Amanda Ribeiro de Oliveira

Gabaergic regulation of the neural organization of fear in the midbrain tectum

In midbrain tectum (MT) structures, such as the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG), the superior colliculus (SC) and the inferior colliculus (IC) GABAergic neurons exert a tonic control on the neural substrates involved in the expression of defensive reactions. In this review, we summarize behavioral, immunohistochemical (brain Fos distribution) and electrophysiological (auditory evoked potentials) data obtained with the reduction of GABA transmission by local injections of a GABA receptor blocker (bicuculline, BIC) or a glutamic acid decarboxylase inhibitor (semicarbazide, SMC) into the MT. Distinct patterns of Fos distribution were obtained following the freezing and escape reactions induced by MT injections of SMC and BIC, respectively. While only the laterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus was labeled after SMC-induced freezing, a widespread increase in Fos expression in the brain occurred after BIC-induced escape. Also, injections of SMC into the IC increased the auditory evoked potentials recorded from this structure. It is suggested that GABAergic mechanisms of MT are also called into play when sensory gating of the MT is activated during different emotional states.

Conditioned and unconditioned fear organized in the periaqueductal gray are differentially sensitive to injections of muscimol into amygdaloid nuclei

The lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala (LaA and BLA, respectively) serve as a filter for unconditioned and conditioned aversive information that ascends to higher structures from the brainstem, whereas the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is considered to be the main output for the defense reaction. It has been shown that the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) is activated by threatening stimuli and has important functional links with the amygdala through two-way anatomical connections. In this work, we examined the influence of chemical inactivation of these nuclei of amygdala on the freezing and escape responses induced by electrical stimulation through electrodes implanted in the dPAG of Wistar rats. Each rat also bore a cannula implanted in the LaA, BLA or CeA for injections of muscimol (0.5 microg/0.5 microL) or its vehicle. The duration of freezing behavior that outlasts electrical stimulation of the dPAG was also measured. On the following day, these animals were submitted to a contextual fear-conditioning using foot shocks as unconditioned stimulus. Conditioned freezing to contextual cues previously associated with foot shocks was also inhibited by injections of muscimol into these amygdaloid nuclei. The contextual conditioned freezing behavior is generated in the neural circuits of conditioned fear in the amygdala. The data obtained also show that injections of muscimol into the three amygdaloid nuclei did not change the aversive threshold of freezing, but disrupted the dPAG post-stimulation freezing. Previous findings that the latter freezing results directly from dPAG stimulation and that it is not sensitive to a context shift suggest that it is unconditioned in nature. Thus, the amygdala can affect some, but not all, aspects of unconditioned freezing. Post-stimulation freezing may reflect the process of transferring aversive information from dPAG to higher brain structures.

Dopaminergic mechanisms in the conditioned and unconditioned fear as assessed by the two-way avoidance and light switch-off tests

The involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms in fear and anxiety is still unclear. Behavioral studies aimed to disclose the involvement of dopamine in anxiety have reported anxiolytic-like, anxiogenic-like and lack of effects with the use of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists in animal models of anxiety. This work was an attempt to contribute to this field by providing evidence that these discrepancies may be due to the kind of aversive situation the animals experience in these models. The present study examined the effects of a dopaminergic agonist apomorphine, a dopaminergic D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 and a D(2) receptor antagonist sulpiride on the two-way avoidance response test (CAR) and on the switch-off responses to light (SOR). In both tests, learning was assessed by the performance of the animals across four blocks of 10 trials in which light was paired to footshocks (CAR) or only light was presented to the animals (SOR). The obtained data show that rats learn to make a shuttling response to avoid the shock in the CAR test and maintain a regular pace of switch-off responses in the SOR. While sulpiride and SCH 23390 administrations prevented learning of the avoidance responses, apomorphine injections produced a dose-dependent enhancement in the conditioned learning in the CAR test. The number of escape responses was unchanged by these drugs. In the light-induced switch-off test, apomorphine reduced the number of switch-off responses whereas sulpiride increased these responses. These findings suggest that the involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms in threatening situations depends on the nature of the aversive stimulus. Activation of D(1) and D(2) receptors seems to be implicated in the heightened aversiveness to conditioned stressful situations, as assessed by the CAR test. Thus, blockade of D(1) and D(2) receptors may be necessary for attenuating the aversiveness triggered by these conditioned fear stimuli. In contrast, mechanisms mediated by D(2) receptors seem to be involved in the setting up of adaptive responses to innate fear reactions. Therefore, the signal of the modulatory dopaminergic mechanisms on defensive behavior will depend on the type of emotional stimuli triggering the coping reaction.

