Amarild Cuko

Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients

BACKGROUNDnConventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients.nnnMETHODSnForty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention.nnnRESULTSnEvaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P < .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing -dP/dtmin (-13.5% ± 10.2% vs -10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (-7.5% ± 9.0% vs -4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (-18.2% ± 22.4% vs -8.7% ± 21.4%; P < .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention.nnnCONCLUSIONSnCRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.

Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome in the Era of Catheter Ablation Insights From a Registry Study of 2169 Patients

Background— The management of Wolff-Parkinson-White is based on the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations, but evidence is limited in the asymptomatic population.nnMethods and Results— The Wolff-Parkinson-White registry was an 8-year prospective study of either symptomatic or asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White patients referred to our Arrhythmology Department for evaluation or ablation. Inclusion criteria were a baseline electrophysiological testing with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). Primary end points were the percentage of patients who experienced ventricular fibrillation (VF) or potentially malignant arrhythmias and risk factors. Among 2169 enrolled patients, 1001 (550 asymptomatic) did not undergo RFA (no-RFA group) and 1168 (206 asymptomatic) underwent ablation (RFA group). There were no differences in clinical and electrophysiological characteristics between the 2 groups except for symptoms. In the no-RFA group, VF occurred in 1.5% of patients, virtually exclusively (13 of 15) in children (median age, 11 years), and was associated with a short accessory pathway antegrade refractory period ( P <0.001) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia initiating atrial fibrillation ( P <0.001) but not symptoms. In the RFA group, ablation was successful in 98.5%, and after RFA, no patients developed malignant arrhythmias or VF over the 8-year follow-up. Untreated patients were more likely to experience malignant arrhythmias and VF (log-rank P <0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting VF identified an optimal anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway cutoff of 240 milliseconds.nnConclusions— The prognosis of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome essentially depends on intrinsic electrophysiological properties of AP rather than on symptoms. RFA performed during the same procedure after electrophysiological testing is of benefit in improving the long-term outcomes.nn# CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-36}Background— The management of Wolff-Parkinson-White is based on the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations, but evidence is limited in the asymptomatic population. Methods and Results— The Wolff-Parkinson-White registry was an 8-year prospective study of either symptomatic or asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White patients referred to our Arrhythmology Department for evaluation or ablation. Inclusion criteria were a baseline electrophysiological testing with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). Primary end points were the percentage of patients who experienced ventricular fibrillation (VF) or potentially malignant arrhythmias and risk factors. Among 2169 enrolled patients, 1001 (550 asymptomatic) did not undergo RFA (no-RFA group) and 1168 (206 asymptomatic) underwent ablation (RFA group). There were no differences in clinical and electrophysiological characteristics between the 2 groups except for symptoms. In the no-RFA group, VF occurred in 1.5% of patients, virtually exclusively (13 of 15) in children (median age, 11 years), and was associated with a short accessory pathway antegrade refractory period (P<0.001) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia initiating atrial fibrillation (P<0.001) but not symptoms. In the RFA group, ablation was successful in 98.5%, and after RFA, no patients developed malignant arrhythmias or VF over the 8-year follow-up. Untreated patients were more likely to experience malignant arrhythmias and VF (log-rank P<0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting VF identified an optimal anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway cutoff of 240 milliseconds. Conclusions— The prognosis of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome essentially depends on intrinsic electrophysiological properties of AP rather than on symptoms. RFA performed during the same procedure after electrophysiological testing is of benefit in improving the long-term outcomes.

Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study

BACKGROUNDnCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months.nnnOBJECTIVEnThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months.nnnMETHODSnConsecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status.nnnRESULTSnForty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P = .33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P = .03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001).nnnCONCLUSIONnSustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.

Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves acute LV function. We hypothesized that multipoint pacing (MPP) can improve midterm echocardiographic and clinical response compared with conventional CRT.

