Amelia Focaccio

Renal insufficiency following contrast media administration trial (REMEDIAL) : A randomized comparison of 3 preventive strategies

Background— Volume supplementation by saline infusion combined with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) represents an effective strategy to prevent contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity (CIN). Preliminary data support the concept that sodium bicarbonate and ascorbic acid also may be effective in preventing CIN. Methods and Results— Three hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease, referred to our institutions for coronary and/or peripheral procedures, were randomly assigned to prophylactic administration of 0.9% saline infusion plus NAC (n=111), sodium bicarbonate infusion plus NAC (n=108), and 0.9% saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC (n=107). All enrolled patients had serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2. Contrast nephropathy risk score was calculated in each patient. In all cases, iodixanol (an iso-osmolar, nonionic contrast agent) was administered. The primary end point was an increase of ≥25% in the creatinine concentration 48 hours after the procedure (CIN). The amount of contrast media administered (179±102, 169±92, and 169±94 mL, respectively; P=0.69) and risk scores (9.1±3.4, 9.5±3.6, and 9.3±3.6; P=0.21) were similar in the 3 groups. CIN occurred in 11 of 111 patients (9.9%) in the saline plus NAC group, in 2 of 108 (1.9%) in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (P=0.019 by Fisher exact test versus saline plus NAC group), and in 11 of 107 (10.3%) in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (P=1.00 versus saline plus NAC group). Conclusions— The strategy of volume supplementation by sodium bicarbonate plus NAC seems to be superior to the combination of normal saline with NAC alone or with the addition of ascorbic acid in preventing CIN in patients at medium to high risk.

Divergent effects of serotonin on coronary-artery dimensions and blood flow in patients with coronary atherosclerosis and control patients.

BACKGROUND Studies in animals have shown that serotonin constricts coronary arteries if the endothelium is damaged, but in vitro studies have revealed a vasodilating effect on isolated coronary segments with an intact endothelium. To investigate the effect of serotonin in humans, we studied coronary-artery cross-sectional area and blood flow before and after the infusion of serotonin in seven patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries and in seven with coronary artery disease. METHODS We measured the cross-sectional area of the coronary artery by quantitative angiography and coronary blood flow with an intracoronary Doppler catheter. Measurements were obtained at base line and during intracoronary infusions of serotonin (0.1, 1, and 10 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per minute, for two minutes). We repeated the measurements after an infusion of ketanserin, an antagonist of serotonin receptors that is thought to block the effect of serotonin on receptors in the arterial wall but not in the endothelium. RESULTS In patients with normal coronary arteries, the highest dose of serotonin increased cross-sectional area by 52 percent (P less than 0.001) and blood flow by 58 percent (P less than 0.01). The effect was significantly potentiated by administration of ketanserin. In patients with coronary-artery atherosclerosis, serotonin reduced cross-sectional area by 64 percent (P less than 0.001) and blood flow by 59 percent (P less than 0.001). Ketanserin prevented this effect. CONCLUSIONS Serotonin has a vasodilating effect on normal human coronary arteries; when the endothelium is damaged, as in coronary artery disease, serotonin has a direct, unopposed vasoconstricting effect. When considered with other evidence, these data suggest that platelet-derived factors such as serotonin may have a role in certain acute coronary ischemic syndromes.

Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting Events (Naples) II Trial Impact of a Single High Loading Dose of Atorvastatin on Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVES Atorvastatin administered at least 7 days before the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI). It is unknown whether a single, high (80 mg) loading dose of atorvastatin may reduce the rate of periprocedural MI. BACKGROUND Periprocedural MI is a prognostically important complication of PCI. METHODS The day before the elective PCI, 668 statin-naive patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 80 mg (atorvastatin group; n = 338) or no statin treatment (control group; n = 330). Creatine kinase-myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB) (upper limit of normal [ULN] 3.5 ng/ml) and cardiac troponin I (ULN 0.10 ng/ml) were assessed before and 6 and 12 h after the intervention. Periprocedural MI was defined as a CK-MB elevation >3x ULN alone or associated with chest pain or ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities. RESULTS The incidence of a periprocedural MI was 9.5% in the atorvastatin group and 15.8% in the control group (odds ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.35 to 0.89; p = 0.014). Median CK-MB peak after PCI was 2.10 ng/ml (interquartile range 1.00 to 12.50 ng/ml) in the atorvastatin group and 3.20 ng/ml (interquartile range 1.37 to 16.07 ng/ml) in the control group (p = 0.014). The incidence of cardiac troponin I elevation >3x ULN was 26.6% in the atorvastatin group and 39.1% in the control group (odds ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.40 to 0.78; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A single, high (80 mg) loading (within 24 h) dose of atorvastatin reduces the incidence of periprocedural MI in elective PCI.

Cystatin C and Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Background— Cystatin C (CyC) is more sensitive than serum creatinine (sCr) to rapidly detect acute changes in renal function. Methods and Results— We measured CyC together with sCr in 410 consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing either coronary and/or peripheral angiography and/or angioplasty. sCr was assessed at baseline and 24 and 48 hours after contrast media exposure. CyC was assessed at baseline and at 24 hours. Major adverse events (including death of any cause and dialysis) at 12 months were assessed. At 48 hours after contrast media exposure, contrast-induced acute kidney injury (defined as a sCr increase ≥0.3 mg/dL) occurred in 34 patients (8.2%). A CyC increase concentration ≥10% at 24 hours after contrast media exposure was detected in 87 patients (21.2%). This was the best CyC cutoff for the early identification of patients at risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury (negative predictive value=100%; positive predictive value=39.1%). According to the defined cutoffs (that is, increase in CyC ≥10% and sCr ≥0.3 mg/dL), major adverse events occurred in 16 of 297 patients (5.4%) without any cutoffs satisfied (group 1), in 9 of 49 patients (18.4%) with only a CyC increase ≥10% (group 2), and in 9 of 31 patients (29%) with both cutoffs satisfied (group 3). By logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of major adverse events at 1 year were group 2 (odds ratio=2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 5.41; P=0.02), group 3 (odds ratio=4.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 11.54; P=0.002), and baseline glomerular filtration rate (odds ratio=0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.95; P<0.001). Conclusions— In patients with chronic kidney disease, CyC seems to be a reliable marker for the early diagnosis and prognosis of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Renal Insufficiency After Contrast Media Administration Trial II (REMEDIAL II) RenalGuard System in High-Risk Patients for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury

Background— The RenalGuard System, which creates high urine output and fluid balancing, may be beneficial in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Methods and Results— The Renal Insufficiency After Contrast Media Administration Trial II (REMEDIAL II) trial is a randomized, multicenter, investigator-driven trial addressing the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in high-risk patients. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2 and/or a risk score ≥11 were randomly assigned to sodium bicarbonate solution and N-acetylcysteine (control group) or hydration with saline and N-acetylcysteine controlled by the RenalGuard System and furosemide (RenalGuard group). The primary end point was an increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL in the serum creatinine concentration at 48 hours after the procedure. The secondary end points included serum cystatin C kinetics and rate of in-hospital dialysis. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred in 16 of 146 patients in the RenalGuard group (11%) and in 30 of 146 patients in the control group (20.5%; odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.92). There were 142 patients (48.5%) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 and 149 patients (51.5%) with only a risk score ≥11. Subgroup analysis according to inclusion criteria showed a similarly lower risk of adverse events (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2: odds ratio, 0.44; risk score ≥11: odds ratio, 0.45; P for interaction=0.97). Changes in cystatin C at 24 hours (0.02±0.32 versus −0.08±0.26; P =0.002) and 48 hours (0.12±0.42 versus 0.03±0.31; P =0.001) and the rate of in-hospital dialysis (4.1% versus 0.7%; P =0.056) were higher in the control group. Conclusion— RenalGuard therapy is superior to sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in high-risk patients. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: [http://www.clinicaltrial.gov][1]. Unique identifier: [NCT01098032][2]. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-39} [1]: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov. [2]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01098032&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F124%2F11%2F1260.atomBackground— The RenalGuard System, which creates high urine output and fluid balancing, may be beneficial in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Methods and Results— The Renal Insufficiency After Contrast Media Administration Trial II (REMEDIAL II) trial is a randomized, multicenter, investigator-driven trial addressing the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in high-risk patients. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ⩽30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2 and/or a risk score ≥11 were randomly assigned to sodium bicarbonate solution and N-acetylcysteine (control group) or hydration with saline and N-acetylcysteine controlled by the RenalGuard System and furosemide (RenalGuard group). The primary end point was an increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL in the serum creatinine concentration at 48 hours after the procedure. The secondary end points included serum cystatin C kinetics and rate of in-hospital dialysis. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury occurred in 16 of 146 patients in the RenalGuard group (11%) and in 30 of 146 patients in the control group (20.5%; odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.92). There were 142 patients (48.5%) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ⩽30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 and 149 patients (51.5%) with only a risk score ≥11. Subgroup analysis according to inclusion criteria showed a similarly lower risk of adverse events (estimated glomerular filtration rate ⩽30 mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2: odds ratio, 0.44; risk score ≥11: odds ratio, 0.45; P for interaction=0.97). Changes in cystatin C at 24 hours (0.02±0.32 versus −0.08±0.26; P=0.002) and 48 hours (0.12±0.42 versus 0.03±0.31; P=0.001) and the rate of in-hospital dialysis (4.1% versus 0.7%; P=0.056) were higher in the control group. Conclusion— RenalGuard therapy is superior to sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury in high-risk patients. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098032.

Rotational atherectomy in resistant chronic total occlusions

Objectives: To assess the application of rotational atherectomy to improving the success rate of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO). Background: Although the inability to cross the occlusion with a guidewire is the reason for failure in the majority of cases, one of the most frustrating situations that may occur during a recanalization procedure is when a guidewire crosses successfully but it is impossible to advance any device over the wire through the occluded segment. Methods: From January 2006 to October 2009, 45/648 (7%) consecutive patients with CTO resistant to recanalization by conventional techniques were treated by high‐speed rotational atherectomy (Rotablator group). Results: All but two lesions were successfully crossed by Rotablator and eventually treated by stent implantation. As compared to the 603 CTO treated by conventional techniques (Conventional group), the 45 patients in the Rotablator group were older, more often female, active smokers, with chronic kidney disease and higher rate of previous surgical revascularization. The CTO in the Rotablator group had a longer duration. Peri‐procedural myocardial infarction was more frequent in the Rotablator group (35% vs. 22%; P = 0.044). Coronary perforation occurred only in three patients in the Conventional group and two of these patients needed urgent surgical intervention. No patient died from either group. Conclusions: The inability to cross a CTO with a balloon catheter occurs in approximately 7% of all CTOs that are successfully crossed with a guidewire. Rotational atherectomy is a safe and effective technique to overcome this frustrating situation.

Hemodynamic and hormonal effects of atrial natriuretic factor in patients with essential hypertension

Hemodynamic and hormonal effects of two graded infusions of alpha-human-(1-28)-atrial natriuretic factor (0.5 microgram/kg prime followed by 0.05 microgram/kg per min for 20 minutes and by 0.1 microgram/kg per min for 20 minutes) were evaluated in 13 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The lower dose of atrial natriuretic factor did not change significantly any of the considered variables, although it tended to reduce aortic mean blood pressure (from 132.6 +/- 5.3 to 125.5 +/- 4.6 mm Hg), cardiac index (from 3.67 +/- 0.2 to 3.54 +/- 0.18 liters/min per m2) and forearm vascular resistance (from 178.6 +/- 15 to 148.3 +/- 10 mm Hg/ml per s). The higher dose of atrial natriuretic factor significantly reduced mean aortic pressure (118.6 +/- 5 mm Hg), cardiac index (3.29 +/- 0.16 liters/min per m2) and stroke volume index (from 45.9 +/- 2.6 to 38.9 +/- 3 ml/m2) and slightly decreased pulmonary wedge pressure, whereas both total peripheral resistance and forearm vascular resistance were not modified. With this latter dose a reduction in aortic pressure was observed in all patients at the steady state, and this was associated with a fall in stroke volume index in 10 of the 13 patients and with a reduction in total peripheral resistance in only 6 patients. Heart rate and right atrial and pulmonary pressures did not change during infusion of atrial natriuretic factor. Plasma renin activity was only slightly reduced by atrial natriuretic factor, whereas plasma norepinephrine rose significantly (from 233 +/- 34 to 330 +/- 58 pg/ml).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events (Naples) III trial: randomized comparison of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients at increased risk of bleeding undergoing transfemoral elective coronary stenting.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the safety and the efficacy of bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) alone in the subset of patients at increased risk of bleeding undergoing transfemoral elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND Bivalirudin, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, determines a significant decrease of in-hospital bleeding following PCI. METHODS This is a single-center, investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Consecutive biomarker-negative patients at increased bleeding risk undergoing PCI through the femoral approach were randomized to UFH (UFH group; n = 419) or bivalirudin (bivalirudin group; n = 418). The primary endpoint was the rate of in-hospital major bleeding. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the UFH group versus 14 patients (3.3%) in the bivalirudin group (odds ratio: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.35 to 1.72; p = 0.54). Distribution of access-site and non-access-site bleeding was 18% and 82% in the UFH group versus 50% and 50% in the bivalirudin group (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS The results of this randomized study, carried out at a single institution, suggest that there is no difference in major bleeding rate between bivalirudin and UFH in increased-risk patients undergoing transfemoral PCI. (Novel Approaches in Preventing and Limiting Events III Trial: Bivalirudin in High-Risk Bleeding Patients [NAPLES III]; NCT01465503).

Comparison of bivalirudin monotherapy versus unfractionated heparin plus tirofiban in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Bivalirudin demonstrated similar efficacy but resulted in a lower rate of bleeding compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. It has not been clearly evaluated whether this can also be applied to patients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 335 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus referred for elective percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized in the Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting EventS (NAPLES) trial to receive bivalirudin monotherapy or UFH plus routine tirofiban. The primary composite end point (30-day composite incidence of death, urgent repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all bleeding) was lower in the bivalirudin group than in the UFH plus tirofiban group (18.0% vs 31.5%, odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.79, p = 0.004). No death, urgent revascularization, or Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred. The rate of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was similar in the 2 groups (10.2% in the bivalirudin group vs 12.5% in the UFH plus tirofiban group, p = 0.606). In contrast, fewer patients in the bivalirudin group experienced bleeding (8.4% vs 20.8%, odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.67, p = 0.002). This difference was mainly ascribed to the lower rate of minor bleeding (7.8% in the bivalirudin group vs 18.5% in the UFH plus tirofiban group, odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.74, p = 0.005), although the rate of major bleeding in the 2 groups was comparable (0.6% vs 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.371). In conclusion, in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, the strategy of bivalirudin monotherapy compared to UFH plus routine tirofiban is safe and feasible and associated with a significant reduction of in-hospital bleeding.

The STENTYS® paclitaxel-eluting stent in the treatment of unprotected distal left main

Vessel tapering represents an important limitation of the balloon‐expandable drug‐eluting stent (DES) in the treatment of distal unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) lesions. In this study, we assessed the suitability of the STENTYS DES(P), a self‐apposing nitinol paclitaxel‐eluting stent, for use in the treatment of distal ULMCA lesions.