Pharmacological dissociation of moderate and high contextual fear as assessed by freezing behavior and fear-potentiated startle

The amplitude of the whole-body acoustic startle response is reliably enhanced when elicited in the presence of foreground signals, such as light, previously paired with footshocks. It has been shown that this enhancement is evident by moderate fear levels, but is less affected by high fear levels. Potentiation of the acoustic startle reflex has also been reported in the presence of background cues previously associated with footshocks. However, the effects of anxiolytic drugs on different levels of fear elicited by moderate and intense contextual fear conditioning associated with startle reflex have not been examined yet. To approach this issue, we examined the effects of the anxiolytic, midazolam, on two intensities of contextual fear; freezing behavior and the startle response to loud noise. First, we compared the magnitude of the freezing behavior and the startle amplitude during the testing sessions in groups of rats submitted to fear conditioning using 0.3 and 0.6 mA as unconditioned stimuli (10 stimuli of 1 s each, intertrial interval from 60 to 180 s). Afterwards, the effects of midazolam (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) were assessed in these two conditions. Rats showed a potentiated startle reflex and a significant freezing behavior to moderate fear conditioning, which were both attenuated by midazolam. Higher levels of fear conditioning caused more intense freezing behavior without enhancing the startle reflex. Whereas midazolam reduced this freezing response, the startle response was unaffected. These results are indicative that anxiolytic-sensitive freezing and fear-potentiated startle are triggered by moderate contextual fear conditioning, while contextual conditioning with the use of high footshocks causes a distinct pattern of behavioral responses, which is only partially affected by midazolam. Due to the differential sensitivity to midazolam of these two patterns of startle responses generated as a function of the intensity of contextual fear conditioning, it is proposed that they represent moderate and intense aversive states that may be related to anxiety or panic/phobic conditions, respectively.

Conditioned fear is modulated by D2 receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and basolateral amygdala.

Excitation of the mesocorticolimbic pathway, originating from dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), may be important for the development of exaggerated fear responding. Among the forebrain regions innervated by this pathway, the amygdala is an essential component of the neural circuitry of conditioned fear. The functional role of the dopaminergic pathway connecting the VTA to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in fear and anxiety has received little attention. In vivo microdialysis was performed to measure dopamine levels in the BLA of Wistar rats that received the dopamine D(2) agonist quinpirole (1 μg/0.2 μl) into the VTA and were subjected to a fear conditioning test using a light as the conditioned stimulus (CS). The effects of intra-BLA injections of the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 (1 and 2 μg/0.2 μl) and D(2) antagonist sulpiride (1 and 2 μg/0.2 μl) on fear-potentiated startle (FPS) to a light-CS were also assessed. Locomotor performance was evaluated by use of open-field and rotarod tests. Freezing and increased dopamine levels in the BLA in response to the CS were both inhibited by intra-VTA quinpirole. Whereas intra-BLA SCH 23390 did not affect FPS, intra-BLA sulpiride (2 μg) inhibited FPS. Sulpirides ability to decrease FPS cannot be attributed to nonspecific effects because this drug did not affect motor performance. These findings indicate that the dopamine D(2) receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and the basolateral amygdala modulates fear and anxiety and may be a novel pharmacological target for the treatment of anxiety.

Role of dopamine receptors in the ventral tegmental area in conditioned fear

The increased startle reflex in the presence of a stimulus that has been previously paired with footshock has been termed fear-potentiated startle (FPS) and is considered a reliable index of anxiety. Some studies have suggested an association between stressful situations and alterations in dopaminergic (DA) transmission. Many studies converge on the hypothesis that the mesocorticolimbic pathway, originating from DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), is particularly sensitive to fear-arousing stimuli. The present study explored the involvement of VTA DA receptors in the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear to a light conditioned stimulus (CS). We evaluated the effects of intra-VTA administration of SKF 38393 (D(1) agonist), SCH 23390 (D(1) antagonist), quinpirole (D(2) agonist), and sulpiride (D(2) antagonist) on FPS. All drugs were administered bilaterally into the VTA (1.0 microg/0.2 microl/site). Locomotor activity/exploration and motor coordination were evaluated in the open-field and rotarod tests. None of the drugs produced significant effects on FPS when injected before conditioning, indicating that VTA DA receptors are not involved in the acquisition of conditioned fear to a light-CS. In contrast, when injected before the test session, quinpirole significantly reduced FPS, whereas the other drugs had no effect. Quinpiroles ability to decrease FPS may be the result of an action on VTA D(2) presynaptic autoreceptors that decrease dopamine levels in terminal fields of the mesocorticolimbic pathway. Altogether, the present results suggest the importance of VTA DA neurons in the fear-activating effects of Pavlovian conditioning. In addition to demonstrating the importance of dopaminergic mechanisms in the motivational consequences of footshock, the present findings also indicate that these neural circuits are mainly involved in the expression, rather than acquisition, of conditioned fear.

Involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens core and shell subregions in the expression of fear conditioning

The involvement of dopamine (DA) mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) in fear conditioning has been proposed by many studies that have challenged the view that the NAC is solely involved in the modulation of appetitive processes. However, the role of the core and shell subregions of the NAC in aversive conditioning remains unclear. The present study examined DA release in these NAC subregions using microdialysis during the expression of fear memory. Guide cannulae were implanted in rats in the NAC core and shell. Five days later, the animals received 10 footshocks (0.6 mA, 1 s duration) in a distinctive cage A (same context). On the next day, dialysis probes were inserted through the guide cannulae into the NAC core and shell subregions, and the animals were behaviorally tested for fear behavior either in the same context (cage A) or in a novel context (cage B). Dialysates were collected every 5 min for 90 min and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The rats exhibited a significant fear response in cage A but not in cage B. Moreover, increased DA levels in both NAC subregions were observed 5-25 min after the beginning of the test when the animals were tested in the same context compared with accumbal DA levels from rats tested in the different context. These findings suggest that DA mechanisms in both the NAC core and shell may play an important role in the expression of contextual fear memory.

Isolation-induced changes in ultrasonic vocalization, fear-potentiated startle and prepulse inhibition in rats.

Isolation causes important changes in the behavioral reactivity of rats to environmental stimuli. These changes include deficit in sensorimotor gating and altered fear-like responses to aversive stimuli. Measures of ultrasound vocalizations at 20–22 kHz when rats are exposed to threatening conditions, such as novelty, have been taken as a good measure of fear. The fear-potentiated startle to loud sounds and the prepulse inhibition tests have been considered reliable indicators of anxiety and attention impairments, respectively. Rats reared under conditions of isolation from weaning display clear deficits in prepulse inhibition. Taking into account that housing condition changes the emotional state of the animals, we evaluated in this work the performance of rats in the fear-potentiated startle test, prepulse inhibition and emission of ultrasound vocalizations to novelty when isolated for 10 days and after resocialization for 1 week in comparison to grouped rats. Isolated rats showed greater reactivity to loud sounds in the fear-potentiated startle test than grouped animals. They also emitted less ultrasound vocalizations at 20–22 kHz than grouped animals when exposed to a novel environment. In contrast to the well-known deficit in prepulse inhibition displayed by isolation-reared animals, in the present study isolation for 10 days caused a significant increase in prepulse inhibition. Resocialization was not able to counteract the effects of isolation in all three tests. The results suggest that the emotional state of the animals is altered by 10 days of isolation; they do not vocalize characteristically as grouped rats when submitted to novelty; unconditioned responses to loud sounds are enhanced and increased prepulse inhibition is shown rather than a deficit as largely documented in studies with isolation-reared animals. It is suggested that the assessment of the emotional state of the animals is a prerequisite in the evaluation of prepulse inhibition. The level of defensive reactivity displayed by isolated animals is crucial for the functioning of sensory gating and, by extension, to the expression of prepulse inhibition.

