Amanda Lehman
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amanda Lehman.
Ophthalmic Epidemiology | 2016
Pleet A; Michael E. Sulewski; Rebecca Salowe; Raymond Fertig; Julia Salinas; Allison Rhodes; Merritt Iii W; Natesh; Jiayan Huang; Harini V. Gudiseva; David W. Collins; Venkata Ramana Murthy Chavali; Tapino P; Amanda Lehman; Regina-Gigiliotti M; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Prithvi Sankar; Gui-shuang Ying; Joan M. O'Brien
ABSTRACT Purpose: To determine the risk factors associated with progression to blindness from primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in an African-American population. Methods: This study examined 2119 patients enrolled in the Primary Open-Angle African-American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. A total of 59 eyes were identified as legally blind as a result of POAG (cases) and were age-and sex-matched to 59 non-blind eyes with glaucoma (controls). Chart reviews were performed to record known and suspected risk factors. Results: Cases were diagnosed with POAG at an earlier age than controls (p = 0.005). Of the 59 eyes of cases, 16 eyes (27.1%) presented with blindness at diagnosis. Cases had worse visual acuity (VA) at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), with VA worse than 20/40 conferring a 27 times higher risk of progression to blindness (p = 0.0005). Blind eyes also demonstrated more visual field defects (p = 0.01), higher pre-treatment intraocular pressure (IOP; p < 0.0001), and higher cup-to-disc ratio (p = 0.006) at diagnosis. IOP was less controlled in cases, and those with IOP ≥21 mmHg at more than 20% of follow-up visits were 73 times more likely to become blind (p < 0.0001). Cases missed a greater number of appointments per year (p = 0.003) and had non-adherence issues noted in their charts more often than controls (p = 0.03). However, other compliance data did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusion: Access to care, initial VA worse than 20/40, and poor control of IOP were the major risk factors associated with blindness from POAG. Future studies should examine earlier, more effective approaches to glaucoma screening as well as the role of genetics in these significantly younger patients who progress to blindness.
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology | 2015
Rebecca Salowe; Julia Salinas; Neil H Farbman; Aishat Mohammed; Joshua Z Warren; Allison Rhodes; Alexander J. Brucker; Meredith Regina; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Prithvi Sankar; Amanda Lehman; Joan M. O'Brien
Objective To identify the major risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in individuals of African descent. Methods We searched PubMed for relevant articles, with results spanning April 1947 to present. All abstracts were reviewed and, where relevant to POAG and race, articles were catalogued and analyzed. Additional sources were identified through citations in articles returned by our search. Results Numerous potential POAG risk factors were identified and organized into categories by demographics (age, sex, and skin color), lifestyle choices (smoking, alcohol), comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity), ophthalmic findings (eye structure, central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, elevated intraocular pressure, myopia, cataract, and vascular abnormalities), family history, socioeconomic status, and adherence. Older age, male sex, lower central corneal thickness, decreased corneal hysteresis, elevated intraocular pressure, myopia, vascular abnormalities, and positive family history were definitively associated with increased risk of POAG. Conclusions Individuals at greatest risk for POAG should be screened by an ophthalmologist to allow earlier detection and to slow disease progression. Further studies on the genetics of the disease will provide more insight into underlying pathologic mechanisms and could lead to improved therapeutic interventions. Continued research in urban areas with large populations of blacks is especially needed.
