Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Amanda S. Bruegl is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Amanda S. Bruegl.


Modern Pathology | 2016

Germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort

Kari L. Ring; Amanda S. Bruegl; Brian Allen; Eric P. Elkin; Nanda Singh; Anne Renee Hartman; Molly S. Daniels; Russell Broaddus

Hereditary endometrial carcinoma is associated with germline mutations in Lynch syndrome genes. The role of other cancer predisposition genes is unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of cancer predisposition gene mutations in an unselected endometrial carcinoma patient cohort. Mutations in 25 genes were identified using a next-generation sequencing-based panel applied in 381 endometrial carcinoma patients who had undergone tumor testing to screen for Lynch syndrome. Thirty-five patients (9.2%) had a deleterious mutation: 22 (5.8%) in Lynch syndrome genes (three MLH1, five MSH2, two EPCAM-MSH2, six MSH6, and six PMS2) and 13 (3.4%) in 10 non-Lynch syndrome genes (four CHEK2, one each in APC, ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, NBN, PTEN, and RAD51C). Of 21 patients with deleterious mutations in Lynch syndrome genes with tumor testing, 2 (9.5%) had tumor testing results suggestive of sporadic cancer. Of 12 patients with deleterious mutations in MSH6 and PMS2, 10 were diagnosed at age >50 and 8 did not have a family history of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers. Patients with deleterious mutations in non-Lynch syndrome genes were more likely to have serous tumor histology (23.1 vs 6.4%, P=0.02). The three patients with non-Lynch syndrome deleterious mutations and serous histology had mutations in BRCA2, BRIP1, and RAD51C. Current clinical criteria fail to identify a portion of actionable mutations in Lynch syndrome and other hereditary cancer syndromes. Performance characteristics of tumor testing are sufficiently robust to implement universal tumor testing to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. Germline multi-gene panel testing is feasible and informative, leading to the identification of additional actionable mutations.


International Journal of Gynecological Pathology | 2016

Defective DNA Mismatch Repair Influences Expression of Endometrial Carcinoma Biomarkers.

Ekene Okoye; Amanda S. Bruegl; Bryan Fellman; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Russell R. Broaddus

Endometrial endometrioid carcinomas are related to estrogen excess and express estrogen and progesterone receptors. However, hormone receptor expression can be variable from tumor to tumor, and this variability is not always explained by differences in tumor grade. Variable expression of other biomarkers that may be used in the diagnostic work-up of endometrial cancer has also been noted. We hypothesized that mismatch repair (MMR) defects may contribute to this variability. A total of 411 unselected endometrial carcinomas were evaluated for immunohistochemical expression of DNA MMR proteins and MLH1 methylation. Loss of immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 was defined as MMR deficient; positive expression was defined as MMR intact. A case-control cohort of 80 Grade 2 endometrioid carcinomas was selected from this set (40 MMR deficient, 40 MMR intact). Cases were matched for histotype, grade, and age. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, CK7, CK20, and Pax-8 immunohistochemistry was evaluated. The median percentage of CK7+ tumor cells was significantly lower in the MMR deficient group compared with the MMR intact group. The mean percentage of tumor cells exhibiting estrogen receptor expression was similar in both the MMR-deficient and MMR intact groups. However, there was greater variability in the MMR-deficient group. Our study shows that MMR defects influence the expression of clinically important biomarkers for endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma as decreased cytokeratin 7 expression is more commonly associated with MMR deficiency.


Cancer Prevention Research | 2017

Clinical Challenges Associated with Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome–Associated Endometrial Cancer

Amanda S. Bruegl; Kari L. Ring; Molly S. Daniels; Bryan Fellman; Diana L. Urbauer; Russell Broaddus

Universal testing for Lynch syndrome is now a routine component of the diagnostic work-up of endometrial cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to identify prospectively the barriers to universal screening based on a tissue testing approach [microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis, IHC for DNA mismatch repair proteins, and MLH1 methylation analysis]. Endometrial carcinoma patients (n = 213) prospectively underwent microsatellite instability and IHC testing for expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. Patients with low (MSI-L) or high (MSI-H) levels of tumor MSI or immunohistochemical loss of MLH1 (and absent MLH1 methylation), MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 were referred to a genetic counselor for consideration of germline testing. Six discordances (3.1% of tested cases) between IHC and MSI were identified. Half of these exhibited heterogeneous immunohistochemical loss of MLH1/PMS2 and were microsatellite stable (MSS). Of the remaining cases, one was MSS with immunohistochemical loss of MSH6, one was MSS with immunohistochemical loss of MLH1/PMS2 and absent MLH1 promoter methylation, and one was MSI-H with intact expression of DNA MMR proteins. Four patients had MSI-L tumors with intact immunohistochemical protein expression; the clinical significance of MSI-L in endometrial cancer is unclear. Eight patients did not have germline mutations despite tissue testing suggesting Lynch syndrome. Including cases with insufficient tissue for testing and patients declining tissue or germline testing, we encountered significant barriers to universal screening in 13.6% of screened patients (29/213) that preclude designation of a tumor as sporadic or hereditary. Cancer Prev Res; 10(2); 108–15. ©2016 AACR.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2018

A contemporary framework of health equity applied to gynecologic cancer care: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review

Sarah M. Temkin; B.J. Rimel; Amanda S. Bruegl; Camille C. Gunderson; A.L. Beavis; Kemi M. Doll