Electrical Substrate Elimination in 135 Consecutive Patients With Brugada Syndrome

Background— There is emerging evidence that localization and elimination of abnormal electric activity in the epicardial right ventricular outflow tract may be beneficial in patients with Brugada syndrome. Methods and Results— A total of 135 symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients having implantable cardiac defibrillator were enrolled: 63 (group 1) having documented ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and Brugada syndrome–related symptoms, and 72 (group 2) having inducible VT/VF without ECG documentation at the time of symptoms. About 27 patients of group 1 experienced multiple implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks for recurrent VT/VF episodes. Three-dimensional maps before and after ajmaline determined the arrhythmogenic electrophysiological substrate (AES) as characterized by prolonged fragmented ventricular potentials. Primary end point was identification and elimination of AES leading to ECG pattern normalization and VT/VF noninducibility. Extensive areas of AES were found in the right ventricle epicardium, which were wider in group 1 (P=0.007). AES increased after ajmaline in both groups (P<0.001) and was larger in men (P=0.008). The increase of type-1 ST-segment elevation correlated with AES expansion (r=0.682, P<0.001). Radiofrequency ablation eliminated AES leading to ECG normalization and VT/VF noninducibility in all patients. During a median follow-up of 10 months, the ECG remained normal even after ajmaline in all except 2 patients who underwent a repeated effective procedure for recurrent VF. Conclusions— In Brugada syndrome, AES is commonly located in the right ventricle epicardium and ajmaline exposes its extent and distribution, which is correlated with the degree of coved ST-elevation. AES elimination by radiofrequency ablation results in ECG normalization and VT/VF noninducibility. Substrate-based ablation is effective in potentially eliminating the arrhythmic consequences of this genetic disease. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02641431.

Atrial fibrillation detection using a novel three-vector cardiac implantable monitor: the atrial fibrillation detect study

AimsnContinuous rhythm monitoring is valuable for adequate atrial fibrillation (AF) management in the clinical setting. Subcutaneous leadless implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) yield an improved AF detection, overcoming the intrinsic limitations of the currently available external recording systems, thus resulting in a more accurate patient treatment. The study purpose was to assess the detection performance of a novel three-vector ICM device equipped with a dedicated AF algorithm.nnnMethods and resultsnSixty-six patients (86.4% males; mean age 60.4 ± 9.4 years) at risk to present AF episodes, having undergone the novel ICM implant (BioMonitor, Biotronik SE&Co. KG, Berlin, Germany), were enrolled. External 48-h ECG Holter was performed 4 weeks after the device implantation. The automatic ICM AF classification was compared with the manual Holter arrhythmia recordings. Of the overall study population, 63/66 (95.5%) had analysable Holter data, 39/63 (62%) showed at least one true AF episode. All these patients had at least one AF episode stored in the ICM. On Holter monitoring, 24/63 (38%) patients did not show AF episodes, in 16 of them (16/24, 67%), the ICM confirmed the absence of AF. The AF detection sensitivity and positive predictive value for episodes analysis were 95.4 and 76.3%, respectively.nnnConclusionnContinuous monitoring using this novel device, equipped with a dedicated detection algorithm, yields an accurate and reliable detection of AF episodes. The ICM is a promising tool for tailoring individual AF patient management. Further long-term prospective studies are necessary to confirm these encouraging results.

Ventricular fibrillation in lone atrial fibrillation as clinical manifestation of latent Brugada syndrome: Usefulness of flecainide testing

Introduction The association of Brugada syndrome (BrS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is well known, but its prognostic significance has not been well defined. In 1992, the Brugada brothers described 8 patients with a syndrome of ST segment elevation in ECG leads V1–V3 associated with right bundle branch block appearance and the risk of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac death. One patient was an 8-year-old girl with an additional history of paroxysmal AF. She experienced her first paroxysm of AF soon after birth, while her first episode of syncope occurred at 8 years of age. Patients with a spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern, those with inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias, or those who fulfilled criteria for an implantable cardioverter have a higher incidence of atrial arrhythmias, suggesting that atrial arrhythmias may be considered as an indicator for more severe disease. The recent HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement does not recommend genetic testing for AF because of the limited outcome data available. The most important reason was that none of the current known disease-associated genes for AF has been shown to account for 45% of the disease. However, the possibility that within the large pool of young patients with new-onset AF, a relatively large minority with latent BrS may be at risk of sudden death (as first reported by our group) could potentially increase the diagnostic and prognostic contribution of genetic testing. Recent observations from the Brugada group have supported the results of our seminal work, posing a new challenge for all cardiologists in the management of patients with AF. In our initial experience, this association was analyzed in as many as 346 individuals with new-onset AF

