN(high) patients. AIAA-positive sera were able to effectively neutralize type I IFN activity in vitro. CONCLUSION Patients with SLE commonly harbor AIAAs. AIAA-positive patients have lower levels of serum type I IFN bioactivity and evidence for reduced downstream IFN-pathway and disease activity. AIAAs may influence the clinical course in SLE by blunting the effects produced by IFNα.

Complement Inhibition in Cynomolgus Monkeys by Anti–Factor D Antigen-Binding Fragment for the Treatment of an Advanced Form of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Anti–factor D (AFD; FCFD4514S, lampalizumab) is a humanized IgG Fab fragment directed against factor D (fD), a rate-limiting serine protease in the alternative complement pathway (AP). Evaluation of AFD as a potential intravitreal (IVT) therapeutic for dry age-related macular degeneration patients with geographic atrophy (GA) is ongoing. However, it is unclear whether IVT administration of AFD can affect systemic AP activation and potentially compromise host-immune responses. We characterized the pharmacologic properties of AFD and assessed the effects of AFD administered IVT (2 or 20 mg) or intravenous (0.2, 2, or 20 mg) on systemic complement activity in cynomolgus monkeys. For the IVT groups, serum AP activity was reduced for the 20 mg dose group between 2 and 6 hours postinjection. For the intravenous groups, AFD inhibited systemic AP activity for periods of time ranging from 5 minutes (0.2 mg group) to 3 hours (20 mg group). Interestingly, the concentrations of total serum fD increased up to 10-fold relative to predose levels following administration of AFD. Furthermore, AFD was found to inhibit systemic AP activity only when the molar concentration of AFD exceeded that of fD. This occurred in cynomolgus monkeys at serum AFD levels ≥2 µg/ml, a concentration 8-fold greater than the maximum serum concentration observed following a single 10 mg IVT dose in a clinical investigation in patients with GA. Based on these findings, the low levels of serum AFD resulting from IVT administration of a clinically relevant dose are not expected to appreciably affect systemic AP activity.

Association of the interferon signature metric with serological disease manifestations but not global activity scores in multiple cohorts of patients with SLE

Objectives The interferon (IFN) signature (IS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) includes over 100 genes induced by type I IFN pathway activation. We developed a method to quantify the IS using three genes—the IS metric (ISM)—and characterised the clinical characteristics of patients with SLE with different ISM status from multiple clinical trials. Methods Blood microarray expression data from a training cohort of patients with SLE confirmed the presence of the IS and identified surrogate genes. We assayed these genes in a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, yielding an ISM from the IS. The association of ISM status with clinical disease characteristics was assessed in patients with extrarenal lupus and lupus nephritis from four clinical trials. Results Three genes, HERC5, EPSTI and CMPK2, correlated well with the IS (p>0.96), and composed the ISM qPCR assay. Using the 95th centile for healthy control data, patients with SLE from different studies were classified into two ISM subsets—ISM-Low and ISM-High—that are longitudinally stable over 36 weeks. Significant associations were identified between ISM-High status and higher titres of anti-dsDNA antibodies, presence of anti extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies, elevated serum B cell activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family (BAFF) levels, and hypocomplementaemia. However, measures of overall clinical disease activity were similar for ISM-High and ISM-Low groups. Conclusions The ISM is an IS biomarker that divides patients with SLE into two subpopulations—ISM-High and ISM-Low—with differing serological manifestations. The ISM does not distinguish between high and low disease activity, but may have utility in identifying patients more likely to respond to treatment(s) targeting IFN-α. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT00962832.

2015 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on new technologies and biomarkers (Part 3 – LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity)

The 2015 9th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (9th WRIB) took place in Miami, Florida with participation of 600 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5 day, week-long event - A Full Immersion Bioanalytical Week - specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA approaches, including the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2015 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2015 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts. Part 3 discusses the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity. Part 1 (small molecule bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) have been published in volume 7, issues 22 and 23 of Bioanalysis, respectively.

Pre-Existing Biotherapeutic-Reactive Antibodies: Survey Results Within the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