Health disparities are defined as the preventable difference in the burden of disease, injury, and violence, or opportunity to achieve optimal health that socially disadvantaged populations experience compared to the population as a whole. Disparities in incidence and cancer outcomes for women with gynecologic malignancies have been well described particularly for American women of Black race. The etiology of these disparities has been tied to socio-economics, cultural, educational and genetic factors. While access to high quality treatment has been primarily linked to survival from cervical and ovarian cancer, innate biologic distinctions have been principally cited as reasons for differences in incidence and mortality in cancers of the uterine corpus. This article will update the framework of disparities to incorporate a broader understanding of the social determinants of health and how they affect health equity by addressing the root causes of disparities within the health care system. Special populations are identified who are at risk for health inequities which include but are not limited to Black race, underserved racial and ethnic minorities (e.g. indigenous peoples, low English fluency), trans/gender nonconforming people and rural populations. Each of these populations at risk have unique structural barriers within the healthcare system impacting gynecologic cancer outcomes. The authors provide practical recommendations for practitioners aimed at eliminating cancer related outcome disparities.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2017

Salvage chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Utility or futility?

Kathleen Gong Essel; Amanda S. Bruegl; David M. Gershenson; Lois M. Ramondetta; R. Wendel Naumann; Jubilee Brown

OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of chemotherapy after failed initial treatment in patients with high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). METHODS We performed a retrospective IRB-approved chart review of all patients with GTN seen at a single institution from 1985 to 2015, including all patients who failed initial treatment. We summarized clinical characteristics with descriptive statistics and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 68 identified patients, 38 required >2 chemotherapy regimens. Patients were treated for GTN (n=53), including choriocarcinoma, persistent GTN, and invasive mole; for placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) (n=5); and for intermediate trophoblastic tumor (ITT) (n=10). Patients with GTN had a median of 2 salvage regimens, median PFS of 4.0months, and median OS was not reached at median follow-up of 71.2months. Active regimens included EMACO, MAC, BEP, platinum- and etoposide-based combination therapies, and ICE; 8 of 53 patients died of disease (DOD). Patients with PSTT had a median of 3 salvage regimens, median PFS of 2.8months, and median OS of 38.8months. Active regimens included ICE and EMA-EP; 4 of 5 patients DOD. Patients with ITT had a median of 3 salvage regimens, median PFS of 4.1months, and median OS of 38.2months. Active regimens included liposomal doxorubicin, platinum-containing regimens, EMA-CO, and EMA-EP; 7 of 10 patients DOD. CONCLUSIONS Several salvage chemotherapy regimens demonstrate activity in high risk GTN. Multiple regimens may be required and cure is not universal.


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2017

No evidence that genetic variation in the myeloid-derived suppressor cell pathway influences ovarian cancer survival

Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell; Rikki Cannioto; Alyssa Clay; John Lewis Etter; Kevin H. Eng; Song Liu; Sebastiano Battaglia; Qiang Hu; J. Brian Szender; Albina N. Minlikeeva; Janine M. Joseph; P.C. Mayor; Scott I. Abrams; Brahm H. Segal; Paul K. Wallace; Kah Teong Soh; Emese Zsiros; Hoda Anton-Culver; Elisa V. Bandera; Matthias W. Beckmann; Andrew Berchuck; Line Bjørge; Amanda S. Bruegl; Ian G. Campbell; Shawn Patrice Campbell; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Daniel W. Cramer; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Fanny Dao; Brenda Diergaarde

Background: The precise mechanism by which the immune system is adversely affected in cancer patients remains poorly understood, but the accumulation of immunosuppressive/protumorigenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is thought to be a prominent mechanism contributing to immunologic tolerance of malignant cells in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To this end, we hypothesized genetic variation in MDSC pathway genes would be associated with survival after EOC diagnoses. Methods: We measured the hazard of death due to EOC within 10 years of diagnosis, overall and by invasive subtype, attributable to SNPs in 24 genes relevant in the MDSC pathway in 10,751 women diagnosed with invasive EOC. Versatile Gene-based Association Study and the admixture likelihood method were used to test gene and pathway associations with survival. Results: We did not identify individual SNPs that were significantly associated with survival after correction for multiple testing (P < 3.5 × 10−5), nor did we identify significant associations between the MDSC pathway overall, or the 24 individual genes and EOC survival. Conclusions: In this well-powered analysis, we observed no evidence that inherited variations in MDSC-associated SNPs, individual genes, or the collective genetic pathway contributed to EOC survival outcomes. Impact: Common inherited variation in genes relevant to MDSCs was not associated with survival in women diagnosed with invasive EOC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 420–4. ©2016 AACR.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

A prospective evaluation of universal tumor testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer.

Kari L. Ring; Amanda S. Bruegl; Brittany A.L. Batte; Molly S. Daniels; Mark F. Munsell; Karen H. Lu; Russell Broaddus


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2018

Complete Resection Is Essential in the Surgical Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia

Kathleen Gong Essel; Aaron Shafer; Amanda S. Bruegl; David M. Gershenson; Lane K. Drury; Lois M. Ramondetta; R. Wendel Naumann; Jubilee Brown


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

An alternative approach to identify women at risk for colorectal cancer.

Amanda S. Bruegl; Bojana Djordjevic; Shannon N. Westin; Pamela T. Soliman; Amanda C. Brandt; Molly S. Daniels; Karen H. Lu; Russell Broaddus


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Multi-gene panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort.

Kari L. Ring; Amanda S. Bruegl; Brian C. Allen; Eric P. Elkin; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Russell Broaddus

Collaboration


Dive into the Amanda S. Bruegl's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Molly S. Daniels

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Russell Broaddus

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bryan Fellman

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Gershenson

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diana L. Urbauer

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jubilee Brown

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen H. Lu

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen Gong Essel

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge