Alyssa Stephenson-Famy
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alyssa Stephenson-Famy.
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2001
Jean S. Campbell; Lisa Prichard; Fred Schaper; Jochen Schmitz; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Maryland E. Rosenfeld; Gretchen M. Argast; Peter C. Heinrich; Nelson Fausto
The cytokines TNF and IL-6 play a critical role early in liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy (PH). Since IL-6 activates signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), we examined whether the suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) may be involved in terminating IL-6 signaling. We show here that SOCS-3 mRNA is induced 40-fold 2 hours after surgery. SOCS-2 and CIS mRNA are only weakly induced, and SOCS-1 is not detectable. SOCS-3 induction after PH is transient and correlates with a decrease in STAT-3 DNA binding and a loss of tyrosine 705 phosphorylation. This response is markedly reduced in IL-6 knockout (KO) mice. TNF injection induces SOCS-3 mRNA in wild-type mice (albeit weakly compared with the increase observed after PH) but not in TNF receptor 1 or IL-6 KO mice. In contrast, IL-6 injection induces SOCS-3 in these animals, demonstrating a requirement for IL-6 in SOCS-3 induction. IL-6 injection into wild-type mice also induces SOCS-1, -2, and CIS mRNA, in addition to SOCS-3. Together, these results suggest that SOCS-3 may be a key component in downregulating STAT-3 signaling after PH and that SOCS-3 mRNA levels in the regenerating liver are regulated by IL-6.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America | 2014
Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Carolyn Gardella
Genital herpes in pregnancy continues to cause significant maternal morbidity, with an increasing number of infections being due to oral-labial transmission of herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1. Near delivery, primary infections with HSV-1 or HSV-2 carry the highest risk of neonatal herpes infection, which is a rare but potentially devastating disease for otherwise healthy newborns. Prevention efforts have been limited by lack of an effective intervention for preventing primary infections and the unclear role of routine serologic testing.
Biochemical Pharmacology | 2017
Jennifer E. Sager; Sasmita Tripathy; Lauren S.L. Price; Abhinav Nath; Justine Chang; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Nina Isoherranen
Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. Abstract Bupropion is a widely used antidepressant and smoking cessation aid and a strong inhibitor of CYP2D6 in vivo. Bupropion is administered as a racemic mixture of R‐ and S‐bupropion and has stereoselective pharmacokinetics. Four primary metabolites of bupropion, threo‐ and erythro‐hydrobupropion and R,R‐ and S,S‐OH‐bupropion, circulate at higher concentrations than the parent drug and are believed to contribute to the efficacy and side effects of bupropion as well as to the CYP2D6 inhibition. However, bupropion and its metabolites are only weak inhibitors of CYP2D6 in vitro, and the magnitude of the in vivo drug‐drug interactions (DDI) caused by bupropion cannot be explained by the in vitro data even when CYP2D6 inhibition by the metabolites is accounted for. The aim of this study was to quantitatively explain the in vivo CYP2D6 DDI magnitude by in vitro DDI data. Bupropion and its metabolites were found to inhibit CYP2D6 stereoselectively with up to 10‐fold difference in inhibition potency between enantiomers. However, the reversible inhibition or active uptake into hepatocytes did not explain the in vivo DDIs. In HepG2 cells and in plated human hepatocytes bupropion and its metabolites were found to significantly downregulate CYP2D6 mRNA in a concentration dependent manner. The in vivo DDI was quantitatively predicted by significant down‐regulation of CYP2D6 mRNA and reversible inhibition of CYP2D6 by bupropion and its metabolites. This study is the first example of a clinical DDI resulting from CYP down‐regulation and first demonstration of a CYP2D6 interaction resulting from transcriptional regulation.
Journal of Surgical Education | 2017
Nasim Sobhani; Emily Fay; Melissa A. Schiff; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Katherine E. Debiec
OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that compared to paper evaluations, a smartphone-based quick response (QR) evaluation tool would improve timeliness of feedback, enhance efficacy of giving and receiving feedback, and be as easy to use. DESIGN We performed a randomized controlled trial of student and instructor experience with two evaluation tools in the OB/GYN clerkship at University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM). Sites were randomized to the QR or paper tool; students at QR sites received individualized QR codes at the beginning of the clerkship. Instructors and students completed postintervention surveys regarding the evaluation tool and associated feedback. We compared responses between groups using chi-squared tests. SETTING Participating clerkship sites included primary, tertiary, private practice and institutional settings affiliated with the University of Washington in the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho region. PARTICIPANTS Of the 29 OB/GYN UWSOM clerkship sites, 18 agreed to participate and were randomized. Of 29 eligible instructors, 25 (86%) completed the survey, with n = 18 using QR and n = 7 using paper. Of 161 eligible students, 102 (63%) completed the survey, with n = 54 using QR and n = 48 using paper. RESULTS Compared to those using paper evaluations, instructors using QR evaluations were significantly more likely to agree that the evaluation tool was easy to understand (100% QR vs 43% paper, p = 0.002), the tool was effective in providing feedback (78% QR vs 29% paper, p = 0.002), and they felt comfortable approaching students with the tool (89% QR vs 43% paper, p = 0.002). Compared to those using paper evaluations, students using QR evaluations were less likely to agree the tool was effective in eliciting feedback (QR 43% vs paper 55%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION Instructors found QR evaluations superior to paper evaluations for providing feedback to medical students, whereas students found QR evaluations less effective for feedback.
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters | 2016
Jennifer E. Sager; John R. Choiniere; Justine Chang; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Wendel L. Nelson; Nina Isoherranen
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2007
Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Jane Hitti; Xinfang Lu; Jodi Lapidus; Anna Girsen; Juha Rasanen; Michael G. Gravett; Srinivasa Nagalla
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2018
Emily Fay; Josephine Amory; Michael G. Gravett; Sarah Alexander; Shani Delaney; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2018
Emily Fay; Josephine Amory; Caroline Hurd; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2018
Carlie Field; Lyndsey Benson; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Sarah Prager
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2018
Meredith J. Alston; Jessica Ehrig; Amy M. Autry; Sarah A. Wagner; Belinda M. Kohl-Thomas; Amanda A. Allshouse; Marshall Gottesfeld; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy