Amanda M. VanDenburgh

OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Pooled Analyses of the 56-Week PREEMPT Clinical Program

Objective.— To evaluate safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine.

Comparison of once- or twice-daily bimatoprost with twice-daily timolol in patients with elevated IOP: A 3-month clinical trial

OBJECTIVE To compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% instilled once daily or twice daily with timolol 0.5% twice daily. DESIGN Multicenter, 3-month, randomized, double-masked, interventional comparison trial. PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with ocular hypertension or glaucoma (n = 596). INTERVENTION Patients received bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution once daily (8 PM, with vehicle control at 8 AM), bimatoprost 0.03% twice daily (8 AM; 8 PM), or timolol 0.5% twice daily (8 AM; 8 PM) in an uneven 2:2:1 randomization. Scheduled visits were at prestudy, baseline (day 0), weeks 2 and 6, and month 3. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 8 AM (predose), 10 AM, and 4 PM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was reduction in IOP in the eye with higher IOP at baseline. Secondary outcome measures included safety variables (adverse events, ophthalmoscopy, biomicroscopy, iris pigmentation, laser-flare meter, visual acuity, visual fields, heart rate, blood pressure, blood chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis). RESULTS At month 3, the mean reduction in IOP from baseline at 8 AM was 9.16 mmHg (35.2%) with bimatoprost once daily, 7.78 mmHg (30.4%) with bimatoprost twice daily, and 6.74 mmHg (26.2%) with timolol twice daily. At all follow-up visits, mean IOP reductions were significantly greater in the bimatoprost once daily group than in the timolol group at each time point (8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM; P < 0.001). Twice-daily dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean reductions in IOP than timolol at most time points but was not as effective as once-daily dosing. Bimatoprost was associated with significantly more hyperemia and eyelash growth than timolol, whereas timolol was associated with significantly more burning and stinging sensation in eyes. Overall, bimatoprost was well tolerated with few discontinuations because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Bimatoprost 0.03% once daily was safe and statistically superior to timolol 0.5% twice daily in lowering IOP in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. Bimatoprost given once daily consistently provided IOP reductions approximately 2 to 3 mmHg greater than those provided by timolol. Once-daily dosing of bimatoprost, 0.03%, demonstrated greater IOP-lowering effect and better ocular tolerability than twice-daily dosing.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Exploratory Study

Objective.—This exploratory trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple treatments of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX®, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) as prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine headaches.

Meta-analysis of neutralizing antibody conversion with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) across multiple indications.

This meta‐analysis evaluated the frequency of neutralizing antibody (nAb) conversion with onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®; Allergan) across five studied indications. The analysis was based on large, controlled or prospective, open‐label trials (durations 4 months to ≥2 years). Serum samples were analyzed for nAbs using the Mouse Protection Assay. Subjects who were antibody negative at baseline and had at least one analyzable postbaseline antibody assay result were included. The 16 clinical studies included 3,006 subjects; of these, 2,240 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Subjects received 1–15 treatments (mean 3.8 treatments) with onabotulinumtoxinA. Total doses per treatment cycle ranged from 10 or 20 units in glabellar lines to 20–500 units in cervical dystonia. The numbers of subjects who converted from an antibody‐negative status at baseline to antibody‐positive status at any post‐treatment time point were: cervical dystonia 4/312 (1.28%), glabellar lines 2/718 (0.28%), overactive bladder 0/22 (0%), post‐stroke spasticity 1/317 (0.32%), and primary axillary hyperhidrosis 4/871 (0.46%). Across all indications, 11/2,240 subjects (0.49%) converted from antibody negative at baseline to positive at one or more post‐treatment time points, but only three subjects became clinically unresponsive to onabotulinumtoxinA at some point following a positive assay. Based on these large trials, the frequency of antibody conversion after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment is very low, and infrequently leads to loss of efficacy.

