Ami Choi
University of Edinburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ami Choi.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
Konrad Kuijken; Catherine Heymans; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Reiko Nakajima; Thomas Erben; Jelte T. A. de Jong; Massimo Viola; Ami Choi; Henk Hoekstra; Lance Miller; Edo van Uitert; Alexandra Amon; Chris Blake; Margot M. Brouwer; Axel Buddendiek; Ian Fenech Conti; Martin Eriksen; A. Grado; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Ewout Helmich; Ricardo Herbonnet; Nancy Irisarri; Thomas D. Kitching; Dominik Klaes; Francesco La Barbera; N. R. Napolitano; M. Radovich; Peter Schneider; Cristóbal Sifón; Gert Sikkema
The Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) is a multi-band imaging survey designed for cosmological studies from weak lensing and photometric redshifts. It uses the European Southern Observatory VLT Survey Telescope with its wide-field camera OmegaCAM. KiDS images are taken in four filters similar to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugri bands. The best seeing time is reserved for deep r-band observations. The median 5σ limiting AB magnitude is 24.9 and the median seeing is below 0.7 arcsec. Initial KiDS observations have concentrated on the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) regions near the celestial equator, where extensive, highly complete redshift catalogues are available. A total of 109 survey tiles, 1 square degree each, form the basis of the first set of lensing analyses of halo properties of GAMA galaxies. Nine galaxies per square arcminute enter the lensing analysis, for an effective inverse shear variance of 69 arcmin-2. Accounting for the shape measurement weight, the median redshift of the sources is 0.53. KiDS data processing follows two parallel tracks, one optimized for weak lensing measurement and one for accurate matched-aperture photometry (for photometric redshifts). This technical paper describes the lensing and photometric redshift measurements (including a detailed description of the Gaussian aperture and photometry pipeline), summarizes the data quality and presents extensive tests for systematic errors that might affect the lensing analyses. We also provide first demonstrations of the suitability of the data for cosmological measurements, and describe our blinding procedure for preventing confirmation bias in the scientific analyses. The KiDS catalogues presented in this paper are released to the community through http://kids.strw.leidenuniv.nl.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
Massimo Viola; Marcello Cacciato; Margot M. Brouwer; Konrad Kuijken; Henk Hoekstra; Peder Norberg; Aaron S. G. Robotham; E. van Uitert; Mehmet Alpaslan; Ivan K. Baldry; Ami Choi; J. T. A. de Jong; Simon P. Driver; T. Erben; A. Grado; Alister W. Graham; Catherine Heymans; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Andrew M. Hopkins; Nancy Irisarri; Benjamin Joachimi; Jon Loveday; Lance Miller; Reiko Nakajima; Peter Schneider; Cristóbal Sifón; G. Verdoes Kleijn
The Kilo-Degree Survey is an optical wide-field survey designed to map the matter distribution in the Universe using weak gravitational lensing. In this paper, we use these data to measure the density profiles and masses of a sample of ∼1400 spectroscopically identified galaxy groups and clusters from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey. We detect a highly significant signal (signal-to-noise-ratio ∼120), allowing us to study the properties of dark matter haloes over one and a half order of magnitude in mass, from M ∼ 1013–1014.5 h−1 M⊙. We interpret the results for various subsamples of groups using a halo model framework which accounts for the mis-centring of the brightest cluster galaxy (used as the tracer of the group centre) with respect to the centre of the groups dark matter halo. We find that the density profiles of the haloes are well described by an NFW profile with concentrations that agree with predictions from numerical simulations. In addition, we constrain scaling relations between the mass and a number of observable group properties. We find that the mass scales with the total r-band luminosity as a power law with slope 1.16 ± 0.13 (1σ) and with the group velocity dispersion as a power law with slope 1.89 ± 0.27 (1σ). Finally, we demonstrate the potential of weak lensing studies of groups to discriminate between models of baryonic feedback at group scales by comparing our results with the predictions from the Cosmo-OverWhelmingly Large Simulations project, ruling out models without AGN feedback.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
Shahab Joudaki; Chris Blake; Catherine Heymans; Ami Choi; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Benjamin Joachimi; Andrew Johnson; Alexander Mead; David Parkinson; Massimo Viola; Ludovic Van Waerbeke
We investigate the impact of astrophysical systematics on cosmic shear cosmological parameter constraints from the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) and the concordance with cosmic microwave background measurements by Planck. We present updated CFHTLenS cosmic shear tomography measurements extended to degree scales using a covariance calibrated by a new suite of N-body simulations. We analyse these measurements with a new model fitting pipeline, accounting for key systematic uncertainties arising from intrinsic galaxy alignments, baryonic effects in the non-linear matter power spectrum, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We examine the impact of the systematic degrees of freedom on the cosmological parameter constraints, both independently and jointly. When the systematic uncertainties are considered independently, the intrinsic alignment amplitude is the only degree of freedom that is substantially preferred by the data. When the systematic uncertainties are considered jointly, there is no consistently strong preference in favour of the more complex models. We quantify the level of concordance between the CFHTLenS and Planck data sets by employing two distinct data concordance tests, grounded in Bayesian evidence and information theory. We find that the two data concordance tests largely agree with one another and that the level of concordance between the CFHTLenS and Planck data sets is sensitive to the exact details of the systematic uncertainties included in our analysis, ranging from decisive discordance to substantial concordance as the treatment of the systematic uncertainties becomes more conservative. The least conservative scenario is the one most favoured by the cosmic shear data, but it is also the one that shows the greatest degree of discordance with Planck. The data and analysis code are publicly available at https://github.com/sjoudaki/cfhtlens_revisited.
