Amit K. Mehrotra

Usefulness of Red Cell Distribution Width as a Prognostic Marker in Pulmonary Hypertension

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW), a widely available biomarker, independently predicts adverse outcomes in left-sided heart failure. The relation between RDW and death in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is unknown. In a prospective study of 162 consecutive patients with PH, RDW was recorded during initial diagnostic right-sided cardiac catheterization, and patients were followed for 2.1 +/- 0.8 years to determine vital status. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic variables were compared by tertile of RDW. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine whether RDW was independently associated with death, and the prognostic utility of RDW was compared to that of other laboratory predictors, including N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP). Of the 162 study patients, 78% were women, and 62% had pulmonary arterial hypertension. The mean age was 53 +/- 15 years, and most patients had severe PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure 48 +/- 13 mm Hg). The highest tertile of RDW predicted death (univariate hazard ratio 4.86, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 17.29, p = 0.015; multivariate hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 5.84, p = 0.045, after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disease, diuretic use, phosphodiesterase inhibitor use, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, and blood urea nitrogen [BUN]). Of the laboratory data, only RDW, BUN, and NT-pro-BNP were associated with death on univariate analysis. When RDW, BUN, and NT-pro-BNP were entered into a multivariate model, only RDW was still associated with death (p = 0.037 for RDW, p = 0.18 for BUN, and p = 0.39 for NT-pro-BNP). Adding NT-pro-BNP to RDW did not improve the prediction of mortality. In conclusion, RDW is independently associated with death in patients with PH and performs better as a prognostic indicator than NT-pro-BNP.

Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Closure Successfully Treats Left Ventricular Assist Device–Associated Aortic Insufficiency and Improves Cardiac Hemodynamics

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the effectiveness of a novel percutaneous method to treat left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-associated severe aortic insufficiency (AI) in a series of patients determined to be poor reoperative candidates. BACKGROUND The increased use of continuous-flow LVAD in advanced heart failure has led to marked changes in the management of patients with this condition. However, secondary AI can become a significant complication. METHODS Five patients with continuous-flow LVAD and severe post-LVAD AI underwent percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve closure from September to October 2011 at a single quaternary care academic medical center. All patients had LVAD implanted as destination therapy. LVAD parameters, hemodynamics, and echocardiographic measurements were obtained before and after aortic valve closure. RESULTS All patients underwent successful closure with the Amplatzer cribriform device (AGA Medical, Plymouth, Minnesota) via a percutaneous transcatheter femoral approach with a significant reduction of AI from severe to trivial. Cardiac hemodynamics improved, and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was reduced in all patients. There was no change in mitral or tricuspid regurgitation, LVAD power, or pulsatility index. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous transcatheter closure of the aortic valve effectively treats LVAD-associated AI and reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. This procedure should be considered to treat LVAD-associated AI in patients who are poor candidates for repeat operation. Further data are needed to assess long-term results.

TCT-379 Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Closure Successfully Treats Left Ventricular Assist Device-Associated Aortic Insufficiency and Improves Cardiac Hemodynamics

The increased use of continuous-flow LVADs in advanced heart failure has led to marked changes in the management of patients with this condition. However, secondary AI can become a significant complication. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of a novel percutaneous method to treat left

Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall: Determining the initial 5-year management cost to Medicare

BACKGROUND The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead has a high failure rate and was recalled in October 2007. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental cost of the management of this lead to Medicare. METHODS Real hospital cost data in U.S. dollars were collected on 32 patients with a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead who underwent lead revision. Of these patients, 15 were excluded because they had insurance coverage other than that provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Seventeen patients with Medicare or Medicaid coverage underwent lead revision either electively (n = 6) or after being hospitalized for multiple shocks caused by a lead fracture (n = 11). Eighty-eight percent of the patients underwent extraction of the Fidelis lead at the time of lead revision. A decision model was made that outlines the potential management of the lead recall over time. The existing literature and Medtronic data were reviewed for parameters included in the decision model. The model assumed that 175,000 patients were alive with an implanted Fidelis lead at the time of the recall and that the annual failure rate will be 1.8% over the first 5 years. It was also assumed that 1% of patients without a lead fracture would also undergo elective lead revision each year and that the proportion of patients who would have the Fidelis lead extracted rather than abandoned would be 20:80. Estimates with ranges were used for parameters for which no data are available. The industry standard rate of lead failure was estimated based on the Sprint Quattro model 6947 lead, and this was subtracted from the estimated rates for the Sprint Fidelis lead such that the incremental cost of the lead failure could be estimated. RESULTS The cost of lead revision trended higher when the Fidelis lead was extracted rather than abandoned (

Wellens syndrome: a life-saving diagnosis

45,077 ±

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy after treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

11,693 vs

Dramatic improvement in hypoxemic respiratory failure after patent foramen ovale closure in a patient with obesity hypoventilation syndrome

33,802 ±

Echocardiography for percutaneous heart pumps.

33, P = .20). In 5 years, the estimated cost impact of the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead recall to Medicare will be

A farewell to subjectivity using multivariate analytical models to improve patient outcomes and lower costs

287,000,000 (range

LATE GADOLINIUM ENHANCED CMR-GUIDED IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION TO PREVENT SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH IN CARDIAC SARCOIDOSIS: A MARKOV ANALYSIS

176,000,000-