Relationship Between Disability and Health-Related Quality of Life and Caregiver Burden in Patients With Upper Limb Poststroke Spasticity

To evaluate the relationship between disability and both health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and caregiver burden in patients with upper limb poststroke spasticity.

Dose response with onabotulinumtoxinA for post‐stroke spasticity: A pooled data analysis

Clinical trials demonstrate that onabotulinumtoxinA reduces upper limb post‐stroke spasticity, with therapeutic response influenced by injected dose. Individual studies provide limited insight regarding muscle group‐specific dose–response relationships. Our objective was to characterize dose–response relationships between onabotulinumtoxinA and muscle tone in specific upper limb muscles. Individual patient data from seven multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials were pooled. Of 544 post‐stroke patients enrolled, 362 received onabotulinumtoxinA and 182 received placebo, injected into the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and/or biceps brachii (BB). Ashworth Scale score change at week 6 (AshworthCBL) was the primary outcome measure for muscle tone. For a broader analysis of response, AshworthCBL/onabotulinumtoxinA dosage relationships were characterized using three techniques: (1) AshworthCBL plotted as a function of onabotulinumtoxinA dose in Units (U) [dose–response curve]; (2) mean AshworthCBL per onabotulinumtoxinA dose depicting the responses seen with specific dose injection clusters/groups for each specific muscle group; and (3) onabotulinumtoxinA dose estimated to produce a mean 1‐point decrease in AshworthCBL as an indicator of clinically meaningful benefit of treatment. Increasing onabotulinumtoxinA doses produced greater AshworthCBLs (muscle tone improvements). The maximal week 6 response (Emax) model indicated a saturating dose–response relationship, with mean Emax AshworthCBL values of ‐1.48, ‐1.48, ‐0.63, ‐0.77, and ‐0.61 in the FCR, FCU, FDS, FDP, and BB, respectively. OnabotulinumtoxinA doses estimated to produce a mean 1‐point decrease in AshworthCBL were: 22.5U, 18.4U, 66.3U, 42.5U in the FCR, FCU, FDS, and FDP, respectively, and not determinable in the BB. These analyses demonstrate a saturating effect of greater muscle tone improvements with increasing onabotulinumtoxinA doses in post‐stroke spasticity patients. These findings suggest potentially effective onabotulinumtoxinA doses in selected muscle groups in this study population.

Long-term safety evaluation of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%: a pooled analysis of six double-masked, randomized, active-controlled clinical trials

Background: Bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% was approved in the US for reducing intraoccular pressure (IOP) based on two double-masked, active-controlled clinical trials. Four additional long-term studies (≥12 months) were conducted; however, the aggregate safety profile of the six studies has not been reported. Methods: Adverse events (AEs) were pooled from six double-masked, active-controlled, long-term clinical trials in which subjects received bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) as an eyedrop. AE terms were converted to MedDRA (V.11.0) Preferred Terms and analyzed. Results: In total, 1409 patients received more than one dose of bimatoprost 0.03% QD or BID. Most AEs were mild in severity and reported by 86.7% (QD) and 94.8% (BID) of subjects (≤12 months of treatment). AEs reported through month 12 (aggregate incidence of ≥5%) were conjunctival hyperemia, increased eyelash growth, eye pruritus, periocular skin hyperpigmentation, eye irritation, dry eye, and hypertrichosis. AE onset was generally reported within four months of treatment. The cumulative incidence of common AEs in the QD treatment group at 24–48 months was similar to that measured at 12 months of treatment. Conclusion: Bimatoprost 0.03% has a favorable safety and tolerability profile as characterized by six long-term studies. Common AEs were due to the known pharmacological activity of bimatoprost and reversible with treatment cessation.