Ethnicity & Health | 2017
Rupin Parikh; Laura O’Keefe; Rebecca Salowe; Makayla Mccoskey; Wei Pan; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Victoria Addis; Amanda Lehman; Maureen G. Maguire; Joan M. O’Brien
ABSTRACT Objective: African Americans have been historically underrepresented in research studies. Our aim was to evaluate factors influencing enrollment in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. Design: Patients approached to enroll in the POAAGG study were asked to complete a 15-item survey addressing demographic characteristics, knowledge of genetics and glaucoma, and opinions on human research. Survey responses were compared between subjects who enrolled (Enrollers) and did not enroll (Decliners) in the POAAGG study. Results: Enrollers (N = 190) were 3.7 years younger (P = 0.007) and had similar gender, education, and income level to Decliners (N = 117). Knowledge about genetics and glaucoma was similar between groups. Enrollers were more comfortable providing DNA for research studies (93.1% vs 54.1%; P < 0.001) and more likely to have participated in prior studies (P = 0.003) and consider participating in future studies (P < 0.001). Among Decliners, lack of time was the primary reason given for not enrolling. Conclusion: To increase participation of African Americans in genetic research studies, efforts should be made to raise comfort with DNA donation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2018
David W. Collins; Harini V. Gudiseva; Venkata Ramana Murthy Chavali; Benjamin Trachtman; Meera Ramakrishnan; William T. Merritt; Maxwell Pistilli; Rebecca A. Rossi; Stephanie Blachon; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Victoria Addis; Joan M. O'Brien
Purpose We investigate the function of the V83I polymorphism (m.6150G>A, rs879053914) in the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (MT-CO1) gene and its role in African American (AA) primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods This study used Sanger sequencing (1339 cases, 850 controls), phenotypic characterization of Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics study (POAAGG) cases, a masked chart review of CO1 missense cases (V83I plus M117T, n = 29) versus wild type cases (n = 29), a yeast 2-hybrid (Y2H) cDNA library screen, and quantification of protein–protein interactions by Y2H and ELISA. Results The association of V83I with POAG in AA was highly significant for men (odds ratio [OR] 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0–21.3, P = 0.0001), but not for women (OR 1.1; 95% CI, 0.62–2.00, P = 0.78). POAG cases having CO1 double missense mutation (V83I + M117T, L1c2 haplogroup) had a higher cup-to-disc ratio (0.77 vs. 0.71, P = 0.04) and significantly worse visual function (average pattern standard deviation, 6.5 vs. 4.3, P = 0.009; average mean deviation −10.4 vs. −4.5, P = 0.006) when compared to matched wild type cases (L1b haplogroup). Interaction of the V83I region of CO1 with amyloid beta peptide (Aβ) was confirmed by ELISA assay, and this interaction was abrogated by V83I. A Y2H screen of an adult human brain cDNA library with the V83 region of CO1 as bait retrieved the UBQLN1 gene. Conclusions The V83I polymorphism was associated strongly with POAG in AA men and disrupts Aβ-binding to CO1. This region also interacts with a neuroprotective protein, UBQLN1.
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology | 2017
Prithvi Sankar; Laura O’Keefe; Daniel Choi; Rebecca Salowe; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Victoria Addis; Meera Ramakrishnan; Vikas Natesh; Gideon Whitehead; Naira Khachatryan; Joan M. O’Brien
Objective No method of grading visual field (VF) defects has been widely accepted throughout the glaucoma community. The SCHEIE (Systematic Classification of Humphrey visual fields-Easy Interpretation and Evaluation) grading system for glaucomatous visual fields was created to convey qualitative and quantitative information regarding visual field defects in an objective, reproducible, and easily applicable manner for research purposes. Methods The SCHEIE grading system is composed of a qualitative and quantitative score. The qualitative score consists of designation in one or more of the following categories: normal, central scotoma, paracentral scotoma, paracentral crescent, temporal quadrant, nasal quadrant, peripheral arcuate defect, expansive arcuate, or altitudinal defect. The quantitative component incorporates the Humphrey visual field index (VFI), location of visual defects for superior and inferior hemifields, and blind spot involvement. Accuracy and speed at grading using the qualitative and quantitative components was calculated for non-physician graders. Results Graders had a median accuracy of 96.67% for their qualitative scores and a median accuracy of 98.75% for their quantitative scores. Graders took a mean of 56 seconds per visual field to assign a qualitative score and 20 seconds per visual field to assign a quantitative score. Conclusion The SCHEIE grading system is a reproducible tool that combines qualitative and quantitative measurements to grade glaucomatous visual field defects. The system aims to standardize clinical staging and to make specific visual field defects more easily identifiable. Specific patterns of visual field loss may also be associated with genetic variants in future genetic analysis.
Molecular Vision | 2016
David W. Collins; Harini V. Gudiseva; Benjamin Trachtman; Anita S. Bowman; Anna Sagaser; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Victoria Addis; Joan M. O'Brien
BMC Medical Genomics | 2016
Harini V. Gudiseva; Mark Hansen; Linda Gutierrez; David W. Collins; Jie He; Lana Verkuil; Ian D. Danford; Anna Sagaser; Anita S. Bowman; Rebecca Salowe; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Joan M. O’Brien
BMC Medical Research Methodology | 2017
Rebecca Salowe; Laura O’Keefe; Sayaka Merriam; Roy Lee; Naira Khachatryan; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Victoria Addis; Windell Murphy; Jeffrey D. Henderer; Maureen G. Maguire; Joan M. O’Brien
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2018
Joan M. O’Brien; Rebecca Salowe; Raymond Fertig; Julia Salinas; Maxwell Pistilli; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Amanda Lehman; Windell Murphy; Melissa Homsher; Katelyn Gordon; Gui-shuang Ying
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017
Allison Rhodes; Qi J Cui; Maxwell Pistilli; Ebenezer Daniel; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Victoria Addis; Amanda Lehman; Maureen G. Maguire; Joan M. O'Brien