Amir Khodabandeh
Curtin University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Amir Khodabandeh.
Journal of Geodesy | 2015
Peter J. G. Teunissen; Amir Khodabandeh
PPP-RTK is integer ambiguity resolution-enabled precise point positioning. In this contribution, we present the principles of PPP-RTK, together with a review of different mechanizations that have been proposed in the literature. By application of
Journal of Geodesy | 2016
Dennis Odijk; Baocheng Zhang; Amir Khodabandeh; Robert Odolinski; Peter J. G. Teunissen
Gps Solutions | 2016
Nandakumaran Nadarajah; Amir Khodabandeh; Peter J. G. Teunissen
\mathcal {S}
Journal of Geodesy | 2015
Amir Khodabandeh; Peter J. G. Teunissen
Journal of Geodesy | 2012
Amir Khodabandeh; A. R. Amiri-Simkooei; Mohammad Ali Sharifi
S-system theory, the estimable parameters of the different methods are identified and compared. Their interpretation is essential for gaining a proper insight into PPP-RTK in general, and into the role of the PPP-RTK corrections in particular. We show that PPP-RTK is a relative technique for which the ‘single-receiver user’ integer ambiguities are in fact double-differenced ambiguities. We determine the transformational links between the different methods and their PPP-RTK corrections, thereby showing how different PPP-RTK methods can be mixed between network and users. We also present and discuss four different estimators of the PPP-RTK corrections. It is shown how they apply to the different PPP-RTK models, as well as why some of the proposed estimation methods cannot be accepted as PPP-RTK proper. We determine analytical expressions for the variance matrices of the ambiguity-fixed and ambiguity-float PPP-RTK corrections. This gives important insight into their precision, as well as allows us to discuss which parts of the PPP-RTK correction variance matrix are essential for the user and which are not.
Measurement Science and Technology | 2014
Amir Khodabandeh; Peter J. G. Teunissen
The concept of integer ambiguity resolution-enabled Precise Point Positioning (PPP-RTK) relies on appropriate network information for the parameters that are common between the single-receiver user that applies and the network that provides this information. Most of the current methods for PPP-RTK are based on forming the ionosphere-free combination using dual-frequency Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations. These methods are therefore restrictive in the light of the development of new multi-frequency GNSS constellations, as well as from the point of view that the PPP-RTK user requires ionospheric corrections to obtain integer ambiguity resolution results based on short observation time spans. The method for PPP-RTK that is presented in this article does not have above limitations as it is based on the undifferenced, uncombined GNSS observation equations, thereby keeping all parameters in the model. Working with the undifferenced observation equations implies that the models are rank-deficient; not all parameters are unbiasedly estimable, but only combinations of them. By application of S\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}
Journal of Geodesy | 2013
Peter J. G. Teunissen; Amir Khodabandeh
Journal of Surveying Engineering-asce | 2011
Amir Khodabandeh; A. R. Amiri-Simkooei
\mathcal {S}
Survey Review | 2014
Dennis Odijk; Peter J. G. Teunissen; Amir Khodabandeh
IAG 25th General Assembly of the International-Union-of-Geodesy-and-Geophysics (IUGG) | 2014
Dennis Odijk; Peter J. G. Teunissen; Amir Khodabandeh
\end{document}-system theory the model is made of full rank by constraining a minimum set of parameters, or S-basis. The choice of this S-basis determines the estimability and the interpretation of the parameters that are transmitted to the PPP-RTK users. As this choice is not unique, one has to be very careful when comparing network solutions in different S\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}