A comparative study with two types of elevated plus-maze (transparent vs. opaque walls) on the anxiolytic effects of midazolam, one-trial tolerance and fear-induced analgesia.

The phenomenon known as one-trial tolerance (OTT) to the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines observed in rats submitted to the elevated plus-maze test (EPM) is considered to be due to the emergence of phobic states across the test/retest sessions. Antinociception is a usual component of the defense reaction. Until now, no study has examined antinociception and OTT together in freely behaving rats in the EPM. This work is a new approach looking at the sensorimotor gatings underlying OTT through the examination of the changes in reactivity to noxious stimuli during OTT development. We used the tail-flick test to assess the reactivity of rats to noxious stimulus during the effects of midazolam in test/retest sessions using two types of EPM, one with opaque (standard EPM) and another one with transparent walls (modified EPM). The authors had previously shown that this modified test caused an overall stressful situation more related to anxiety while the standard test coursed with a mixture of anxiety and high fear levels. In both plus mazes, the study was conducted in two experiments: (i) midazolam before the first trial, and (ii) midazolam before the second trial. In each experimental condition the effects of midazolam were tested under two doses (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) against a control group that received injections of saline. The anxiolytic effects of midazolam were more pronounced in animals tested in the modified EPM than in the standard EPM. Stressful stimuli present in both types of maze were able to elicit one-trial tolerance to midazolam on re-exposure. However, anxiolytic-insensitive behaviors in the first and the reduction in exploratory activity in the second trial are more pronounced in the standard EPM indicating that this test is more prone to transfer fear-related states across trials than the modified maze test. Antinociception is not present upon the re-exposure of rats to the EPM. These findings show that animals tested in the modified EPM showed higher sensitivity to the anxiolytic effects of midazolam than the standard EPM. Antinociception was not a concomitant of the shift in the emotional state present in the retest sessions of the EPM. These results are in agreement with the premises that repeated stressful experience leads to anxiolytic-insensitive fear state different from anxiety.

Serotonergic mechanisms in the basolateral amygdala differentially regulate the conditioned and unconditioned fear organized in the periaqueductal gray.

The amygdala is an important filter for unconditioned and conditioned aversive information. The amygdala synthesizes the stimuli input from the environment and then signals the degree of threat that they represent to the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG), which would be in charge of selecting, organizing and executing the appropriate defense reaction. In this study, we examined the influence of fluoxetine microinjections (1.75 and 3.5 nmol/0.2 microL) into the lateral (LaA) and basolateral (BLA) amygdaloid nuclei on the freezing and escape responses induced by electrical stimulation of the dPAG. Freezing behavior was also measured after the interruption of the electrical stimulation of the dPAG. On the following day, these rats were also submitted to a contextual fear paradigm to examine whether these microinjections would affect the conditioned freezing to contextual cues previously associated with foot shocks. Fluoxetine injections into both amygdaloid nuclei did not change the freezing and escape thresholds, but disrupted the dPAG-post-stimulation freezing. Moreover, the conditioned freezing was enhanced by fluoxetine. Whereas 5-HT mechanisms in the amygdala facilitate the acquisition of conditioned fear they inhibit the dPAG-post-stimulation freezing. However, the unconditioned fear triggered by activation of the dPAG is produced downstream of the amygdala. These findings have important implications for the understanding of the neurochemical substrates that underlie panic and generalized anxiety disorders.