The immunogenicity profile of a biotherapeutic is determined by a multitude of product and patient-related risk factors that can influence the observed incidence and clinical consequences of immunogenicity. Pre-existing antibodies, i.e., biotherapeutic-reactive antibodies present in samples from treatment-naïve subjects, have been commonly observed during immunogenicity assessments; however their relevance in terms of the safety and efficacy of a biotherapeutic is poorly understood. An American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists-sponsored survey was conducted to gather information about the prevalence, nature, and consequences of pre-existing antibodies in clinical and nonclinical studies. The survey results indicate that pre-existing antibodies against a variety of biotherapeutics (e.g., mAbs, fusion proteins) are frequently encountered, especially in the context of autoimmune diseases, but that the methods and approaches used to detect, characterize, and report these antibodies vary. In most cases, pre-existing antibodies did not appear to have clinical consequences; however, a few of the respondents reported having observed an effect on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and/or efficacy parameters. The findings from this survey are an important first step in evaluating the potential risks associated with the presence of pre-existing antibodies and highlight the importance of standardizing the approaches for detection and characterization of these antibodies. Cross-industry sharing of case studies and relevant data collection will help better inform biotherapeutic risk/benefit profiles and provide deeper understanding of the biological consequences of pre-existing antibodies.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lampalizumab Administered Intravitreally to Patients With Geographic Atrophy

Intravitreally administered lampalizumab is an investigational complement inhibitor directed against complement factor D (CFD) for the treatment of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age‐related macular degeneration. We sought to develop an integrated ocular and systemic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for lampalizumab in patients with GA using the data from the clinical phase I and II studies. The kinetics of lampalizumab and CFD disposition were well described by the combined ocular/serum target‐mediated drug disposition model using a quasi‐steady‐state approximation. This model takes into account the drug, target, and drug–target complex clearance, their transfer rates between ocular and serum compartments, and turnover kinetics of CFD. The constructed model provided a prediction of target occupancy in ocular tissues and supported that the two dosing regimens (10 mg q4w and 10 mg q6w) selected for the phase III studies are expected to be efficacious and able to achieve near‐complete target engagement in the vitreous humor.

A mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of factor D inhibition in cynomolgus monkeys by lampalizumab for the treatment of geographic atrophy.

Lampalizumab is an antigen-binding fragment of a humanized monoclonal antibody against complement factor D (CFD), a rate-limiting enzyme in the activation and amplification of the alternative complement pathway (ACP), which is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of geographic atrophy. Understanding of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and biodistribution of lampalizumab following intravitreal administration in the ocular compartments and systemic circulation is limited but crucial for selecting doses that provide optimal efficacy and safety. Here, we sought to construct a semimechanistic and integrated ocular-systemic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of lampalizumab in the cynomolgus monkey to provide a quantitative understanding of the ocular and systemic disposition of lampalizumab and CFD inhibition. The model takes into account target-mediated drug disposition, target turnover, and drug distribution across ocular tissues and systemic circulation. Following intravitreal administration, lampalizumab achieves rapid equilibration across ocular tissues. Lampalizumab ocular elimination is relatively slow, with a τ1/2 of approximately 3 days, whereas systemic elimination is rapid, with a τ1/2 of 0.8 hours. Target-independent linear clearance is predominant in the eye, whereas target-mediated clearance is predominant in the systemic circulation. Systemic CFD synthesis was estimated to be high (7.8 mg/day); however, the amount of CFD entering the eye due to influx from the systemic circulation was small (<10%) compared with the lampalizumab dose and is thus expected to have an insignificant impact on the clinical dose-regimen decision. Our findings support the clinical use of intravitreal lampalizumab to achieve significant ocular ACP inhibition while maintaining low systemic exposure and minimal systemic ACP inhibition.

Fit-for-purpose biomarker immunoassay qualification and validation: three case studies

AIM To improve on the efficiency of biomarker assay readiness, and for reliable biomarker data to support three drug programs, we implemented a fit-for-purpose approach, qualifying two biomarker assays and validating a third. Results/methodology: The qualification strategy and selection of experiments for two exploratory biomarkers (CXCL1, CCL19) was determined by the intended use of the biomarker data. The third biomarker, IL-6, was validated as the data would be used in monitoring patient safety during dose-escalation studies in a Phase I trial. All three assays passed a priori acceptance criteria. CONCLUSION These assays highlight strategies and methodologies for a fit-for-purpose approach. Minimum qualification, full qualification and validation were chosen and supported programs at different stages of drug development.

Commercial biomarker assays: friend and foe

AIM Commercial kits can provide a convenient solution for measuring circulating biomarkers to support drug development. However, their suitability should be assessed in the disease matrix of interest. METHODOLOGY Twelve biomarkers were evaluated in samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We used immunoassay kits from five vendors on three multiplexed platforms. Kit suitability was evaluated on the basis of detectability and prespecified performance acceptance criteria. RESULTS Assays had varying levels of sensitivity and susceptibility to interference by matrix components. Only a few assays in the multiplexed kits were found to be suitable. In general, kits for analytes that passed our assay criteria showed good correlation between vendors. CONCLUSION The data from this study demonstrate that the majority of assays on multiplexed kits evaluated either lacked sensitivity and/or had poor performance, which diminishes the utility of the multiplexing approach.