WPW Syndrome in the Era of Catheter Ablation: Insights from a Registry Study of 2169 Patients

Background— The management of Wolff-Parkinson-White is based on the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations, but evidence is limited in the asymptomatic population.nnMethods and Results— The Wolff-Parkinson-White registry was an 8-year prospective study of either symptomatic or asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White patients referred to our Arrhythmology Department for evaluation or ablation. Inclusion criteria were a baseline electrophysiological testing with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). Primary end points were the percentage of patients who experienced ventricular fibrillation (VF) or potentially malignant arrhythmias and risk factors. Among 2169 enrolled patients, 1001 (550 asymptomatic) did not undergo RFA (no-RFA group) and 1168 (206 asymptomatic) underwent ablation (RFA group). There were no differences in clinical and electrophysiological characteristics between the 2 groups except for symptoms. In the no-RFA group, VF occurred in 1.5% of patients, virtually exclusively (13 of 15) in children (median age, 11 years), and was associated with a short accessory pathway antegrade refractory period ( P <0.001) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia initiating atrial fibrillation ( P <0.001) but not symptoms. In the RFA group, ablation was successful in 98.5%, and after RFA, no patients developed malignant arrhythmias or VF over the 8-year follow-up. Untreated patients were more likely to experience malignant arrhythmias and VF (log-rank P <0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting VF identified an optimal anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway cutoff of 240 milliseconds.nnConclusions— The prognosis of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome essentially depends on intrinsic electrophysiological properties of AP rather than on symptoms. RFA performed during the same procedure after electrophysiological testing is of benefit in improving the long-term outcomes.nn# CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-36}Background— The management of Wolff-Parkinson-White is based on the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations, but evidence is limited in the asymptomatic population. Methods and Results— The Wolff-Parkinson-White registry was an 8-year prospective study of either symptomatic or asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White patients referred to our Arrhythmology Department for evaluation or ablation. Inclusion criteria were a baseline electrophysiological testing with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). Primary end points were the percentage of patients who experienced ventricular fibrillation (VF) or potentially malignant arrhythmias and risk factors. Among 2169 enrolled patients, 1001 (550 asymptomatic) did not undergo RFA (no-RFA group) and 1168 (206 asymptomatic) underwent ablation (RFA group). There were no differences in clinical and electrophysiological characteristics between the 2 groups except for symptoms. In the no-RFA group, VF occurred in 1.5% of patients, virtually exclusively (13 of 15) in children (median age, 11 years), and was associated with a short accessory pathway antegrade refractory period (P<0.001) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia initiating atrial fibrillation (P<0.001) but not symptoms. In the RFA group, ablation was successful in 98.5%, and after RFA, no patients developed malignant arrhythmias or VF over the 8-year follow-up. Untreated patients were more likely to experience malignant arrhythmias and VF (log-rank P<0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting VF identified an optimal anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway cutoff of 240 milliseconds. Conclusions— The prognosis of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome essentially depends on intrinsic electrophysiological properties of AP rather than on symptoms. RFA performed during the same procedure after electrophysiological testing is of benefit in improving the long-term outcomes.

Multipoint pacing improves peripheral hemodynamic response. Non-invasive assessment using radial artery tonometry

Multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], Abbott, Sylmar, CA, USA) improves the response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We evaluated the feasibility of noninvasive radial artery tonometry (RAT) to characterize arterial pressure morphology changes (pre‐ejection period [PEP] and ejection duration [ED]) between conventional CRT and MPP pacing interventions.

Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome in the Era of Catheter Ablation: Insights From a Registry Study of 2169 Patients”

We thank Fenici et al for their interest in our experience on the natural history of the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome.1 The authors, on the basis of their experience, suggest the routine use of ambulatory transesophageal atrial pacing (TEAP) as an intermediate approach to minimize “invasiveness” for risk assessment in the asymptomatic WPW population. It is well known that, unlike invasive electrophysiological testing (EPT), TEAP provides less accurate information about “the real electrophysiological profile of the risk” in WPW patients. Potential limitations are an approximate value of the anterograde refractory period of accessory pathways (APs), no identification of multiple APs, no reproducibility or inducibility of atrial fibrillation, no information on AP …