Space Science Reviews | 2015
D. Kirk; Michael L. Brown; Henk Hoekstra; Benjamin Joachimi; Thomas D. Kitching; Rachel Mandelbaum; Cristóbal Sifón; Marcello Cacciato; Ami Choi; Alina Kiessling; Adrienne Leonard; A. Rassat; Björn Malte Schäfer
Galaxy shapes are not randomly oriented, rather they are statistically aligned in a way that can depend on formation environment, history and galaxy type. Studying the alignment of galaxies can therefore deliver important information about the physics of galaxy formation and evolution as well as the growth of structure in the Universe. In this review paper we summarise key measurements of galaxy alignments, divided by galaxy type, scale and environment. We also cover the statistics and formalism necessary to understand the observations in the literature. With the emergence of weak gravitational lensing as a precision probe of cosmology, galaxy alignments have taken on an added importance because they can mimic cosmic shear, the effect of gravitational lensing by large-scale structure on observed galaxy shapes. This makes galaxy alignments, commonly referred to as intrinsic alignments, an important systematic effect in weak lensing studies. We quantify the impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear surveys and finish by reviewing practical mitigation techniques which attempt to remove contamination by intrinsic alignments.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2017
Fabian Köhlinger; Massimo Viola; Benjamin Joachimi; Henk Hoekstra; E. van Uitert; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Ami Choi; T. Erben; Catherine Heymans; Shahab Joudaki; Dominik Klaes; Konrad Kuijken; Julian Merten; Lance Miller; Peter Schneider; E Valentijn
We present measurements of the weak gravitational lensing shear power spectrum based on
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Edo van Uitert; Marcello Cacciato; Henk Hoekstra; Margot M. Brouwer; Cristóbal Sifón; Massimo Viola; Ivan K. Baldry; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; Ami Choi; Simon P. Driver; Thomas Erben; Catherine Heymans; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Benjamin Joachimi; Konrad Kuijken; J. Liske; J. Loveday; John McFarland; Lance Miller; Reiko Nakajima; J. A. Peacock; M. Radovich; Aaron S. G. Robotham; Peter Schneider; Gert Sikkema; Edward N. Taylor; Gijs Verdoes Kleijn
450
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
Shahab Joudaki; Chris Blake; Andrew Johnson; Alexandra Amon; Marika Asgari; Ami Choi; Thomas Erben; Karl Glazebrook; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Catherine Heymans; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Henk Hoekstra; Dominik Klaes; Konrad Kuijken; C. Lidman; Alexander Mead; Lance Miller; David Parkinson; Gregory B. Poole; Peter Schneider; Massimo Viola; Christian Wolf
sq. deg. of imaging data from the Kilo Degree Survey. We employ a quadratic estimator in two and three redshift bins and extract band powers of redshift auto-correlation and cross-correlation spectra in the multipole range
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Chris Blake; Shahab Joudaki; Catherine Heymans; Ami Choi; Thomas Erben; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Benjamin Joachimi; Reiko Nakajima; Ludovic Van Waerbeke; Massimo Viola
76 \leq \ell \leq 1310
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
Edo van Uitert; Benjamin Joachimi; Shahab Joudaki; Alexandra Amon; Catherine Heymans; Fabian Köhlinger; Marika Asgari; Chris Blake; Ami Choi; Thomas Erben; Daniel J. Farrow; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Hendrik Hildebrandt; Henk Hoekstra; Thomas D. Kitching; Dominik Klaes; Konrad Kuijken; Julian Merten; Lance Miller; Reiko Nakajima; Peter Schneider; E Valentijn; Massimo Viola
. The cosmological interpretation of the measured shear power spectra is performed in a Bayesian framework assuming a
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
Hendrik Hildebrandt; Ami Choi; Catherine Heymans; Chris Blake; Thomas Erben; Lance Miller; Reiko Nakajima; L. van Waerbeke; Massimo Viola; Axel Buddendiek; Joachim Harnois-Déraps; Alireza Hojjati; Benjamin Joachimi; Shahab Joudaki; Thomas D. Kitching; Christian Wolf; Stephen Gwyn; Nicholas Johnson; K. Kuijken; Z. Sheikhbahaee; Alexandru Tudorica; H. K. C. Yee
\Lambda