Bimatoprost 0.03% for the Treatment of Eyebrow Hypotrichosis

BACKGROUND Eyebrow loss may have substantial negative functional and social consequences. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% in subjects with eyebrow hypotrichosis. METHODS This multicenter, double-masked study randomized adult females or males with eyebrow hypotrichosis to receive bimatoprost 0.03% twice (BID) or once daily (QD) or vehicle BID for 7 months. Primary endpoint was overall eyebrow fullness at Month 7. Secondary endpoints included eyebrow fullness (mm2), darkness (intensity units), and subject satisfaction with treatment. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS At Month 7, the proportion of subjects with improvement was significantly higher in bimatoprost groups versus vehicle (both, p < .001). Improvements occurred in both bimatoprost groups versus vehicle after Month 1 and continued through follow-up; eyebrow fullness and darkness improved as early as Months 2 and 1, respectively (both, p < .001). Greater satisfaction was reported with bimatoprost versus vehicle at Month 2 and all subsequent time points. Overall, 38.1%, 42.4%, and 35.5% of subjects in the bimatoprost BID, QD, and vehicle groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent TEAEs were similar across groups. No skin or iris hyperpigmentation or conjunctival hyperemia occurred. CONCLUSION Bimatoprost 0.03% BID and QD is safe, well tolerated, and effective for eyebrow hypotrichosis.

An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost for eyelash growth in pediatric subjects.

Purpose Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bimatoprost 0.03% for treatment of eyelash hypotrichosis in a pediatric population. Patients and methods This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study was conducted at seven sites in the US and Brazil. Subjects with eyelash hypotrichosis caused by chemotherapy or alopecia areata (aged 5–17 years) or healthy adolescents aged 15–17 years were enrolled (N=71). Subjects applied bimatoprost 0.03% or vehicle to upper eyelid margins once nightly for 4 months and were followed for 1 month post-treatment. Eyelash prominence was assessed using the validated 4-grade Global Eyelash Assessment scale with photonumeric guide. Changes in eyelash length, thickness, and darkness were measured by digital image analysis. Safety was assessed by adverse events and ophthalmic observations. Results Eyelash prominence improved in a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with bimatoprost compared with vehicle at month 4 (70.8% versus 26.1%; P<0.001). This benefit was sustained at month 5 post-treatment assessment. Digital image analysis measures were significantly improved with bimatoprost. Significant treatment benefits with bimatoprost versus vehicle were evident among the healthy adolescents but not in the postchemotherapy or alopecia areata subgroups. The safety profile of bimatoprost was consistent with previous studies in adults. Conclusion Bimatoprost was safe and well tolerated in pediatric subjects with eyelash hypotrichosis. In this study with limited sample size, subgroup analyses showed that treatment was effective in healthy adolescents with no concurrent contributing medical condition, but not in those with eyelash hypotrichosis due to chemotherapy or alopecia areata.

Poster 385: Degree of Disability Due to Upper Limb Post-Stroke Spasticity (UL PSS) is Associated with Physical and Psychological Functioning

lead to improvements in knee muscle strength, gait performance and participation in post-stroke individuals, but the mechanisms underlying the improvements in strength is not known. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifteen men and women (mean age 61 years) with post-stroke weakness (19 months post-stroke). Interventions: The men and women participated in supervised progressive resistance training (80% of maximum load) of the thigh muscles, twice weekly for 10 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Before and after the training period, strength was measured dynamically and isokinetically, magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the anatomical thigh muscle area of both lower limbs and muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis of the paretic leg to determine the mean area and proportion of different fiber types. Results: The mean improvement in dynamic strength was between 40% and 70% (P .001) and in isokinetic strength between 14% and 64% (P .01). The mean cross-sectional area of the extensor and the flexor muscles increased 4% to 6% (P .001) in both lower limbs. There was a significant increase in the cross-sectional area of Type IIA (fast-twitch, fatigue-resistant) fibers (10%) (P .05), but no other significant changes in fiber area or fiber type proportion. Conclusions: Improvements in muscles strength following PRT in chronic stroke can be partly explained by increased muscle mass and muscle fiber cross-sectional area.